TÜRKİYE’DE KARBON EMİSYONLARI, YENİLENEBİLİR ENERJİ VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 66 - 86, 31.01.2020

Bilge Kağan Ozdemir , Kübra Koç

https://doi.org/10.18354/esam.665191

Cited By: 6

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi hipotezi (EKC)’nin geçerliliğini Türkiye örneğinde test etmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, kişi başına CO2 emisyonları, kişi başına reel GSYH, kişi başına enerji kullanımı, kişi başına yenilenebilir enerji kullanımı ve ticari dışa açıklık değişkenleri ile kübik formda bir model kurulmuştur. ARDL Sınır Testi ile uzun dönem denge ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Ampirik bulgulara göre kişi başına CO2 emisyonları ile kişi başına gelir arasında N-şeklinde kübik polinominal ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Uzun dönem katsayı tahminlerine göre bağımlı değişken olan kişi başına CO2 emisyonu üzerinde tamamı istatistiksel anlamlılığa sahip olmak üzere, enerji kullanımının pozitif, yenilenebilir enerjinin negatif, ticari dışa açıklığın da pozitif etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ampirik bulgulara göre, Türkiye'nin enerji matrisini yenilenebilir enerji lehine yeniden şekillendirmek son derece yararlı olacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi, Türkiye ekonomisi, ARDL, Yenilenebilir enerji, CO2 emisyonu

Kaynakça

• Akbostancı, E., Aşık, S. T., & Tunç, G. İ. (2009). The Relationship between Income and Environment in Turkey:Is There an Evironmental Kuznets Curve? Energy Policy, 37, 861-867.
• Alshehry, A. S., & Belloumi, M. (2017). Study of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Transport Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Saudi Arabia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 1339-1347.
• Atıcı, C., & Kurt, F. (2007). Türkiye'nin Dış Ticareti ve Çevre Kirliliği: Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Yaklaşımı. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 13(2), 61-69.
• Aydın, C., & Esen, Ö. (2017). The Validity of The Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Co2 Emissions in Turkey: New Evidence from Smooth Transition Regression Approach. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(39), 101-116.
• Azomahou, T., Laisney, F., & Van, P. N. (2006). Economic Development and CO2 Emissions: A Nonparametric Panel Approach. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1347– 1363.
• Baek, J., & Kim, H. S. (2013). Is Economic Growth Good or Bad for the Environment? Empirical Evidence from Korea. Energy Economics, 36, 744–749.
• Bakirtas, I., & Cetin, M. A. (2017). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve and pollution haven hypotheses: MIKTA sample. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(22), 18273–18283.
• Balıbey, M. (2015). Relationships among CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth and Foreign Direct Investment and the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Turkey. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(4), 1042-1049.
• Başar, S., & Temurlenk, M. S. (2007). Çevreye Uyarlanmış Kuznets Eğrisi: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 1-12.
• Begum, R. A., Sohag, K., Abdullah, S. M., & Jaafar, M. (2015). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 594-601.
• Bölük, G., & Mert, M. (2015). The Renewable Energy, Growth and Environmental Kuznets Curve in Turkey: An ARDL Approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 587–595.
• Brock, W. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2010). The Green Solow model. Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2), 127–153.
• Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., & Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships over Time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 37(2), 149-192.
• Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
• Cetin, M. A. (2018). Investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Role of Green Energy: Emerging and developed markets. International Journal of Green Energy, 15(1), 37-44.
• Chen, W.-J. (2012). The Relationships of Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Income in a Newly Industrialized Economy. Applied Economics, 44, 1621–1630.
• Cole, M. A., Rayner, A. J., & Bates, J. M. (1997). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: An Empirical Analysis. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 401-416.
• Çağlar, A. E., & Mert, M. (2017). Türkiye'de Çevresel Kuznets Hipotezi ve Yenilenebilir Enerji Tüketiminin Karbon Salımı Üzerine Etkisi: Yapısal Kırılmalı Eşbütünleşme Yaklaşımı. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 24(1), 21-38.
• Day, K. M., & Grafton, R. Q. (2003). Growth and the Environment in Canada: An Empirical Analysis. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(2), 197-216.
• Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, 49, 431-455.
• Dinda, S. (2005). A Theoretical Basis for the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, 53(3), 403-413.
• Ehrlich, P. (1968). The Population Bomb. New York: Ballentine.
• Elgin, C., & Öztunalı, O. (2014). Environmental Kuznets Curve for the Informal Sector of Turkey (1950-2009). PANOECONOMICUS, 4, 471-485.
• Erdoğan, İ., Türköz, K., & Görüş, M. Ş. (2015). Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezinin Türkiye Ekonomisi için Geçerliliği. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 44, 113-123.
• Friedl, B., & Getzner, M. (2003). Determinants of CO2 Emissions in a Small Open Economy. Ecological Economics, 45, 133-148.
• Ginevičius, R., Lapinskienė, G., & Peleckis, K. (2017). The Evolution of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Concept: The Review of the Research. Panoeconomicus, 64(1), 93-112.
• Gozgor, G., & Can, M. (2016). Export Product Diversification and The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(21), 21594–21603.
• Gökmenoğlu, K., & Taspinar, N. (2016). The Relationship Between Co2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth And FDI: The Case of Turkey. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(5), 706-723.
• Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper No. 3914, 1-57.
• Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1993). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement,” in Mexican-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. P. M. Garber içinde, Mexico-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (s. 1-10). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Güney, A. (2018). Genişletilmiş Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisinin Türkiye için Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 32(3), 745-761.
• Gürlük, S., & Karaer, F. (2004). Türkiye'de Ekonomik Büyüme ile Çevre Kirliliği İlişkisinin İncelenmesi. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 10(1-2), 43-54.
• Halicioglu, F. (2009). An Econometric Study of CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Trade in Turkey. Energy Policy, 37, 1156-1164.
• He, Z., Xu, S., Shen, W., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2017). Impact of Urbanization on Energy Related CO2 Emission at Different Development Levels: Regional Difference in China based on Panel Estimation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1719-1730.
• Hussain, M., Javaid, M. I., & Drake, P. R. (2012). An Econometric Study of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Economic Growth of Pakistan. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 6(4), 518-533.
• Iwata, H., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2010). Empirical Study on the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 in France: The role of Nuclear Energy. Energy Policy, 38, 4057–4063.
• Jalil, A., & Syed F.Mahmud. (2009). Environment Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emissions: A Cointegration Analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37, 5167–5172.
• Jaunky, V. C. (2011). The CO2 Emissions-İncome Nexus:Evidence from Rich Countries. Energy Policy, 39, 1228–1240.
• Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R., & Liu, Y. (2012). CO2 Emissions,Energy Consumption,Trade and Income: A Comparative Analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42, 450–460.
• Kaika, D., & Zervas, E. (2013). The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Theory-Part A: Concept, Causes and the CO2 Emissions Case. Energy Policy, 62, 1392-1402.
• Kaika, D., & Zervas, E. (2013). The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Theory-Part B: Critical Issues. Energy Policy, 62, 1403-1411.
• Karasoy, A. (2019). Drivers of Carbon Emissions in Turkey: Considering Asymmetric Impacts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(9), 9219–9231.
• Karasoy, A., & Akçay, S. (2018). Effects of Renewable Energy Consumption and Trade on Environmental Pollution: The Turkish Case. Management of Environmental Quality, 30(2), 437-455 .
• Katircioglu, S., & Celebi, A. (2018). Testing the Role of External Debt in Environmental Degradation: Empirical Evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 843–8852.
• Katircioğlu, S. T., & Taşpinar, N. (2017). Testing the Moderating Role of Financial Development in an Environmental Kuznets Curve: Empirical Evidence from Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 572–586.
• Katircioğlu, S., & Katircioğlu, S. (2018). Testing the Role of Urban Development in the Conventional Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Turkey. Applied Economics Letters, 25(11), 741-746.
• Kaya, M. G., & Kaya, P. H. (2018). Environmental Kuznets Curve and Turkey: An ARDL Approach. N. Tsounis, & A. Vlachvei içinde, Advances in Panel Data Analysis in Applied Economic Research (s. 223-234). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics.
• Kaygısız, A. D. (2018). Çevresel Kuznets Hipotezi: Türkiye Üzerine Ampirik Bir Uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(32), 186-204.
• Keskingöz, H., & Karamelikli, H. (2015). Dış Ticaret-Enerji Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Büyümenin CO2 Emisyonu Üzerine Etkisi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, 7-17.
• Kijima, M., Nishide, K., & Ohyama, A. (2010). Economic Models for the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Survey. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(7), 1187-1201.
• Kılıç, R., & Akalın, G. (2016). Türkiye’de Çevre ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 49-60.
• Kocak, E. (2014). Türkiye’de Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezinin Geçerliliği: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı. İşletme ve İktisat Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 62-73.
• Koçak, E., & Şarkgüneşi, A. (2018). The Impact of Foreign Direct İnvestment on CO2 Emissions in Turkey: New Evidence from Cointegration and Bootstrap Causality Analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 790–804. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
• Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Hauck, J., Pongratz, J., . . . Canadell, J. G. (2018). Global Carbon Budget. Earth System Science Data, 10(4), 2141-2194.
• Lebe, F. (2016). Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Hipotezi: Türkiye için Eşbütünleşme ve Nedensellik Analizi. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 17(2), 177-194.
• Lise, W. (2006). Decomposition of CO2 emissions over 1980–2003 in Turkey. Energy Policy, 34, 1841–1852.
• Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. H. (1972). The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
• Moosa, I. A. (2017). The Econometrics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: an Illustration using Australian CO2 Emissions. Applied Economics, 49(49), 4927-4945.
• Nahman, A., & Antrobus, G. (2005). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Literature Survey. South African Journal of Economics, 73(1), 105-120.
• Narayan, P. (2005). The Saving and Investment Nexus for China: Evidence from Cointegration Tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979-1990.
• Ozatac, N., Gokmenoglu, K. K., & Taspinar, N. (2017). Testing the EKC Hypothesis by Considering Trade Openness, Urbanization, and Financial Development: The Case of Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 16690–16701.
• Ozcan, B. (2013). The Nexus between Carbon Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Middle East Countries: A Panel Data Analysis. Energy Policy, 62, 1138–1147.
• Ozcan, B., Apergis, N., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). A Revisit of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Turkey: New Evidence from Bootstrap Rolling Window Causality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 32381–32394.
• Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2010). CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 3220–3225.
• Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2013). The Long-Run and Causal Analysis of Energy, Growth, Openness and Financial Development on Carbon Emissions in Turkey. Energy Economics, 36, 262–267.
• Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development. World Employment Programme Research, 1-45.
• Panayotou, T. (1997). Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Turning a Black Box into a Policy Tool. Environment and Development Economics, 2, 465–484.
• Panayotou, T. (2003). Economic Growth and Environment. Economic Survey of Europe(2), 45-72.
• Pata, U. K. (2018). Procedure, The Effect of Urbanization and Industrialization on Carbon Emissions in Turkey: Evidence from ARDL Bounds Testing. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 7740–7747.
• Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable Energy Consumption, Urbanization, Financial Development, Income and CO2 Emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC Hypothesis with Structural Breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779.
• Pata, U. K. (2018). The Influence of Coal And Noncarbohydrate Energy Consumption on CO2 Emissions: Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Turkey. Energy, 160, 1115-1123.
• Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
• Radkau, J. (2017). Doğa ve İktidar: Global Bir Çevre Tarihi. (N. Güder, Çev.) İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
• Robalino-López, A., Mena-Nieto, Á., García-Ramos, J.-E., & Golpe, A. A. (2015). Studying the Relationship between Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Venezuela (1980–2025). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 602–614.
• Saatçi, M., & Dumrul, Y. (2011). Çevre Kirliliği ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisinin Türk Ekonomisi için Yapısal Kırılmalı Eş-Bütünleşme Yöntemiyle Tahmini. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 37, 65-86. Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., & Mohd, S. (2012). Economic Growth And CO2 Emissions in Malaysia: A Cointegration Analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Energy Policy, 52, 184–191.
• Sarkodie, S. A., & Strezov, V. (2019). A Review on Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Using Bibliometric and Meta-Analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 649, 128-145.
• Seker, F., Ertugrul, H. M., & Cetin, M. (2015). The İmpact of Foreign Direct İnvestment on Environmental Quality: A Bounds Testing and Causality Analysis for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 347-356.
• Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147-162.
• Shafik, N. (1994). Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 757-773.
• Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality Time-Series and Cross-Country Evidence. Policy Research Working Paper , 1-55.
• Shahbaz, M., IlhanOzturk, Afza, T., & Ali, A. (2013). Revisiting the Evironmental Kuznets Curve in a Global Economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 494–502.
• Shahbaz, M., Lean, H. H., & Shabbir, M. S. (2012). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and Granger Causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 2947– 2953.
• Shahbaz, M., Mahalik, M. K., Shah, S. H., & Sato, J. R. (2016). Time-Varying Analysis of CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, and Economic Growth Nexus: Statistical Experience in Next 11 Countries. Energy Policy, 98, 33-48.
• Sinn, H.-W. (2016). Yeşil Paradoks: Küresel Isınmaya Arz Yanlı Bir Yaklaşım. (M. E. Dinçer, Çev.) İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Soytas, U., & Sarı, R. (2009). Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Carbon Emissions: Challenges Faced by an EU Candidate Member. Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1667-1675.
• Stern, D. I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419-1439.
• Tiba, S., & Omri, A. (2017). Literature Survey on the Relationships between Energy, Environment and Economic Growth. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 1129-1146.
• Tutulmaz, O. (2015). Environmental Kuznets Curve Time Series Application for Turkey: Why Controversial Results Exist for Similar Models? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 73–81.
• Vita, G. d., Katircioglu, S., Altinay, L., Fethi, S., & Mercan, M. (2015). Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in a Tourism Development Context. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(21), 16652–16663.
• Wang, S. S., Zhou, D. Q., Zhou, P., & Wang, Q. W. (2011). CO2 emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in China: A Panel Data Analysis. Policy, Energy, 39, 4870–4875.
• Yavuz, N. Ç. (2014). CO2 Emission, Energy Consumption, and Economic Growth for Turkey: Evidence from a Cointegration Test With a Structural Break. Energy Sources, 9(3), 229-235.
• Yurttagüler, İ. M., & Kutlu, S. (2017). An Econometric Analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: The Case of Turkey. The Journal of Operations Research, Statistics, Econometrics and Management Information Systems, 5(1), 115-126.
• Zhang, L., & Gao, J. (2016). Exploring the Effects of International Tourism on China's Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and Environmental Pollution: Evidence from a Regional Panel Analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 225-234.