Library and Information Science Students’ Trust and Judgement: An Analysis of Youth’s Social Media Engagement

Year 2023, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 13 - 27, 27.07.2023

Joseph Marmol Yap , Agnes Hajdu Barat , Kevin Conrad Tansiongco

Abstract

The study observed the level of trust and judgment afforded by Library and Information Science (LIS) students toward their close relationships as they engage and interact in social media. The study employed a mixed-methods approach using quantitative data to describe and measure the mean and standard deviation and narrative analysis as its qualitative method using semi-structured interviews to understand how the youth critically appraises their social relationship with family, friends, and others. The online survey gathered 55 library and information science students and analyzed how they behave and interact online given that trust and judgement are at risk when people engage online.

Results showed that the youth give a high level of trust to their family members and close friends and a medium level of trust towards other people on social media. The students also indicate a low level of judgement towards close family, friends, and other people when they share information or interact on social media. This study provides a novel contribution to LIS students’ perceived trust and judgement towards their close relations as they interact and share information on social media.

Keywords

social media engagement, relationships, trust, judgement, information evaluation, information literacy, youth

Kütüphane ve Bilgi Bilimi Öğrencilerinin Güveni ve Yargısı: Gençlerin Sosyal Medya Etkileşimlerinin Bir Analizi

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Kütüphane ve Enformasyon Bilimi öğrencilerinin, sosyal medyada etkileşimde bulunurken yakın ilişkilerine karşı gösterdikleri güven ve muhakeme düzeyini gözlemledi. Çalışma, ortalama ve standart sapmayı tanımlamak ve ölçmek için nicel verileri kullanan karma yöntemli bir yaklaşım ve gençlerin aileleri, arkadaşları ve diğerleriyle olan sosyal ilişkilerini eleştirel bir şekilde nasıl değerlendirdiklerini anlamak için yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeleri kullanan nitel yöntem olarak da anlatı analizini kullandı. Çevrimiçi anket, 55 Kütüphane ve Enformasyon Bilimi öğrencisini bir araya getirdi ve insanlar çevrimiçi etkileşim kurduğunda güven ve muhakemenin risk altında olduğu göz önüne alındığında, çevrimiçi ortamda nasıl davrandıklarını ve etkileşimde bulunduklarını analiz etti.

Sonuçlar, gençlerin sosyal medyada aile üyelerine ve yakın arkadaşlarına yüksek düzeyde, diğer insanlara ise orta düzeyde güven duyduklarını göstermiştir. Öğrenciler ayrıca bilgi paylaştıklarında veya sosyal medyada etkileşimde bulunduklarında yakın aile, arkadaşlar ve diğer insanlara karşı muhakeme yetileri düşük düzeydedir. Bu çalışma, Kütüphane ve Enformasyon Bilimi öğrencilerinin sosyal medyada etkileşimde bulunurken ve bilgi paylaşırken yakın ilişkilerine yönelik algıladıkları güven ve muhakeme konularına yeni bir katkı sağlamaktadır.

Keywords

sosyal medya etkileşimi, ilişkiler, güven, bilgi değerlendirmesi, Bilgi okuryazarlığı, gençlik, muhakeme

References

• Addy, J. M. (2020). The art of the real: Fact checking as information literacy instruction. Reference Services Review, 48(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-09-2019-0067
• American Press Institute. (2017, March 20). ‘Who shared it?’: How Americans decide what news to trust on social media. https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/trust-social-media/
• Auxier, D., & Anderson, M. (2021, April 7). Social media use in 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2021/04/PI_2021.04.07_Social-Media-Use_FINAL.pdf
• Carr, P. R., Cuervo Sanchez, S. L., & Daros, M. A. (2020). Citizen engagement in the contemporary era of fake news: hegemonic distraction or control of the social media context? Postdigital Science and Education, 2(1), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00052-z
• Çelik, G. T., & Oral, E. L. (2016). Big five and organizational commitment–the case of Turkish construction professionals. Human Resource Management Research, 6(1), 6-14. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.hrmr.20160601.02
• Chambers, D. (2013). Social Media and Personal Relationships: Online Intimacies and Networked Friendship. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Eger, L., Egerová, D., Mičík, M., Varga, E., Czeglédi, C., Tomczyk, L., & Sládkayová, M. (2020). Trust building and fake news on social media from the perspective of university students from four Visegrad countries. Communication Today, 11(1), 70-88. https://otik.uk.zcu.cz/bitstream/11025/42389/1/05_EGER-et-al_CT-1-2020.pdf
• Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454(7208), 1079-1083. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07155
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology. 78(6), 1360-1380. https://snap.stanford.edu/class/cs224w-readings/granovetter73weakties.pdf
• Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2020). Information literacy challenges in digital culture: conflicting engagements of trust and doubt. Information, Communication & Society, 25(8), 1176-1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1851389
• Haider, J., & Sundin, O. (2019). How do you trust? On infrastructural meaning-making and the need for self-reflection. In U. Carlsson (Ed.), Understanding Media and Information Literacy (MIL) in the Digital Age A Question of Democracy (pp. 107-112). University of Gothenburg.
• Kemp, S. (2021, February 11). Digital 2021: The Philippines. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-philippines#:~:text=There%20were%2089.00%20million%20social,total%20 population%20in%20January%202021
• Lamdan, S. S. (2015). Social media privacy: A rallying cry to librarians. The Library Quarterly, 85(3), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1086/681610
• Levine, L. (2019). Digital trust and cooperation with an integrative digital social contract. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04201-z
• Mapa, D. S. (2020, December 28). Functional literacy rate of Filipinos by exposure to different forms of mass media ranges from 92.6 percent to 97.1 percent in 2019. https://psa.gov.ph/press-releases/id/163686
• Osatuyi, B. (2013). Information sharing on social media sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2622-2631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.001
• Polizzi, G. (2020). Information literacy in the digital age: why critical digital literacy matters for democracy. In S. Goldstein (Ed.), Informed Societies: Why Information Literacy Matters for Citizenship, Participation and Democracy (pp. 1-23). Facet Publishing.
• Roberts, S. G., & Dunbar, R. I. (2011). The costs of family and friends: an 18-month longitudinal study of relationship maintenance and decay. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(3), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.005
• Statista. (2023, March 15). Social media in the Philippines - statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/6759/social-media-usage-in-the-philippines/#topicHeader__wrapper
• Sullivan, M. C. (2019). Leveraging library trust to combat misinformation on social media. Library & Information Science Research, 41(1), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.02.004
• Taddei, S., & Contena, B. (2013). Privacy, trust and control: Which relationships with online self-disclosure? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 821-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.022
• Taylor, S. H., Zhao, P., & Bazarova, N. N. (2021). Social media and close relationships: a puzzle of connection and disconnection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45(101292). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.004
• Toma, C. L. (2014). Counting on friends: Cues to perceived trustworthiness in Facebook profiles. In Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/view/8044/8150
• Utz, S. (2010). Show me your friends and I will tell you what type of person you are: How one's profile, number of friends, and type of friends influence impression formation on social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(2), 314-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01522.x
• Waterloos, C., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2021). Designing and validating the social media political participation scale: An instrument to measure political participation on social media. Technology in Society, 64, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101493
• Watts, D. J., Rothschild, D. M., & Mobius, M. (2021). Measuring the news and its impact on democracy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), e1912443118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912443118
• Yap, J. M., Tansiongco, K.C.T., & Barat, A.H. (2022). Digital civic engagement and youth participation: a survey research. In R. Knežević et al. (Eds.), Epistemology: Opinion, Belief and the Reality (pp. 103-113). Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Western Balkan Information and Media Literacy WBIMLC 2021, Limerick Institute of Ireland, Limerick.