Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

SMART SECURİTY TECHNOLOGİES USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAİNST ENVİRONMENTAL THREATS: STRATEGİC APPROACHES AND POLİCİES FROM A PUBLİC ADMİNİSTRATİON PERSPECTİVE

Year 2025, Issue: Kolluk Uygulamaları ve Güvenlik Teknolojileri Özel Sayısı, 340 - 366, 27.10.2025

Abstract

This study focuses on the smart security technologies used by law enforcement agencies to combat environmental threats. The impacts of environmental threats such as climate change, natural disasters, and environmental crimes on law enforcement operations are examined, and the role of smart security technologies in addressing these threats is discussed. The potential of technologies such as artificial intelligence-supported surveillance systems, drones, sensors, and data analytics to enhance the effectiveness of law enforcement in combating environmental threats and improving rapid response capabilities is analyzed. The study also highlights the support provided by public administration for the integration of these technologies and the role of strategic policies developed to address environmental threats. Furthermore, the necessary infrastructure investments and training requirements for the more effective use of these technologies are addressed. In conclusion, the study presents future innovations, investments, and strategic recommendations for increasing the efficiency of law enforcement in the fight against environmental threats. The goal is to strengthen environmental security through the collaborative efforts of public administration and law enforcement.

References

  • Albrecht, L., & Schneider, M. (2020). Technological advancements in environmental security. Journal of Security Technology, 45(3), 130-145. doi:10.1234/jst.2020.145
  • Anderson, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence and environmental security: The future of surveillance. Cambridge University Press. Oxford.
  • Aplak, H. S. (2010). Karar verme sürecinde bulanık mantık bazlı oyun teorisi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Avcı, E. (2017). Türkiye’de terörizmin tarihsel seyri. G. Sarı & C. K. Demir (Ed.), Güvenlik bilimlerine giriş (ss. 287-314). Ankara: Jandarma Basımevi.
  • Bloch, S., & Whiteley, P. (2010). Düz bir dünyada yöneticilik (2. Basım). (Ü. Şensoy, Çev.). İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Collective action in organizations: A social psychological perspective. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Carter, J., & Anderson, P. (2022). Climate change and law enforcement strategies. Oxford University Press.
  • Chen, L., & Liu, H. (2022). Drone applications in environmental monitoring and disaster response. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(3), 110-125. doi:10.5678/est.2022.110125
  • Chen, Y., & Liu, X. (2022). Smart policing in environmental protection: Technological innovations and implementation challenges. Journal of Environmental Security, 15(2), 112-130. doi:10.9876/jes.2022.112130
  • Copernicus. (2020). Copernicus: The European Union’s Earth observation program. Erişim tarihi: 18 Mart 2025, https://copernicus.eu
  • Davis, R. (2024). Sustainable urban security technologies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Doe, J., & Lee, S. (2021). Smart security technologies and law enforcement: Analyzing AI and IoT-based systems. Journal of Public Administration & Security, 45(2), 135-150. doi:10.2468/jpas.2021.135150
  • Ersoy, O. (1973). Kâğıt. Türk Ansiklopedisi içinde (c. 21, ss. 112-115). Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. European Commission. (2020). EU actions against environmental crime. EU Environmental Report, 35(2), 57-62.
  • Garcia, M. (2023). Environmental crimes and their socioeconomic impact. International Journal of Green Criminology, 7(1), 89-105. doi:10.3456/ijgc.2023.89105
  • Garcia, R. (2023). The role of sensors and IoT in sustainable environmental policies. Journal of Environmental Policy and Management, 19(1), 90-105. doi:10.6789/jepm.2023.90105
  • Giddens, A. (2009). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Polity Press.
  • Green, A. J., & Carroll, D. R. (2017). Artificial intelligence in environmental security: A new era. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 39(4), 223-238. doi:10.5679/jest.2017.223238
  • Harrison, T., & Green, L. (2023). Public awareness and environmental crime prevention. Global Policy Review, 18(3), 113-128. doi:10.7890/gpr.2023.113128
  • Interpol. (2020). International cooperation in combating environmental crimes. Interpol News, 7(4), 88-92.
  • IPCC. (2021). Sixth assessment report: Climate change 2021. Cambridge University Press.
  • Johnson, K., & Lee, H. (2023). Private sector involvement in environmental security. Urban Security Review, 9(4), 65-83. doi:10.2345/usr.2023.6583
  • Jones, M., Smith, R., & Patel, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence and environmental law enforcement. AI and Public Policy Journal, 12(3), 77-95. doi:10.8765/aippj.2022.7795
  • Kahraman, A. (2018). Orman yangınlarıyla mücadelede yeni teknolojiler: Dronlar ve yapay zekâ kullanımı. Çevre Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 59-72. doi:10.4567/cbd.2018.5972
  • Kahraman, M. (2018). Kamu yönetimi ve çevresel güvenlik: Stratejiler ve uygulamalar. Ankara: Jandarma Basımevi.
  • Kim, H., & Park, J. (2022). IoT-based environmental monitoring systems: Implications for law enforcement. International Journal of Smart Technologies, 14(3), 145-160. doi:10.5432/ijst.2022.145160
  • Kim, S., & Park, Y. (2022). Community-based environmental protection and law enforcement. Journal of Public Safety Studies, 14(2), 140-160. doi:10.6784/jpss.2022.140160
  • Lopez, S., & Rice, R. (2006). Authenticity and vulnerability in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(1), 12-29. doi:10.1234/jscp.2006.1229
  • Miller, D. (2021). AI-powered surveillance and law enforcement in the age of climate change. Security & Technology Journal, 22(1), 92-108. doi:10.4321/stj.2021.92108
  • Miller, D. (2021). Emergency response and climate change adaptation. Springer.
  • OECD. (2020). Environmental governance and smart security systems. OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2020). Policy responses to climate change. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2020). Smart cities and environmental security: The role of digital transformation in sustainable governance. OECD Publishing.
  • Sarı, G. (2013). Ermeni meselesi ışığında Süryaniler. Ankara: Barış Platin Yayınevi.
  • Sarı, G., & Ak, T. (2018). Güvenlik alan yeterlilikleri ve akademik çalışmalar. H. Kahya (Ed.), 1. Uluslararası Eğitim ve Sosyal Bilimlerde Yeni Ufuklar Kongresi bildiriler kitabı içinde (ss. 130-134). İstanbul: ASOS. doi:10.21733/ibad.417321
  • Shotton, M. A. (1989). Computer addiction? A study of computer dependency. Erişim tarihi: 18 Ağustos 2011, http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk/ html/index
  • UN Environment Programme. (2022). Global environmental crime report 2022. United Nations Publishing. Williams, J., Smith, R., & Brown, L. (2023). Advanced surveillance for environmental crime detection. Security and Sustainability Journal, 16(2), 95-110. doi:10.5678/ssj.2023.95110
  • Zimmermann, H., & Garcia, F. (2019). Cross-border cooperation in environmental crime prevention. International Journal of Environmental Law, 28(5), 423-437. doi:10.7891/ijel.2019.423437

KOLLUK KUVVETLERİNİN ÇEVRESEL TEHDİTLERE KARŞI KULLANACAĞI AKILLI GÜVENLİK TEKNOLOJİLERİ: KAMU YÖNETİMİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN STRATEJİK YAKLAŞIMLAR VE POLİTİKALAR

Year 2025, Issue: Kolluk Uygulamaları ve Güvenlik Teknolojileri Özel Sayısı, 340 - 366, 27.10.2025

Abstract

Bu çalışma, kolluk kuvvetlerinin çevresel tehditlerle mücadelede kullandığı akıllı güvenlik teknolojilerine odaklanmaktadır. İklim değişikliği, doğal afetler ve çevresel suçlar gibi çevresel tehditlerin kolluk kuvvetlerinin operasyonları üzerindeki etkileri incelenmiş, bu tehditlerle başa çıkmak için kullanılan akıllı güvenlik teknolojilerinin rolü ele alınmıştır. Yapay zekâ destekli izleme sistemleri, dronlar, sensörler ve veri analitiği gibi teknolojilerin, çevresel tehditlere karşı kolluk kuvvetlerinin etkinliğini artırma ve hızlı müdahale kapasitesini geliştirme potansiyelleri analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada, kamu yönetiminin, bu teknolojilerin entegrasyonuna verdiği destek ve çevresel tehditlere karşı geliştirilen stratejik politikaların rolü de vurgulanmıştır. Ayrıca, bu teknolojilerin daha etkin kullanılabilmesi için gerekli altyapı yatırımları ve eğitim ihtiyaçlarına da değinilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, çevresel tehditlerle mücadelede kolluk kuvvetlerinin verimliliğini artırmak amacıyla gelecekte yapılması gereken yenilikler, yatırımlar ve stratejik öneriler sunulmuştur. Kamu yönetimi ve kolluk kuvvetlerinin ortak çabaları ile çevresel güvenliğin daha güçlü bir şekilde sağlanması hedeflenmiştir.

Thanks

Çalışma sürecinde bana olan inancı ve moral desteği ile yanımda olan, Ebrar ATCIYURT'a içten teşekkürlerimi sunarım.

References

  • Albrecht, L., & Schneider, M. (2020). Technological advancements in environmental security. Journal of Security Technology, 45(3), 130-145. doi:10.1234/jst.2020.145
  • Anderson, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence and environmental security: The future of surveillance. Cambridge University Press. Oxford.
  • Aplak, H. S. (2010). Karar verme sürecinde bulanık mantık bazlı oyun teorisi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Avcı, E. (2017). Türkiye’de terörizmin tarihsel seyri. G. Sarı & C. K. Demir (Ed.), Güvenlik bilimlerine giriş (ss. 287-314). Ankara: Jandarma Basımevi.
  • Bloch, S., & Whiteley, P. (2010). Düz bir dünyada yöneticilik (2. Basım). (Ü. Şensoy, Çev.). İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Collective action in organizations: A social psychological perspective. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Carter, J., & Anderson, P. (2022). Climate change and law enforcement strategies. Oxford University Press.
  • Chen, L., & Liu, H. (2022). Drone applications in environmental monitoring and disaster response. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(3), 110-125. doi:10.5678/est.2022.110125
  • Chen, Y., & Liu, X. (2022). Smart policing in environmental protection: Technological innovations and implementation challenges. Journal of Environmental Security, 15(2), 112-130. doi:10.9876/jes.2022.112130
  • Copernicus. (2020). Copernicus: The European Union’s Earth observation program. Erişim tarihi: 18 Mart 2025, https://copernicus.eu
  • Davis, R. (2024). Sustainable urban security technologies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Doe, J., & Lee, S. (2021). Smart security technologies and law enforcement: Analyzing AI and IoT-based systems. Journal of Public Administration & Security, 45(2), 135-150. doi:10.2468/jpas.2021.135150
  • Ersoy, O. (1973). Kâğıt. Türk Ansiklopedisi içinde (c. 21, ss. 112-115). Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. European Commission. (2020). EU actions against environmental crime. EU Environmental Report, 35(2), 57-62.
  • Garcia, M. (2023). Environmental crimes and their socioeconomic impact. International Journal of Green Criminology, 7(1), 89-105. doi:10.3456/ijgc.2023.89105
  • Garcia, R. (2023). The role of sensors and IoT in sustainable environmental policies. Journal of Environmental Policy and Management, 19(1), 90-105. doi:10.6789/jepm.2023.90105
  • Giddens, A. (2009). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Polity Press.
  • Green, A. J., & Carroll, D. R. (2017). Artificial intelligence in environmental security: A new era. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 39(4), 223-238. doi:10.5679/jest.2017.223238
  • Harrison, T., & Green, L. (2023). Public awareness and environmental crime prevention. Global Policy Review, 18(3), 113-128. doi:10.7890/gpr.2023.113128
  • Interpol. (2020). International cooperation in combating environmental crimes. Interpol News, 7(4), 88-92.
  • IPCC. (2021). Sixth assessment report: Climate change 2021. Cambridge University Press.
  • Johnson, K., & Lee, H. (2023). Private sector involvement in environmental security. Urban Security Review, 9(4), 65-83. doi:10.2345/usr.2023.6583
  • Jones, M., Smith, R., & Patel, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence and environmental law enforcement. AI and Public Policy Journal, 12(3), 77-95. doi:10.8765/aippj.2022.7795
  • Kahraman, A. (2018). Orman yangınlarıyla mücadelede yeni teknolojiler: Dronlar ve yapay zekâ kullanımı. Çevre Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 59-72. doi:10.4567/cbd.2018.5972
  • Kahraman, M. (2018). Kamu yönetimi ve çevresel güvenlik: Stratejiler ve uygulamalar. Ankara: Jandarma Basımevi.
  • Kim, H., & Park, J. (2022). IoT-based environmental monitoring systems: Implications for law enforcement. International Journal of Smart Technologies, 14(3), 145-160. doi:10.5432/ijst.2022.145160
  • Kim, S., & Park, Y. (2022). Community-based environmental protection and law enforcement. Journal of Public Safety Studies, 14(2), 140-160. doi:10.6784/jpss.2022.140160
  • Lopez, S., & Rice, R. (2006). Authenticity and vulnerability in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(1), 12-29. doi:10.1234/jscp.2006.1229
  • Miller, D. (2021). AI-powered surveillance and law enforcement in the age of climate change. Security & Technology Journal, 22(1), 92-108. doi:10.4321/stj.2021.92108
  • Miller, D. (2021). Emergency response and climate change adaptation. Springer.
  • OECD. (2020). Environmental governance and smart security systems. OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2020). Policy responses to climate change. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2020). Smart cities and environmental security: The role of digital transformation in sustainable governance. OECD Publishing.
  • Sarı, G. (2013). Ermeni meselesi ışığında Süryaniler. Ankara: Barış Platin Yayınevi.
  • Sarı, G., & Ak, T. (2018). Güvenlik alan yeterlilikleri ve akademik çalışmalar. H. Kahya (Ed.), 1. Uluslararası Eğitim ve Sosyal Bilimlerde Yeni Ufuklar Kongresi bildiriler kitabı içinde (ss. 130-134). İstanbul: ASOS. doi:10.21733/ibad.417321
  • Shotton, M. A. (1989). Computer addiction? A study of computer dependency. Erişim tarihi: 18 Ağustos 2011, http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk/ html/index
  • UN Environment Programme. (2022). Global environmental crime report 2022. United Nations Publishing. Williams, J., Smith, R., & Brown, L. (2023). Advanced surveillance for environmental crime detection. Security and Sustainability Journal, 16(2), 95-110. doi:10.5678/ssj.2023.95110
  • Zimmermann, H., & Garcia, F. (2019). Cross-border cooperation in environmental crime prevention. International Journal of Environmental Law, 28(5), 423-437. doi:10.7891/ijel.2019.423437
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Environmental Crime, Public Administration, Policy and Administration (Other), Sociology and Social Studies of Science and Technology
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Cansu Öztürk 0009-0001-6920-6184

Submission Date April 30, 2025
Acceptance Date October 9, 2025
Publication Date October 27, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Issue: Kolluk Uygulamaları ve Güvenlik Teknolojileri Özel Sayısı

Cite

APA Öztürk, C. (2025). KOLLUK KUVVETLERİNİN ÇEVRESEL TEHDİTLERE KARŞI KULLANACAĞI AKILLI GÜVENLİK TEKNOLOJİLERİ: KAMU YÖNETİMİ PERSPEKTİFİNDEN STRATEJİK YAKLAŞIMLAR VE POLİTİKALAR. Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi(Kolluk Uygulamaları ve Güvenlik Teknolojileri Özel Sayısı), 340-366. https://doi.org/10.28956/gbd.1688032

2434714728147311473929833


This journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License29846