Globalization And Increasing Domination Over The Nation State

Year 2021, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 135 - 158, 23.06.2021

Ertuğrul Buğra Orhan

Abstract

Globalization is a phenomenon that deeply affects today's economies and politics. The excessive growth of global companies erodes the economic and political effectiveness of nation states. It is seen that this phenomenon is handled with different approaches in the context of globalization literature. However, especially the approach put forward by the critical theory has been the academic parameter adopted for this research. Therefore, the focus is on the context of the approach of globalization that strengthens capital companies and negatively affects nation states. In the research, it has been concluded that the nation state was the dominant actor of the global system, whereas today nation states are under pressure. In addition, it has been concluded that global capital companies are in a dominating position against nation states. The concepts of freedom, intervention, and domination have been abstract explanators in reaching this conclusion. The method adopted in the use of concepts is the functionality of the concepts and the related concepts approach. These approaches have been evaluated with an inductive conceptualization.

Keywords

globalization, nation state, freedom, domination

GLOBALIZATION AND INCREASING DOMINATION OVER THE NATION STATE

Abstract

Globalization is a phenomenon that deeply affects today's economies and politics. The excessive growth of global companies erodes the economic and political effectiveness of nation states. It is seen that this phenomenon is handled with different approaches in the context of globalization literature. However, especially the approach put forward by the critical theory has been the academic parameter adopted for this research. Therefore, the focus is on the context of the approach of globalization that strengthens capital companies and negatively affects nation states. In the research, it has been concluded that the nation state was the dominant actor of the global system, whereas today nation states are under pressure. In addition, it has been concluded that global capital companies are in a dominating position against nation states. The concepts of freedom, intervention, and domination have been abstract explanators in reaching this conclusion. The method adopted in the use of concepts is the functionality of the concepts and the related concepts approach. These approaches have been evaluated with an inductive conceptualization.

Keywords

Globalization, Freedom, Nation State, Domination

References

• ARENDT, H. (1996). Geçmişle Gelecek Arasında, (Çev. Şener, B, S) İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
• AYDOĞAN, M. (2006). Küreselleşme ve Siyasi Partiler, (2. Baskı), Umay Yayınları, İzmir.
• BAUMAN, Z. (2012). Küreselleşme: Toplumsal Sonuçları, (Çev. Yılmaz, A) Ayrıntı Yayınları, ISBN 978-975-539-254-7, İstanbul.
• BECK, U. (2002) The Cosmopolitan Perspective: Sociology in the Second Age of Modernity, Conceving Cosmopolitanism : Theory, Context, and Practice, der. S. Vertovec ve R. Cohen, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
• BELLAMY, R. (2005), “J. S. Mill, T. H. Green and Isaiah Berlin on the Nature of Liberty and Liberalism”, Rethinking Liberalism, Richard Bellamy, Continuum, pp. 22-46.
• BERKTAY, F. (2015), 19. Yüzyıldan 20. Yüzyıla Modern Siyasal İdeolojiler, Örs, B. , İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
• BERLİN, I. (2002), Two Concepts of Liberty, Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, (Ed.) Henry Hardy, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 166-217.
• BRAUDEL, F. (1996), Uygarlıkların Grameri, (Çev. Kılıçbay, M, A) İmge Kitabevi, Ankara.
• DELANTY, G. (2006), "The Cosmopolitan Imagination: Critical Cosmopolitanism and Social Theory", The British Journal of Sociology, Vol.57(1).
• ERDOĞAN, M. (2006), Aydınlanma, Modernlik ve Liberalizm, Orion Yayınevi, (1. Basım), Ankara
• ESGİN, A. (2005) “Ulus-Devlet ve Küreselleşmeye İlişkin Bazı Tartışmalar”, C.Ü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, cilt:25,No:2.
• FUKUYAMA, F, Richman, B, Goel, A, (2021), “How to Save Democracy from Technology: Ending Big Tech’s Information Monopoly”, Foreign Affairs, Retriewed from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-11-24/fukuyama-how-save-democracy-technology?utm_medium=email_notifications&utm_source=reg_confirmation&utm_campaign=reg_guestpass
• GELLNER E. (1992), Uluslar ve Ulusçuluk, (Çev. Ersanlı B, ve Günay Özdoğan, G, G) İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları.
• GİDDENS, A. (2012), Modernliğin Sonuçları, (Çev. Kuşdil, E), Ayrıntı Yayınları, (5. Basım), İstanbul.
• GİDDENS, A. (2008), Ulus Devlet Ve Şiddet, (Çev. Atay, C), Kalkedon Yayınları, İstanbul.
• HABLEMİTOĞLU, Ş. (2004), Küreselleşme Düşlerden Gerçekleri, Ankara: Toplumsal Dönüşüm Yayınları.
• HELD, D., McGrew, A. (2008) Küresel DönüĢümler: Büyük KüreselleĢme TartıĢması, (Çev. Güngen, A, R), Phoenix Yayınları, Ankara.
• HEYWOOD, A, (2016), Siyaset Teorisine Giriş, (Çev. Köse, H, M), Küre Yayınları, (7. Baskı), İstanbul, ISBN: 978-605-5383-02-2.
• JESSOP, B. (2004) The European Union and Recent Transformations in Statehood. In: Transformations of Statehood from a European Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 3-593-37632-6
• KAPANİ, M. (2004), Politika Bilimine Giriş, Bilgi Yayınevi, (16. Basım), İstanbul.
• KİSSİNGER, H. (2014), Dünya Düzeni, (Çev. Gül, S, S) Boyner Yayınları, (1.Baskı), İstanbul, ISBN: 978-975-7004-74-5
• KLAUSMEİER, H. J. (1992). Concept learning and concept teaching. Educational Psychologist, 27 (3), 267-286.
• KYMLİCKA, Will, (2016), Çağdaş Siyaset Felsefesine Giriş, (Çev. Kılıç, E), İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
• LEYEN, U, V,D. (2021), “Almanya ve AB: Sosyal medya devlerini dizginleyelim” Retriewed from https://www.dw.com/tr/almanya-ve-ab-sosyal-medya-devlerini-dizginleyelim/a-56350601 (Erişim Tarihi: 25.01.2021)
• MERKEL, A, (2021), “Almanya ve AB: Sosyal medya devlerini dizginleyelim” Retriewed from https://www.dw.com/tr/almanya-ve-ab-sosyal-medya-devlerini-dizginleyelim/a-56350601 (Erişim Tarihi: 25.01.2021)
• MERRİLL, M. D., & Tennyson, R. D. (1977). Concept teaching: An instructional design guide. NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• MİLL, J. S. (2000) Özgürlük Üstüne, (Çev. Ertan, A), Belge Yayınları, İstanbul.
• NAİSBİTT, J. (1994), Global Paradoks: Büyüyen Dünya Ekonomisinin Güçlenen Küçük Oyuncuları, (Çev. Gül, S), Sabah Kitapları, İstanbul, ISBN: 975-7238-04-X
• PETTIT, P. (1998), Cumhuriyetçilik: Bir Özgürlük ve Yönetim Teorisi, (Çev. Yılmaz, A) Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul.
• PUTİN, V. (2021), “ Extension of START ‘step in right direction': Putin" Retriewed from https://www.aa.com.tr/en/politics/extension-of-start-step-in-right-direction-putin/2124911 (Erişim Tarihi: 26.01.2021)
• SCHOLTE, J. A.(2000), Globalization: A Critical Introduction, (New York: St. Martin‟s Press).
• SMİTH, A. (2002), Küresel Çağda Milletler ve Milliyetçilik, (Çev. Kömürcü, D) Everest Yayınları, 1. Basım, İstanbul.
• SMİTH, A. (2003), "Küresel Bir Kültüre Doğru Mu?", (Çev. Güngen A, R ve diğerleri), Ed. Held, D. & McGrew, A.), Küresel Dönüşümler: Büyük Küreselleşme Tartışması, Phoenix Yayınevi, Ankara.
• SWİFT, A. (2006), Political Philosophy, Polity Press, Cambridge.
• THE NEW YORK TİMES, (2021), “Anti-Lockdown Protesters Clash With Officers in the Netherlands” Retriewed from https://www.nytimes.com/video/world/europe/100000007568109/anti-lockdown-protesters-police-netherlands.html (Erişim Tarihi: 28.01.2021)
• TRUMP, D, (2019), “Trump: Gelecek küreselcilerin değil vatanseverlerin” Retriewed from https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-49816735 (Erişim Tarihi: 15.05.2021)
• URRY, J. (2000), "Mobile Sociology", British Journal of Socilogy, 51/1
• WALLERSTEİN, I. (1998), Liberalizmden Sonra, (The New Press, New York ile yapılan anlaşma ile yayınlanan eser), Orj Adı After Liberalism, 1995, (Çev. ÖZ, E) Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
• YEATES, N. (2002), Globalization and Social Policy, SAGE Publications (London, Thousand Oaks, ca and New Delhi) vol. 2(1): 69–91. [1468-0181 (200204) 2:1; 69–91; 022095]
• ZABCI, F.Ç. (2009), Kral Devletten Ulus Devlete, Siyaset Felsefesi içinde (162-222). Ağaoğulları, M,A, Zabcı,F,Ç, ve Ergün, R., İmge Kitabevi, (2. Baskı), Ankara