BibTex RIS Cite

Doğal olarak enfekte ördeklerde antelmektiklerin etkinliği

Year 2012, Volume: 28 Issue: 4, 229 - 232, 01.12.2012

Abstract

Araştırmanın amacı dört antelmentiğin (piperazin sitrat,
albendazol, fenbendazol, ivermektin) doğal enfekte ördeklerde
etkinliğini belirlemektir. Farklı çiftliklerden elde
edilen yirmi ördek temin edilerek dışkıları üç ayrı helmint
açısından incelendi. Ördekler dört eşit gruba beş uygulama
yapılacak şekilde ayrıldı. Dışkının her gramındaki yumurta
oranı tedaviden önce ve sonraki 7, 14, 21 ve 30. günlerde
hesaplandı. Amidostomum türü hariç bütün antelmentikler
14 güne kadar %100 etkinlik gösterdi. Fenbendazol 21.
günde Capillaria tune %67 oranında etkiliyken diğerlerine
%100 etkili olduğu belirlendi. Ivermektinin 21. güne kadar
helmintlere %100 etkili olduğu belirlendi. Piperazin sitrat,
fenbendazole ve ivermektin ile tedavi edilen ördeklerde Capillaria
türlerinde karşı maksimumum koruma sağlandığı
belirlendi. Sonuç olarak piperazin sitrat ile ivermektinin
albendazol ile fenbendazolden daha etkin olduğu ifade edilebilir.

References

  • Ahmed S, 1969. Survey on type of helminths commonly found in country ducks. Pak J Vet Sci, 3, 110-112.
  • Anisuzzaman, Alim MA, Rahman MH, Mondal MMH, 2005. Helminth parasites in indigenous ducks: Seasonal dynamics and effects on production performance. J Bangladesh Agrill Univ, 3, 283-290.
  • Anisuzzaman, Farjan T, Alim MA, Khan MAHNA, Mondal MMH, 2006. Amidostomiasis in indigenous ducks of Bangladesh: Prevalence and pathology. Bangladesh Vet J, 40, 1-9.
  • Anonym 2007. Statistical pocket book of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (Statistics division), Ministry of Planning. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
  • Farjana T, Alim MA, Das PM, Mondal MMH, 2004. Helminth infection in ducks at free range and semi intensive farming in two districts of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Vet J, 38, 125-134.
  • Ibarra-Velarde F, Guerrero-Molina C, Vera-Montenegro Y, Alcala-Canto Y, Romero-Callejas E, 2011. Comparison of the anthelmintic efficacy of three commercial products against ascarids and capillaria spp. in fighting cocks. J Pharm Pharmacol, 2, 146-150.
  • Kates KC, Colglazier ML, Enzie FD, 1969. Comparative efficacy of levo-tetramisole, parbendazole, and piperazine citrate against some common helminths of turkeys. Trans Amer Microsc Soc, 88, 142-148.
  • Katkov MV, 1963. Piperazine in amidostomiasis of geese. Veterinariya, 40, 24.
  • Khayatnouri MH, Garedaghi Y, Arbati AR, Khalili H, 2011. The Effect of ivermectin pour-on administration against natural Heterakis gallinarum infestation and its prevalence in native poultry. Am J Anim Vet Sci, 6, 55-58.
  • Kirsch R, 1984. Treatment of nematodiasis in poultry and game birds with fenbendazole. Avian Dis, 28, 311-318.
  • Morishita TY, Schaul JC, 2008. Parasites of birds, in: Flynn’s Parasites of Laboratory Animals, Ed; Baker DG, Second Edition, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp: 219296.
  • Rabbi AKMA, Islam A, Majumder S, Anisuzzaman, Rahman MH, 2006. Gastrointestinal helminths infection in different types of poultry. Bangl J Vet Med, 4, 13-18.
  • Soulsby EJL, 1982. Helminths, Arthropods and Protoza of Domesticated Animals, Seventh edition, Bailliere Tindall, London, UK, pp: 5-355.
  • Ssenyonga GSZ, 1982. Efficacy of fenbendazole against helminth parasites of poultry in Uganda. Trop Anim Health Pro, 14, 163-166.
  • Tanveer MK, Kamran A, Abbas M, Umer NC, Azhar MA, Munir M, 2011. Prevalence and chemo-therapeutical investigations of gastrointestinal nematodes in domestic pigeons in Lahore, Pakistan. Trop Biomed, 28, 102-110.
  • Theinpont D, Rochette F, Vanparijs OFJ, 1979. Diagnosing helminthiasis through coprological examination. Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium.
  • Tucker CA, Yazwinski TA, Reynolds L, Johnson Z, Keating M, 2007. Determination of the anthelmintic efficacy of albendazole in the treatment of chickens naturally infected with gastrointestinal helminths. J Appl Poult Res, 16, 392-396.
  • Tudor DC, 1962. A review of piperazine and piperazine compounds as poultry ascaracides. Avian Dis, 6, 493-499.
  • Ziela M, 1999. A comparative study of gastrointestinal nematode infections in traditional and commercial chickens and effects of anthelminthic treatment on production. MS thesis, University of Zambia.

Efficacy of anthelmintics against nematodes in naturally infected free range ducks

Year 2012, Volume: 28 Issue: 4, 229 - 232, 01.12.2012

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of
four anthelmintics (piperazine citrate, albendazole, fenbendazole,
ivermectin) against nematodes of free range ducks.
Twenty free-range ducks were selected from different farmer’s
house by fecal examination which was infected with
three species of helminths. Ducks were divided into four
treatment groups with five replications. Eggs per gram of
faeces (epg) were calculated on pre-treatment and on day
7th, 14th, 21st and 30th post-treatment. All the anthelmintics
showed 100% efficacy up to 14 days against all helminths
except Amidostomum sp. Fenbendazole showed 100% efficacy
against all nematodes except 67% against Capillaria sp.
up to 21 days. Ivermectin showed 100% efficacy against all
the helminths up to 21 days. Ducks treated with piperazine
citrate, fenbendazole and ivermectin got the maximum protection
against infection with Capillaria sp. In conclusion,
it might be stated that piperazine citrate and ivermectin
showed better efficacy than albendazole and fenbendazole.

References

  • Ahmed S, 1969. Survey on type of helminths commonly found in country ducks. Pak J Vet Sci, 3, 110-112.
  • Anisuzzaman, Alim MA, Rahman MH, Mondal MMH, 2005. Helminth parasites in indigenous ducks: Seasonal dynamics and effects on production performance. J Bangladesh Agrill Univ, 3, 283-290.
  • Anisuzzaman, Farjan T, Alim MA, Khan MAHNA, Mondal MMH, 2006. Amidostomiasis in indigenous ducks of Bangladesh: Prevalence and pathology. Bangladesh Vet J, 40, 1-9.
  • Anonym 2007. Statistical pocket book of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (Statistics division), Ministry of Planning. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
  • Farjana T, Alim MA, Das PM, Mondal MMH, 2004. Helminth infection in ducks at free range and semi intensive farming in two districts of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Vet J, 38, 125-134.
  • Ibarra-Velarde F, Guerrero-Molina C, Vera-Montenegro Y, Alcala-Canto Y, Romero-Callejas E, 2011. Comparison of the anthelmintic efficacy of three commercial products against ascarids and capillaria spp. in fighting cocks. J Pharm Pharmacol, 2, 146-150.
  • Kates KC, Colglazier ML, Enzie FD, 1969. Comparative efficacy of levo-tetramisole, parbendazole, and piperazine citrate against some common helminths of turkeys. Trans Amer Microsc Soc, 88, 142-148.
  • Katkov MV, 1963. Piperazine in amidostomiasis of geese. Veterinariya, 40, 24.
  • Khayatnouri MH, Garedaghi Y, Arbati AR, Khalili H, 2011. The Effect of ivermectin pour-on administration against natural Heterakis gallinarum infestation and its prevalence in native poultry. Am J Anim Vet Sci, 6, 55-58.
  • Kirsch R, 1984. Treatment of nematodiasis in poultry and game birds with fenbendazole. Avian Dis, 28, 311-318.
  • Morishita TY, Schaul JC, 2008. Parasites of birds, in: Flynn’s Parasites of Laboratory Animals, Ed; Baker DG, Second Edition, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp: 219296.
  • Rabbi AKMA, Islam A, Majumder S, Anisuzzaman, Rahman MH, 2006. Gastrointestinal helminths infection in different types of poultry. Bangl J Vet Med, 4, 13-18.
  • Soulsby EJL, 1982. Helminths, Arthropods and Protoza of Domesticated Animals, Seventh edition, Bailliere Tindall, London, UK, pp: 5-355.
  • Ssenyonga GSZ, 1982. Efficacy of fenbendazole against helminth parasites of poultry in Uganda. Trop Anim Health Pro, 14, 163-166.
  • Tanveer MK, Kamran A, Abbas M, Umer NC, Azhar MA, Munir M, 2011. Prevalence and chemo-therapeutical investigations of gastrointestinal nematodes in domestic pigeons in Lahore, Pakistan. Trop Biomed, 28, 102-110.
  • Theinpont D, Rochette F, Vanparijs OFJ, 1979. Diagnosing helminthiasis through coprological examination. Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium.
  • Tucker CA, Yazwinski TA, Reynolds L, Johnson Z, Keating M, 2007. Determination of the anthelmintic efficacy of albendazole in the treatment of chickens naturally infected with gastrointestinal helminths. J Appl Poult Res, 16, 392-396.
  • Tudor DC, 1962. A review of piperazine and piperazine compounds as poultry ascaracides. Avian Dis, 6, 493-499.
  • Ziela M, 1999. A comparative study of gastrointestinal nematode infections in traditional and commercial chickens and effects of anthelminthic treatment on production. MS thesis, University of Zambia.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA69HY37NR
Journal Section Short Communication
Authors

Ausraful Islam This is me

- Anisuzzaman This is me

Shankar Majumder This is me

Mohammad Atiqul Islam This is me

Abul Kalam Mohammad Arifur Rabbi This is me

Mohammad Hafezur Rahman This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2012 Volume: 28 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Islam, A., Anisuzzaman, .-., Majumder, S., Islam, M. A., et al. (2012). Efficacy of anthelmintics against nematodes in naturally infected free range ducks. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 28(4), 229-232.
AMA Islam A, Anisuzzaman, Majumder S, Islam MA, Rabbi AKMA, Rahman MH. Efficacy of anthelmintics against nematodes in naturally infected free range ducks. Eurasian J Vet Sci. December 2012;28(4):229-232.
Chicago Islam, Ausraful, - Anisuzzaman, Shankar Majumder, Mohammad Atiqul Islam, Abul Kalam Mohammad Arifur Rabbi, and Mohammad Hafezur Rahman. “Efficacy of Anthelmintics Against Nematodes in Naturally Infected Free Range Ducks”. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 28, no. 4 (December 2012): 229-32.
EndNote Islam A, Anisuzzaman -, Majumder S, Islam MA, Rabbi AKMA, Rahman MH (December 1, 2012) Efficacy of anthelmintics against nematodes in naturally infected free range ducks. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 28 4 229–232.
IEEE A. Islam, .-. Anisuzzaman, S. Majumder, M. A. Islam, A. K. M. A. Rabbi, and M. H. Rahman, “Efficacy of anthelmintics against nematodes in naturally infected free range ducks”, Eurasian J Vet Sci, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 229–232, 2012.
ISNAD Islam, Ausraful et al. “Efficacy of Anthelmintics Against Nematodes in Naturally Infected Free Range Ducks”. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences 28/4 (December 2012), 229-232.
JAMA Islam A, Anisuzzaman -, Majumder S, Islam MA, Rabbi AKMA, Rahman MH. Efficacy of anthelmintics against nematodes in naturally infected free range ducks. Eurasian J Vet Sci. 2012;28:229–232.
MLA Islam, Ausraful et al. “Efficacy of Anthelmintics Against Nematodes in Naturally Infected Free Range Ducks”. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, vol. 28, no. 4, 2012, pp. 229-32.
Vancouver Islam A, Anisuzzaman -, Majumder S, Islam MA, Rabbi AKMA, Rahman MH. Efficacy of anthelmintics against nematodes in naturally infected free range ducks. Eurasian J Vet Sci. 2012;28(4):229-32.