Year 2021, Volume 7 , Issue 2, Pages 116 - 126 2021-03-04

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the level of knowledge and perception of the Turkish society about the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This cross-sectional study whose sampling consists of 903 adults.

Results: About half (49.6%) of the participants' information sources about COVID-19 composed of printed and visual media tools such as television, radio, newspaper, etc. 57.5% of the participants stated that their self-knowledge levels about COVID-19 were at a good level, whereas 19.7% of them at a very good level. 64.4% of the participants stated that their health would be seriously damaged if they get this virus; 58.9% of them thinks that this virus will severely damage their place of the resident; 50.9% of them stated that they trust that this crisis will be handled effectively by the health authorities of Turkey. Participants rated themselves an average of 8.7 points on compliance with COVID-19 measures. It was found that the participants had a 55% confidence in the Coronavirus Scientific Advisory Board (Turkey) and the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding COVID-19.

Conclusions: Like all over the world, health authorities also in Turkey have taken several measures in the context of fighting against the pandemic and they expect society to comply with these measures. The fact that individuals in the society fulfill their individual responsibilities by confirming the accuracy of the information took place in printed/visual and social media from reliable sources is an important factor in reducing the effects of infectious diseases.

COVID-19, coronavirus, pandemic, public health, perception
  • 1. World Health Organization. COVID-19 situation reports. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/. Accessed May 18, 2020.
  • 2. Van Bavel JJ, Baicker K, Boggio PS, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M, et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav 2020;4:460-71.
  • 3. Motta Zanin G, Gentile E, Parisi A, Spasiano D. A preliminary evaluation of the public risk perception related to the COVID-19 health emergency in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:3024.
  • 4. Roy D, Tripathy S, Kar SK, Sharma N, Verma SK, Kaushal V. Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J Psychiatr 2020;51:102083.
  • 5. Hekler EB, Lambert J, Leventhal E, Leventhal H, Jahn E, Contrada RJ. Commonsense illness beliefs, adherence behaviors, and hypertension control among African Americans. J Behav Med 2008;31:391-400.
  • 6. Faasse K, Newby JM. Public perceptions of COVID-19 in Australia: perceived risk, knowledge, health-protective behaviours, and vaccine intentions. medRxiv 2020:20079996.
  • 7. Oh S-H, Lee SY, Han C. The effects of social media use on preventive behaviors during infectious disease outbreaks: the mediating role of self-relevant emotions and public risk perception. Health Commun 2020 Feb 16;1-10.
  • 8. Özdinç Ö. [The sentiments of Çukurova University students on sports and the sports participation – socialization relationship]. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilim Derg 2005;3:77-84. [Article in Turkish]
  • 9. McFadden SAM, Malik AA, Aguolu OG, Willebrand KS, Omer SB. Perceptions of the adult US population regarding the novel coronavirus outbreak. PLoS One 2020;15:e0231808.
  • 10. Oh S-H, Paek H-J, Hove T. Cognitive and emotional dimensions of perceived risk characteristics, genre-specific media effects, and risk perceptions: the case of H1N1 influenza in South Korea. Asian J Commun 2015;25:14-32.
  • 11. Vadivu S, Annamuthu P. An awareness and perception of COVID-19 among general public-a cross sectional analysis. Int J Mod Trends Sci Technol 2020;6:49-53.
  • 12. Elamin F, Nour MO, Babilghith AO, Natto HA, Al-Amin FO, Alawneh SM. Knowledge, attitude and practices of healthcare providers towards MERS-CoV infection at Makkah hospitals, KSA. Int Res J Med Med Sc 2020;3:103-12.
  • 13. Kırık AM, Özkoçak V. [Social media and new coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemia in the context of the new world order]. J Soc Sci 2020;7:133-54. [Article in Turkish]
  • 14. Depoux A, Martin S, Karafillakis E, Preet R, Wilder-Smith A, Larson H. The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak. J Travel Med 2020:3;27:taaa031.
  • 15. Lai CC, Shih TP, Ko WC, Tang HJ, Hsueh PR. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): the epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020,55:105924.
  • 16. Sahin AR, Erdogan A, Agaoglu PM, Dineri Y, Cakirci AY, Senel ME, et al. 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: a review of the current literature. Eurasian J Med Oncol 2020;4:1-7.
  • 17. Taghrir MH, Borazjani R, Shiraly R. Covid-19 and Iranian medical students; A survey on their related-knowledge, preventive behaviors and risk perception. Arch Iran Med 2020;23:249-54.
  • 18. World Health Organization. Myth busters. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/myth-busters?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIxOuG8vO96QIVE8ayCh15RgK_EAAYASACEgKzofD_BwE. Accessed May 18, 2020.
  • 19. Hou Z, Du F, Jiang H, Zhou X, Lin L. Assessment of public attention, risk perception, emotional and behavioural responses to the COVID-19 outbreak: social media surveillance in China. Hyg Trop Med 2020:20035956.
  • 20. Kwok KO, Li KK, Chan HHH, Yi YY, Tang A, Wei WI, et al. Community responses during early phase of Covid-19 epidemic, Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis 2020;26:1575-9.
  • 21. Aker S, Mıdık Ö. The views of medical faculty students in Turkey concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. J Community Health 2020;45:684-8.
  • 22. Gerhold L. Covid-19: risk perception and coping strategies. PsyArXiv Prepr 2020;1-11.
  • 23. Bostan S, Erdem R, Öztürk YE, Kılıç T, Yılmaz A. The effect of Covid-19 pandemic on the Turkish society. Electron J Gen Med 2020;17:em237.
  • 24.Simione L, Gnagnarella C. Differences between health workers and general population in risk perception, behaviors, and psychological distress related to COVID-19 spread in Italy. PsyArXiv Prepr 2020.
  • 25. Worldometer. Turkey Coronavirus. Available at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/turkey/. Accessed May 18, 2020.
  • 26. Worldometer. Italy Coronavirus. Available at: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/. Accessed May 18, 2020.
Primary Language en
Subjects Health Care Sciences and Services
Journal Section Original Articles
Authors

Orcid: 0000-0002-1174-1184
Author: Haydar HOŞGÖR
Institution: Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Uşak University, Vocational School of Health Services, Uşak, Turkey
Country: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0003-4561-4025
Author: Zeynep AKÖZLÜ (Primary Author)
Institution: Department of Medical Services and Techniques, Maltepe University, Vocational School, İstanbul, Turkey
Country: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0002-1377-4617
Author: Derya GÜNDÜZ HOŞGÖR
Institution: Department of Nursing Management, Doctorate Program Student, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Institute of Graduate Studies, İstanbul, Turkey
Country: Turkey


Dates

Application Date : July 28, 2020
Acceptance Date : August 27, 2020
Publication Date : March 4, 2021

EndNote %0 The European Research Journal The perception concerning the COVID-19 pandemic: case of Turkey %A Haydar Hoşgör , Zeynep Aközlü , Derya Gündüz Hoşgör %T The perception concerning the COVID-19 pandemic: case of Turkey %D 2021 %J The European Research Journal %P -2149-3189 %V 7 %N 2 %R doi: 10.18621/eurj.774757 %U 10.18621/eurj.774757