Being Nonmother in a Pronatalist Culture

Abstract

Being Nonmother in a Pronatalist Culture This qualitative research tries to understand how the pronatalist cultural acceptances, which promote reproduction by locating the family within the centre of social life and conflating womanhood with motherhood, mould non-mother women’s relationship with their husbands/partners, family members, friends with children and with other people they meet in their everyday life. To find answers to this research question, I apply the data derived from the face-to-face interviews and e-interviews conducted with fourteen childless women. To be able to understand how the participants find themselves within the pronatalist culture and perceive their gendered being, first of all I focus on their conceptualizing of womanhood and motherhood and then, on their relationship with others. The urban life and the social milieu relatively protect them from the pronatalist cultural acceptances. Yet they cannot totally escape from connection with people who can easily pose questions about their childlessness or give advice to them about having children or feel sorry for their childlessness. For those women who question the pronatalist cultural acceptances, childlessness becomes a field of struggle and they become the subjects of it. The others who develop strategies without challenging the sexist dimension of pronatalist culture unknowingly weaken mothers and non-mothers although they just want to get empowered

Keywords

• pronatalism,pronatalist culture,motherhood,childlessness,relationship with others

Pronatalist Kültürde Anne Olmamak

Abstract

Bu niteliksel çalışma aileyi merkeze alarak üremeyi teşvik eden ve kadınlıkla anneliği eş tutan pronatalist kültürel kabullerin, anne olmayan kadınların eşleriyle/partnerleriyle, aileleriyle, çocuklu arkadaşlarıyla ve gündelik hayatlarındaki diğer kişilerle kurdukları ilişkileri nasıl biçimlendirdiğini kavramaya çalışmaktadır. Bu araştırma sorusuna yanıt bulabilmek için on dört çocuksuz kadınla yüz yüze ve e-mülakat tekniğiyle yaptığım mülakatlardan elde ettiğim verileri kullanıyorum. Öncelikle katılımcıların pronatalist kültür içerisinde nasıl konumlandığını ve kendi cinsiyetli oluşlarını nasıl kavradıklarını anlayabilmek için katılımcıların kadınlığı ve anneliği kavramsallaştırma biçimleri, ardından eşleri/partnerleri, aileleri ve diğerleri ile olan ilişkileri üzerinde duruyorum. Katılımcılar açısından kent yaşamı ve kendi sosyal çevreleri onlara görece korunaklılık sağlayabiliyor fakat çocuksuzlukla ilgili kendilerine yöneltilen sorular, çocuk doğurmaları yönünde yapılan tavsiyeler, çocuksuz oldukları için onlara acınması rahatsızlık duydukları ilişkilenme biçiminlerinden tamamen uzak durmanın mümkün olamadığını gösteriyor. Pronatalist kültürel kabullere daha eleştirel yaklaşabilen kadınlar açısından çocuksuzluk kendilerini fail olarak konumlandırabildikleri bir mücadele alanı olabiliyor fakat mevcut pronatalist değerlerin cinsiyetçiliğini sorgulamadan strateji geliştirmeye çalışan kadınlar, güçlenmeye çalışırken farkına varmaksızın anne olan veya olmayan kadınları güçsüzleştirmeye yöneliyor

Keywords

• pronatalizm,pronatalist kültür,annelik,çocuksuzluk,gündelik ve yakın ilişkiler

References

1. Akşit, Elif Ekin. “Geç Osmanlı ve Cumhuriyet Dönemlerinde Nüfus Kontrolü Yaklaşımları,” Toplum ve Bilim, 117 (2010) :179-197.
2. Arendell, Terry. “Conceiving and Investigating Motherhood: The Decade’s Scholarship,” Journal of Marriage and Family, 62 (2000): 1192-1207.
3. Bartholomaeus, Clare& Riggs, W. Daimen. “Daughters and Mothers: The Reproduction of Pronatalist Discourses Across Generations,” Women’s Studies International Forum, 62 (2017):1-7.
4. Benezra, Belin. “The Institutional History of Family Planning in Turkey.” K. Kamp et.al. (eds.) Contemporary Turkey at a Glance (2014): 41-56, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-04916-4_5.
5. Clarke Hurd, Laura; Martin-Matthews, Anne; Matthews, Ralph. “The Continuity and Discontinuity of the Embodied Self in Infertility,” CRSA/RCSA, 43:1 (2006): 95-113.
6. Daniluk, C. Judith. “When Biology Isn't Destiny: Implications for the Sexuality of Women Without Children,” Canadian Journal of Counselling, 33:2 (1999): 79-94.
7. De Beauvoir, Simone. Kadın İkinci Cins II Evlilik Çağı. (İstanbul: Payel Yayınevi, 2010).
8. Donath, Orna. “Choosing motherhood? Agency and Regret Within Reproduction and Mothering Retrospective Accounts,” Women's Studies International Forum, 53 (2015): 200–209.

9. Edwards, Natalie. Voicing Voluntary Childlessness Narratives of Non-Mothering in French. (Oxford, Berlin, Bruxelles: Peter Lang, 2016).
10. Gillespie, Rosemary. “Voluntary Childlessness in the United Kingdom,” Reproductive Health Matters, 7:13 (1999): 43- 53, DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(99)90111-8.
11. Gillespie, Rosemary. “When No Means No: Disbelief, Disregard and Deviance as Discourses of Voluntary Childlessness,” Women’s Studies International Forum, 23:2 (2000): 223-234
12. Gillespie, Rosemary. “Childfree and Feminine: Understanding the Gender Identity of Voluntary Childless Women,” Gender and Society. 17:1 (2003): 122-136.
13. Hays, Sharon. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. (NewHaven&London: Yale University Press, 1996).
14. Heitlinger, Alena. “Pronatalism and Women's Equality Policies,” European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie,7: 4 (1991): 343-375.
15. Hird, J. Myra ve Abshoff, Kimberly. “Women without Children: A Contradiction in Terms?,” Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31:3 (2000):347-366.
16. Jones, K. Rachel; Brayfield, April. “Life’s Greatest Joy? : European Attitudes Toward the Centrality of Children,” Social Forces, 75:4 (1997): 1239-70.
17. Kelly, Maura. “Women's Voluntary Childlessness: A Radical Rejection of Motherhood?” Women's Studies Quarterly, 37: 3/4 (2009): 157- 172.
18. Letherby, Gayle. Other Than Mother and Mothers as Others: The Experience of Motherhood and Non-Motherhood in Relation to “Infertility” and “Involuntary Childlessness,” Women’s Studies International Forum, 22:3 (1999): 359-372
19. Letherby, Gayle. “Childless and Bereft? Stereotypes and Realities in Relation to Voluntary and Involuntary Childlessness and Womanhood,” Sociological Inquiry, 72:1 (2002): 7-20.
20. Lovett, L. Laura. “Pronatalism” Encyclopedia of Motherhood ed. Andrea O’Reilly (Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication, 2010), 1028-29.
21. Meyers Tietjens, Diana. “The Rush to Motherhood: Pronatalist Discourse and Women's Autonomy,” Signs, 26 :3 (2001): 735-773.
22. Morell, Carolyn. “Saying No: Women’s Experiences with Reproductive Refusal” Feminism and Psychology, (2010): 313-322.
23. O’Reilly, Andrea. (ed.) From Motherhood to Mothering The Legacy of Adrienne Rich’s of Women Born. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004).
24. Peterson, Helen. “Fifty Shades of Freedom: Voluntary Childlessness as Women’s Ultimate Liberation” Women’s Studies International Forum, 53 (2015): 182-191.
25. Park, Kristin. “Stigma Management Among the Voluntary Childless,” Sociological Perspective Volume 45:1 (2002): 21- 45.
26. Rich, Adrienne. Of Woman Born Motherhood as Experience and Institution. (New York&London: W.W. Norton&Company, 1986).
27. Rich, StephanieTaket, Ann;Graham, Melissa; Shelley, Julia. “‘Unnatural’, ‘Unwomanly’, ‘Uncreditable’ and ; ‘Undervalued’: The Significance of Being a Childless Woman in Australian Society,” Gender Issues 28, (2011): 226–247, DOI 10.1007/s12147-011-9108-1.
28. Shapiro, Gilla. “Voluntary Childlessness: A Critical Review of the Literature,” Studies of Maternal, 6:1 (2014): 1-15.