Research Article

BREXIT AND THE POSSIBILITY OF “DOMINO EFFECT”

Volume: 5 Number: 2 December 21, 2021
EN TR

BREXIT AND THE POSSIBILITY OF “DOMINO EFFECT”

Abstract

The European Union (EU) was established by six member states in 1957. It had a policy of ever-forward enlargement and became a union with 28 member states in 2013. The United Kingdom (UK) was one of the first states to apply for membership and is also first to leave the EU. Brexit Referendum, which was held in 2016, was a milestone in the EU. Although it was the first time a member state left the EU the UK’s Euroscepticism was nothing new. However, the UK is not the only Eurosceptic member of the EU. For that reason, after the Referendum other “-exits” began to be discussed by the member states with doubts about the EU policies. Frexit, Nexit and Grexit were the examples of other “-exit” discussions. Domino effect possibility was on the papers just after the Referendum but after five years it just seems to be a rhetoric. This research scrutinises Brexit and its possible effects on EU integration through the concepts of Euroscepticism and domino effect. It also argues that Brexit is closely related with the UK’s own circumstances, background, interests, capabilities, and expectations. Therefore, it claims that it is difficult to talk about domino effect.

Keywords

Euroscepticism , Brexit , Domino Effect , EU Integration

References

  1. ADLER-NISSEN, Rebecca, (2011), “Opting Out of an Ever-Closer Union: The Integration Doxa and the Management of Sovereignty”, West European Politics, 34:5, pp. 1092-113, Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080%2F01402382.2011.591102 (Accessed: 11.07.2021).
  2. ADLER, Katya, (2016), “Scared by Brexit, Europe asks what next”, BBC, 24 June, Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36625573 (Accessed: 23.07.2021).
  3. ARNORSSON, Agust and ZOEGA, Gylfi, (2018), “On the causes of Brexit”, European Journal of Political Economy, 55, pp. 301-323, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.02.001 (Accessed: 15.07.2021).
  4. BBC, (2021), “Brexit divorce bill: How much does the UK owe to the EU?”, 9 July 2021, Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/51110096 (Accessed: 23.07.2021).
  5. CHRISAFIS, Angelique (2016), “European far right hails Brexit vote”, The Guardian, 24 June, Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/24/european-far-right-hails-britains-brexit-vote-marine-le-pen (Accessed: 23.07.2021).
  6. CONSILLIUM, (n.d.), “European Council Meeting at Fontainebleau Conclusions of the Presidency”, Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/20673/1984_june_-_fontainebleau__eng_.pdf (Accessed: 10.07.2021).
  7. DOUGLAS-SCOTT, Sionaidh, (2014) “Fundamental Rights not Euroscepticism: Why the UK should embrace the EU Charter”, Legal Research Paper Series, Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2528768 (Accessed: 15.07.2021).
  8. DUNAI, Marton, (2016), “Dutch anti-immigrant party chief urges ‘Nexit’ referendum for Netherlands”, Reuters, 24 June, Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/britain-eu-outers-netherlands-idINKCN0ZA2A2 (Accessed: 23.07.2021).
  9. EISENHOWER, Dwight, D., (1954), “President Eisenhower’s Conference”, Available at: https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/pentagon/ps11.htm (Accessed: 10.07.2021).
  10. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, (n.d.)a, “Winston Churchill: calling for a United States of Europe”, Available at: https://europa.eu/european-union/sites/default/files/docs/body/winston_churchill_en.pdf (Accessed: 10.07.2021).
APA
Hocaoğlu Bahadır, N. (2021). BREXIT AND THE POSSIBILITY OF “DOMINO EFFECT”. Fırat Üniversitesi Uluslararası İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 123-140. https://izlik.org/JA44KK23RP