Objectives:
The aim of this study was to assess whether ultrasound-guided (US-guided)
percutaneous drainage of breast abscesses could be used as an alternative to
surgery.
Methods: We performed a retrospective study.
Twenty patients were included in the study who were diagnosed as having a
non-specific breast abscess. Eleven patients underwent surgery whereas nine
patients were treated with US-guided drainage. Ultrasonographic findings,
results of treatment and follow-up were evaluated between the two groups.
Results: In the US-guided drainage group, 5
patients were treated with needle aspiration and 4 were treated with catheter
drainage. All cases within the needle aspiration group totally recovered.
However, one case within the catheter drainage group failed. The total success
rate of US-guided drainage was 88.8%. The median follow-up period was 21.0 days
in the US-guided drainage group and 45.0 days in the surgical drainage group.
There were no statistically significant differences in terms of recovery (p = 0.450) and follow-up periods (p = 0.112) between the surgical drainage
and US-guided drainage groups.
Conclusions: US-guided percutaneous drainage may
be preferred as a first method of choice in treatment of a breast abscess. The
most appropriate approach to breast abscess treatment will be possible with a
multidisciplinary approach of surgery and radiology.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Surgery, Radiology and Organ Imaging |
Journal Section | Original Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | September 4, 2019 |
Submission Date | May 5, 2018 |
Acceptance Date | April 30, 2019 |
Published in Issue | Year 2019 |