Farklı Taper Açılarına Sahip Endodontik Eğelerin Biyomekanik Özelliklerinin Sonlu Elemanlar Analiziyle Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışma, farklı konik açılara sahip nikel-titanyum (Ni-Ti) döner aletlerin bükülme ve burulma sırasındaki gerilim dağılımını sonlu elemanlar analizi (SEA) kullanılarak değerlendirilmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma için 0.02, 0.04 ve 0.06 sabit taper açılarına sahip döner alet eğeleri Solidworks yazılımı kullanılarak modellendi. Bu modeller Ansys yazılımına aktarıldı. Eğelerin esnekliğini ve burulma sertliğini değerlendirmek için SEA yöntemi kullanılarak, ISO 3630-1 spesifikasyonuna göre gerçekleştirildi. Test sonuçlarına göre 0.02 taper açısına sahip eğe sistemi bükülmeye maruz kaldığında 0.04 ve 0.06 tapera sahip eğelerden daha yüksek esneklik gösterdi. Burulma direnci açısından 0.06 taper açısına sahip döner eğe, 0.02 ve 0.04 taper açısına sahip eğelerden daha yüksek burulma direnci gösterdi. Aletin geometrisi, döner eğelerin mekanik davranışını (bükülme ve burulma) etkilemektedir. Klinisyen döner eğelerdeki davranışsal farklılıkların farkında olmalı, üretici talimatlarına ek olarak klinik duruma göre uygun eğeyi kullanmalıdır. Bu çalışma, farklı konik açılara sahip nikel-titanyum (Ni-Ti) döner aletlerin bükülme ve burulma sırasındaki gerilim dağılımını sonlu elemanlar analizi (FEA) kullanılarak değerlendirilmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

• Endodontik eğe
• Bükme testi
• Burulma testi
• Sonlu elemanlar analizi

Evaluation of the Biomechanical Properties of Endodontic Files with Different Taper Angles Using Finite Element Analysis

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the stress distribution of nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary tools with different conical angles during bending and torsion using finite element analysis (FEA). For the study, rotary file models with fixed taper angles of 0.02, 0.04, and 0.06 were modeled using Solidworks software. These models were transferred to Ansys software. It was performed according to the ISO 3630-1 specification using the SEA method to evaluate the flexibility and torsional stiffness of the files. According to the test results, the file system with a 0.02 taper angle showed higher flexibility when subjected to bending compared to the files with 0.04 and 0.06 taper angles. Regarding torsional resistance, the rotary file with a 0.06 taper angle demonstrated higher torsional resistance than the files with 0.02 and 0.04 taper angles. The geometry of the instrument affects the mechanical behavior (bending and torsional) of rotary files. Clinicians should be aware of the behavioral differences in rotary files and, in addition to following manufacturer instructions, should use the appropriate file according to the clinical situation

Keywords

• Endodontic file
• Bending test
• Torsional test
• Finite element analysis

References

1. [1] L. de Arruda Santos, J. B. López, E. B. de Las Casas, M. G. de Azevedo Bahia, and V. T. L. Buono, "Mechanical behavior of three nickel-titanium rotary files: A comparison of numerical simulation with bending and torsion tests," Mat. Sci. and Eng.: C, vol. 37, pp. 258-263, 2014.
2. H. Kim, H. Kim, C. Lee, B. Kim, J. Park, and A. Versluis, "Mechanical response of nickel–titanium instruments with different cross‐sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals," Internat. Endod. Jour., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 593-602, 2009.
3. S. C. S. Martins, P. R. Garcia, A. C. D. Viana, V. T. L. Buono, and L. A. Santos, "Off-centered geometry and influence on NiTi endodontic file performance evaluated by finite element analysis," Jour. of Mat. Eng. and Perfor., vol. 29, pp. 2095-2102, 2020.
4. P. Y. H. Chien, L. J. Walsh, and O. A. Peters, "Finite element analysis of rotary nickel‐titanium endodontic instruments: a critical review of the methodology," Europ. Jour. of Oral Sci., vol. 129, no. 5, p. e12802, 2021.
5. URL: https://bondent.eu/product_family/endo/ (Visited on Dec. 8, 2023).
6. URL: https://incidental.com.tr/uploads/catalogs/RubyDent_tr.pdf (Visited on Dec. 8, 2023).
7. URL:https://www.fkg.ch/sites/default/files/FKG_Race%20Family_Brochure_EN_WEB_ 202201. pdf Visited on Dec. 8, 2023).
8. E. Berutti, G. Chiandussi, I. Gaviglio, and A. Ibba, "Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile," Jour.of Endod., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 15-19, 2003.

9. O. C. Zienkiewicz, R. L. Taylor, and J. Z. Zhu, The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals. Elsevier, 2005.
10. D. R. C. Instruments—Part, "1: General requirements and test methods," Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, pp. 3630-1, 2008.
11. A. G. Ismail, M. H. A. Zaazou, M. Galal, N. O. M. Kamel, and M. A. Nassar, "Finite element analysis comparing WaveOne Gold and ProTaper Next endodontic file segments subjected to bending and torsional load," Bull. of the Nati. Res. Cen., vol. 43, pp. 1-6, 2019.
12. N. Wakabayashi, M. Ona, T. Suzuki, and Y. Igarashi, "Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications," Jour. of Dent., vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 463-471, 2008.
13. A. Versluis, H.-C. Kim, W. Lee, B.-M. Kim, and C.-J. Lee, "Flexural stiffness and stresses in nickel-titanium rotary files for various pitch and cross-sectional geometries," Jour.of Endod., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 1399-1403, 2012.
14. N. Bonessio et al., "Validated finite element analyses of WaveOne Endodontic Instruments: a comparison between M‐Wire and NiTi alloys," Intern. Endod. Jour., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 441-450, 2015.
15. H. S. Topçuoğlu, G. Topçuoğlu, Ö. Kafdağ, and H. Balkaya, "Effect of two different temperatures on resistance to cyclic fatigue of one Curve, EdgeFile, HyFlex CM and ProTaper next files," Austr. Endod. Jour., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 68-72, 2020.
16. J. N. Martins et al., "Characterization of the file‐specific heat‐treated ProTaper Ultimate rotary system," Intern. Endod. Jour., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 530-542, 2023.
17. E. C. Kökan, A. Y. Atik, Ş. Özüpek, and E. Podnos, "Structural Assessment of Endodontic Files via Finite Element Analysis," Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 18, p. 10293, 2023.
18. E. Ninan and D. W. Berzins, "Torsion and bending properties of shape memory and superelastic nickel-titanium rotary instruments," Jour. of Endod., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 101-104, 2013.
19. R. He and J. Ni, "Design improvement and failure reduction of endodontic files through finite element analysis: application to V-Taper file designs," Jour. of Endod., vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1552-1557, 2010.
20. M. I. El-Anwar, S. A. Yousief, E. M. Kataia, and T. M. A. El-Wahab, "Finite element study on continuous rotating versus reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments," Braz. Dental Jour., vol. 27, pp. 436-441, 2016.