SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ

Esma Ülkü Kaya

SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ

Öz

Süreç yenileme, görev ve süreçlerin tamamen yeniden dizaynıdır. Bu nedenle süreç yenileme, örgütsel süreçlerde radikal değişimlere izin veren bir yaklaşımdır. TKY ise uzun dönemde ürün ve hizmetlerde sürekli kalite artışlarını gerçekleştirmek için geniş örgütsel bir katkıya dayalıdır. TKY ve süreç yenileme hem ortak hem de farklı özellikleri paylaşırlar. Kıyaslama bir süreç yenileme tekniği olarak kullanılır. Süreç yenilemenin başarılı olabilmesi için kıyaslama çok iyi şekilde uygulanmalıdır.

Bu makalenin amacı, TKY ve kıyaslama yaklaşımları ile süreç yenileme arasındaki ilişkiyi göstermektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Süreç Yenileme,Kıyaslama,TKY

References

1. Al-Mashari, Majed ve Mohamed, Zairi, “BPR Implementation Process: An Analysis Of Key Success And Failure Factors”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol.5, No.1, 1999, ss.87-112
2. Al-Mashari, Majed ve Mohamed, Zairi, “Revisiting BPR:A Holistic Review Of Practice And Development”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol.6, No.1, 2000, ss.10-42
3. Armistead, Colin ve Alan, Harrison, “Business Process Re-engineering:Lessons From Operations Management”, Intarnational Journal of Operations&Production Management, Vol.15, Issue:12, 1995, ss.46-59
4. Beerten, Peter, “Can We Construct A Quality And Participation Architecture?”, Journal for Quality&Participation, Vol.19, Issue:2, 1996, ss. 20-28
5. Berman, Saul, “Strategic Direction:Don’t Reengineer Without It Scanning The Horizon for Turbulence”, Plannig Review, Vol.22, Issue:6 (Nov), 1994, ss.18-24
6. Brown, Alan ve Wiele, T.V.D, “Insights into TQM And Downsizing in Large Organizations”, Benchmarking for Quality Management &Technology, Vol.4, Issue:3, 1997, ss.202-212
7. Carter, Tony, The Aftermath Of Reengineering-Downsizing And Corporate Performance, New York:The Haworth Press, 1999
8. Chan, Peng S. ve David, Peel, “Causes And Impact Of Reengineering”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol.4, No.1, 1996, ss.44-55

9. Chu, William W. ve Diğerleri, “Business Process Reengineering Analysis And Recommendations”, 1994
10. Collins, Philippa, “Approaches To Quality”, The TQM Magazine, Vol.6, No.3, 1994, ss.39-43
11. Davenport, Thomas, “Will Participative Makeovers Of Business Processes Succeed Where Reengineered Failed ?”, Planning Review, Vol.23, Issue:1 (January), 1995, ss.24-30
12. Eisenberg, Howard,“Reengineering and Dumbsizing:Mismanagement of The Knowledge Resource”, Quality Progress, Vol.30, Issue: 5, 1997, ss.57-65 13. Farrell, John, “A Pratical Guide For Implementing Reengineering”, Plannig Review, Vol.22, Issue:2(Mar/Apr), 1994, ss.40-46
14. Gale, Bradley J.,“Quality Profiling: The First Step In Reengineering And Benchmarking”, Planning Review, Vol.23, Issue:3 (May/Jun), 1995, ss.37-39
15. Guimaraes, Thor ve Wendi, Bond, “Empirically Assessing The Impact of BPR on Manufacturing Firms”, International Journal of Operations&Production Management, Vol.16, Issue:8, 1996, ss.5-28
16. Lee, Sang M., “ TQM And BPR: Symbiosis And A New Approach for Integration”, Management Decision, Vo.35, Issue:5-6, 1997, ss.410-412
17. Li, Heng ve Diğerleri, “Co-operative Benchmarking: A Tool For Partnering Excellence In Construction”, International Journal Of Project Management, Vol.19, 2001, s.179
18. Macdonald, John, “Together TQM And BPR Are Winners”, The TQM Magazine, Vol.7, No.3, 1995, ss.21-25
19. Newman, Karin, ve Diğerleri, “Case Study:Service Quality, Business Re-engineering And Human Resources: A Case In Point?” , International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol.16, Issue:6, 1998, ss.225 -242
20. Peppard, Joe, “Benchmarking, Process Re-Engineering And Strategy:Some Focusing Frameworks”, Human Systems Management,Vol.18, Issue:3/4, 1999, ss.297-314
21. Perreira, Zulema L. ve Elaine, Aspinwall, “Total Quality Management Versus Business Process Re-Engineering”, Total Quality Management, Vol.8, Issue:1, 1997, ss.33-39
22. Scott, George M., “Downsizing, Business Process Reengineering, And Quality Improvement Plans:How Are They Related?”, Information Strategy:The Executive’s Journal, Vol. 11, Issue: 3,1995, ss.18-34
23. Simpson, Mike, ve Diğerleri, “From Benchmarking to Business Process Reengineering:A Case Study”, Total Quality Management, Vol.10,Issue:4/5, 1999, ss.717-725
24. Richman, Theodor ve Charles, Koontz, “How Benchmarking Can Improve Business Reengineering”, Planning Review, Vol.21, Issue:6, 1993, ss.26-29
25. Robenson, Matthew, ve Diğerleri, “Reengineering (Downsizing), Corporate Security And Loss Prevention”, International Journal Of Risk, Security And Crime Prevention, 1998
26. Thor, Carl G., “Let’s Clear Up Some Confusıon About Benchmarking”, Journal for Quality&Participation, Vol.19, Issue:4, 1996,ss.88-91
27. Zairi, Mohamed ve David, Sinclair, “Business Process Re-Engineering And Process Management”, Management Decision, Vol.33, Issue:3, 1995, ss.3-16
28. Zairi, Mohamed, “The Integration of Benchmarking And BPR:A Matter of Choice or Necessity”, Business Process Re-engineering&Management Journal, Vol.01, Issue:3, 1995, ss.3-9
29. Zairi, Mohamed, “What’s In The Basket? A Survey On Integrated Management Through BPR And TQM”, The TQM Magazine, Vol.8, No.6, 1996, ss.58-65

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Esma Ülkü Kaya ^*
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 19, 2003

Submission Date

November 3, 2002

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2003 Volume: 1 Number: 3

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA22ZZ59WF

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kaya, E. Ü. (2003). SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ. Fırat Üniversitesi Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(3), 56-63. https://izlik.org/JA22ZZ59WF

AMA

1.Kaya EÜ. SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ. (DAD). 2003;1(3):56-63. https://izlik.org/JA22ZZ59WF

Chicago

Kaya, Esma Ülkü. 2003. “SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ”. Fırat Üniversitesi Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi 1 (3): 56-63. https://izlik.org/JA22ZZ59WF.

EndNote

Kaya EÜ (June 1, 2003) SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ. Fırat Üniversitesi Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi 1 3 56–63.

IEEE

[1]E. Ü. Kaya, “SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ”, (DAD), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 56–63, June 2003, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA22ZZ59WF

ISNAD

Kaya, Esma Ülkü. “SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ”. Fırat Üniversitesi Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi 1/3 (June 1, 2003): 56-63. https://izlik.org/JA22ZZ59WF.

JAMA

1.Kaya EÜ. SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ. (DAD). 2003;1:56–63.

MLA

Kaya, Esma Ülkü. “SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ”. Fırat Üniversitesi Doğu Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 3, June 2003, pp. 56-63, https://izlik.org/JA22ZZ59WF.

Vancouver

1.Esma Ülkü Kaya. SÜREÇ YENİLEME TEKNİĞİNİN KIYASLAMA VE TKY YAKLAŞIMLARIYLA İLİŞKİSİ. (DAD) [Internet]. 2003 Jun. 1;1(3):56-63. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA22ZZ59WF