Abstract
— Hypermedia forms the basis of the e-learning with the active, non-linear and flexible structure. It provides a wide flexibility of movement for the learners. This allows access to a large number of educational multimedia materials. However, this learner control flexibility provided by hypermedia and abundance of information also have led to the emergence of disorientation, cognitive overload, divided attention and waste of time problems which negatively affect learner navigation performance. To cope with these problems it is expected to benefit from the metaphors as natural models in educational hypermedia. Because the metaphors may make the environment understandable and memorable to the user advantage of the concrete object, familiar facts, habits and tasks. The results from metaphorical interface design studies conducted over a 4 year period , provided the basis for this study. Based on the results of research a metaphorical interface design framework named EMMI (educational content analysis, metaphors, metaphorical interface components, Interface Design) has been developed. In this study, the pedagogical and practical implications are presented with the structure and operation of the framework
Keywords
— Hypermedia Web interface design educational interface design cognitive load disorientation metaphors navigation performance
References
- G. Jacobs, “Hypermedia and Discovery-Based Learning: A Historical Perspective”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 113–121, 1992.
- R. Garrison, and T. Anderson, E-learning in the 21 st century: A Framework for Research and Practice. New York: Rutledge Flamer. 2003.
- J. Conklin, “Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey”. IEEE Computer, 20, 17-41, 1987.
- R. Oliver, and H. Oliver, “Information Access and Retrieval With Hypermedia Information Systems”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 27: 33–44, 1996.
- E. Kılıç, ve Ş. Karadeniz, “Hiperortamlarda Öğrencilerin Bilişsel Yüklenme ve Kaybolma Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 40, 562–579, 2004.
- M. Fırat, ve I. Kabakçı, “Use of Visual Metaphors for Navigation in Educational Hypermedia: Effects on the Navigational Performance”. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(1), 5-22, 2010. [7] P. Barr, User-interface Metaphor in Theory and Practice. MSc. Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Department of Mathematical and Computing Sciences. 2003.
- P.J. Lynch, “Visual Design for the User Interface”. Journal of Biocommunications, 21, 22-30, 1994.
- J. Lee, and Y. Hsu, “Visual Metaphor Interface and Cognitive Style: A study for Online Learning”. In L. Cantoni ve C. McLoughlin (Eds.). Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp.4478-4481). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. 2004.
- J. Cheon, and M.M. Grant, “A cognitive load approach to metaphorical interface design: Reconsidering theoretical frameworks”. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, 1054-1059. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. 2008.
- E. Merdivan and N. Özdener, “Effects of different metaphor usage on hypertext learning”. Behaviour and Information Technology, 30(2), 273-285, 2011.
- A. Ortony, Metaphor and Thought (2nd Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1993.
- G. Lakoff, and M. Johnson, Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1980.
- R.G. Malgady and M.G. Johnson, “Measurement of figurative language: Semantic feature models of comprehension and appreciation”. In R.P. Honeck and R. R. Hoffman (Eds.). Cognition and figurative language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1980.
- M. Fırat and I. Kabakçı Yurdakul, “Metaphores in metacommunication”. In Meta-Communication for Reflective Online Conversations: Models for Distance Educations, Ed.: U. Demiray, G. Kurubacak ve T. V. Yuzer, Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2011.
- M. Fırat and I. Kabakçı Yurdakul, “Determining the Variables of Instructional Hypermedia Navigation Performance”. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy NWSA-Education Sciences, 1C0494, 7, (1), 296-304, 2012.
- M. Fırat, Eğitsel Hiperortamlarda Metaforik Arayüzlerin Bilişim Teknolojileri Öğretmen Adaylarının Gezinim Performansına Etkileri. Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir, 2012.
- D.S. Catre, Visualization of Interface Metaphor for Software: An Engineering Approach. Baco Raton, USA: Florida, 2011.
- P. Kilgore, M., Trutschl, and U. Cvek, “Panoramic Interaction with Interval Data Based on the Slider Metaphor.” In ACHI 2014, The Seventh International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, (pp. 271-276), March 2014.
- M. Ishihara & Y. Ishihara, "Fishing Metaphor for Navigation in CAVE." HCI International 2014-Posters’ Extended Abstracts. Springer International Publishing, 2014. 596-601.
Abstract
Doğrusal olmayan, hareketli ve esnek yapısıyla Hiperortamlar e-öğrenmenin temelini oluşturmaktadır. Öğrenen için geniş bir hareket esnekliği sağlayan Hiperortamlar birbirinden farklı çok sayıda eğitsel çoklu ortam materyaline ulaşma olanağı sağlamıştır. Ancak Hiperortamların öğrenen kontrolü için sağladığı bu esneklik ve enformasyon bolluğu öğrenenin eğitsel Hiperortamdaki gezinim performansını olumsuz yönde etkileyen kaybolma, aşırı bilişsel yüklenme, dikkat bölünmesi ve zaman kaybı gibi gezinim problemlerini de beraberinde getirmiştir. Bu problemlerle başa çıkmak için eğitsel hiper ortamlarda doğal modeller olarak metaforlardan yararlanılabileceği düşünülmektedir. Çünkü metaforlar tanıdık olgular, alışkanlıklar, görevler ve somut nesnelerden yararlanarak ortamın fonksiyonlarını kullanıcıya anlaşılır ve hatırlanabilir hale getirebilirler. Bu çalışmada araştırmacılar tarafından 2009-2013 yılları arasında dört yıl süren araştırma sonuçlarından yararlanılmıştır. Yapılan araştırmalar sonucunda EMMA (Eğitsel içerik analizi, Metaforlar, Metaforik arayüz bileşenleri, Arayüz Tasarımı) Adımları adlı bir metaforik arayüz tasarım geliştirme çerçevesi belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada EMMA Adımlarının yapısı ve işleyişiyle birlikte pedagojik ve pratik çıkarımları sunulmuştur.
Keywords
References
- G. Jacobs, “Hypermedia and Discovery-Based Learning: A Historical Perspective”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 113–121, 1992.
- R. Garrison, and T. Anderson, E-learning in the 21 st century: A Framework for Research and Practice. New York: Rutledge Flamer. 2003.
- J. Conklin, “Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey”. IEEE Computer, 20, 17-41, 1987.
- R. Oliver, and H. Oliver, “Information Access and Retrieval With Hypermedia Information Systems”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 27: 33–44, 1996.
- E. Kılıç, ve Ş. Karadeniz, “Hiperortamlarda Öğrencilerin Bilişsel Yüklenme ve Kaybolma Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 40, 562–579, 2004.
- M. Fırat, ve I. Kabakçı, “Use of Visual Metaphors for Navigation in Educational Hypermedia: Effects on the Navigational Performance”. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(1), 5-22, 2010. [7] P. Barr, User-interface Metaphor in Theory and Practice. MSc. Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Department of Mathematical and Computing Sciences. 2003.
- P.J. Lynch, “Visual Design for the User Interface”. Journal of Biocommunications, 21, 22-30, 1994.
- J. Lee, and Y. Hsu, “Visual Metaphor Interface and Cognitive Style: A study for Online Learning”. In L. Cantoni ve C. McLoughlin (Eds.). Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp.4478-4481). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. 2004.
- J. Cheon, and M.M. Grant, “A cognitive load approach to metaphorical interface design: Reconsidering theoretical frameworks”. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, 1054-1059. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. 2008.
- E. Merdivan and N. Özdener, “Effects of different metaphor usage on hypertext learning”. Behaviour and Information Technology, 30(2), 273-285, 2011.
- A. Ortony, Metaphor and Thought (2nd Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1993.
- G. Lakoff, and M. Johnson, Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1980.
- R.G. Malgady and M.G. Johnson, “Measurement of figurative language: Semantic feature models of comprehension and appreciation”. In R.P. Honeck and R. R. Hoffman (Eds.). Cognition and figurative language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 1980.
- M. Fırat and I. Kabakçı Yurdakul, “Metaphores in metacommunication”. In Meta-Communication for Reflective Online Conversations: Models for Distance Educations, Ed.: U. Demiray, G. Kurubacak ve T. V. Yuzer, Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, 2011.
- M. Fırat and I. Kabakçı Yurdakul, “Determining the Variables of Instructional Hypermedia Navigation Performance”. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy NWSA-Education Sciences, 1C0494, 7, (1), 296-304, 2012.
- M. Fırat, Eğitsel Hiperortamlarda Metaforik Arayüzlerin Bilişim Teknolojileri Öğretmen Adaylarının Gezinim Performansına Etkileri. Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir, 2012.
- D.S. Catre, Visualization of Interface Metaphor for Software: An Engineering Approach. Baco Raton, USA: Florida, 2011.
- P. Kilgore, M., Trutschl, and U. Cvek, “Panoramic Interaction with Interval Data Based on the Slider Metaphor.” In ACHI 2014, The Seventh International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, (pp. 271-276), March 2014.
- M. Ishihara & Y. Ishihara, "Fishing Metaphor for Navigation in CAVE." HCI International 2014-Posters’ Extended Abstracts. Springer International Publishing, 2014. 596-601.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | January 1, 2015 |
| Submission Date | November 1, 2014 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2015 Volume: 8 Issue: 1 |
