Determination of Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Crimson Seedless Grape Variety Soils in Vineyards of Alaşehir for Growing Quality Grape

Year 2021, Volume: 4 Issue: 8, 241 - 251, 29.09.2021

Fadime Ateş Fulya Kuştutan

Abstract

This study was conducted in 2015 aimed to determine some physical and chemical properties of Crimson Seedless grape variety grown soils in vineyards of Alaşehir district, which is the largest grape producing vineyard area of Manisa Province in Turkey. According to the results of vineyard soil samples analyses; 80% loamy and 20% soil samples had clay–loamy textures; 20% soil samples were found with strong alkaline, the 60% having slight alkalineand 20% Mild acid, 100% were salt–free. These soil samples are placed into low class category in terms of total organic matter due to its 80% low and 20% calcareous level. Soil samples contain 60% medium, 20% high and 20% very high level of P; 20% very low, 30% low and 50% medium level of K; Soil samples having 20% low, 40% medium and 40% high Mg level; also containing 40% very low, 20% low and 40% medium level of Ca; Soil samples possessing 40% low and 60% critical level of Zn; also having 60% critical and 40% adequate Fe; Nitrogen contents were found low while Cu and Mn contents in sufficient amount in case of all soil samples. In addition to this, the presence of significant bilateral relations relating to some physical and chemical properties of vineyard soils were also determined.

Keywords

Vitis vinifera L., Crimson Seedless grape variety, Physical and chemical properties of soil, Nutrient, Alaşehir/Manisa.

References

• Anonymous (1990). Micronutrient, Assessment at the Country Level: An International Study. FAO Soil Bulletin by Sillanpaa, Rome.
• Anonim (2015 a). TUİK, 2015. http://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bitkiselapp/bitkisel.zul., (Ulaşım Tarihi: 11.03.2015).
• Anonymous (2015 b). FAO Statistical Yearbook 2013 World Food and Agriculture. http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3107e/i3107e.PDF. (Available from: 25.06.2016)
• Atalay, İ.Z., Anaç, D. (1991). Salihli bağlarının beslenme durumunun toprak ve bitki analizleri ile incelenmesi. Proje Raporu; Tübitak proje no: TOAG–659. Bayraklı, F. (1987). Toprak ve Bitki Analizleri. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniv. Yayınları, Yayın No:17 200 s. Samsun. (Soil and Plant Analysis. Publication of Nineteen May University., Publication No. 17. 200 p., Samsun).
• Bouyoucos, G. J. (1955). A Recalibration Of The Hydrometer For Making Mechanical Analysis Of Soils. Agronomy J.43: 434-443.
• Çağlar, K. Ö. (ed.) (1958). Toprak Bilgisi, Ankara Üniversitesi Zir. Fak. Yayın No: 10. Ankara.
• Çelik, S. (ed.) (2011). Bağcılık (Ampeloloji). Cilt–1. 3. Baskı. Trakya Üniversitesi, Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Bahçe Bitkileri Bölümü. 428 s. Tekirdağ.
• Dokoozlian, N., D. Luvisi, Moriyama, M. and Schrader, P. (1995). Cultural practices improve color, size of ‘Crimson Seedless’. Calif. Agr. 49:36–40.
• Evliya, H. (ed.) (1964). Kültür bitkilerinin beslenmesi. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yayınları, Sayı: 36.
• Harry, O.B and Brady, N. C., (ed.) (1969). The Nature and Properties of Soils ; 7th ed pp 20-33.
• Havlin, J.L., Tisdale, S.L., Beaton, J.D. and Nelson. W.L. (ed.) (2005). Soil Fertility and Fertilizers. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
• İrget, M.E. (1988). Menemen yöresi bağlarının beslenme durumunun toprak ve bitki analizleri ile incelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İzmir.
• İrget, M.E., Atalay, İ.Z. (1992). Menemen bağlarının demir, çinko ve mangan durumunun toprak ve bitki analizleri ile incelenmesi. Türkiye I. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi. Cilt: 2. 487–492. İzmir.
• Jackson, M. L. (ed.) (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall Of Private Limited, New Delhi. USA.
• Kacar, B. (ed.) (1995). Bitki Ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri III, A. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Eğitim Araştırma Ve Geliştirme Vakfı Yayınları: No:3, Ankara.
• Konuk, F., Çolakoğlu, H. (1986). Gediz ovası çekirdeksiz üzüm bağlarında makro besin elementleri, toprak–bitki ilişkileri ve bağların beslenme durumu. Tariş Araş. Geliştirme Müdür. Proje No: Ar–Ge 001. İzmir.
• Kovancı, İ., Atalay, İ.Z. (1977). Çal bağlarında makro besin elementi ve toprak bitki ilişkileri. Bitki Cilt 4, Sayı:2,192–212.
• Lindsay, W.L., And Norwel, W. A. (1978). Development Of DTPA Soil Test For Zink, Iron, Manganase And Copper, Soil Sci. Soc. Of Amer. Journal 42; 421-428.
• Nelson, D.W., and Sommer, L.E. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. p. 539-579. In A.L. Page (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. 2nd Ed. ASA Monogr. 9(2). Amer. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI.
• Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S., Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular Nr 939, US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C.
• Özbek, N. (ed.) (1975). Toprak verimliliği ve gübreler. II. Gübreler. Ankara Ü. Zir. Fak. Yay.: 54, Ders Kitabı: 180, A. Ü. Basımevi, Ankara. Sayfa: 61-88, Sayfa Sayısı 196.
• Ramming, D.W., Tarailo, R. and Badr. S.A. (1995).‘Crimson Seedless’: A new late maturing, red seedless table grape. HortScience 30:1473–1474.
• Rauterberg, E., Kremkus, F. (1951). Bestimmung Von Gesamt Humus und Alkalischen Humusstoffen in Boden., z.fur Pflanaenernaehrun Düngung und Bodenkunde, Verlag Chemie, Gmbh, Weinheim.
• Richards, L. A. (ed.) (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Agriculture Handbook 60, Washington D. C.
• Römheld, V. (2012). Diagnosis of deficiency and toxicity of nutrients. In: Marschner,P. (Ed.), Marschner’s .
• Soil Survey Staff (1951). Soil Survey Manual, U.S. Dep. Agric. Handbook 18,503 pp.
• Viets, F.G., Lindsay, W.L. (1973). Testing Soils for Zinc. Copper. Manganese and Iron. Soil Soc. Of Amer. Inc. Madison Wisconcin USA. 153-172.
• Winkler, A., Cook, J., Kliewer, W. and Lider. L. (ed.) (1974.) General Viticulture. 710 pp. University of California Press, Berkeley.
• Yener, H., Aydın, Ş., Güleç, İ. (2002). Alaşehir Kavaklıdere yöresi bağlarının beslenme durumu. Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araş. Ens. Derg. (ANADOLU). 12 (2): 110–139.