Effects of o-tDCS and tDCS on Maximal Grip Strength

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the current study was to examine and compare the effects of oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (o-tDCS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) against sham stimulation on maximal intermittent gripping performance. Materials and Methods: The study included 25 healthy, right-handed male subjects (age range 18-35 years) who were randomly assigned to three separate groups: o-tDCS (n=9), tDCS (n=8) and sham (n=8). The left primary motor cortex was selected as the anodal stimulation region, and a cathode electrode was placed over the right supraorbital area. A hand dynamometer is used to measure the maximum grip values during a maximal intermittent gripping task. Between-group comparisons were made; for each stimulation group, baseline grip values of the participants were compared with those obtained during stimulation. Results: Although the o-tDCS group showed slightly better improvements in maximal and mean strength, there were no statistically significant differences between stimulation groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The findings of the study suggest neither o-tDCS nor tDCS has a significant facilitative impact on grip strength values in healthy young males, most likely due to a ceiling effect in this population.

Keywords

• Transcranial direct current stimulation
• oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation
• grip strength
• grip endurance

References

1. 1. Wind AE, Takken T, Helders PJM, Engelbert RHH. Is grip strength a predictor for total muscle strength in healthy children, adolescents, and young adults? Eur J Pediatr 2010; 169(3): 281-7. google scholar
2. 2. Everhart DE, Harrison DW, Shenal BV, Williamson J, Wuensch KL. Grip-strength, fatigue, and motor perseveration in anxious men without depression. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2002; 15(2): 133-42. google scholar
3. 3. Fink B, Weege B, Pham MN, Shackelford TK. Handgrip strength and the Big Five personality factors in men and women. Personal Individ Differ 2016; 88: 175-7. google scholar
4. 4. Mathersul D, Williams LM, Hopkinson PJ, Kemp AH. Investigating models of affect: Relationships among EEG alpha asymmetry, depression, and anxiety. Emotion 2008; 8(4): 560-72. google scholar
5. 5. Ding H, Leino-Arjas P, Murtomaa H, Takala EP, Solovieva S. Variation in work tasks in relation to pinch grip strength among middle-aged female dentists. Appl Ergon 2013; 44(6): 977-81. google scholar
6. 6. Sims SEG, Engel L, Hammert WC, Elfar JC. Hand sensibility, strength, and laxity of high-level musicians compared to nonmusicians. J Hand Surg 2015; 40(10): 1996-2002.e5. google scholar
7. 7. Stinear CM, Byblow WD. Role of intracortical inhibition in selective hand muscle activation. J Neurophysiol 2003; 89(4): 2014-20. google scholar
8. 8. Mason J, Frazer AK, Avela J, Pearce AJ, Howatson G, Kidgell DJ. Tracking the corticospinal responses to strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020; 120(4): 783-98. google scholar

9. 9. Del Vecchio A, Casolo A, Negro F, Scorcelletti M, Bazzucchi I, Enoka R, et al. The increase in muscle force after 4 weeks of strength training is mediated by adaptations in motor unit recruitment and rate coding. J Physiol 2019; 597(7): 1873-87. google scholar
10. 10. Fling BW, Christie A, Kamen G. Motor unit synchronization in FDI and biceps brachii muscles of strength-trained males. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009; 19(5): 800-9. google scholar
11. 11. Zatsiorsky VM, Kraemer WJ, Fry AC. Science and practice of strength training. Third edition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2021. google scholar
12. 12. Van Duinen H, Renken R, Maurits N, Zijdewind I. Effects of motor fatigue on human brain activity, an fMRI study. NeuroImage 2007; 35(4): 1438-49. google scholar
13. 13. Das S, Holland P, Frens MA, Donchin O. Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on neuronal functions. Front Neurosci 2016; 10: 550. google scholar
14. 14. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 2000; 527(3): 633-9. google scholar
15. 15. Chinzara TT, Buckingham G, Harris DJ. Transcranial direct current stimulation and sporting performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial direct current stimulation effects on physical endurance, muscular strength and visuomotor skills. Eur J Neurosci 2022; 55(2): 468-86. google scholar
16. 16. Hu K, Chen Y, Guo F, Wang X. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper limb muscle strength and endurance in healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Physiol 2022; 13: 834397. google scholar
17. 17. Neuling T, Rach S, Wagner S, Wolters CH, Herrmann CS. Good vibrations: Oscillatory phase shapes perception. NeuroImage 2012; 63(2): 771-8. google scholar
18. 18. Merlet I, Birot G, Salvador R, Molaee-Ardekani B, Mekonnen A, Soria-Frish A, et al. From oscillatory transcranial current stimulation to scalp EEG changes: a biophysical and physiological modeling study. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(2): e57330. google scholar
19. 19. Filho E, Dobersek U, Husselman TA. The role of neural efficiency, transient hypofrontality and neural proficiency in optimal performance in self-paced sports: a meta-analytic review. Exp Brain Res 2021; 239(5): 1381-93. google scholar
20. 20. Ogata K, Nakazono H, Uehara T, Tobimatsu S. Prestimulus cortical EEG oscillations can predict the excitability of the primary motor cortex. Brain Stimulat 2019; 12(6): 1508-16. google scholar
21. 21. Bemben MG, Massey BH, Bemben DA, Misner JE, Boileau RA. Isometric intermittent endurance of four muscle groups in men aged 20-74 yr: Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28(1): 145-53. google scholar
22. 22. White C, Dixon K, Samuel D, Stokes M. Handgrip and quadriceps muscle endurance testing in young adults. Springer Plus 2013; 2(1): 451. google scholar
23. 23. Vulic K, Bjekic J, Paunovic D, Jovanovic M, Milanovic S, Filipovic SR. Theta-modulated oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex improves associative memory. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1): 3013. google scholar
24. 24. Workman C, Fietsam A, Rudroff T. Transcranial direct current stimulation at 4 mA induces greater leg muscle fatigability in women compared to men. Brain Sci 2020; 10(4): 244. google scholar
25. 25. Rudroff T, Workman CD, Fietsam AC, Kamholz J. Response variability in transcranial direct current stimulation: why sex matters. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11: 585. google scholar
26. 26. Gerodimos V. Reliability of handgrip strength test in basketball players. J Hum Kinet 2012; 31(2012): 25-36. google scholar
27. 27. Xu Z yang, Gao D fa, Xu K, Zhou Z qi, Guo Y kun. The Effect of posture on maximum grip strength measurements. J Clin Densitom 2021; 24(4): 638-44. google scholar
28. 28. Karatrantou K. Dynamic Handgrip Strength Endurance: A reliable measurement in older women. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2019; 42(3): E51-6. google scholar
29. 29. Nicolay CW, Walker AL. Grip strength and endurance: influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender. Int J Ind Ergon 2005; 35(7): 605-18. google scholar
30. 30. Evans WJ, Hurley BF. Age, gender, and muscular strength. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995; 50A(Special): 41-4. google scholar
31. 31. Alix-Fages, Romero-Arenas, Castro-Alonso, Colomer-Poveda, Rfo-Rodriguez, Jerez-Martı'nez, et al. Short-term effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on endurance and maximal force production. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2019; 8(4): 536. google scholar
32. 32. Hazime FA, da Cunha RA, Soliaman RR, Romancini ACB, Pochini A de C, Ejnisman B, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) increases isometric strength of shoulder rotators muscles in handball players. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2017; 12(3): 402-7. google scholar
33. 33. Vargas VZ, Baptista AF, Pereira GOC, Pochini AC, Ejnisman B, Santos MB, et al. Modulation of isometric quadriceps strength in soccer players with transcranial direct current stimulation: a crossover study. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32(5): 1336-41. google scholar
34. 34. Tanaka S, Hanakawa T, Honda M, Watanabe K. Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2009; 196(3): 459-65. google scholar
35. 35. DaSilva AF, Volz MS, Bikson M, Fregni F. Electrode positioning and montage in transcranial direct current stimulation. J Vis Exp JoVE 2011; (51): 2744. google scholar
36. 36. Pavlova E, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA, Borg J. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the premotor cortex: Effects on hand dexterity. Brain Res 2014; 1576: 52-62. google scholar
37. 37. Trinidad-Fernandez M, Gonzalez-Molina F, Moya-Esteban A, Roldan-Jimenez C, Gonzalez-Sanchez M, Cuesta-Vargas AI. Muscle activity and architecture as a predictor of hand-grip strength. Physiol Meas 2020; 41(7): 075008. google scholar