The role of stress coping styles in the relationship between separation individualization and sexual self-schema

Year 2023, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 416 - 427, 04.03.2023

Kahraman Güler Haydeh Faraji Gözde Arslan

https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1182932

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the role of stress coping styles in the relationship between separation individualization and sexual self-schema.

Methods: Relational screening model was used in the study. In the selection of the sample group of the study, the convenience sampling method, which is one of the non-random sampling methods, was preferred. The study group of the research consists of 246 (61%) females, 157 (39.0%) males. In this study, Demographic Information Form, Separation Individuation Scale, Sexual Self Schema Scale, and Coping with Stress Scale was used.

Results: According to the results, problem-focused coping styles play a partial mediator role in the relationship between separation individuation and loving/compassionate sexual self-schema in coping with stress, and there is a relationship between separation individuation and problem-focused coping styles.

Conclusions: There was a significant relationship between separation, individuation and loving/compassionate sexual self and self-confident, optimistic approach, seeking social support. Predicts the compassionate sexual self-schema; It was determined that coping styles were a partial mediating variable in the relationship between relational problems and the loving/compassionate sexual self-schema.

Keywords

Separation individuation, sexual self-schema, styles of coping with stress

References

• 1. Lapsley DK, Stey P. Separation-individuation. In: Weiner I, Craighead E, eds. Corsini’s Encyclopedia of Psychology, N Y: Wiley; 2010.
• 2. Mahler MS, Pine F, Bergman A. İnsan yavrusunun psikolojik doğumu. (Babaoğlu, Çev.) İstanbul: Metis; 2003/2012.
• 3. Blos P. The second individuation process of adolescence. Psychoanal Study Child 1967;22:162-86.
• 4. Aslan S, Güven M. [The relation between attachment and personal adjustment mediated by separation-individuation]. Eğitim ve Bilim 2010;35:181-90. [Article in Turkish]
• 5. Colarusso CA. The third individuation: the effect of biological parenthood on separation-individuation processes in adulthood. Psychoanal Study Child 1990;45:179-94.
• 6. Colarusso CA. Separation individuation processes in middle adulthood: The fourth individuation. In: Akhtar S, Kramer S, eds. The Seasons of life, New Jersey: Jason Aronson; 1997; pp. 73-94.
• 7. Colarusso CA. Separation-individuation phenomena in adulthood: general concepts and the fifth individuation. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2000;48:1467-89.
• 8. Carver CS, Scheier MF. Attention and Self-Regulation: A Control Theory Approach to Human Behavior. New York: Springer; 1981.
• 9. Epstein S. The self-concept: A review and the proposal of an integrated theory of personality. In: Staub E, eds. Personality: Basic issues and current research, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1980; pp. 253-75.
• 10. Markus H, Wurf E. The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annu Rev Psychol., 1987; 38:1, 299-333.
• 11. Andersen BL, Cyranowski JM. Women’s Sexual Self-Schema. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;67:1079-100.
• 12. Andersen BL. Surviving cancer: the importance of sexual self‐concept. Med Pediatr Oncol 1999;33:15-23.
• 13. Andersen BL, Cyranowski JM, Espindle D. Men's sexual self-schema. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999;76:645-61.
• 14. Breakwell GM, Millward LJ. Sexual self-concept and sexual risk-taking. J Adolesc 1997;20:29-41.
• 15. Hill DB. Differences and similarities in men's and women's sexual self-schemas. J Sex Res 2007;44:135-44.
• 16. Cohen F, Lazarus RS. Coping with the stress of illness. In: Stone GC, Cojen F, Adler N.E. (eds). Health psychology. A handbook. Theories, applications and challenges of a psychological approach to the health care system. Jossey- Bass, San Francisco; 1979.
• 17. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company; 1984.
• 18. Feingold A. Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 1994;116:429-56.
• 19. Forsythe CJ, Compas BE. Interaction of cognitive appraisals of stressful events and coping: Testing the goodness of fit hypothesis. Clin Psychol Rev 1987;11:473-85.
• 20. Yazıcıoğlu Y, Erdoğan S. SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık; 2004.
• 21. Christenson RM, Wilson WP. Assessing pathology in the separation - individuation process by an inventory: a preliminary report. J Nerv Ment Dis 1985;175:561-5.
• 22. Göral FS. The Second Separation- Individuation Process of the Turkish Young Adults: The Relationship between the Perceived Maternal Parenting Attitudes, Second Separation- Individuation, Expanding Self and Experiences in the Romantic Relationships (Unpublished Master Thesis). Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey; 2002.
• 23. Göral Alkan FS. Coupling through Projective Identification: Bridging Role of Projective Identification in the Associations among Early Parenting Experiences, Personality Constructs and Couple Relationship (PhD Dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey; 2010.
• 24. Hazen C, Shaver P. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52:511-24.
• 25. Koçak G, Fışıloğlu H. [A validity and reliability study of the sexual self-schema scale smong undergraduate students]. Klinik Psikiyatri 2010;13:159-69. [Article in Turkish]
• 26. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav 1980;21:219-39.
• 27. Şahin NH, Durak A. Stresle başa çıkma tarzları ölçeği: Üniversite öğrencileri için uyarlanması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 1995;10:56-73.
• 28. George D, Mallery M. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson; 2010.
• 29. Faraji H, Özen ZD. [The mediator role of adult separation anxiety between separation anxiety and the level of individuation in emerging adulthood]. Mavi Atlas 2022;10:47-69. [Article in Turkish]
• 30. Pine F. On the pathology of the separation-individuation process as manifested in later clinical work. Int J Psychoanal 1979;60:225-42.
• 31. Aarestad L. The role of attachment style and sexual self-schemas in romantic and sexual relationships: a study of dating couples (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University). OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center; 2000.
• 32. Cyranowski JM, Andersen L. Schemas, sexuality, and romantic attachment. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998;74:1364-79.
• 33. Villanueva C. How attachment, personality, and sexual self-schema influence sexual behavior (Master's thesis); 2012.
• 34. Smith AW. Separation-individuation and coping: Contributions to freshman college adjustment (Doctoral dissertation); 1994.
• 35. Sungur MZ. Cultural factors in sex therapy: the Turkish experience. Sex Marital Ther 1999;14:165-71.
• 36. Kayır A. Cinsellik Kavramı ve Cinsel Mitler. Yetkin, N., İncesu, C. (Ed.), Cinsel işlev bozuklukları monograf serisi (ss.34-9). İstanbul: Roche Müstehzarları Sanayi A.Ş; 2001.
• 37. Set T, Dağdeviren N, Aktürk Z. [Sexuality of adolescents]. Genel Tıp Dergisi. 2006; 16:3, 138- 40. [Article in Turkish]
• 38. Kukulu K, Gürsoy E, Sözer GA. Turkish University students’ beliefs in sexual myths. Sex Disabil 2009;27:49-59.
• 39. Nobre P, Gouveia JP, Gomes FA. Sexual dysfunctional beliefs questionnaire: an instrument to assess sexual dysfunctional beliefs as vulnerability factors to sexual problems. Sex Relation Ther 2003;18:171-204.
• 40. Torun F, Torun SD, Özaydın AN. [Men’s belief in sexual myths and factors effecting these myths]. Dusunen Adam 2011;24:24-31. [Article in Turkish]
• 41. Yaşan A, Gürgen F. [The ways to get sexual knowledge and the comparıson of the rate of sexual myths in nurses who have sexual partners and who do not have]. Yeni Symposium Dergisi 2004;42:72-6. [Article in Turkish]
• 42. Gündüz M. Psikolojik danışman adaylarının stresle başa çıkma tarzlarının çok yönlü eylemli kişilik özelliklerine, öznel iyi oluşlarına ve risk faktörlerine göre incelenmesi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü (Kayıt No. 596502); Istanbul, 2018.
• 43. Kaya M, Genç M, Kaya B, Pehlivan E. [Prevalence of depressive symptoms, ways of coping, and related factors among medical school and health services higher education students]. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2007;18:137-46. [Article in Turkish]
• 44. Çetin MÇ, Kuru E. [Investigation of physical education and sport school students’ coping with the stress styles’ according to some variables]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi 2010;187:193-206. [Article in Turkish]
• 45. Eraslan M. [Investigation personality aspects and coping style to stress of students taking education at sport departments in terms of some variables]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2015;7:65-82. [Article in Turkish]
• 46. Lloyd ME. Fear of intimacy in romantic relationships during emerging adulthood: the influence of past parenting and separation-individuation (Doctoral dissertation); 2011.
• 47. Azizoglou C. Mükemmeliyetçilik ve Stresle Başa Çıkma Yaklaşımlarının Sosyal Kaygı Üzerindeki Etkisi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Psikoloji Anabilim Dalı, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, (Kayıt No. 616245), İstanbul 2020.
• 48. Gürlek Yüksel E. Üniversite öğrencilerinin ayrılma bireyleşme özellikleri ve etkileyen etmenler (Yayınlanmamış Uzmanlık Tezi). Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, (Kayıt No. 193198); Manisa, 2006.
• 49. Uzunoğlu S. Evli kadınların cinsel benlik şemaları ile cinsel işlev düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki (Yayımlanmış Yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Kent Üniversi, (Kayıt No. 665438); İstanbul, 2021.
• 50. Corportation, IBM. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 25.0 Armonk). IBM Corp.: Armonk, NY, USA. 2017.