Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, , 67 - 72, 04.01.2020
https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.451391

Abstract

References

  • 1. Zimmerman JE, Alzola C, Von Rueden KT. The use of benchmarking to identify top performing critical care units: a preliminary assessment of their policies and practices. J Crit Care 2003;18:76-86.
  • 2. Orsini J, Butala A, Salomon S, Studer S, Gadhia S, Shamian B, et al. Prognostic factors associated with adverse outcome among critically ill elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015;15:889-94.
  • 3. Talib S, Sharif F, Manzoor S, Yaqub S, Kashif W. Charlson comorbidity index for prediction of outcome of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Iran J Kidney Dis 2017;11:115-23.
  • 4. Burch JB, Augustine AD, Frieden LA, Hadley E, Howcroft TK, Johnson R, et al. Advances in geroscience: impact on healthspan and chronic disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69 Suppl 1:S1-3.
  • 5. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83.
  • 6. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:676-82.
  • 7. Núñez JE, Núñez E, Fácila L, Bertomeu V, Llàcer A, Bodí V, et al. [Prognostic value of Charlson comorbidity index at 30 days and 1 year after acu]te myocardial infarction]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2004;57:842-9. [Article in Spanish]
  • 8. Tripathy S, Mishra JC, Dash SC. Critically ill elderly patients in a developing world--mortality and functional outcome at 1 year: a prospective single-center study. J Crit Care 2014;29:474.e7-13.
  • 9. Pisani MA. Considerations in caring for the critically ill older patient. J Intens Care Med 2009;24:83-95.
  • 10. Falsetti L, Viticchi G, Tarquinio N, Silvestrini M, Capeci W, Catozzo V, et al. Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of in-hospital death in acute ischemic stroke among very old patients: a single-cohort perspective study. Neurol Sci 2016;37:1443-8.
  • 11. Chelluri L, Pinsky MR, Donahoe MP, Grenvik A. Long-term outcome of critically ill elderly patients requiring intensive care. JAMA 1993;269:3119-23.
  • 12. Zekry D, Loures Valle BH, Lardi C, Graf C, Michel JP, Gold G, et al. Geriatrics index of comorbidity was the most accurate predictor of death in geriatric hospital among six comorbidity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1036-44.
  • 13. Buntinx F, Niclaes L, Suetens C, Jans B, Mertens R, Van den Akker M. Evaluation of Charlson's comorbidity index in elderly living in nursing homes. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:1144-7.
  • 14. Quach S, Hennessy DA, Faris P, Fong A, Quan H, Doig C. A comparison between the APACHE II and Charlson Index Score for predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:129.
  • 15. Poses RM, McClish DK, Smith WR, Bekes C, Scott WE. Prediction of survival of critically ill patients by admission comorbidity. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:743-7.

The prognostic role of Charlson comorbidity index for critically ill elderly patients

Year 2020, , 67 - 72, 04.01.2020
https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.451391

Abstract

Objectives:
Comorbidities
represent a risk factor for adverse events in several critical illnesses. The
aim of this study was to identify the relationship between the Charlson
Comorbidity Index (CCI) with mortality and length of stay (LOS) in critically
ill elderly patients.

Methods: A
retrospective analysis was made of patients admitted to our tertiary adult
intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2015 and January 2016. The impact of
comorbidity was evaluated with the CCI. Other required data were retrieved from
the patients' follow-up records.

Results: The
study included a total of 251 patients. The mean age was
78.79 ± 6.70 years. The total
mortality rate was 41.0%. The most common cause for admission was sepsis and
acute respiratory failure (18.3% vs 18.3%). The median APACHE II score was
significantly higher in non-survivors than survivors (31.0 [13.0-47.0] vs 21.0
[9.0-40.0];
p < 0.01). The median
CCI was 2.0 (0.0-7.0) for survivors and 3.0 (1.0-10.0) for non-survivors. The
CCI of non-survivors was significantly higher than that of survivors (
p = 0.005). Patients with CCI > 3 had
higher mortality than those with CCI
3
(
p < 0.05). The odds ratio of the
APACHE II score for mortality was 1.214 (95% CI: 1.154-1.276), and for CCI it
was
1.320
(95% CI: 1.088-1.602). There was a significant positive correlation between CCI
and LOS
(r=0.147; p = 0.020).







Conclusions: CCI
is strongly associated with both mortality and LOS. It can be used as a
prognostic marker for elderly patients in critical care. 

References

  • 1. Zimmerman JE, Alzola C, Von Rueden KT. The use of benchmarking to identify top performing critical care units: a preliminary assessment of their policies and practices. J Crit Care 2003;18:76-86.
  • 2. Orsini J, Butala A, Salomon S, Studer S, Gadhia S, Shamian B, et al. Prognostic factors associated with adverse outcome among critically ill elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015;15:889-94.
  • 3. Talib S, Sharif F, Manzoor S, Yaqub S, Kashif W. Charlson comorbidity index for prediction of outcome of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Iran J Kidney Dis 2017;11:115-23.
  • 4. Burch JB, Augustine AD, Frieden LA, Hadley E, Howcroft TK, Johnson R, et al. Advances in geroscience: impact on healthspan and chronic disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69 Suppl 1:S1-3.
  • 5. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83.
  • 6. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:676-82.
  • 7. Núñez JE, Núñez E, Fácila L, Bertomeu V, Llàcer A, Bodí V, et al. [Prognostic value of Charlson comorbidity index at 30 days and 1 year after acu]te myocardial infarction]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2004;57:842-9. [Article in Spanish]
  • 8. Tripathy S, Mishra JC, Dash SC. Critically ill elderly patients in a developing world--mortality and functional outcome at 1 year: a prospective single-center study. J Crit Care 2014;29:474.e7-13.
  • 9. Pisani MA. Considerations in caring for the critically ill older patient. J Intens Care Med 2009;24:83-95.
  • 10. Falsetti L, Viticchi G, Tarquinio N, Silvestrini M, Capeci W, Catozzo V, et al. Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of in-hospital death in acute ischemic stroke among very old patients: a single-cohort perspective study. Neurol Sci 2016;37:1443-8.
  • 11. Chelluri L, Pinsky MR, Donahoe MP, Grenvik A. Long-term outcome of critically ill elderly patients requiring intensive care. JAMA 1993;269:3119-23.
  • 12. Zekry D, Loures Valle BH, Lardi C, Graf C, Michel JP, Gold G, et al. Geriatrics index of comorbidity was the most accurate predictor of death in geriatric hospital among six comorbidity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1036-44.
  • 13. Buntinx F, Niclaes L, Suetens C, Jans B, Mertens R, Van den Akker M. Evaluation of Charlson's comorbidity index in elderly living in nursing homes. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:1144-7.
  • 14. Quach S, Hennessy DA, Faris P, Fong A, Quan H, Doig C. A comparison between the APACHE II and Charlson Index Score for predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:129.
  • 15. Poses RM, McClish DK, Smith WR, Bekes C, Scott WE. Prediction of survival of critically ill patients by admission comorbidity. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:743-7.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Haematology, ​Internal Diseases
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Abdulkerim Yıldız 0000-0002-9596-4042

Ali Yiğt This is me 0000-0002-7828-9698

Ali Ramazan Benli 0000-0003-0039-1497

Publication Date January 4, 2020
Submission Date August 6, 2018
Acceptance Date April 30, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

AMA Yıldız A, Yiğt A, Benli AR. The prognostic role of Charlson comorbidity index for critically ill elderly patients. Eur Res J. January 2020;6(1):67-72. doi:10.18621/eurj.451391

Cited By








e-ISSN: 2149-3189 


The European Research Journal, hosted by Turkish JournalPark ACADEMIC, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

by-nc-nd.png

2024