Developmental screening of healthy children between 6-24 months
Abstract
Objectives. Developmental screening of healthy children from early childhood provides to identify high-risk children, early diagnose of developmental delay, better prognosis, correspond direction of family and treatment efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the developmental stages for healthy children referring to the pediatric clinic for early childhood check-ups. Methods. The development of 328 children was evaluated. It is found that; awareness skills of infants with siblings were better than those without siblings. The infants attended to by caregivers had limited word usage compared with those cared for by mothers and relatives. The developmental stages were evaluated by using Social-Communication Area Screening Test for Infants (SCASI). Results. The developmental stages of infants whose mothers were graduated from university were better than the other infants in terms of awareness skills. In addition, social content skills in terms of communication levels and total points were better in infants cared for by mothers and relatives than the others, and it appears that those cared for by relatives were better compared to those only looked after by mothers. Our study indicated that according to SCASI scores, 6.1% of infants were in the risk group. Conclusions. During the first years, regular check-ups and recording of the development are very important in terms of ensuring that there is early intervention in the case of any delay in development stages. Screening tests that can be used easily, regularly repeatable, including observation of parents and having short evaluation process should be extended.
Keywords
References
- [1] Schweinhart LJ, Montie J, Xiang Z, Barnett WS, Belfield CR, Nores M. Lifetime effects: the High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 40. Ypsilanti, MI: HighScope Press; 2005.
- [2] Shonkoff JP, Marshall PC. The biology of developmental vulnerability. In: Shonkoff JP, Meisels SJ, eds. Handbook of early childhood intervention. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2000:35-53.
- [3] Shonkoff JP. From neurons to neighborhoods: old and new challenges for developmental and behavioral pediatrics. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2003;24:70-6.
- [4] de Graaf-Peters VB, Hadders-Algra M. Ontogeny of the human central nervous system: what is happening when? Early Hum Dev 2006;82:257-66.
- [5] Sonnander K, Claesson M. Predictors of developmental delay at 18 months and later school achievement problems. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999;41:195-202.
- [6] Rydz MI, Shevell A, Majnemer A, Oskoui M. Developmental screening. J Child Neurol 2005;20:4-21.
- [7] Öztürk Ertem İ. İlk üç yaşta gelişimsel sorunları olan çocuklar: üç sorun ve üç çözüm. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi 2005;6:13-25.
- [8] Glascoe FP, Robertshaw NS. Five reasons to screen well for developmental and behavioral problems: an explanation of why developmental and behavioral assessments are important components in pediatric practice. Contemp Pediatr 2007;24:72-5.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Esra Yurumez Solmaz
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ufuk University School of Medicine, Ankara
Türkiye
Ulku Ayberk
This is me
Pediatrician, Private Practise, Ankara
Türkiye
Publication Date
November 4, 2017
Submission Date
April 7, 2017
Acceptance Date
May 5, 2017
Published in Issue
Year 2017 Volume: 3 Number: 3