Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Boş Zaman Yönetimi ve İlişkili Faktörler: Kesitsel Bir Araştırma

Year 2023, Volume: 11 Issue: 29, 1 - 13, 29.04.2023

Filiz Taş

https://doi.org/10.52528/genclikarastirmalari.974551

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencilerinin boş zaman yönetimi tutumlarını ve etkileyen faktörleri belirlemektir. Metod: Araştırma tanımlayıcı tiptedir. Araştırmanın örneklemini bir üniversitede sağlık alanında lisans eğitimi alan 704 öğrenci oluşturdu. Araştırma verileri “Kişisel Bilgi Formu” ve “Boş Zaman Yönetimi Ölçeği” kullanılarak toplandı. Verilerin istatistiksel analizlerinde Independent t testi, Mann-Whitney U testi, Ona-Way Anova, Kruskal- Walls testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin boş zaman yönetimi puanlarının ortalamanın üstünde olduğu görüldü. Bölümler arasında “amaç belirleme ve yöntem”, “boş zaman tutumu” ve “değerlendirme” alt boyutları arasında farklılık olduğu tespit edildi. Analiz sonucuna göre öğrencilerin bölümleri, okudukları sınıflar, boş zaman aktiviteleri ve hobiye sahip olma durumları ile boş zaman yönetimi toplam puanları arasında anlamlılık bulundu. Sonuç: Çalışma sonuçlarına göre öğrencilerin amaç belirleme ile planlama konularında desteklenmeleri gerekmektedir. Boş zaman, yaşamın öznel kalitesini yansıtır, bu nedenle gençlerin boş zamanlarını etkin bir şekilde kullanabilecekleri sosyal alanlar ve sosyal programlar oluşturmaları önerilir.

Keywords

Üniversite öğrencileri, Boş zaman Yönetimi, Sağlık

Supporting Institution

yok

Project Number

yok

Leisure Management Attitudes of University Students and Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

Objective: This study endeavors to determine university students’ leisure management attitudes and the factors that affect these attitudes. Methods: The research design was descriptive. The sample study consisted of 704 undergraduate students enrolled in different departments of health sciences. The data of the study were collected by using a demographics form and the Leisure Time Management Scale. In the analysis of the data, Independent t-Test and a Mann–Whitney U Test, One-Way ANOVA and Kruskal-Walls tests were used. Results: Students’ leisure management scores were found to be above the mean. Respondents differed in the dimensions of “goal setting and methods”, “leisure time attitudes” and “evaluation” depending on the variable of department attended. Significant relationships were found between the variables of department, grade level, leisure activities and having hobbies and the leisure time management total scores. Conclusions: The study found that students should be supported in setting goals and planning. Since leisure time is a metric of one’s quality of life, it is recommended that social spaces and social programs be created for young people where they can make effective use of their free time.

Keywords

University students, Leisure management, Health

Project Number

yok

References

• Akgul BM, Karakucuk S. (2015). Free time management scale: Validity and reliability analysis, International Journal of Human Sciences, 12, 1867-1880. doi:10.14687/ijhs.v12i2.3445
• Akyuz H, Turkmen M. (2016). Investigation of University Students' Attitudes toward Leisure Time Activities: Bartin University Sample. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport (IntJSCS), 4(Special Issue 1): 340-357. Doi: 10.14486/IntJSCS562
• Albena Gayef A, Tapan B, Sur H. (2017). Relationship between time management skills and academic achievement of the students in vocational school of health services. Hacettepe Journal of Health Administration, 20(2): 247-257.
• Carr N. (2017). Leisure matters: the state and future of leisure studies, Annals of Leisure Research, 20(3): 386-387, DOI: 10.1080/11745398.2016.1219670.
• Cha YJ. (2018). Correlation between Leisure Activity Time and Life Satisfaction: Based on KOSTAT Time Use Survey Data. Occupational Therapy International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5154819.
• Doğan M, Elçi G, Gürbüz B. (2019). Examination of Relationship between leisure satisfaction, leisure boredom and job satisfaction: A Research on Academicians. Spormetre, 17(1), 154-164. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331988971.
• Evans T, Bellon M, Matthews B. (2017). Leisure as a human right: an exploration of people with disabilities’ perceptions of leisure, arts and recreation participation through Australian Community Access Services, Annals of Leisure Research, 20:3, 331-348, DOI: 10.1080/11745398.2017.1307120.
• Gaironeesa H, Shazly S, Florence M. (2015). Adolescent peer pressure, leisure boredom, and substance use in low-income Cape Town communities. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. 99–109, https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.1.99.
• Gül T. (2019). Predictive role of leisure time satisfaction on life satisfaction. Selçuk University Journal of Social Sciences Vocational School, 22 (2), 914-930. https://doi.org/10.5555/uri:pii:000399939290160X.
• Hendricks G, Savahl S, Florence M. (2015). Adolescent peer pressure, Leisure boredom and substance use in low-income Cape Town communities, Social Behavior and Personality. 43(1); 99-110. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2015.43.1.99.
• Junhyoung K, May K, Areum H. (2018). Exploring the Relationship between Types of Leisure Activities and Life Satisfaction, Health Perception, and Social Support among Korean Individuals with Physical Disabilities. Am J Health Behav. 42(4):34-44. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.42.4.4.
• Kara FM, Ozdedeoğlu B. (2017). Examination of Relationship between Leisure Boredom and Leisure Constraints. Sport Sciences. 12(3): 24-36. DOI: 10.12739/NWSA.2017.12.3.2B0109.
• Lapa YT, Köse E, Günbayı I. (2018). Recreation Studies in Turkey: A Systematic Analysis, Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 29 (2): 87–104. doi: 10.17644/sbd.349989.
• McLean D, Hurd A. (2015). Kraus’ Recreation and Leisure in Modern Society. London: Jones & Bartlett Learning Publishers.
• Muzindutsi PF, Masango Z. (2015). Determinants of leisure satisfaction among undergraduate students at A South African University. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 7(1,2): 33-47.
• Sevinc F, Ozel ÇH. (2018). Dıvıng as a leısure tıme actıvıty and ıts relatıonshıp wıth lıfe satısfactıon Dokuz Eylul University, Journal of GSSS. 20 (3), 397-415. doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.416816.
• Silk M, Caudwell J, Gibson H. (2017). Views on leisure studies: Pasts, presents & future possibilities? Leisure Studies, 36(2), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2017.1290130.
• Tepekoylu Ozturk O. (2019). Leisure satisfaction of sports science students, International Education Studies, 12(4), 42-48. DOI: 10.5539/ies.v12n4p42.
• Wang WC. (2019). Exploring the relationship among free-time management, leisure boredom, and internet addiction in undergraduates in Taiwan, Psychological Reports. 122, 1651–1665. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0033294118789034.
• Wang WC, Kao CH, Huan TC, Wu CC. (2011). An Exploration of the relationships between free time management and the Quality of life of wage-earners in Taiwan. World Leisure Journal. 48. DOI: 10.1080/04419057.2006.9674427.
• Yasarturk F, Akyuz H, Karatas I. (2017). Examination of university students’ levels of leisure boredom perception and life satisfaction towards recreative activities. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies (IntJCSS), 3(Special Issue 2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1990.11969811. Yersüren S, Ozel CH. (2020). A Bibliometric Study on Theses on Leisure and Recreation, Journal of Turkish Tourism Research, 4(2): 1139-1159. DOI: 10.26677/TR1010.2020.387