Cytogenetic and Molecular Evaluation of Ambiguous Genitalia In Pediatric Patients

Year 2008, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 28 - 31, 01.02.2008

Hüseyin Yüce Ebru Etem Ülkü Özbey

Abstract

Objective: A newborn with ambiguous genitalia needs prompt evaluation to detect life-threatening conditions such as salt-losing crisis in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) and gender assignment. Sex assignment in these newborn continues to be a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic problem. In our study, we aimed to investigate the causes and characteristics of ambiguous genitalia in 21 newborn who were referred to a cytogenetic laboratory. Materials and Methods: Cytogenetic analysis was performed for each case. The cases were analysed by also molecular genetic and interphase FISH technique to exhibit exist Y. Chromosome molecular genetic analysis was performed for Y chromosomal loci (SRY, ZFY, SY84, SY86, SY127, SY134, SY254, SY255). Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood. Results: In all of patient were detected 46,XX and 46,XY karyotype by cytogenetic analysis. 21 cases were successfully analyzed by interphase-FISH. Some individuals carry a Y chromosome but are phenotypically female or one of cases have a female karyotype but are phenotypically male. Conclusion: The correlation between genotype (SRY+/-) and phenotype is still unclear. The etiology of ambiguous genitalia is variable. The physician managing these families could minimize the trauma of having a child with unidentified sex by providing appropriate genetic counseling so that the parents can make an early decision. ©2008, Firat University, Medical Faculty

Keywords

-

Pediatrik Hastalarda Ambigious Genitalyanın Sitogenetik ve Moleküler Değerlendirmesi

Abstract

Amaç: Ambigious genitalyalı yeni doğanın, cinsiyet belirlenmesi ve konjenital adrenal hiperplazide (KAH) tuz kaybetme krizi gibi yaşamı tehlikeye sokan durumların tespit edilmesi için değerlendirilmesi gerekir. Bu yeni doğanlarda cinsiyet belirlenmesi, tanı koyma ve tedaviyle ilgili problemlerin üstesinden gelmeyi sağlar. Bu çalışmamızda, sitogenetik laboratuarına gönderilen 21 yeni doğanda ambigious genitalyanın özellikleri ve bu duruma yol açan nedenleri araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Her bir vaka için sitogenetik analiz yapıldı. Y kromozomunun varlığını göstermek için vakalar moleküler genetik ve interfaz FISH tekniğiyle analiz edildi. Y kromozom bölgeleri (SRY, ZFY, SY84, SY86, SY127, SY134, SY254, SY255) için moleküler genetik analiz yapıldı. Genomik DNA periferik kandan izole edildi. Bulgular: Hastaların hepsinde sitogenetik analizle 46,XX ve 46,XY karyotipi tespit edildi. 21 olgu interfaz FISH tekniğiyle başarılı bir şekilde analiz edildi. Bazı bireyler Y kromozomu taşımaktadır ama fenotipik olarak dişidir ya da bir olgu dişi karyotipe sahiptir ama fenotipik olarak erkektir. Genotip (SRY+/-) ve fenotip arasındaki korelasyon hala net değildir. Sonuç: Ambigious genitalyanın etiyolojisi değişkenlik göstermektedir. Hekimlerin, ebeveynlere erken karar verebilmesi açısından uygun genetik danışmanlık vermesiyle cinsiyet belirsizliği bir çocuğa sahip olma travmasını hafifletebilir. ©2008, Fırat Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi

Keywords

Ambigious genitalya, SRY, sitogenetik analiz, interseks bozukluklar

References

• Frimberger D, Gearhart JP . Ambiguous genitalia and intersex. Urol Int. 2005; 75: 291-297.
• Sultan C, Paris F, Jeandel C, Lumbroso S, Galifer RB. Ambiguous genitalia in the new born. Semin Reprod Med. 2002; 20: 181-188.
• Mendes JR, Strufaldi MW, Delcelo R, et al. Y-chromosome identification by PCR and gonadal histopathology in Turner's syndrome without overt Y-mosaicism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999; 50: 19-26.
• Özbey Ü, Yüce H, Elyas H. Đnfertilitenin genetik temelleri. Sendrom Dergisi. 2006; 18: 32-37.
• Ergun-Longmire B, Vinci G, Alonso L, et al. Clinical, hormonal and cytogenetic evaluation of 46,XX males and review of the literature. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 18: 739-748.
• Berta P, Hawkins JR, Sinclair AH, et al. Genetics Evidence Equaling SRY and The Testis Determining Factor. Nature. 1990; 348: 448-450.
• Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1989.
• Al-Agha AE, Thomsett MJ, Batch JA. The child of uncertain sex: 17 years of experience. J Paediatr Child Health. 2001; 37: 348351.
• Court-Brown WM, Harnden DG, Jacobs PA, Maclean N, Mantle DJ. Abnormalities of the sex chromosome complement in man. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office: Medical Research Council, Special Report Series, 1964:p.305.
• Rajender S, Rajani V, Gupta NJ, et al. SRY-negative 46,XX male with normal genitals, complete masculinization and infertility. Mol Hum Reprod. 2006; 12: 341-346.
• Pérez-Palacios G, Kofman S. Sex reversal in humans: The XX Male Syndrome and related disorders. In: Martínez- Mora J (Editors). Textbook of Intersexual States. Barcelona, Spain: Doyma Press, 1994: p.269.
• Zenteno-Ruiz JC, Kofman-Alfaro S, Mendez JP. 46,XX Sex reversal. Arch Med Res. 2001; 32: 559-566.
• Kusz K, Kotecki M, Wojda A, et al. Incomplete masculinisation of XX subjects carrying the SRY gene on an inactive X chromosome. J Med Genet. 1999; 36: 452-456.
• Wachtel SS. XX Sex reversal in the human: In: Wachtel SS (Editors). Molecular genetics of sex determination. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 1994:p.267.
• Damiani D, Guedes DR, Damiani D, et al. XX male: 3 case reports during childhood. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2005 Feb;49: 7982.
• Abusheikha N, Lass A, Brinsden P. XX Males without SRY Gene and with infertility. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 717-718.
• Vaiman D, Pailhoux E. Mammalian sex reversal and intersexuality: deciphering the sex-determination cascade. Trends Genet. 2000; 16: 488-494.
• Caenazzo L, Ponzano E, Greggio NA, Cortivo P. Prenatal sexing and sex determination in infants with ambiguous genitalia by polymerase chain reaction. Genet Test. 1998;1: 289-291.
• Zenteno JC, Lopez M, Vera C, Mendez JP, Kofman-Alfaro S. Two SRY-negative XX male brothers without genital ambiguity. Hum Genet. 1997; 100: 606-610.