Research Article

Corneal topographic and aberrometric changes in patients with acquired blepharoptosis after levator resection surgery

Volume: 11 Number: 1 January 4, 2025
EN

Corneal topographic and aberrometric changes in patients with acquired blepharoptosis after levator resection surgery

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate changes in corneal topography and aberrometry in patients with acquired blepharoptosis after levator resection surgery.

Methods: This prospective, interventional study evaluated 30 eyelids of 19 patients who underwent levator resection surgery for acquired blepharoptosis with fair and good levator function (LF). Patients underwent corneal topography before and 3 months after surgery.

Results: Eleven patients had bilateral, and 8 patients had unilateral surgery. There were significant decreases in steep keratometry (K2) (preoperative: 46.21±5.02, postoperative: 44.58±2.11, P=0.046) and corneal astigmatism (preoperative: 2.98±0.61, postoperative: 1.59±1.50, P=0.034). There were no statistically significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative values of flat keratometry (K1) (P=0.585), mean keratometry (Kmean) (P=0.122), axis of corneal astigmatism (P=0.548), central corneal thickness (P=0.350), anterior chamber depth (P=0.747) and anterior chamber volume (P=0.679). The root mean square (RMS)-higher order aberrations (HOA) (P<0.001), RMS-Coma (Z₃¹) (P<0.001), and RMS-Trefoil (Z₃³) (P=0.005) decreased significantly. Preoperative and postoperative values of the seconder astigmatism (P=0.345), RMS-spherical aberration (Z₄⁰) (P=0.255), and RMS-Quadrafoil (Z₄⁴) values were found similar.

Conclusions: Levator resection for acquired blepharoptosis can improve the topography and aberrometry measurements of the cornea 3 months after surgery.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Written consent was obtained from the patients. Ethics committee approval (number: 2011-KAEK-25 2023/05-14) was obtained from the Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital’s local ethics committee.

References

  1. 1. Yadegari S. Approach to a patient with blepharoptosis. Neurol Sci. 2016;37(10):1589-1596. doi: 10.1007/s10072-016-2633-7.
  2. 2. Díaz-Manera J, Luna S, Roig C. Ocular ptosis: differential diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31(5):618-627. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000600.
  3. 3. Sridharan GV, Tallis RC, Leatherbarrow B, Forman WM. A community survey of ptosis of the eyelid and pupil size of elderly people. Age Ageing. 1995;24(1):21-24. doi: 10.1093/ageing/24.1.21.
  4. 4. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Emamian MH, et al. The prevalence of ptosis in an Iranian adult population. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016;28(3):142-145. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2016.04.005.
  5. 5. Kim MH, Cho J, Zhao D, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of blepharoptosis in Korean adult population: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(6):940-946. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.43.
  6. 6. Richards HS, Jenkinson E, Rumsey N, et al. The psychological well-being and appearance concerns of patients presenting with ptosis. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(3):296-302. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.264.
  7. 7. Fowler BT, Pegram TA, Cutler-Peck C, et al. Contrast sensitivity testing in functional ptosis and dermatochalasis surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;31(4):272-274. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000307.
  8. 8. Cahill KV, Bradley EA, Meyer DR, et al. Functional indication for upper eyelid ptosis and blepharoplasty surgery: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(12):2510-2517. doi: 10.1016/j. ophtha.2011.09.029.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Ophthalmology

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

December 30, 2024

Publication Date

January 4, 2025

Submission Date

December 4, 2024

Acceptance Date

December 26, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 11 Number: 1

AMA
1.Sariyeva Ismayilov A, Doğanay D, Yelkovan M. Corneal topographic and aberrometric changes in patients with acquired blepharoptosis after levator resection surgery. Eur Res J. 2025;11(1):98-104. doi:10.18621/eurj.1596476