The relationship between the attachment styles of the adults with and without depression and the parenting attitudes of their parents

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 6, 553 - 560, 04.11.2020

Büşra Sümeyye Bıyık Cengiz Akkaya

https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.537638

Abstract

Objectives:
In this study, it is aimed to determine the relationship between
attachment styles of adults with and without depression and child rearing
attitudes of their parents.

Methods: One hundred eighteen patients
who are admitted to outpatient clinic of Department
of Psychiatry of the Uludağ University School of Medicine, who are diagnosed
with depression according to DSMIV-R and DSM V and put on regular medication,
and 130 healthy individuals of similar demographic characteristics without any
psychopathologic diagnostic, are included in this study. Within the scope of this research "Experiences in
Close Relationships Inventory-II", "Child-Rearing Attitudes
Scale", "Beck Depression Inventory" and Sociodemographic Information Form were used.

Results: It is found that there is a
significant difference between the attachment styles of the individuals with
and without depression and their parents' attitudes towards child rearing. Maternal and paternal acceptance / interest scores of
the patient group were lower than those of the healthy group, and the parents'
supervision / control scores were higher. The anxiety and avoidance attachment scores of the
married individuals of the patient group are higher than the scores of married
individuals of the healthy group.

Conclusions: High anxiety and avoidance
related to attachment and controlling parental attitudes were found to be risk
factors for depression. 

Keywords

Attachment styles, parent child rearing attitudes, depression

References

• 1. Yahşi G, Bayraktar S. [The effect of birth order on attachment style according to attachment theory]. Int J Soc Sci Edu Res 2016;2:256-67. [Article in Turkish]
• 2. Özeren GS, Akın S. [Styles of attachment to parents and evaluation of interpersonal relations]. İstanbul Bilim Üniversitesi Florence Nightingale Tıp Dergisi 2016;2:222-32.[Article in Turkish]
• 3. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: Vol 1, Attachment. New York Basic Books; 1969: pp. 233-67.
• 4. Main M, Weston DR. Avoidance of the attachmnet figure in infancy: Descrıptıons and interpretations. In: Parker CM, Hinde JS, eds. The place of attachment in human behavior. London and New York: Tavistock Publications Ltd., 1982: pp. 31-59.
• 5. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: Vol 3, Sadness and Depression. New York Basic Books; 1980: pp. 281-7.
• 6. Hazan C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52:511-24.
• 7. Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991;61:226-44.
• 8. Sümer N, Güngör D. [Psychometric evaluation of Adult attachment measures on Turkish samples and a cross-cultural comparison]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 1999;14:71-106. [Article in Turkish]
• 9. Kesebir S, Kavzoğlu SÖ, Üstündağ MF. [Attachment and psychopathology]. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar 2011;3:321-42. [Article in Turkish]
• 10. Çalışır M. [The relationship of adult attachment theory and affect regulation strategies to depression]. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar 2009;1:240-55. [Article in Turkish]
• 11. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. Attachment patterns in adulthood: structure, dynamics and change. New York: Guilford Press, 2007.
• 12. Selçuk E, Günaydın G, Sümer N, Uysal A. [A new scale developed to measure adult attachment dimensions: experiences in close relationships-revised (ECR-R) - Psychometric evaluation in a Turkish sample]. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 2005;8:1-11. [Article in Turkish]
• 13. Sümer N, Güngör D. [The impact of perceived parenting styles on attachment styles, self –evaluations and close relationships]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 1999;14:35-58. [Article in Turkish]
• 14. Hisli N. [A study on the validity of Beck Depression Inventory]. Psikoloji Dergisi 1988;6:118-21. [Article in Turkish]
• 15. Wohlfarth T. Socioeconomic inequality and psychopathology: are socioeconomic status and social class interchangeable. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:399-410.
• 16. Öztürk MO. [Mental health and disorders]. Ankara: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi, 2002: pp.566-70. [Book in Turkish].
• 17. Bifulco A, Kwon J, Jacobs C, Moran PM, Bunn A, Beer N. Adult attachment style as mediator between childhood neglect/abuse and adult depression and anxiety. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2006;41:796-805.