The outcomes of external dacryocystorhinostomy with bicanalicular silicone knot started in the lacrimal sac without suturing posterior flap

Year 2021, , 88 - 92, 04.01.2021

Selim Genç , Taha Ayyıldız , Osman Şalkacı , İbrahim Ali Hassan , İbrahim Abdi Keinan , Hanefi Çakır

https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.804723

Abstract

Objectives: During external dacryocystorhinostomy (DSR) - Bicanalicular silicone tube implantation (BSTI), it is aimed to utilize the mechanical pressure effect due to the initiation of silicone knotting inside the lacrimal sac and evaluate the effectiveness of this modified technique in which the sac and nasal mucosa posterior flaps are not sutured.

Methods: Sixty-six patients between the ages of 8-57 years who were admitted to Kartal Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital and Somalia Mogadishu Recep Tayyip Erdogan Training and Research Hospital Eye Diseases outpatient clinic with irrigation and lacrimal secretion complaints between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 were included in the study. In these patients with lacrimal stenosis, external dacryocystorhinostomy (DSR) and Bicanalicular silicone tube implantation surgery method were applied.

Results: A total of 66 patients, 3 males (4.5%) and 63 females (95.5%), were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 45 (8-57) years. It was determined that 4 of the patients who were followed up for an average of 16 months developed atrophic mucosa due to chronic rhinitis, and 6 developed nasolacrimal ductus obstruction due to excessive wound healing due to young age.

Conclusions: When the comfort and complications it provides are evaluated together, this technique emerges as a preferred method.

Keywords

External Dacryocystorhinostomy, Bicanalicular Silicone Knot, Posterior Flap

References

• 1. Çoban DT, Beden U, Sönmez B, Erkan D. [Outcomes of external dacryocystorhinostomy and effects of the incision type on cosmetic and functional outcomes]. J Clin Anal Med 2011;2:21-4. [Article in Turkish]
• 2. Yang JW, Oh HN. Success rate and complications of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with unciformectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;250:1509-13.
• 3. Eroğul Ö, Eroğul LE, Doğan M, Polat O, Buyruk A. Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and transcanalicular multidiod laser dacryocystorhinostomy results in patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Acta Medica Alanya 2017;1:67-71.
• 4. Lee MJ, Khwarg SI, Kim IH, Choi JH, Choi Y, Kim N, et al. Surgical outcomes of external dacryocystorhinostomy and risk factors for functional failure: a 10-year experience. Eye (Lond.) 2017;31:691-7.
• 5. El Sawy AM, Hamdi MM, Elwan SS, Abdalla TM. Study of the effect of different designs of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps on the success rate of external dacryocystorhinostomy. J Egypt Ophthalmol Soc 2017;110:14-21.
• 6. Katuwal S, Aujla JS, Limbu B, Saiju R, Ruit S. External dacryocystorhinostomy: do we really need to repair the posterior flap? Orbit 2013;32:102-6.
• 7. Sharma HR, Sharma AK, Sharma R. Modified external dacryocystorhinostomy in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:NC01-5.
• 8. Leong SC, MacEwen CJ, White PS. A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010;24:81-90.
• 9. Karakurt A, Sarıcaoğlu MS, Baysan A, Bulut AK, Kaçarlar İY, Duru Z, et al. [Surgical success in single flap external dacryocystorhinostomy]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol 2016;25:42-5. [Article in Turkish]
• 10. Kazancı B, Erşan İ, Özek D, Gencer B. [External dacryocystorhinostomy: single flap or double flaps anastomosis]. Dicle Med J 2013;40:601-4. [Article in Turkish]
• 11. Elwan S. A randomized study comparing DCR with and without excision of the posterior mucosal flap. Orbit 2003;22:7-13.
• 12. Baldeschi L, Nardi M, Hintschich CR, Koornneef L. Anterior suspended flaps: a modified approach for external dacryocystorhinostomy. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:790-2.
• 13. Baldeschi L, MacAndie K, Hintschich CR. The length of unsutured mucosal margins in external dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:840-4.
• 14. Becker BB. Dacryocystorhinostomy without flaps. Ophthalmic Surg 1988;19:419-27.
• 15. Köksal M, Ünal M. Eksternal lakrimal cerrahide silikon tüp endikasyonları. MN Oftalmoloji 1999, 2:151-5.
• 16. Rosen N, Shark M, Moverman DC, Rosner M. Dacryocystorhinostomy with silicone tubes: evaluation of 253 cases. Ophthalmic Surg 1989;20:115-9.
• 17. Sodhi PK, Pandey RM, Malik KPS. Experience with bicanalicular intubation of the lacrimal drainage apparatus combined with conventional external dacryocystorhinostomy. J CranioMaxillofac Surg 2003;31:187-90.
• 18. Doğan H, Erkılıç K, Mirza GE. [The evaluation of postoperative results of different dacryocystorhinostomy methods]. Erciyes Med J 1995;17:239-45. [Article in Turkish]
• 19. Pokharel SM, Chaudhary SK, Chaurasiya BD. Factors affecting the success rate of external dacryocystorhinostomy at BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. Birat J Health Sci 2017;2:196-200.
• 20. Yazgan S, Çelik T, Koç H, Doğan M. [Effectiveness of transcanalicular diode laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy in cases with failure after at least two external dacryocystorhinostomy: two-year results]. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol 2017;26:175-80. [Article in Turkish]