OTOETNOĞRAFİK ÇALIŞMA; BORDERLİNE OVER TÜMÖRLERİNİN TANI VE TEDAVİ SÜRECİ İLE HEMŞİRELİK BAKIMI DENEYİMLERİ

Abstract

Otoetnografi, otobiyografi ile etnografinin özelliklerini birleştiren kalitatif bir araştırma yöntemidir. Otoetnografi, Ellis ve Bochner (2000) tarafından üçlü bir model olarak ele alınmıştır. Kültürel deneyim, inanç ve uygulamaları tanımlamak (ethno) ve yorumlamak için (grafi), kişisel deneyimi (oto) kullanan bir oto-etno-grafik araştırma sürecidir. Nitel bir araştırma yöntemi olan otoetnografik çalışmalar, hemşirelik bilimi için oldukça önemlidir. Doğum ile başlayıp ölümle biten yaşam döngüsünün içerisinde bizi biz yapan yaşadıklarımızdı. Seçtiğim mesleğim de, farkında olmasam da yıllar içinde yaşama bakış açımı değiştiriyor ve şekillendiriyordu. Hastaneler benim için yaşamın özeti gibiydi. Bir insanın yaşayabileceği tüm duyguları orada görebilirdiniz: sağlık, hastalık, heyecan, huzur, korku, kaygı, endişe, doğum ve ölüm gibi. Yaşam, doğumla hastanede başlıyor ve ölümle yine hastanede bitiyordu. Hemşire olarak çalışırken, hep insanların hayatında olumlu izler bırakmak istedim. Hastanede yatan benim sevdiklerimde olabilirdi. Ama farkettim ki hasta olabileceğimi hiç düşünmemiştim… Bu makalede borderline over tümörü tanısı alan, cerrahi geçiren ve kemoterapi alan bir akademisyen hemşire olarak, tanı, tedavi ve takip sürecindeki deneyimlerimi otoetnografik olarak paylaştım. Anahtar Kelimeler: Otoetnoğrafik çalışma, borderline over tümörleri, hemşirelik bakımı deneyimleri

Keywords

• otoetnoğrafi
• borderline over tümörleri
• hemşirelik bakımı

AUTOETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH; DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT PROCESS OF BORDERLINE OVARIAN TUMORS AND NURSING CARE EXPERIENCES

Abstract

Autoethnography is a qualitative research method that combines the elements of autobiography and ethnography. Ellis and Bochner (2000) studied autoethnography as a tripartite model. It is an autoethnographic research process that uses personal experience (auto) to define (ethno) and interpret (graphy) cultural experiences, beliefs, and practices. As a qualitative research method, autoethnographic studies are of great importance for nursing science. It is believed to contribute to the nursing profession and the quality of nursing care with the development of nursing theories and the increase in research culture. In the life cycle that starts with birth and ends with death, it is what we experience that makes us who we are. And the profession I chose changed and shaped my life perspective over the years without realizing it. Hospitals were like the summary of life for me. There you could see all the emotions a human being can experience: health, illness, excitement, peace, fear, anxiety, worry, birth, and death. Life began with birth in the hospital and ended with death at the very same place. While working as a nurse, I always wanted to leave positive impressions in people's lives. Those hospitalized could have been my loved ones. But then I realized that I had never thought I could be the patient. In this article, as an academic nurse who was diagnosed with a borderline ovarian tumor, underwent surgery, and received chemotherapy, I shared my autobiographic experiences in the processes of diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

Keywords

• Autoetnographic research
• borderline ovarian tumors
• nursing care experinces

References

1. Adams, T. E., Ellis, C., & Jones, S. H. 2017. Autoethnography. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1-11.
2. Ağca-Varoğlu, F. G., Çoban, B., Bingöl, M., Karakurt, Z., Kılıç, G., Kaplaner, N., & Zengin, S. 2022. Fragments of everyday life in a pandemic: autoethnographic reflections of young women from Eastern and Southeastern Turkey. Fe Dergi, 14 1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.46655/ federgi.1050366
3. Batch, M., & Windsor, C. 2015. Nursing casualization and communication: a critical ethnography. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71 (4), 870-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12557
4. Beesley, V. L., Alemayehu, C., & Webb, P. M. 2018. A systematic literature review of the prevalence of and risk factors for supportive care needs among women with gynaecological cancer and their caregivers. Supportive Care in Cancer, 26, 701-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00520-017-3971-6
5. Bektaş Ata, L. 2016. Bir güvenlikli site hikâyesi: gündelik hayatın dönüşümüne otoetnografik yaklaşım. Fe Dergi, 8 (2), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1501/ Fe0001_0000000164
6. Berry, K. 2007. Embracing the catastrophe: Gay body seeks acceptance. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 259–281. https:// doi:10.1177/1077800406294934
7. Blair, C., Brown, J. R., & Baxter, L. A. 1994. Disciplining the feminine. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80, 383–409. https:// 102 fe dergi Bakanoğlu Kalkavan doi:10.1080/00335639409384084
8. Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. S. 2006. Communication as autoethnography. In G. J. Shepherd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as … Perspectives on theory (110–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

9. Bostancı, E., Ayas, S., Boza, A., Gürbüz, A., & Karateke, A. 2014. Borderline over tümörlü 53 olgunun retrospektif analizi. Medical Journal of Bakirkoy, 10 (1). DOI: 10.5350/BTDMJB201410106.
10. Carbonnel, M., Layoun, L., Poulain, M., Tourne, M., Murtada, R., Grynberg, M., Feki, A., & Ayoubi, J. M. 2021. Serous borderline ovarian tumor diagnosis, management and fertility preservation in young women. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10 (18), 4233. https://doi.org/10.3390/ jcm10184233.
11. Crawford, L. 1996. Personal ethnography. Communication Monographs, 63, 158–170. https://doi:10.1080/03637759609376384.
12. Du Bois, A., Trillsch, F., Mahner, S., Heitz, F., & Harter, P. 2016. Management of borderline ovarian tumors. Annals of Oncology, 27 20-22. https:// doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw090
13. Eker, A., & Aslan, E. 2017. Jinekolojik kanser hastalarında psiko-sosyal yaklaşım. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi, 14 (4), 298-303. https://doi:10.5222/HEAD.2017.298
14. Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. 2010. “Autoethnography: An Overview,” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12, 1.
15. Ellis, C. 2004. The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography (Vol. 13). Rowman Altamira. 103 fe dergi Autoethnographic Research
16. Erdoğan, E. 2022. Anadolu’da akademisyen olarak çalışmanın haletiruhiyesi: Başka türlü bir dünyaya inanma isteği. Fe Dergi, 14 (1), 21-34. https:// doi.org/10.46655/federgi.996087.
17. Fang, C., Zhao, L., Chen, X., Yu, A., Xia, L. & Zhang, P. 2018. The impact of clinicopathologic and surgical factors on relapse and pregnancy in young patients (≤ 40 years old) with borderline ovarian tumors. BMC Cancer, 18, 1147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4932-2
18. Fischerova, D., Zikan, M., Dundr, P., Cibula, D. 2012. Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of borderline ovarian tumors. The Oncologist, 17 (12), 1515–1533. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0139
19. Gershenson, D. M. 2017. Management of borderline ovarian tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 41, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bpobgyn.2016.09.012
20. Goodall, H. L. 2006. A need to know: The clandestine history of a CIA family. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
21. Gosvig, C. F., Kjaer, S. K., Blaakær, J., Høgdall, E., Høgdall, C., & Jensen, A. 2015. Coffee, tea, and caffeine consumption and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline ovarian tumors: Results from a Danish case-control study. Acta Oncologica, 54 (8), 1144-1151. https://doi.org /10.3109/0284186X.2014.1001035
22. Guvenal, T., Dursun, P., Hasdemir, P.S., Hanhan, M., Guven, S., Yetimalar, H., Goksedef, B.P., Sakarya, D. K., Doruk, A., Terek, M. C., Saatli, B., Guzin, K., Corakcı, A., Deger, E., Celik, H., Cetin, A., Ozsaran, A., Ozbakkaloğlu, A., Kolusarı, A., … & Ayhan, A. 2013. Effect of surgical staging on 539 patients with borderline ovarian tumors: A Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecologic Oncology, 104 fe dergi Bakanoğlu Kalkavan 131 (3), 546-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.08.038
23. Hart, W. R. 2005. Borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary. Modern pathology, 18, 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-3952(22)04457-X.
24. Hauptmann, S., Friedrich, K., Redline, R., Avril, S. 2017. Ovarian borderline tumors in the 2014 WHO Classification: evolving concepts and diagnostic criteria. Virchows Arch. 470 (2), 125–142. https:// doi:10.1007/ s00428-016-2040-8
25. Hodges, N. 2014. The American dental dream. Health Communication, 30, 943–950. https://doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.914621
26. Holman Jones, S. 2005. Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (763–791). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27. Jago, B. J. 2002. Chronicling an academic depression. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 31, 729–757. https:// doi:10.1177/089124102237823
28. Jewell, A., McMahon, M., Khabele, D. 2018. Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer. Cancers, 10, 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers10090296
29. Karabinis, G., Koukourikos, K., Tsaloglidou, A. 2015. Psychological support and quality of life in patients with gynecological cancer. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3 (11), 2992-2997. http:// dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150948
30. Kim, S. H. 2019. Assessment of solid components of borderline ovarian tumor and stage I carcinoma: added value of combined diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine, 36 (3), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.12701/ 105 fe dergi Autoethnographic Research yujm.2019.00234
31. Klafke, N., Mahler, C., Von Hagens, C., Blaser, G., Bentner, M., & Joos, S. 2016. Developing and implementing a complex Complementary and Alternative (CAM) nursing intervention for breast and gynecologic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy—report from the CONGO (complementary nursing in gynecologic oncology) study. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24, 2341-2350. DOI 10.1007/s00520-015-3038-5
32. Minareci, Y., Tosun, O. A., Sozen, H., Topuz, S., & Salihoglu, M. Y. 2020. A retrospective clinical analysis of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gynecological cancers: technical details, tolerability, and efficacy. Medeniyet Medical Journal, 35 (3) 202-211. https:// doi:10.5222/MMJ.2020.31855.
33. Özcan, E., Benli, C. K., & Alkan, S. A. 2023. Hemşirelik felsefesinde paradigma değişimi: postmodernizm. Samsun Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.47115/jshs.1134443.
34. Richard, R. 2008. Writing the other self: Autoethnography and the problem of objectification in writing about illness and disability. Qualitative Health Research, 18 (12), 1717-1728. https://doi. org/10.1177/1049732308325866.
35. Sancı, M., Güngördük, K., Gülseren, V., Özdemir, İ. A., & Ayhan, A. 2014. Borderline over tümörleri: tanı, tedavi, takip borderline ovarian tümörleri: tanı, tedavi & takip. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi, 4, 113-122.
36. Selçuk, F. 2024. 290 Otobüs Hattında Gündelik Seyahatler: Minör Güzergâhlar, Mekânsallıklar ve Kartografiler Üzerinden Çokluğun Mekânlarını Araştırmak. Fe Dergi, 16 (2), 10-47. https://doi.org/10.46655/ federgi.1351698 106 fe dergi Bakanoğlu Kalkavan
37. Seong, S. J., Kim, M. K., & Song, T. 2015. Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 26 (4), 343-349. https://doi. org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.343
38. Smith, L. T. 1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous species. New York: Zed Books.
39. Sozen, H., Vatansever, D., Topuz, S., Iyibozkurt, C., Kandemir, H., Yalcin, I., Onder, M., Yavuz, E., & Salihoglu, Y. 2019. Clinicopathological analysis of borderline ovarian tumours and risk factors related to recurrence: experience of single institution. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 39 (2), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.201 8.1499076.
40. Strandås, M., & Bondas, T. 2018. The nurse–patient relationship as a story of health enhancement in community care: A meta‐ethnography. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74 (1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13389
41. Sun, Y., Xu, J., & Jia, X. 2020. The diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and molecular pathology of borderline ovarian tumors: current status and perspectives. Cancer Management and Research, 12, 3651-3659. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S250394
42. Tillmann, L. M. 2009. Body and bulimia revisited: Reflections on “a secret life.” Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 98–112.https:// doi:10.1080/00909880802592615
43. Topfedaisi Özkan, N., & Güngör, T. 2015. Borderline ovaryan tümörlerde fertilite koruyucu cerrahi. Türk Jinekolojik Onkoloji Dergisi, 4, 113- 118. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/439573
44. Tropé, C. G., Kaern, J., Davidson, B. 2012. Borderline ovarian tumours. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 26 (3), 107 fe dergi Autoethnographic Research 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.12.006
45. Tropé, C., Davidson, B., Paulsen, T., Abeler, V. M., & Kaern, J. 2009. Diagnosis and treatment of borderline ovarian neoplasms “the state of the art”. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, 30 (5), 471- 482. https://article.imrpress.com/journal/EJGO/30/5/pii/2009116/471- 482.pdf
46. Turgut, B. H. 2022. Kadın araştırmalarında meta-diyalojik yöntem arayışları: bir alan deneyimi olarak otoetnografi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, (25), 111-140. https://doi.org/10.26650/ iukad.2022.1166272
47. Ushijima, K., Kawano, K., Tsuda, N., Nishio, S., Terada, A., Kato, H., Tasaki, T., & Matsukuma, K. 2015. Epithelial borderline ovarian tumor: diagnosis and treatment strategy. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 58 (3),183–187. https://doi:10.5468/ogs.2015.58.3.183
48. Vasconcelos, I., Olschewski, J., Braicu, I., & Sehouli, J. 2015. A meta-analysis on the impact of platinum-based adjuvant treatment on the outcome of borderline ovarian tumors with invasive implants. The Oncologist 20 (2), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0144
49. Wang, M. & Liu, K. 2022. Advances in fertility preserving surgery for borderline ovarian tumors. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 270 206-211. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.11.428
50. Zheng, X., Lyu, G., Gan, Y., Hu, M., Liu, X., Chen, S., Wu, X., Yang, W., Ye, F., Yan, X., & Zhang, Y. 2021. Microcystic pattern and shadowing are independent predictors of ovarian borderline tumors and cystadenofibromas in ultrasound. Europian Radiology, 31, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07113-z