Ticari yumurtacı tavuklarda Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale enfeksiyonunun serolojik prevalansı

Year 2016, Volume: 32 Issue: 1, 22 - 25, 01.03.2016

Zeki Aras Zafer Sayin Gokcenur Sanioglu

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada ticari yumurtacı tavuk işletmelerinde
bulunan tavuklarda Ornithobacterium (O.) rhinotracheale
enfeksiyonunun serolojik prevalansının belirlenmesi amaç-
landı.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Konya, Aksaray, Karaman, Ankara ve
Gaziantep illerinde bulunan 26 farklı kümesteki yumurtacı
tavuklardan 650 kan serum örneği toplandı. Örnekleme yapılan
tavukların hiç birisi daha önceden O. rhinotracheale
enfeksiyonuna karşı aşılanmamışlardı. O. rhinotracheale’ye
karşı oluşmuş antikorların varlığı ELISA testi ile belirlendi.
Bulgular: Toplam 650 kan serum örneğinden 113
(%17.4)’ünde O. rhinotracheale antikoru tespit edildi. Bu
113 pozitif serum örneği örnekleme yapılan 26 kümesin 12
(%46.2)’sinden toplanmıştı. Enfekte 12 kümes, Konya, Gaziantep,
Ankara ve Karaman illerindeki 12 farklı çiftliğe aitti.
Öneriler: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları göstermiştir ki, Türkiye’deki
ticari yumurtacı tavuk kümeslerinde O. rhinotracheale
enfeksiyonu yüksek bir prevalansa sahiptir.

Keywords

Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale, yumurtacı tavuk, serolojik prevalans

Serologic prevalence of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in commercial layers

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the serological
prevalence of Ornithobacterium (O.) rhinotracheale
infections in commercial layers.
Materials and Methods: A total of 650 blood serum samples
were collected from 26 different layer flocks located in Konya,
Aksaray, Karaman, Ankara, and Gaziantep provinces. None of
the chickens have been vaccinated against O. rhinotracheale
prior to sampling. The presence of antibodies against O. rhinotracheale
in each sample was determined by ELISA.
Results: Of the 650 serum samples, 113 (17.4%) were found
to be positive for O. rhinotracheale antibodies. These 113 positive
sera were collected from 12 (46.2%) out of 26 flocks.
The twelve infected flocks belonged to 12 different farms
form Konya, Gaziantep, Ankara and Karaman.
Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that O. rhinotracheale
infection is at high prevalence in the commercial
layer flocks from this part of Turkey.

Keywords

Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale, layer, serological prevalence

References

• Allymehr M, 2006. Seroprevalence of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in broiler and broiler breeder chickens in West Azarbaijan Province, Iran. J Vet Med Series A, 3, 40-42.
• Back A, Halvorson D, Rajashekara G, Nagaraja KV, 1998. Development of a serum plate agglutination test to detect antibodies to Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale. J Vet Diagn Invest, 10, 84-86.
• Banani M, Momayez R, Pourbakhsh SA, Goodarzi H, Bahmaninejad MA, 2002. Simultaneous isolation of O. rhinotracheale and avian influenza virus subtype H9N2 from commercial poultry chickens. Iran J Vet Res, 6, 190-195.
• Chansiripornchai N, Wanasawaeng W, Sasipreeyajan J, 2007. Seroprevalence and identification of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale from broiler and broiler breeder flocks in Thailand. Avian Dis, 51, 777-780
• Charlton B, Channing-Santiago S, Bickford A, Cardona C, Chin R, Cooper G, Droul R, Jeffrey J, Meteyer H, Shivaprasad H, Walker R, 1993. Preliminary characterization of a pleomorphic Gramnegative rod associated with avian respiratory disease. J Vet Diagn Invest, 5, 47-51.
• Chin RP, Droual R, 1997. Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection. In: Diseases of Poultry, Eds: Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, McDougald LR and Saif YM, 10th edition, Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA, pp: 1012-1015.
• Dudouyt J, Leorat J, Van Empel P, Gardin Y, Celine D, 1995. Isolement d’un novel pathogene chez la dinde: Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale: Conduit a tenir. In: Proceedings of the Journees de la Recherche Avicole, Angers, France, 28–30 March 1995, 240-243.
• Erganiş O, Hadimli HH, Kav K, Çorlu M, Öztürk D, 2002. A comparative study on detection of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale antibodies in meat-type turkeys by dot immunobinding assay, rapid agglutination test and serum agglutination test. Avian Pathol, 31, 201-204.
• Erganiş O, Hadimli HH, Kav K, Sayın Z, 2013. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of strains of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolated from poultry in Turkey. Afr J Microbiol Res, 7, 82-88.
• Eröksüz H, Özbey G, Çevik A, Gencer B, Tarakci B, Balik DT, 2006. Immuno-histochemical, Pathological, Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay and Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Experimental Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale Infection in Quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Rev Med Vet, 157, 197-202.
• Hafez HM, 1998. Current status on the Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT) infection in poultry. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wocchenschr, 111, 143-145.
• Hafez HM, Sting R, 1996. Serologic surveillance on Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in poultry flocks using self-made ELISA. In: Proceedings of the 45th western poultry disease conference, Cancun, Mexico, 1–5 May 1996, 163-164.
• Heeder CJ, Lopes VL, Nagaraja KV, Shaw DP, Halvarson DA, 2001. Seroprevalance of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in commercial laying hens in the central region of the Unites States. Avian Dis, 45, 1064-1067.
• Hinz KH, Blome C, Ryll M, 1994. Acute exudative pneumonia and airsacculitis associated with Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in turkeys. Vet Rec, 135, 233-234.
• Lopes V, Rajashekara G, Back A, Shaw DP, Halvorson DA, Nagaraja KV, 2000. Outer membrane proteins for serologic detection of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in turkeys. Avian Dis, 44, 957-962.
• Özbey G, Ongor H, Balik DT, Celik V, Kilic A, Muz A, 2004. Investigations on Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in broiler flocks in Elazig province located in the East of Turkey. Vet Med Czech, 49, 305-311.
• Rahimi M, Banani M, 2007. Isolation of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale from the chickens of a broiler farm in Kermanshah Province, west of Iran. Iran J Vet Res, 8, 355-359.
• Rahimi M, 2014. Serologic prevalence of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infections in broilers and broiler breeder chickens in Kermanshah Province, west of Iran. Comp Clin Pathol, 23, 415-418.
• Refai M, El-Gohary A, Attia SA, Khalifa RA, 2005. Diagnosis of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in chickens by ELISA. Egypt J Immunol, 12, 87-93.
• Sakai E, Tokuyma Y, Nonaka F, Ohishi S, Ishikawa Y, Tanaka M, Taneno A, 2000. Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in Japan: Preliminary investigations. Vet Rec, 146, 502-503.
• Travers AF, 1996. Concomitant Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale and Newcastle disease infection in broilers in South Africa. Avian Dis, 40, 488-490.
• Turan N, Ak S, 2002. Investigation of the presence of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in chickens in Turkey and determination of the seroprevalance of the infection using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Avian Dis, 46, 442-446.
• Türkyılmaz S, Kaya O, 2005. Detection of Antibodies Produced against Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale and Bordetella avium by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in Hens and Turkeys in Aydın Province, Turkey. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 29, 897-902.
• Türkyılmaz S, 2005. Isolation and serotyping of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale from poultry. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 29, 1299-1304.
• Van Beek P, 1994. Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale (ORT), clinical aspects in broilers and turkeys. Annual meeting of the veterinary study group of the EU, Amsterdam, November 1994, Holland, pp: 99-101.
• Van Empel P, Van den Bosch H, Loeffen P, Storm P, 1997. Identification and serotyping of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale. J Clin Microbiol, 35, 418-42.
• Van Empel P, Hafez H, 1999. Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale: a review. Avian Pathol, 28, 217-227.
• Van Veen L, Gruys E, Frik K, Van Empel P, 2000. Increased condemnation of broilers associated with Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale. Vet Rec, 147, 422-423.