Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 111 - 119, 13.07.2025

Yasemin Erden , Fadime Ulupınar , Elanur Uludağ

https://doi.org/10.62425/esbder.1503604

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to adapt the Evidence-Based Practice Mentorship Scale (EBP-Mentorship Scale) into Turkish and to evaluate its psychometric properties among Turkish nurses.
Methods: This methodological study was conducted with 152 nurses between October 2022 and May 2023. The EBP-Mentorship Scale was translated into Turkish, and its content and construct validity were assessed. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to validate the factor structure. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson’s correlation, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results: The Turkish version of the EBP-Mentorship Scale retained the original 8 items and 1-factor structure. CFA results indicated a good model fit (χ2/df < 2, RMSEA < 0.08, CFI > 0.90, GFI > 0.90). The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94) and strong test-retest reliability (r = 0.956, p < .01; ICC = 0.997). The average variance extracted (AVE = 0.535) and composite reliability (CR = 0.899) values were sufficient, indicating good convergent validity.
Conclusion: The Turkish version of the EBP-Mentorship Scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing EBP mentorship among Turkish nurses. Its use can enhance the implementation and evaluation of EBP mentoring programs in nursing practice.

Keywords

Evidence-based practice mentorship nursing scale adaption reliability validity

References

  • Aksu, G., Eser, M. T., & Güzeller, C. O. (2017). Açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yapısal eşitlik modeli uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Alarcón, D., Sánchez, J. A., & De Olavide, U. (2015). Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV rating scale: User-written commands for Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Composite Reliability (CR), and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). Spanish STATA meeting,
  • Andrew, D. P., Pedersen, P. M., & McEvoy, C. D. (2019). Research methods and design in sport management. Human Kinetics.
  • Ayhan Öncü, Y., Seren İntepeler, Ş., & Kocaman, G. (2018). The Validty and Reliability of Organizational Culture and readiness for system - Wide Implementation of EBP (OCRSIEP) for Turkish Sample . 7 th International Nursing Management Conference
  • Bae, B.-R. (2017). Structural equation modeling with Amos 24. Seoul: Chenngram Books, 76-309.
  • Beckstead, J. W. (2009). Content validity is naught. International journal of nursing studies, 46(9), 1274-1283.
  • Bolarinwa, O. A. (2015). Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Nigerian postgraduate medical journal, 22(4), 195-201.
  • Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22, 423-432.
  • Chan, L. L., & Idris, N. (2017). Validity and reliability of the instrument using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 400-410.
  • Çamveren, H., & Vatan, F. (2019). Öğretim üyeleri için Mentorluk Yetkinliğini Değerlendirme Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(1), 47-54.
  • Çay, M., & Daşbaş, S. (2020). KANITA DAYALI UYGULAMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇEYE UYARLANMASI: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 31(4), 1514-1546.
  • Çopur, E. Ö., Kuru, N., & Seyman, Ç. C. (2015). Hemşirelikte kanıta dayalı uygulamalara genel bakış. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi, 1(2), 51-55.
  • Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied nursing research, 5(4), 194-197.
  • DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
  • Ephraim, N. (2021). Mentoring in nursing education: An essential element in the retention of new nurse faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(2), 306-319.
  • Güngör, M., & Özkütük, N. (2022). The Turkish Version of The Mentor Behavior Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 21(65), 71-83.
  • Hooge, N., Allen, D. H., McKenzie, R., & Pandian, V. (2022). Engaging advanced practice nurses in evidence‐based practice: An e‐mentoring program. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 19(3), 235-244.
  • Jacobs, S. (2018). An analysis of the evolution of mentorship in nursing. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 7(2), 155-176.
  • Khan, S., Chambers, D., & Neta, G. (2021). Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control. Cancer Causes & Control, 32, 221-230.
  • Kim, S. C., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A. M., Stichler, J. F., & Davidson, J. E. (2017). Benefits of a regional evidence‐based practice fellowship program: A test of the ARCC model. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 14(2), 90-98.
  • Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.
  • Melnyk, B. M. (2012). Achieving a high-reliability organization through implementation of the ARCC model for systemwide sustainability of evidence-based practice. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 127-135.
  • Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Kaplan, L. (2012). The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses: critical implications for nurse leaders and educators. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(9), 410-417.
  • Melnyk, B. M., Gallagher‐Ford, L., Zellefrow, C., Tucker, S., Thomas, B., Sinnott, L. T., & Tan, A. (2018). The first US study on nurses’ evidence‐based practice competencies indicates major deficits that threaten healthcare quality, safety, and patient outcomes. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 15(1), 16-25.
  • Melnyk, B. M., Hsieh, A. P., & Mu, J. (2022). Psychometric properties of the evidence‐based practice mentorship scale. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 19(4), 316-321.
  • Melnyk, B. M., Tan, A., Hsieh, A. P., & Gallagher‐Ford, L. (2021). Evidence‐based practice culture and mentorship predict EBP implementation, nurse job satisfaction, and intent to stay: Support for the ARCC© model. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 18(4), 272-281.
  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. sage publications.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497.
  • Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 30(4), 459-467.
  • Seçer, İ. (2020). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. : Anı yayıncılık
  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological bulletin, 86(2), 420.
  • Spiva, L., Hart, P. L., Patrick, S., Waggoner, J., Jackson, C., & Threatt, J. L. (2017). Effectiveness of an evidence‐based practice nurse mentor training program. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 14(3), 183-191.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2020). Yapisal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamalari. Ömer Faruk Şimşek.
  • Tabachnick BG, F. L., Ullman JB. . (2019). Using multivariate statistics. 7 ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Wallen, G. R., Mitchell, S. A., Melnyk, B., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Miller‐Davis, C., Yates, J., & Hastings, C. (2010). Implementing evidence‐based practice: effectiveness of a structured multifaceted mentorship programme. Journal of advanced nursing, 66(12), 2761-2771.
  • Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
  • Yıldız, A. (2024). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Implementation Leadership Scale in the context of nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 1347.
  • Yildiz, E., & Güngörmüş, Z. (2016). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the evidence based practice evaluation competence questionnaire. Nurse education today, 45, 91-95.
  • Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49-54.

Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 111 - 119, 13.07.2025

Yasemin Erden , Fadime Ulupınar , Elanur Uludağ

https://doi.org/10.62425/esbder.1503604

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to adapt the Evidence-Based Practice Mentorship Scale (EBP-Mentorship Scale) into Turkish and to evaluate its psychometric properties among Turkish nurses.
Methods: This methodological study was conducted with 152 nurses between October 2022 and May 2023. The EBP-Mentorship Scale was translated into Turkish, and its content and construct validity were assessed. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to validate the factor structure. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson’s correlation, and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results: The Turkish version of the EBP-Mentorship Scale retained the original 8 items and 1-factor structure. CFA results indicated a good model fit (χ2/df < 2, RMSEA < 0.08, CFI > 0.90, GFI > 0.90). The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94) and strong test-retest reliability (r = 0.956, p < .01; ICC = 0.997). The average variance extracted (AVE = 0.535) and composite reliability (CR = 0.899) values were sufficient, indicating good convergent validity.
Conclusion: The Turkish version of the EBP-Mentorship Scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing EBP mentorship among Turkish nurses. Its use can enhance the implementation and evaluation of EBP mentoring programs in nursing practice.

Keywords

Evidence-based practice mentorship nursing scale adaption reliability validity

References

  • Aksu, G., Eser, M. T., & Güzeller, C. O. (2017). Açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yapısal eşitlik modeli uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Alarcón, D., Sánchez, J. A., & De Olavide, U. (2015). Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV rating scale: User-written commands for Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Composite Reliability (CR), and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). Spanish STATA meeting,
  • Andrew, D. P., Pedersen, P. M., & McEvoy, C. D. (2019). Research methods and design in sport management. Human Kinetics.
  • Ayhan Öncü, Y., Seren İntepeler, Ş., & Kocaman, G. (2018). The Validty and Reliability of Organizational Culture and readiness for system - Wide Implementation of EBP (OCRSIEP) for Turkish Sample . 7 th International Nursing Management Conference
  • Bae, B.-R. (2017). Structural equation modeling with Amos 24. Seoul: Chenngram Books, 76-309.
  • Beckstead, J. W. (2009). Content validity is naught. International journal of nursing studies, 46(9), 1274-1283.
  • Bolarinwa, O. A. (2015). Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Nigerian postgraduate medical journal, 22(4), 195-201.
  • Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22, 423-432.
  • Chan, L. L., & Idris, N. (2017). Validity and reliability of the instrument using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 400-410.
  • Çamveren, H., & Vatan, F. (2019). Öğretim üyeleri için Mentorluk Yetkinliğini Değerlendirme Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(1), 47-54.
  • Çay, M., & Daşbaş, S. (2020). KANITA DAYALI UYGULAMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇEYE UYARLANMASI: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 31(4), 1514-1546.
  • Çopur, E. Ö., Kuru, N., & Seyman, Ç. C. (2015). Hemşirelikte kanıta dayalı uygulamalara genel bakış. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi, 1(2), 51-55.
  • Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied nursing research, 5(4), 194-197.
  • DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
  • Ephraim, N. (2021). Mentoring in nursing education: An essential element in the retention of new nurse faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(2), 306-319.
  • Güngör, M., & Özkütük, N. (2022). The Turkish Version of The Mentor Behavior Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 21(65), 71-83.
  • Hooge, N., Allen, D. H., McKenzie, R., & Pandian, V. (2022). Engaging advanced practice nurses in evidence‐based practice: An e‐mentoring program. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 19(3), 235-244.
  • Jacobs, S. (2018). An analysis of the evolution of mentorship in nursing. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 7(2), 155-176.
  • Khan, S., Chambers, D., & Neta, G. (2021). Revisiting time to translation: implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) in cancer control. Cancer Causes & Control, 32, 221-230.
  • Kim, S. C., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A. M., Stichler, J. F., & Davidson, J. E. (2017). Benefits of a regional evidence‐based practice fellowship program: A test of the ARCC model. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 14(2), 90-98.
  • Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.
  • Melnyk, B. M. (2012). Achieving a high-reliability organization through implementation of the ARCC model for systemwide sustainability of evidence-based practice. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 127-135.
  • Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Kaplan, L. (2012). The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses: critical implications for nurse leaders and educators. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(9), 410-417.
  • Melnyk, B. M., Gallagher‐Ford, L., Zellefrow, C., Tucker, S., Thomas, B., Sinnott, L. T., & Tan, A. (2018). The first US study on nurses’ evidence‐based practice competencies indicates major deficits that threaten healthcare quality, safety, and patient outcomes. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 15(1), 16-25.
  • Melnyk, B. M., Hsieh, A. P., & Mu, J. (2022). Psychometric properties of the evidence‐based practice mentorship scale. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 19(4), 316-321.
  • Melnyk, B. M., Tan, A., Hsieh, A. P., & Gallagher‐Ford, L. (2021). Evidence‐based practice culture and mentorship predict EBP implementation, nurse job satisfaction, and intent to stay: Support for the ARCC© model. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 18(4), 272-281.
  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. sage publications.
  • Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497.
  • Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 30(4), 459-467.
  • Seçer, İ. (2020). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. : Anı yayıncılık
  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological bulletin, 86(2), 420.
  • Spiva, L., Hart, P. L., Patrick, S., Waggoner, J., Jackson, C., & Threatt, J. L. (2017). Effectiveness of an evidence‐based practice nurse mentor training program. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 14(3), 183-191.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2020). Yapisal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamalari. Ömer Faruk Şimşek.
  • Tabachnick BG, F. L., Ullman JB. . (2019). Using multivariate statistics. 7 ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Wallen, G. R., Mitchell, S. A., Melnyk, B., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Miller‐Davis, C., Yates, J., & Hastings, C. (2010). Implementing evidence‐based practice: effectiveness of a structured multifaceted mentorship programme. Journal of advanced nursing, 66(12), 2761-2771.
  • Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85.
  • Yıldız, A. (2024). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Implementation Leadership Scale in the context of nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 1347.
  • Yildiz, E., & Güngörmüş, Z. (2016). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the evidence based practice evaluation competence questionnaire. Nurse education today, 45, 91-95.
  • Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49-54.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Services and Systems (Other)
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Yasemin Erden 0000-0001-6394-9553

Fadime Ulupınar 0000-0002-8262-2908

Elanur Uludağ 0000-0001-5448-5427

Publication Date July 13, 2025
Submission Date June 23, 2024
Acceptance Date May 27, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Erden, Y., Ulupınar, F., & Uludağ, E. (2025). Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences, 8(2), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.62425/esbder.1503604
AMA Erden Y, Ulupınar F, Uludağ E. Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences. July 2025;8(2):111-119. doi:10.62425/esbder.1503604
Chicago Erden, Yasemin, Fadime Ulupınar, and Elanur Uludağ. “Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish”. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences 8, no. 2 (July 2025): 111-19. https://doi.org/10.62425/esbder.1503604.
EndNote Erden Y, Ulupınar F, Uludağ E (July 1, 2025) Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences 8 2 111–119.
IEEE Y. Erden, F. Ulupınar, and E. Uludağ, “Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish”, Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 111–119, 2025, doi: 10.62425/esbder.1503604.
ISNAD Erden, Yasemin et al. “Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish”. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences 8/2 (July 2025), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.62425/esbder.1503604.
JAMA Erden Y, Ulupınar F, Uludağ E. Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences. 2025;8:111–119.
MLA Erden, Yasemin et al. “Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish”. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, 2025, pp. 111-9, doi:10.62425/esbder.1503604.
Vancouver Erden Y, Ulupınar F, Uludağ E. Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Evidence-Based Practice Mentoring Scale into Turkish. Journal of Midwifery and Health Sciences. 2025;8(2):111-9.
 Download Cover Image

Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License

2992931409