Baseline characteristics of outpatients with heart failure according to phenotype: preliminary analysis from SMYRNA-HF registry

Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 266 - 274, 04.03.2022

Bihter Şentürk Ahmet Çelik Lütfü Bekar Umut Uyan Selcen yakar Tülüce Hakan Güneş Murat Kerkütlüoğlu Ali Çoner Barış Kılıçaslan Nurullah Çetin Ayşe Çolak Burak Açar İlker Gül Cihan Altın Yalçın Özkurt Makbule Kutlu Karadağ Ezgi Kalaycıoğlu Mesut Özkahya Tuba Ekin Nuryil Yilmaz Mehmet Birhan Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1049360

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Objectives: SMYRNA-HF study is a prospective multicenter registry study to determine the profiles of patients with heart failure (HF) in Turkey. This study aimed to present the baseline characteristics of preliminary cohort by comparing them according to different HF phenotypes.

Methods: The first SMYRNA-HF cohort included outpatients with HF from 9 centers. Patients were classified into three HF phenotypes as HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF), and preserved EF (HFpEF) as recommended by guidelines.

Results: Overall, 298 patients were included in this preliminary analysis that 57% of the patients were classified as having HFrEF, 33.3% as having HFpEF, and 9.7% as having HFmrEF. Female gender was more common in HFpEF (p = 0.003). Age, frequency of diabetes mellitus, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker, use of beta-blocker, use of daily loop diuretic, heart rate, blood urea nitrogen levels, lipid profiles, hemoglobin, white blood cell, platelet levels were similar among three HF phenotypes. Body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), frequency of hypertension (HT) (p < 0.001), and atrial fibrillation (AF) (p = 0.015) were higher in HFpEF. Ischemic etiology (p < 0.001) was less frequent in HFpEF. Use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist was higher in HFrEF (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our study presented the baseline characteristics of outpatients with HF in Turkey. There were significant differences among HF phenotypes in terms of gender, BMI, frequency of HT, AF, and ischemic etiology. Treatment implementations seem to follow the guidelines. Although the rates are low, new treatment approaches recommended in the most recent guidelines seem to enter clinical practice.

Keywords

Heart failure, registries, Turkey, phenotypes, outpatients, baseline characteristics

References

• 1. Ziaeian B, Fonarow GC. Epidemiology and aetiology of heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016;13:368-78.
• 2. Parén P, Schaufelberger M, Björck L, Lappas G, Fu M, Rosengren A. Trends in prevalence from 1990 to 2007 of patients hospitalized with heart failure in Sweden. Eur J Heart Fail 2014;16:737-42.
• 3. Schmidt M, Ulrichsen SP, Pedersen L, Bøtker HE, Sørensen HT. Thirty-year trends in heart failure hospitalization and mortality rates and the prognostic impact of co-morbidity: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18:490-9.
• 4. Tavazzi L, Senni M, Metra M, Gorini M, Cacciatore G, Chinaglia A, et al. Multicenter prospective observational study on acute and chronic heart failure: one-year follow-up results of IN-HF (Italian Network on Heart Failure) outcome registry. Circ Heart Fail 2013;6:473-81.
• 5. Ogah OS, Stewart S, Falase AO, Akinyemi JO, Adegbite GD, Alabi AA, et al. Short-term outcomes after hospital discharge in patients admitted with heart failure in Abeokuta, Nigeria: data from the Abeokuta Heart Failure Registry. Cardiovasc J Afr 2014;25:217-23.
• 6. Lee SE, Cho HJ, Lee HY, Yang HM, Choi JO, Jeon ES, et al. A multicentre cohort study of acute heart failure syndromes in Korea: rationale, design, and interim observations of the Korean Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2014;16:700-8.
• 7. Yancy CW, Lopatin M, Stevenson LW, De Marco T, Fonarow GC. Clinical presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved systolic function: a report from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) Database. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:76-84.
• 8. Fonarow GC, Stough WG, Abraham WT, Albert NM, Gheorghiade M, Greenberg BH, et al. Characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with preserved systolic function hospitalized for heart failure: a report from the OPTIMIZE-HF Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:768-77.
• 9. Lam CSP, Gamble GD, Ling LH, Sim D, Leong KTG, Yeo PSD, et al. Mortality associated with heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in a prospective international multi-ethnic cohort study. Eur Heart J 2018;39:1770-80.
• 10. Kebe B, Getachew M, Molla Y, Bahiru B, Dessie B. Management, survival, and predictors of mortality among hospitalized heart failure patients at Debre Markos comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: Prospective cohort study. SAGE Open Med 2021;9:20503121211057336.
• 11. Kristensen SL, Martinez F, Jhund PS, Arango JL, Bĕlohlávek J, Boytsov S, et al. Geographic variations in the PARADIGM-HF heart failure trial. Eur Heart J 2016;37:3167-74.
• 12. Dokainish H, Teo K, Zhu J, Roy A, AlHabib KF, ElSayed A, et al. Global mortality variations in patients with heart failure: results from the International Congestive Heart Failure (INTER-CHF) prospective cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5:e665-72.
• 13. Crespo-Leiro MG, Anker SD, Maggioni AP, Coats AJ, Filippatos G, Ruschitzka F, et al. European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Long-Term Registry (ESC-HF-LT): 1-year follow-up outcomes and differences across regions. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;18: 613-25.
• 14. Yılmaz MB, Çelik A, Çavuşoğlu Y, Bekar L, Onrat E, Eren M, et al. Snapshot evaluation of heart failure in Turkey: Baseline characteristics of SELFIE-TR. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2019;47:198-206.
• 15. Yılmaz MB, Aksakal E, Aksu U, Altay H, Nesligül Y, Çelik A, et al. Snapshot evaluation of acute and chronic heart failure in real-life in Turkey: a follow-up data for mortality. Anatol J Cardiol 2020;23:160-8.
• 16. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2016;37: 2129-200.
• 17. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3599-726.
• 18. Chioncel O, Lainscak M, Seferovic PM, Anker SD, Crespo-Leiro MG, Harjola VP, et al. Epidemiology and one-year outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2017;19:1574-85.
• 19. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018;39:119-77.
• 20. Borlaug BA. Evaluation and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020;17: 559-73.
• 21. Degertekin M, Erol Ç, Ergene O, Tokgözoğlu L, Aksoy M, Erol MK, et al. Heart failure prevalence and predictors in Turkey: HAPPY study. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2012;40:298-308.
• 22. Koh AS, Tay WT, Teng THK, Vedin O, Benson L, Dahlstrom U, et al. A comprehensive population-based characterization of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2017;19:1624-34.
• 23. Vedin O, Lam CSP, Koh AS, Benson L, Teng THK, Tay WT, et al. Significance of ischemic heart disease in patients with heart failure and preserved, midrange, and reduced ejection fraction: a Nationwide Cohort Study. Circ Heart Fail 2017;10:e003875.
• 24. Kapoor JR, Kapoor R, Ju C, Heidenreich PA, Eapen ZJ, Hernandez AF, et al. Precipitating clinical factors, heart failure characterization, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with heart failure with reduced, borderline, and preserved ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail 2016;4:464-72.
• 25. Özlek B, Özlek E, Ağuş HZ, Tekinalp M, Kahraman S, Çil C, et al. Patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF have different clinical characteristics in Turkey: a multicenter observational study. Eur J Intern Med 2019;61:88-95.
• 26. Obokata M, Reddy YNV, Pislaru SV, Melenovsky V, Borlaug BA. Evidence supporting the existence of a distinct obese phenotype of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2017;136:6-19.
• 27. Rao VN, Fudim M, Mentz RJ, Michos ED, Felker GM. Regional adiposity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2020;22:1540-50.
• 28. Packer M. Do most patients with obesity or type 2 diabetes, and atrial fibrillation, also have undiagnosed heart failure? A critical conceptual framework for understanding mechanisms and improving diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Heart Fail 2020;22:214-27.
• 29. Hicklin HE, Gilbert ON, Ye F, Brooks JE, Upadhya B. Hypertension as a road to treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Curr Hypertens Rep 2020;22:82.
• 30. Mentz RJ, Kelly JP, von Lueder TG, Voors AA, Lam CS, Cowie MR, et al. Noncardiac comorbidities in heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:2281-93.
• 31. Koçyiğit D, Sarıgül NU, Altın AT, Çay S, Polat V, Saygı S, et al. Current clinical practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy in Turkey: reflections from Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey-II. Anatol J Cardiol 2020;24:382-96.
• 32. Aras D, Aydoğdu S, Bozkurt E, Çavuşoğlu Y, Eren M, Erol Ç, et al. Cost of heart failure management in Turkey: results of a Delphi Panel. Anatol J Cardiol 2016;16:554-62.
• 33. Gayat E, Arrigo M, Littnerova S, Sato N, Parenica J, Ishihara S, et al. Heart failure oral therapies at discharge are associated with better outcome in acute heart failure: a propensity-score matched study. Eur J Heart Fail 2018;20:345-54.
• 34. McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2014;371:993-1004.
• 35. Kocabaş U, Kıvrak T, Yılmaz Öztekin GM, Tanık VO, Özdemir IH, Kaya E, et al. Adherence to guideline-directed medical and device Therapy in outpAtients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the ATA study. Anatol J Cardiol 2020;24:32-40.
• 36. McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1995-2008.
• 37. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Pocock SJ, Carson P, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1413-24.
• 38. Anker SD, Butler J, Filippatos G, Ferreira JP, Bocchi E, Böhm M, et al. Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1451-61.
• 39. Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Anand IS, Ge J, Lam CSP, Maggioni AP, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1609-20.
• 40. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1999;341:709-17.
• 41. Zannad F, McMurray JJ, Krum H, van Veldhuisen DJ, Swedberg K, Shi H, et al. Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. N Engl J Med 2011;364:11-21.
• 42. Çavuşoğlu Y, Zoghi M, Eren M, Bozçalı E, Kozdağ G, Şentürk T, et al. Post-discharge heart failure monitoring program in Turkey: Hit-PoinT. Anatol J Cardiol 2017;17:107-12.