Review
BibTex RIS Cite

BİTKİ BİYOÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINDA BİYOTEKNOLOJİNİN KULLANIMI VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR

Year 2021, , 1 - 16, 25.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.18036/estubtdc.590752

Abstract

Doğa, çeşitli faktörlerin etkisi ile tahrip edilmekte bu da biyoçeşitlilik kayıplarına neden olmaktadır. Biyoçeşitlilik kayıplarının dünyada ciddi bir problem olması nedeniyle Uluslararası Doğayı Koruma Birliği (IUCN) bu konuda birtakım çalışmalar yapmaktadır. Biyoçeşitlilik kayıplarını önlemek için in situ ve ex situ koruma stratejileri geliştirilmiştir. Ex situ korumada, tohum gen bankaları ve arazide bitki koleksiyonları uygulamaları gibi geleneksel yöntemlerin yanısıra modern yöntemlerin de önemli bir yeri vardır. Özellikle yok olma tehlikesi altında olan türlerin korunmasında ex situ koruma stratejileri kapsamında in vitro teknolojinin kullanılması önemli avantajlar sunmaktadır. Bitki materyalini toplamada, çoğaltmada, uluslararası değişimde ve muhafaza etmede in vitro tekniklerden yararlanılmaktadır. Bu derlemede, in vitro teknikler kullanarak bitki biyoçeşitliliğin korunması ve Türkiye’deki çalışmalar sunulmuştur.

References

  • [1] Işık K. Biyolojik çeşitlilik, In: Kıvanç M, Yücel E, editors. Çevre ve İnsan. Anadolu Üniversitesi Açık Öğretim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Öğretmenliği Lisans Tamamlama Programı, 1998. pp.15-39.
  • [2] Rao NK. Plant genetic resources: Advancing conservation and use through biotechnology. Afr J Biotechnol 2004; 3(2): 136-145.
  • [3] Paunescu A. Biotechnology for endangered plant conservation: A critical overview. Rom Biotechnol Lett 2009; 14(1): 4095-4103.
  • [4] Sharma DK, Sharma T. Biotechnological approaches for biodiversity conservation. IJSR 2013; 4(1): 183-186.
  • [5] Yılmaz E, Aldemir G, Surgun Y, Bürün B. Bitki genetik kaynaklarının önemi, korunması ve yararlanılması. Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Sempozyumu, 22-23 Mayıs 2013, Marmaris-Muğla. pp. 267-271.
  • [6] Pathak MR, Abido MS. The role of biotechnology in the conservation of biodiversity. JEBAS 2014; 2(4): 352-363.
  • [7] Pandotra P, Gupta S. Biotechnological approaches for conservation of plant genetic resources and traditional knowledge. In: Salgotra RK, Gupta BB, editors. Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge for Food Security, Springer Science+Business Media, Singapore, 2015. pp. 121-135.
  • [8] Surgun Y, Bürün B. Biotechnology for conservation of plant biodiversity. In: SEAB2016 The 2nd International Symposium on EuroAsian Biodiversity; 23-27 May 2016, Antalya, Turkey. p. 301.
  • [9] Reed BM, Sarasan V, Kane M, Bunn E, Pence VC. Biodiversity Conservation and Conservation Biotechnology Tools. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2011; 47:1-4.
  • [10] Paunescu A. Biotechnology for endangered plant conservation. In: Ahuja MR, Ramawat KG, editors. Biotechnology and Biodiversity, Sustainable Development and Biodiversity 4, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2014. pp. 181-202.
  • [11] Surgun Acar Y, Bürün B. The studies in Turkey on use of in vitro cultures in the conservation of biodiversity. In: SEAB2017 International Symposium on EuroAsian Biodiversity, 05-08 July 2017, Belarus. p 426.
  • [12] Tan A. Türkiye bitki genetik kaynakları ve muhafazası. Anadolu J of AARI 2010; 20(1): 9-37.
  • [13] Vasile L, Simona V, Eliza A, Zăpârtan M. Methods of conservation of the plant germplasm, In vitro Techniques. Analele Universitătii din Oreda, Fascicula Protectia Mediului 2011; 17: 697-708.
  • [14] Belokurova VB. Methods of biotechnology in system of efforts aimed at plant biodiversity preservation. Cytology and Genetics 2010; 44(3): 174-185.
  • [15] Engelmann F. Use of biotechnologies for the conservation of plant biodiversity. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2011; 47: 5-16.
  • [16] Pence VC. Evaluating costs for the in vitro propagation and preservation of endangered plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant, 2011; 47: 176-187.
  • [17] Rajasekharan PE, Sahijram L. In vitro conservation of plant germplasm. In: Bahadur B, Venkat Rajam M, Sahijram L, Krishnamurthy K, editors. Plant Biology and Biotechnology (Volume II): Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, Springer, India, 2015. pp. 417-443.
  • [18] Rajpurohit D, Jhang T. In situ and ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources and traditional knowledge. In: Salgotra RK, Gupta BB, editors. Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge for Food Security, Springer Science+Business Media, Singapore, 2015. pp. 137-162.
  • [19] Oseni OM, Pande V, Nailwal TP. A review on plant tissue culture, A technique for propagation and conservation of endangered plant species. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2018; 7(7): 3778-3786.
  • [20] Kasagana VN, Karumuri SS. Conservation of medicinal plants (past, present and future trends). Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Research 2011; 3(8): 1378-1386.
  • [21] Cruz-Cruz CA, González-Arnao MT, Engelmann F. Biotechnology and conservation of plant biodiversity. Resources 2013; 2: 73-95.
  • [22] Sarasan V, Cripps R, Ramsay MM, Atherton C, McMichen M, Prendergast G, Rowntree JK. Conservation in vitro of threatened plants – Progress in the past decade. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2006; 42: 206-214.
  • [23] Pence VC. In vitro collecting (IVC) I. The effect of collecting method and antimicrobial agents on contamination in temperate and tropical collections. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2005; 41:324-332.
  • [24] Fay MF. Conservation of rare and endangered plants using in vitro methods. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 1992; 28: 1-4.
  • [25] Bunn E, Turner SR, Dixon KW. Biotechnology for saving rare and threatened flora in a biodiversity hotspot. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2011; 47: 188-200.
  • [26] Khan S, Al-Qurainy F, Nadeem M. Biotechnological approaches for conservation and improvement of rare and endangered plants of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2012; 19: 1-11.
  • [27] Krishnan PN, Decruse SW, Radha RK Conservation of medicinal plants of Western Ghats, India and its sustainable utilization through in vitro technology. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2011; 47: 110-122.
  • [28] Bürün B. Hastalıksız bitki üretimi. Babaoğlu M, Gürel E, Özcan S, editors. Bitki Biyoteknolojisi I, Doku Kültürü ve Uygulamaları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Vakfı Yayınları, Konya, 2001. pp. 190-210.
  • [29] Ogbu JU. Genetic resources and biodiversity conservation in Nigeria through biotechnology approaches. In: Ahuja MR, Ramawat KG, editors. Biotechnology and Biodiversity, Sustainable Development and Biodiversity. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2014. pp. 271-285.
  • [30] Bajaj YPS. Cryopreservation of plant cell, tissue, and organ culture for the conservation of germplasm and biodiversity. In: Bajaj YPS, editör. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Cryopresevation of Plant Germplasm I. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1995. pp. 3-28.
  • [31] Arda H, Dayan S, Kartal Ç, Güler N. In vitro conservation of critically endangered Dianthus ingoldbyi Turrill under slow growth conditions. TUJNS 2016; 17(1): 47-54.
  • [32] Martínez-Gómez P, Majourhat K, Zeinalabedini M, Erogul D, Khayam-Nekoui M, Grigorian V, Hafidi A, Piqueras A, Gradziel TM. Use of biotechnology for preserving rare fruit germplasm. Biorem Biodiv Bioavail 2007; 1(1): 31-40.
  • [33] Surgun Acar Y, Yokaş İ, Bürün B. Seed germination studies in native species for conservation of biodiversity. In: SEAB2017 International Symposium on EuroAsian Biodiversity, 05-08 July 2017, Belarus. p. 663.
  • [34] Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT (edlr.). Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını, İstanbul, 2012.
  • [35] Anonim. Ulusal Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı. T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, Ankara, 2007.
  • [36] Ünaldı EÜ. Tehdit ve tehlike altında bir kültür bitkisi: Safran (Crocus sativus L.). F. Ü. Sosyal Bil Dergi 2007; 4: 53-67.
  • [37] Akbaş F, Kuru İS, Orcan PK. The effects of BAP and Kin on micropropagation of Ajuga vestita BOISS.; a rare endemic medicinal plant. In: ICAEAM'15 2nd International Conference on Advances in Environment, Agriculture & Medical Sciences; 11-12 June 2015; Antalya, Turkey.
  • [38] Yanmaz R, Yazar E, Yaprak Kantoğlu K, Alper A. In vitro plant regeneration and bulblet formation of Tunceli garlic (Allium tuncelianum (Kollman) Özhatay, Matthew, Siraneci) by shoot and root culture. JFAE 2010; 8 (3&4): 572-576.
  • [39] Aasım M. Adventitous bulblet regeneration of endemic Ovacık garlic (Allium tuncelianum Kollman, Özhatay, Mathew, Şiraneci) using wintered half clove explant. Rom Biotechnol Lett 2015; 20(5): 10845-10851.
  • [40] Acemi A, Özen F, Kıran R. Development of an efficient callus production protocol for Amsonia orientalis: A critically endangered medicinal plant. Eurasia J Biosci 2012; 6: 105-112.
  • [41] Özel ÇA. Micropropagation of Anthemıs pestalozzae Boiss. from cotyledonary leaf and leaf explants. Bangladesh J Bot 2016; 45(1): 55-61.
  • [42] Erdağ B, Emek Y. In vitro micropropagation of Anthemis xylopoda O. Schwarz, a critically endangered species from Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 2005; 8(5): 691-695
  • [43] Erdağ B, Emek YÇ. Adventitious shoot regeneration and in vitro flowering of Anthemis xylopoda O. Schwarz, a critically endangered Turkish endemic. Turk J Biol 2009; 33: 319-326.
  • [44] Akın B, Kocaçalıskan İ. In vitro propagation of Arabis drabiformis Boiss. (Brassiaceae) an endemic rare species of Uludağ mountain (Bursa-Turkey). Afr J Biotechnol 2011; 10(80): 18356-18361.
  • [45] Erişen S, Atalay E, Yorgancılar M. The effect of thidiazuron on the in vitro shoot development of endemic Astragalus cariensis in Turkey. Turk J Bot 2011; 35: 521-526.
  • [46] Hasançebi S, Turgut Kara N, Çakır Ö, Arı Ş. Micropropagation and root culture of Turkish endemic Astragalus chrysochlorus (Leguminosae). Turk J Bot 2011; 35: 203-210.
  • [47] Erdağ B. A note on in vitro seed germination and shoot multiplication of Astragalus condensatus Ledeb., an endemic of Turkish flora. Bio-Science Research Bulletin 2002, 18(2): 93-97.
  • [48] Erişen S, Yorgancılar M, Atalay E, Babaoğlu M, Duran A. Callus induction and plant regeneration of the endemic Astragalus nezaketae in Turkey. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 2010; 13 (6).
  • [49] Yorgancılar M, Erişen S. The effect of thidiazuron (TDZ) on shoot regeneration of Astragalus schizopterus. JAPS 2011; 21(3): 519-524.
  • [50] Yüzbaşıoğlu E, Dalyan E, Bona M, Öz G. In vitro propagation of endemic plant Centaurea arifolia Boiss. Taxa. IUFS J Biol 2012; 71(2):121-127.
  • [51] Özel ÇA, Khawar KM, Mirici S, Özcan S, Arslan O. Factors affecting in vitro plant regeneration of the critically endangered Mediterranean knapweed (Centaurea tchihatcheffii Fisch et. Mey). Naturwissenschaften, 2006; 93: 511-517.
  • [52] Okay Y, Ellialtıoğlu Ş, Demir K, Tıpırdamaz R, Savcı AE, Özler H, Gümüş C, Günöz A. Sentorya (Centaurea tchihatchefii Fish.&Mey.) endemik bitkisinin çoğaltımı üzerinde çalışmalar. BİBAD 2014; 7(1): 42-48.
  • [53] Kurt S, Erdağ B. In vitro germination and axillary shoot propagation of Centaurea zeybekii. Biologia Section Botany 2009; 64(1): 97-101.
  • [54] İzgü T, Sevindik B, Çürük P, Şimşek Ö, Aka Kaçar Y, Teixeira da Silva JA, Yalçın Mendi Y. Development of an efficient regeneration protocol for four Cyclamen species endemic to Turkey. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2016, 127: 95-113.
  • [55] Yamaner Ö, Erdağ B. Direct shoot formation and microtuberization from aseptic seedlings of Cyclamen mirabile Hildebr. Biotechnology 2008; 7(2): 328-332.
  • [56] Verma SK, Yücesan BB, Şahin G, Gürel S & Gürel E. Direct shoot regeneration from leaf explants of Digitalis lamarckii, an endemic medicinal species. Turk J Bot 2011; 35: 689-695.
  • [57] Çördük N, Akı C. Doğal ortamda yayılış gösteren ve in vitro çoğaltılan Digitalis trojana türünde kardenolid içeriklerinin karşılaştırılması. 21. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi; 03-07 Eylül 2012; İzmir.
  • [58] Erdağ B, Emek YÇ, Kurt Aydoğan S. Clonal propagation of Dorystoechas hastata via axillary shoot proliferation. Turk J Bot. 2010; 34: 233-240.
  • [59] Uçar Türker A, Birinci Yıldırım A, Taş İ. In vitro adventitious plant regeneration of Echium orientale L., an endemic plant: The evaluation of biological activities and phenolic content. IJBB 2018; 55, 264-272.
  • [60] Akın B, Kocaçalışkan İ, Güleryüz G. Micropropagation of Erodium sibthorpianum subsp. sibthorpianum, an endemic threatened species of Uludağ Mountain (Bursa-Turkey). Turk J Bot 2014; 38: 148-155.
  • [61] Çetin B, Eren H, Oskay D, Akanıl Bingöl N. Kritik tehlikedeki (CR) endemik Erodium somanum türünün in vitro mikroçoğaltımı. CBÜ Fen Bil Derg 2016; 12(1): 115-120.
  • [62] Sevindik B, Tütüncü M, İzgü T, Tagipur EM, Çürük P, Yılmaz Ö, Kaynak G, Yalçın Mendi Y. Micropropagation of Erodium olympicum endemic to Turkey. AJPB 2017; 2(3-1): 24-27.
  • [63] Kızıl S, Sesiz U, Khalid Mahmood Khawar KM, Arslan N. Endemik Fritillaria aurea Schott‟un in vitro çoğaltımı üzerine çalışmalar. V. Süs Bitkileri Kongresi, 06–09 Mayıs 2013, Yalova.
  • [64] Erdağ BB, Emek YÇ, Aktaş LY. In vitro somatic embryogenesis from cormel-derived callus cultures of Gladiolus anatolicus (Boiss.) Stapf. Propagation of Ornamental Plants 2009; 9(4):176-180.
  • [65] Yamaner Ö, Erdağ B. Hypericum adenotrichum’un doku kültürü teknikleri ile çoğaltılması. 22. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, 23-27 Haziran 2014, Eskişehir.
  • [66] Ayan AK, Çırak C. In vitro multiplication of Hypericum heterophyllum an endemic Turkish species. American Journal of Plant Physiology 2006; 1(1): 76-81.
  • [67] Asan HS, Özen HÇ, Onay A, Asan N. Effect of BAP on total hypericin production in shoot cultures of Hypericum scabroides: An endemic species in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Eurasia J Biosci 2015; 9: 46-51.
  • [68] Nasırcılar AG, Denız İG. An alternative plant propagation and conservation process for Iris pampyhlica an endemic and endangered geophyte. AGROSYM 2014, Fifth International Scientific Agricultural Symposium, 23-26 October 2014, Saraybosna-Bosna Hersek. pp. 346-351.
  • [69] Uzun S, İlbaş Aİ, İpek A, Arslan N & Barpete S. Efficient in vitro plant regeneration from immature embryos of endemic Iris sari and I. schachtii. Turk J Agric For 2014; 38: 348-353.
  • [70] Nasırcılar AG, Mirici S, Eren O, Karagüzel O, Baktır İ. Micropropagation of Turkish endemic Iris stenophylla Hausskn & Siehe ex Baker subsp. allisonii B. Mathew. Acta Horticulturae 2011; 886: 19-26.
  • [71] Khawar KM, Çöçü S, Parmaksız İ, Sarıhan EO, Özcan S. Mass proliferation of Madonna Lily (Lilium candidum L) under in vitro conditions. Pak J Bot 2005; 37(2): 243-248.
  • [72] Bürün B, Şahin O. Micropropagation of Lilium candidum L.: A rare and native bulbous flower of Turkey. Bangladesh J Bot 2013, 42(2): 185-187.
  • [73] Daneshvar-Royandazagh S, Pehlivan EC, Teykin EE, Çiftçi HS. Lilium candidum L.’da in vitro mikroçoğaltım ile kozmetik sanayisine ham madde temini. TURKJANS 2014; 2 (Özel Sayı): 1911-1916.
  • [74] Çağlar G, Bulunuz E, Eldoğan S. In vitro propagation of Linaria genistifolia (L.) Miller ssp. praealta (Boiss.) Davis. In: BIORARE Symposium 2010 International Symposium on the Biology of Rare and Endemic Plant Species; 26-29 May 2010, Muğla, Turkey.
  • [75] Erdağ B, Emek Y. In vitro adventitious shoot regeneration of Liquidambar orientalis Miller. Journal of Biological Sciences 2005; 5(6): 805-808.
  • [76] Surgun-Acar Y, Ayaz-Baran Ö, Bürün B. Adventitious shoot formation from hypocotyl and cotyledon explants of relict endemic Liquidambar orientalis Miller. MJST 2018; 4(2): 137-142.
  • [77] Uranbey S. Sitimulating effects of different basal media and cytokinine types on regeneration of endemic and endangered Muscari aucheri. Arch Biol Sci Belgr 2010; 62(3): 663-667.
  • [78] Allahverdikhan Vaziri P, Uranbey S, Sancak C. Efficient in vitro microprapagation for the conservation of endemic and endangered aucher-eloy grape hyacinth [Muscari aucheri (Boiss.) Baker]. JABS 2014; 8 (1): 80-83.
  • [79] Allahverdikhan Vaziri P. Endemik Muscari aucheri’nin in vitro klonal çoğaltımı üzerine araştırmalar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, 2009.
  • [80] Özdemir FA, Kılıç Ö, Bağcı E. In vitro bulb regeneration from stem explants of endemic geophyt Muscari aucheri (Boiss.) Baker. IJSM 2017; 4(3): 50-54.
  • [81] Uranbey S, İpek A, Çalışkan M, Dündar E, Çöçü S, Basalma D, Güneylioğlu H. In vitro bulblet induction from bulb scales of endangered ornamental plant Muscari azureum. Biotechnol Biotec Eq 2010; 24:2: 1843-1848.
  • [82] Uranbey S. In vitro bulblet regeneration from immature embryos of Muscari azureum. Afr J Biotechnol 2010; 9(32): 5121-5125.
  • [83] Nasırcılar AG, Mirici S, Karagüzel Ö, Eren Ö, Baktır İ. In vitro propagation of endemic and endangered Muscari mirum from different explant types. Turk J Bot 2011, 35: 37-43.
  • [84] Uzun S, Parmaksız İ, Uranbey S, Mirici S, Sarıhan EO, İpek A, Kaya MD, Gürbüz B, Arslan N, Sancak C, Khawar KM, Özcan S. In vitro micropropagation from immature embryos of the endemic and endangered Muscari muscarimi Medik. Turk J Biol 2014; 38: 83-88.
  • [85] Özel ÇA, Khawar KM, Ünal F. Factors affecting efficient in vitro micropropagation of Muscari muscarimi Medikus using twin bulb scale. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2015; 22: 132-138.
  • [86] Gümüşçü A, Çöçü S, Uranbey S, İpek A, Çalışkan M, Arslan N. In vitro micro-propagation of endangered ornamental plant-Neotchihatchewia isatidea (Boiss.) Rauschert. Afr J Biotechnol 2008; 7(3): 234-238.
  • [87] Gürlek D, Özcan S, Khawar KM, Aasım M, Fakılı O. Efficient micropropagation of endemic Origanum acutidens (Hand.-Mazz.) Ietswaart. In: BIORARE Symposium 2010 International Symposium on the Biology of Rare and Endemic Plant Species; 26-29 May 2010, Muğla, Turkey.
  • [88] Yıldırım MU. Micropropagation of Origanum acutidens (Hand.-Mazz.) Ietswaart using stem node explants. The Scientific World Journal 2013; Article ID 276464, 3 pages.
  • [89] Özkum D. In vitro shoot regeneration of oregano (Origanum minutiflorum O. Schwarz & Davis). HJBC 2007; 35(2): 97-100.
  • [90] Akçam-Oluk E, Çakır A. Micropropagation of Origanum sipyleum L., an endemic medicinal herb of Turkey. Afr J Biotechnol 2009; 8(21): 5769-5772.
  • [91] Karagüzel Ö, Kaya A, Biner B, Aydinsakir K. In vitro propagation of native Ornithogalum species in West Mediterrenean region of Turkey. Afr J Agric Res 2012; 7(17): 2669-2673.
  • [92] Emek Y, Erdağ B. In vitro propagation of critically endangered endemic Rhaponticoides mykalea (Hub.-Mor.) by axillary shoot proliferation. In: Current Progress in Biological Research, Intech, 2013. pp. 203-213.
  • [93] Emek Y, Erdağ B. In vitro somatic embryogenesis and antioxidant enzyme activities in Rhaponticoides mykalea (Hub.-Mor.) M. V. Agab. & Greuter critically endangered endemic plant. Fresen Environ Bull 2014; 23(4):1051-1057.
  • [94] Hayta Ş, Bayraktar M, Baykan Erel S, Gürel A. Direct plant regeneration from different explants through micropropagation and determination of secondary metabolites in the critically endangered endemic Rhaponticoides mykalea. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology 2015; 151(1): 20-28.
  • [95] Baba Erdağ B, Yürekli AK. Callus induction and shoot regeneration of Sideritis sipylea Boiss. (Lamiaceae). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences 2000; Section B 19 B(1): 41-46.
  • [96] Erişen S, Öncel Z. In vitro propagation of the threatened plant Sphaerophysa kotschyana (Fabaceae): inter simple-sequence-repeat (ISSR) analysis and salt tolerance of the regenerants. Australian Journal of Botany 2013; 61(1): 67-72.
  • [97] Erdağ B, Yürekli AK. In vitro propagation of Stachys tmolea Boiss. (Lamiaceae). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences 2001; 20 B(2): 67-74.
  • [98] Mirici S, Parmaksız İ, Özcan S, Sancak C, Uranbey S, Sarıhan EO, Gümüşçü A, Gürbüz B, Arslan N. Efficient in vitro bulblet regeneration from immature embryos of endangered Sternbergia fischeriana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2005; 80: 239-246.
  • [99] Cenkci S, Kargıoğlu M, Dayan S, Konuk M. In vitro propagation of an endangered plant species, Thermopsis turcica (Fabaceae). Biologia Section Botany 2008; 63(5): 652-657.
  • [100] Cenkci S, Temel M, Kargıoğlu M, Dayan S. Propagation of endangered Thermopsis turcica Kit Tan, Vural & Küçüködük using conventional and in vitro techniques. Turk J Biol 2009; 33: 327-333.
  • [101] Tekdal D, Çetiner S. In vitro plant regeneration derived from leaf and stem explants of endemic Thermopsis turcica. Biologia Section Botany 2014; 69(7): 863-869.
  • [102] Tekdal D, Çetiner S. In-ovule embryo culture of Thermopsis turcica. JAPS 2014; 24(6): 1673-1679.
  • [103] Tekdal D, Çetiner S. Efficient embryogenic callus from filaments with anther in Thermopsis turcica. TurkJANS 2014; 1 (Special Issue): 1242-1246.
  • [104] Baba Erdağ B, Yürekli AK Thymus sipyleus Boiss. (Lamiaceae)’un in vitro çoğaltılması. Turk J Biol 2000; 24 (Ek sayı): 81-86.
  • [105] Şahin-Demirbağ N, Kendir H, Khawar KM, Aasim M. In Vitro regeneration of Turkish endemic Trifolium pannonicum JACQ. subsp. elongatum (Willd). Biotechnol Biotec Eq 2008; 22:4: 921-924.
  • [106] Doğan-Kalyoncu D. Bazı yabani Tulipa türlerinde in vitro soğancık üretimi. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, 2007.
  • [107] Özüdoğru EA, Capuana M, Kaya E, Panis B, Lambardi M. Cryopreservation of Fraxinus excelsior L. embryogenic callus by one-step freezing and slow cooling techniques. CryoLetters 2010; 31(1):63-75.
  • [108] Özüdoğru AE, Kaya E. Cryopreservation of Thymus cariensis and T. vulgaris shoot tips: Comparison of three vitrification-based methods. CryoLetters 2012; 33 (5): 363-375.

THE USE OF BIOTECHNOLOGY IN CONSERVATION OF PLANT BIODIVERSITY AND STUDIES IN TURKEY

Year 2021, , 1 - 16, 25.01.2021
https://doi.org/10.18036/estubtdc.590752

Abstract

Nature is destroyed by the influence of various factors and this causes biodiversity losses. Biodiversity losses are a serious problem in the world and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) carries out some studies on this subject. In situ and ex situ conservation strategies have been developed to prevent biodiversity losses. In ex situ conservation, modern methods have an important role as well as traditional methods such as seed gene banks and plant collections in the field. The use of in vitro technology within the scope of ex-situ conservation strategies for the preservation of species under threat of extinction in particular offers significant advantages. In vitro techniques are used for collecting, propagating, international exchange and storage of plant material. In this review, the conservation of plant biodiversity using in vitro techniques and studies in Turkey are presented.

References

  • [1] Işık K. Biyolojik çeşitlilik, In: Kıvanç M, Yücel E, editors. Çevre ve İnsan. Anadolu Üniversitesi Açık Öğretim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Öğretmenliği Lisans Tamamlama Programı, 1998. pp.15-39.
  • [2] Rao NK. Plant genetic resources: Advancing conservation and use through biotechnology. Afr J Biotechnol 2004; 3(2): 136-145.
  • [3] Paunescu A. Biotechnology for endangered plant conservation: A critical overview. Rom Biotechnol Lett 2009; 14(1): 4095-4103.
  • [4] Sharma DK, Sharma T. Biotechnological approaches for biodiversity conservation. IJSR 2013; 4(1): 183-186.
  • [5] Yılmaz E, Aldemir G, Surgun Y, Bürün B. Bitki genetik kaynaklarının önemi, korunması ve yararlanılması. Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Sempozyumu, 22-23 Mayıs 2013, Marmaris-Muğla. pp. 267-271.
  • [6] Pathak MR, Abido MS. The role of biotechnology in the conservation of biodiversity. JEBAS 2014; 2(4): 352-363.
  • [7] Pandotra P, Gupta S. Biotechnological approaches for conservation of plant genetic resources and traditional knowledge. In: Salgotra RK, Gupta BB, editors. Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge for Food Security, Springer Science+Business Media, Singapore, 2015. pp. 121-135.
  • [8] Surgun Y, Bürün B. Biotechnology for conservation of plant biodiversity. In: SEAB2016 The 2nd International Symposium on EuroAsian Biodiversity; 23-27 May 2016, Antalya, Turkey. p. 301.
  • [9] Reed BM, Sarasan V, Kane M, Bunn E, Pence VC. Biodiversity Conservation and Conservation Biotechnology Tools. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2011; 47:1-4.
  • [10] Paunescu A. Biotechnology for endangered plant conservation. In: Ahuja MR, Ramawat KG, editors. Biotechnology and Biodiversity, Sustainable Development and Biodiversity 4, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2014. pp. 181-202.
  • [11] Surgun Acar Y, Bürün B. The studies in Turkey on use of in vitro cultures in the conservation of biodiversity. In: SEAB2017 International Symposium on EuroAsian Biodiversity, 05-08 July 2017, Belarus. p 426.
  • [12] Tan A. Türkiye bitki genetik kaynakları ve muhafazası. Anadolu J of AARI 2010; 20(1): 9-37.
  • [13] Vasile L, Simona V, Eliza A, Zăpârtan M. Methods of conservation of the plant germplasm, In vitro Techniques. Analele Universitătii din Oreda, Fascicula Protectia Mediului 2011; 17: 697-708.
  • [14] Belokurova VB. Methods of biotechnology in system of efforts aimed at plant biodiversity preservation. Cytology and Genetics 2010; 44(3): 174-185.
  • [15] Engelmann F. Use of biotechnologies for the conservation of plant biodiversity. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2011; 47: 5-16.
  • [16] Pence VC. Evaluating costs for the in vitro propagation and preservation of endangered plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant, 2011; 47: 176-187.
  • [17] Rajasekharan PE, Sahijram L. In vitro conservation of plant germplasm. In: Bahadur B, Venkat Rajam M, Sahijram L, Krishnamurthy K, editors. Plant Biology and Biotechnology (Volume II): Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, Springer, India, 2015. pp. 417-443.
  • [18] Rajpurohit D, Jhang T. In situ and ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources and traditional knowledge. In: Salgotra RK, Gupta BB, editors. Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge for Food Security, Springer Science+Business Media, Singapore, 2015. pp. 137-162.
  • [19] Oseni OM, Pande V, Nailwal TP. A review on plant tissue culture, A technique for propagation and conservation of endangered plant species. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2018; 7(7): 3778-3786.
  • [20] Kasagana VN, Karumuri SS. Conservation of medicinal plants (past, present and future trends). Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Research 2011; 3(8): 1378-1386.
  • [21] Cruz-Cruz CA, González-Arnao MT, Engelmann F. Biotechnology and conservation of plant biodiversity. Resources 2013; 2: 73-95.
  • [22] Sarasan V, Cripps R, Ramsay MM, Atherton C, McMichen M, Prendergast G, Rowntree JK. Conservation in vitro of threatened plants – Progress in the past decade. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2006; 42: 206-214.
  • [23] Pence VC. In vitro collecting (IVC) I. The effect of collecting method and antimicrobial agents on contamination in temperate and tropical collections. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2005; 41:324-332.
  • [24] Fay MF. Conservation of rare and endangered plants using in vitro methods. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 1992; 28: 1-4.
  • [25] Bunn E, Turner SR, Dixon KW. Biotechnology for saving rare and threatened flora in a biodiversity hotspot. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2011; 47: 188-200.
  • [26] Khan S, Al-Qurainy F, Nadeem M. Biotechnological approaches for conservation and improvement of rare and endangered plants of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2012; 19: 1-11.
  • [27] Krishnan PN, Decruse SW, Radha RK Conservation of medicinal plants of Western Ghats, India and its sustainable utilization through in vitro technology. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 2011; 47: 110-122.
  • [28] Bürün B. Hastalıksız bitki üretimi. Babaoğlu M, Gürel E, Özcan S, editors. Bitki Biyoteknolojisi I, Doku Kültürü ve Uygulamaları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Vakfı Yayınları, Konya, 2001. pp. 190-210.
  • [29] Ogbu JU. Genetic resources and biodiversity conservation in Nigeria through biotechnology approaches. In: Ahuja MR, Ramawat KG, editors. Biotechnology and Biodiversity, Sustainable Development and Biodiversity. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2014. pp. 271-285.
  • [30] Bajaj YPS. Cryopreservation of plant cell, tissue, and organ culture for the conservation of germplasm and biodiversity. In: Bajaj YPS, editör. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Cryopresevation of Plant Germplasm I. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1995. pp. 3-28.
  • [31] Arda H, Dayan S, Kartal Ç, Güler N. In vitro conservation of critically endangered Dianthus ingoldbyi Turrill under slow growth conditions. TUJNS 2016; 17(1): 47-54.
  • [32] Martínez-Gómez P, Majourhat K, Zeinalabedini M, Erogul D, Khayam-Nekoui M, Grigorian V, Hafidi A, Piqueras A, Gradziel TM. Use of biotechnology for preserving rare fruit germplasm. Biorem Biodiv Bioavail 2007; 1(1): 31-40.
  • [33] Surgun Acar Y, Yokaş İ, Bürün B. Seed germination studies in native species for conservation of biodiversity. In: SEAB2017 International Symposium on EuroAsian Biodiversity, 05-08 July 2017, Belarus. p. 663.
  • [34] Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT (edlr.). Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını, İstanbul, 2012.
  • [35] Anonim. Ulusal Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı. T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, Ankara, 2007.
  • [36] Ünaldı EÜ. Tehdit ve tehlike altında bir kültür bitkisi: Safran (Crocus sativus L.). F. Ü. Sosyal Bil Dergi 2007; 4: 53-67.
  • [37] Akbaş F, Kuru İS, Orcan PK. The effects of BAP and Kin on micropropagation of Ajuga vestita BOISS.; a rare endemic medicinal plant. In: ICAEAM'15 2nd International Conference on Advances in Environment, Agriculture & Medical Sciences; 11-12 June 2015; Antalya, Turkey.
  • [38] Yanmaz R, Yazar E, Yaprak Kantoğlu K, Alper A. In vitro plant regeneration and bulblet formation of Tunceli garlic (Allium tuncelianum (Kollman) Özhatay, Matthew, Siraneci) by shoot and root culture. JFAE 2010; 8 (3&4): 572-576.
  • [39] Aasım M. Adventitous bulblet regeneration of endemic Ovacık garlic (Allium tuncelianum Kollman, Özhatay, Mathew, Şiraneci) using wintered half clove explant. Rom Biotechnol Lett 2015; 20(5): 10845-10851.
  • [40] Acemi A, Özen F, Kıran R. Development of an efficient callus production protocol for Amsonia orientalis: A critically endangered medicinal plant. Eurasia J Biosci 2012; 6: 105-112.
  • [41] Özel ÇA. Micropropagation of Anthemıs pestalozzae Boiss. from cotyledonary leaf and leaf explants. Bangladesh J Bot 2016; 45(1): 55-61.
  • [42] Erdağ B, Emek Y. In vitro micropropagation of Anthemis xylopoda O. Schwarz, a critically endangered species from Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 2005; 8(5): 691-695
  • [43] Erdağ B, Emek YÇ. Adventitious shoot regeneration and in vitro flowering of Anthemis xylopoda O. Schwarz, a critically endangered Turkish endemic. Turk J Biol 2009; 33: 319-326.
  • [44] Akın B, Kocaçalıskan İ. In vitro propagation of Arabis drabiformis Boiss. (Brassiaceae) an endemic rare species of Uludağ mountain (Bursa-Turkey). Afr J Biotechnol 2011; 10(80): 18356-18361.
  • [45] Erişen S, Atalay E, Yorgancılar M. The effect of thidiazuron on the in vitro shoot development of endemic Astragalus cariensis in Turkey. Turk J Bot 2011; 35: 521-526.
  • [46] Hasançebi S, Turgut Kara N, Çakır Ö, Arı Ş. Micropropagation and root culture of Turkish endemic Astragalus chrysochlorus (Leguminosae). Turk J Bot 2011; 35: 203-210.
  • [47] Erdağ B. A note on in vitro seed germination and shoot multiplication of Astragalus condensatus Ledeb., an endemic of Turkish flora. Bio-Science Research Bulletin 2002, 18(2): 93-97.
  • [48] Erişen S, Yorgancılar M, Atalay E, Babaoğlu M, Duran A. Callus induction and plant regeneration of the endemic Astragalus nezaketae in Turkey. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 2010; 13 (6).
  • [49] Yorgancılar M, Erişen S. The effect of thidiazuron (TDZ) on shoot regeneration of Astragalus schizopterus. JAPS 2011; 21(3): 519-524.
  • [50] Yüzbaşıoğlu E, Dalyan E, Bona M, Öz G. In vitro propagation of endemic plant Centaurea arifolia Boiss. Taxa. IUFS J Biol 2012; 71(2):121-127.
  • [51] Özel ÇA, Khawar KM, Mirici S, Özcan S, Arslan O. Factors affecting in vitro plant regeneration of the critically endangered Mediterranean knapweed (Centaurea tchihatcheffii Fisch et. Mey). Naturwissenschaften, 2006; 93: 511-517.
  • [52] Okay Y, Ellialtıoğlu Ş, Demir K, Tıpırdamaz R, Savcı AE, Özler H, Gümüş C, Günöz A. Sentorya (Centaurea tchihatchefii Fish.&Mey.) endemik bitkisinin çoğaltımı üzerinde çalışmalar. BİBAD 2014; 7(1): 42-48.
  • [53] Kurt S, Erdağ B. In vitro germination and axillary shoot propagation of Centaurea zeybekii. Biologia Section Botany 2009; 64(1): 97-101.
  • [54] İzgü T, Sevindik B, Çürük P, Şimşek Ö, Aka Kaçar Y, Teixeira da Silva JA, Yalçın Mendi Y. Development of an efficient regeneration protocol for four Cyclamen species endemic to Turkey. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 2016, 127: 95-113.
  • [55] Yamaner Ö, Erdağ B. Direct shoot formation and microtuberization from aseptic seedlings of Cyclamen mirabile Hildebr. Biotechnology 2008; 7(2): 328-332.
  • [56] Verma SK, Yücesan BB, Şahin G, Gürel S & Gürel E. Direct shoot regeneration from leaf explants of Digitalis lamarckii, an endemic medicinal species. Turk J Bot 2011; 35: 689-695.
  • [57] Çördük N, Akı C. Doğal ortamda yayılış gösteren ve in vitro çoğaltılan Digitalis trojana türünde kardenolid içeriklerinin karşılaştırılması. 21. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi; 03-07 Eylül 2012; İzmir.
  • [58] Erdağ B, Emek YÇ, Kurt Aydoğan S. Clonal propagation of Dorystoechas hastata via axillary shoot proliferation. Turk J Bot. 2010; 34: 233-240.
  • [59] Uçar Türker A, Birinci Yıldırım A, Taş İ. In vitro adventitious plant regeneration of Echium orientale L., an endemic plant: The evaluation of biological activities and phenolic content. IJBB 2018; 55, 264-272.
  • [60] Akın B, Kocaçalışkan İ, Güleryüz G. Micropropagation of Erodium sibthorpianum subsp. sibthorpianum, an endemic threatened species of Uludağ Mountain (Bursa-Turkey). Turk J Bot 2014; 38: 148-155.
  • [61] Çetin B, Eren H, Oskay D, Akanıl Bingöl N. Kritik tehlikedeki (CR) endemik Erodium somanum türünün in vitro mikroçoğaltımı. CBÜ Fen Bil Derg 2016; 12(1): 115-120.
  • [62] Sevindik B, Tütüncü M, İzgü T, Tagipur EM, Çürük P, Yılmaz Ö, Kaynak G, Yalçın Mendi Y. Micropropagation of Erodium olympicum endemic to Turkey. AJPB 2017; 2(3-1): 24-27.
  • [63] Kızıl S, Sesiz U, Khalid Mahmood Khawar KM, Arslan N. Endemik Fritillaria aurea Schott‟un in vitro çoğaltımı üzerine çalışmalar. V. Süs Bitkileri Kongresi, 06–09 Mayıs 2013, Yalova.
  • [64] Erdağ BB, Emek YÇ, Aktaş LY. In vitro somatic embryogenesis from cormel-derived callus cultures of Gladiolus anatolicus (Boiss.) Stapf. Propagation of Ornamental Plants 2009; 9(4):176-180.
  • [65] Yamaner Ö, Erdağ B. Hypericum adenotrichum’un doku kültürü teknikleri ile çoğaltılması. 22. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, 23-27 Haziran 2014, Eskişehir.
  • [66] Ayan AK, Çırak C. In vitro multiplication of Hypericum heterophyllum an endemic Turkish species. American Journal of Plant Physiology 2006; 1(1): 76-81.
  • [67] Asan HS, Özen HÇ, Onay A, Asan N. Effect of BAP on total hypericin production in shoot cultures of Hypericum scabroides: An endemic species in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Eurasia J Biosci 2015; 9: 46-51.
  • [68] Nasırcılar AG, Denız İG. An alternative plant propagation and conservation process for Iris pampyhlica an endemic and endangered geophyte. AGROSYM 2014, Fifth International Scientific Agricultural Symposium, 23-26 October 2014, Saraybosna-Bosna Hersek. pp. 346-351.
  • [69] Uzun S, İlbaş Aİ, İpek A, Arslan N & Barpete S. Efficient in vitro plant regeneration from immature embryos of endemic Iris sari and I. schachtii. Turk J Agric For 2014; 38: 348-353.
  • [70] Nasırcılar AG, Mirici S, Eren O, Karagüzel O, Baktır İ. Micropropagation of Turkish endemic Iris stenophylla Hausskn & Siehe ex Baker subsp. allisonii B. Mathew. Acta Horticulturae 2011; 886: 19-26.
  • [71] Khawar KM, Çöçü S, Parmaksız İ, Sarıhan EO, Özcan S. Mass proliferation of Madonna Lily (Lilium candidum L) under in vitro conditions. Pak J Bot 2005; 37(2): 243-248.
  • [72] Bürün B, Şahin O. Micropropagation of Lilium candidum L.: A rare and native bulbous flower of Turkey. Bangladesh J Bot 2013, 42(2): 185-187.
  • [73] Daneshvar-Royandazagh S, Pehlivan EC, Teykin EE, Çiftçi HS. Lilium candidum L.’da in vitro mikroçoğaltım ile kozmetik sanayisine ham madde temini. TURKJANS 2014; 2 (Özel Sayı): 1911-1916.
  • [74] Çağlar G, Bulunuz E, Eldoğan S. In vitro propagation of Linaria genistifolia (L.) Miller ssp. praealta (Boiss.) Davis. In: BIORARE Symposium 2010 International Symposium on the Biology of Rare and Endemic Plant Species; 26-29 May 2010, Muğla, Turkey.
  • [75] Erdağ B, Emek Y. In vitro adventitious shoot regeneration of Liquidambar orientalis Miller. Journal of Biological Sciences 2005; 5(6): 805-808.
  • [76] Surgun-Acar Y, Ayaz-Baran Ö, Bürün B. Adventitious shoot formation from hypocotyl and cotyledon explants of relict endemic Liquidambar orientalis Miller. MJST 2018; 4(2): 137-142.
  • [77] Uranbey S. Sitimulating effects of different basal media and cytokinine types on regeneration of endemic and endangered Muscari aucheri. Arch Biol Sci Belgr 2010; 62(3): 663-667.
  • [78] Allahverdikhan Vaziri P, Uranbey S, Sancak C. Efficient in vitro microprapagation for the conservation of endemic and endangered aucher-eloy grape hyacinth [Muscari aucheri (Boiss.) Baker]. JABS 2014; 8 (1): 80-83.
  • [79] Allahverdikhan Vaziri P. Endemik Muscari aucheri’nin in vitro klonal çoğaltımı üzerine araştırmalar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, 2009.
  • [80] Özdemir FA, Kılıç Ö, Bağcı E. In vitro bulb regeneration from stem explants of endemic geophyt Muscari aucheri (Boiss.) Baker. IJSM 2017; 4(3): 50-54.
  • [81] Uranbey S, İpek A, Çalışkan M, Dündar E, Çöçü S, Basalma D, Güneylioğlu H. In vitro bulblet induction from bulb scales of endangered ornamental plant Muscari azureum. Biotechnol Biotec Eq 2010; 24:2: 1843-1848.
  • [82] Uranbey S. In vitro bulblet regeneration from immature embryos of Muscari azureum. Afr J Biotechnol 2010; 9(32): 5121-5125.
  • [83] Nasırcılar AG, Mirici S, Karagüzel Ö, Eren Ö, Baktır İ. In vitro propagation of endemic and endangered Muscari mirum from different explant types. Turk J Bot 2011, 35: 37-43.
  • [84] Uzun S, Parmaksız İ, Uranbey S, Mirici S, Sarıhan EO, İpek A, Kaya MD, Gürbüz B, Arslan N, Sancak C, Khawar KM, Özcan S. In vitro micropropagation from immature embryos of the endemic and endangered Muscari muscarimi Medik. Turk J Biol 2014; 38: 83-88.
  • [85] Özel ÇA, Khawar KM, Ünal F. Factors affecting efficient in vitro micropropagation of Muscari muscarimi Medikus using twin bulb scale. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2015; 22: 132-138.
  • [86] Gümüşçü A, Çöçü S, Uranbey S, İpek A, Çalışkan M, Arslan N. In vitro micro-propagation of endangered ornamental plant-Neotchihatchewia isatidea (Boiss.) Rauschert. Afr J Biotechnol 2008; 7(3): 234-238.
  • [87] Gürlek D, Özcan S, Khawar KM, Aasım M, Fakılı O. Efficient micropropagation of endemic Origanum acutidens (Hand.-Mazz.) Ietswaart. In: BIORARE Symposium 2010 International Symposium on the Biology of Rare and Endemic Plant Species; 26-29 May 2010, Muğla, Turkey.
  • [88] Yıldırım MU. Micropropagation of Origanum acutidens (Hand.-Mazz.) Ietswaart using stem node explants. The Scientific World Journal 2013; Article ID 276464, 3 pages.
  • [89] Özkum D. In vitro shoot regeneration of oregano (Origanum minutiflorum O. Schwarz & Davis). HJBC 2007; 35(2): 97-100.
  • [90] Akçam-Oluk E, Çakır A. Micropropagation of Origanum sipyleum L., an endemic medicinal herb of Turkey. Afr J Biotechnol 2009; 8(21): 5769-5772.
  • [91] Karagüzel Ö, Kaya A, Biner B, Aydinsakir K. In vitro propagation of native Ornithogalum species in West Mediterrenean region of Turkey. Afr J Agric Res 2012; 7(17): 2669-2673.
  • [92] Emek Y, Erdağ B. In vitro propagation of critically endangered endemic Rhaponticoides mykalea (Hub.-Mor.) by axillary shoot proliferation. In: Current Progress in Biological Research, Intech, 2013. pp. 203-213.
  • [93] Emek Y, Erdağ B. In vitro somatic embryogenesis and antioxidant enzyme activities in Rhaponticoides mykalea (Hub.-Mor.) M. V. Agab. & Greuter critically endangered endemic plant. Fresen Environ Bull 2014; 23(4):1051-1057.
  • [94] Hayta Ş, Bayraktar M, Baykan Erel S, Gürel A. Direct plant regeneration from different explants through micropropagation and determination of secondary metabolites in the critically endangered endemic Rhaponticoides mykalea. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology 2015; 151(1): 20-28.
  • [95] Baba Erdağ B, Yürekli AK. Callus induction and shoot regeneration of Sideritis sipylea Boiss. (Lamiaceae). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences 2000; Section B 19 B(1): 41-46.
  • [96] Erişen S, Öncel Z. In vitro propagation of the threatened plant Sphaerophysa kotschyana (Fabaceae): inter simple-sequence-repeat (ISSR) analysis and salt tolerance of the regenerants. Australian Journal of Botany 2013; 61(1): 67-72.
  • [97] Erdağ B, Yürekli AK. In vitro propagation of Stachys tmolea Boiss. (Lamiaceae). Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences 2001; 20 B(2): 67-74.
  • [98] Mirici S, Parmaksız İ, Özcan S, Sancak C, Uranbey S, Sarıhan EO, Gümüşçü A, Gürbüz B, Arslan N. Efficient in vitro bulblet regeneration from immature embryos of endangered Sternbergia fischeriana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 2005; 80: 239-246.
  • [99] Cenkci S, Kargıoğlu M, Dayan S, Konuk M. In vitro propagation of an endangered plant species, Thermopsis turcica (Fabaceae). Biologia Section Botany 2008; 63(5): 652-657.
  • [100] Cenkci S, Temel M, Kargıoğlu M, Dayan S. Propagation of endangered Thermopsis turcica Kit Tan, Vural & Küçüködük using conventional and in vitro techniques. Turk J Biol 2009; 33: 327-333.
  • [101] Tekdal D, Çetiner S. In vitro plant regeneration derived from leaf and stem explants of endemic Thermopsis turcica. Biologia Section Botany 2014; 69(7): 863-869.
  • [102] Tekdal D, Çetiner S. In-ovule embryo culture of Thermopsis turcica. JAPS 2014; 24(6): 1673-1679.
  • [103] Tekdal D, Çetiner S. Efficient embryogenic callus from filaments with anther in Thermopsis turcica. TurkJANS 2014; 1 (Special Issue): 1242-1246.
  • [104] Baba Erdağ B, Yürekli AK Thymus sipyleus Boiss. (Lamiaceae)’un in vitro çoğaltılması. Turk J Biol 2000; 24 (Ek sayı): 81-86.
  • [105] Şahin-Demirbağ N, Kendir H, Khawar KM, Aasim M. In Vitro regeneration of Turkish endemic Trifolium pannonicum JACQ. subsp. elongatum (Willd). Biotechnol Biotec Eq 2008; 22:4: 921-924.
  • [106] Doğan-Kalyoncu D. Bazı yabani Tulipa türlerinde in vitro soğancık üretimi. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara, 2007.
  • [107] Özüdoğru EA, Capuana M, Kaya E, Panis B, Lambardi M. Cryopreservation of Fraxinus excelsior L. embryogenic callus by one-step freezing and slow cooling techniques. CryoLetters 2010; 31(1):63-75.
  • [108] Özüdoğru AE, Kaya E. Cryopreservation of Thymus cariensis and T. vulgaris shoot tips: Comparison of three vitrification-based methods. CryoLetters 2012; 33 (5): 363-375.
There are 108 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Structural Biology
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Betül Bürün 0000-0002-3758-0630

Publication Date January 25, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021

Cite

APA Bürün, B. (2021). BİTKİ BİYOÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINDA BİYOTEKNOLOJİNİN KULLANIMI VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18036/estubtdc.590752
AMA Bürün B. BİTKİ BİYOÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINDA BİYOTEKNOLOJİNİN KULLANIMI VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji. January 2021;10(1):1-16. doi:10.18036/estubtdc.590752
Chicago Bürün, Betül. “BİTKİ BİYOÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINDA BİYOTEKNOLOJİNİN KULLANIMI VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR”. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji 10, no. 1 (January 2021): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18036/estubtdc.590752.
EndNote Bürün B (January 1, 2021) BİTKİ BİYOÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINDA BİYOTEKNOLOJİNİN KULLANIMI VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji 10 1 1–16.
IEEE B. Bürün, “BİTKİ BİYOÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINDA BİYOTEKNOLOJİNİN KULLANIMI VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR”, Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.18036/estubtdc.590752.
ISNAD Bürün, Betül. “BİTKİ BİYOÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINDA BİYOTEKNOLOJİNİN KULLANIMI VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR”. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji 10/1 (January 2021), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18036/estubtdc.590752.
JAMA Bürün B. BİTKİ BİYOÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINDA BİYOTEKNOLOJİNİN KULLANIMI VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji. 2021;10:1–16.
MLA Bürün, Betül. “BİTKİ BİYOÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINDA BİYOTEKNOLOJİNİN KULLANIMI VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR”. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021, pp. 1-16, doi:10.18036/estubtdc.590752.
Vancouver Bürün B. BİTKİ BİYOÇEŞİTLİLİĞİNİN KORUNMASINDA BİYOTEKNOLOJİNİN KULLANIMI VE TÜRKİYE’DEKİ ÇALIŞMALAR. Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi - C Yaşam Bilimleri Ve Biyoteknoloji. 2021;10(1):1-16.