YAŞAM DÖNGÜSÜ DEĞERLENDİRMESİ VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK İLİŞKİSİ BAĞLAMINDA SOSYAL YAŞAM DÖNGÜSÜ DEĞERLENDİRMESİNİN (S-LCA) YERİ

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 166 - 183, 23.08.2019

Alp Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.20290/estubtdb.517254

Cited By: 3

Öz

Bir ürünün ya da
sistemin sürdürülebilirlik değerlendirmesinin yapılabilmesi için çevresel,
ekonomik ve sosyal etkilerinin yaşam döngüsü metodolojileri ile irdelenmesi
gerekmektedir. Çevresel LCA (Environmental Life Cycle Assessment, E-LCA) ve
Yaşam Döngüsü Maliyet Değerlendirmesi (Life Cycle Costing, LCC) yöntemleri sırasıyla
çevresel ve ekonomik değerlendirme için kullanılırken, Sosyal Yaşam Döngüsü
Değerlendirmesi (Social Life Cycle Assessment, S-LCA) ürünün yaşam döngüsü
boyunca oluşan sosyal etkilerini değerlendiren bir yöntemdir. S-LCA, E-LCA’ya
benzer şekilde genel çerçevede dört adımdan; yani hedef ve kapsam tanımı,
envanter analizi, etki değerlendirmesi ve yorumlamadan oluşur. Bu çalışmada,
E-LCA’dan sonra ortaya çıkan S-LCA metodolojisinin sistematik bir
değerlendirmesinin yapılması amaçlanmış ve LCA ve S-LCA’nın metodolojik
özellikleri karşılaştırmalı olarak irdelenmiş, S-LCA’nın uygulanmasında
kullanılabilecek bir yol haritası belirlenmiş ve S-LCA metodolojisinin,
kısıtları ve limitleri ortaya konulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çevresel Yaşam Döngüsü Değerlendirmesi, Sosyal Yaşam Döngüsü Değerlendirmesi, Sürdürülebilirlik

Kaynakça

• [1] Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Siddharth P, Cassia U, Tabea B. The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010;15:156-63.
• [2] O'Brien M, Doig A, Clift R. Social and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (SELCA). Int J LCA. 1996;1:231-7
• [3] Weidema B. The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2006;11:89-96
• [4] Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J. A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2006;11:88–97.
• [5] Norris GA. Social Impacts in Product Life Cycles - Towards Life Cycle Attribute Assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2006;11:97-104.
• [6] UNEP/SETAC. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. http://www.unep.org/pdf/DTIE_PDFS/DTIx1164xPAguidelines_sLCA.pdf .2009
• [7] UNEP/SETAC. The methodological sheets for subcategories in social Life CycleAssessment. www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/SLCA_methodologicalsheets_11.11.13.pdf. .2013
• [8] Fontes J. Handbook for Product Social Impact Assessment Version 3.0 http://product-social-impact-assessment.com/ 2016
• [9] Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen A, Schneider L. Life Cycle Sustainability Dashboard. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2012;16:680-8.
• [10] Aparcana S, Salhofer S. Development of a social impact assessment methodology for recycling systems in low-income countries. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2013;18:1106-15.
• [11] Aparcana S, Salhofer S. Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2013;18:1116-28.
• [12] Foolmaun RK, Ramjeawon T. Life cycle sustainability assessments (LCSA) of four disposal scenarios for used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2013;15:783-806.
• [13] Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L. Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2013;18:1581-92.
• [14] Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A. Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2013;18:1386-92.
• [15] Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G. Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2013;18:127-43.[16] Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, et al. Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014;69:34-48.
• [17] Umair S, Björklund A, Petersen EE. Social impact assessment of informal recycling of electronic ICT waste in Pakistan using UNEP SETAC guidelines. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2015;95:46-57.
• [18] Benoît Norris C, Aulisio D, Gregory A N, editors. Studying the Social Hotspots of 100 product categories with the Social Hotspots Database. Vth International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment, CILCA2013; 2017; Mendoza, Argentina.
• [19] Jorgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M. Methodologies for Social Life Cycle Assessment. Int J LCA 2008: 13: 96 – 103
• [20] ISO 14040. Environmental management:-life cycle assessment-principles and framework. International Standards Organization, ISO 14040: 2006, Geneva
• [21] ISO 14040. Environmental management:-life cycle assessment-requirements and guidelines. International Standards Organization, ISO 14040: 2006b, Geneva
• [22] Zanchi L, Delogu M, Zamagni A, Pierini M. Analysis of the main elements affecting social LCA applications: challenges for the automotive sector. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2018;23:519-35.
• [23] Moltesen A, Bonou A, Wangel A, Bozhilova-Kisheva KP. Social Life Cycle Assessment: An Introduction. Life Cycle Assessment 2018. p. 401-22.
• [24] Garido SR, Parent J, Beaulieu L, Revéret J-P. A literature review of type I SLCA—making the logic underlying methodological choices explicit. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2016;23:432-44.
• [25] Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ. Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2009;15:5-16.
• [26] Chhipi-Shrestha GK, Hewage K, Sadiq R. ‘Socializing’ sustainability: a critical review on current development status of social life cycle impact assessment method. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2015;17:579-96.
• [28] ISO 26000. Guidance on social responsibility -https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social responsibility.html 2010.
• [28] Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Reveret J-P. Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2010;15:164–71.
• [29] Singh RK, Gupta U. Social life cycle assessment in Indian steel sector: a case study. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2017;23:921-39.
• [30] Kloepffer W. Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2008;13:89-95.[31] Traverso M. Is social life cycle assessment really struggling in development or is it on a normal path towards harmonization/standardization? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2018;23:199-200.
• [32] Zamagni A, Feschet P, Irene De Luca A, Iofrida N, Buttol P. Social Life Cycle Assessment: Methodologies and Practice. First Edition. Edited by Jo Dewulf SDM, and Rodrigo A. F. Alvarenga., editor: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017.