RISK BASED-GOAL BASED SHIP HULL FORM DESIGN

Yıl 2018, Sayı: 11, 3 - 18, 01.04.2018

Çağan Birant Pekküçük

Öz

RISK BASED-GOAL BASED SHIP HULL FORM DESIGN

Öz

Risk based design has become a necessity in many work ares today. Since the safety factor is a vital consideration especially for big industries which include ship building industry, it has been gaining more and more importance every day. Also there has been various methods and techniques which are on lifelong development, contributing to the safe and reliable design options. Since the hull form is a core subtitle of ship design, it becomes an interconnection point of many other main design parts of ship, such as stability, manoeuvrability, strength and seakeeping. Thinking on stability base, one of the main precaution which should be taken in case of accidents is a subdivision of a vessel since it determines the survivability degree. Also the avoidance of accident and precautions which should be taken for materializing the accident should be taken into consideration. In this paper, risk-based and goal-based design will be defined briefly and the stability focus for this subtitle will be investigated referring to an existing case study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Risk, Goal, Analysis, Collision, FSA, Stability

Kaynakça

• Rainer Hamann & Jörg Peschmann (2013). Goal-Based Standards and Risk- Based http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/str.2013.60.2.001
• International Maritime Organisation (IMO), International Goal-Based Ship Construction Standards for Bulk Carriers and Oil Tankers, January, 2015
• Dimitris Konovessis, Dracos Vassalos (2007). Risk-based design for damage survivability of passenger Ro-Ro vessels. 130-144
• Pedro Ant˜ao, C. Guedes Soares (2006) Fault-tree Models of Accident Scenarios of
• RoPax Vessels, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11633-006-0107-8 109-112
• Apostolos Papanikolaou (2009). Risk-Based Ship Design. doi:10.1007/978-3-540- 3 308-342
• International Maritime Organisation (IMO), Formal safety assessment: Decision parameters including risk acceptance criteria, Maritime Safety Committee, 72nd Session, Agenda Item 16, MSC72/16, Submitted by Norway, 14 February, 2000.
• SAFEDOR Design, operation and regulation for safety, Integrated Project 516278, www.safedor.org, 2005.
• Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Reducing Risks, Protecting People, HSE Books, ISBN 0-7176-21510.
• Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Reducing Risks, Protecting People, HSE Books, ISBN 0-7176-21510.
• DNV Technica, Safety assessment of passenger Ro-Ro vessels, Main Report REP- T09-003, Joint North-West European Project, 28 October, 1996.
• SAFEDOR Design, operation and regulation for safety, Integrated Project 516278, www.safedor.org, 2005.
• International Maritime Organisation, IMO, Development of revised SOLAS Chapter II-1, Parts A, B and B-1; Report of the Intersessional Correspondence Group – Part 1 (Chapter II-1, Draft Text), SLF 47/3/1, submitted by Sweden and the United States, 9 June, 2004.
• International Maritime Organisation, Interim guidelines for evacuation analyses for new and existing passenger ships, Maritime Safety Committee, Circular 1033, 6 June
• D. Vassalos, G. Christiansen, H.S. Kim, M. Bole and J. Majumder, Evacuability of Passenger Ships at Sea, SASMEX 2002, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002.
• G.C. Vassalos, Design for ease of passenger evacuation in a ship–sea environment, MPhil thesis, The Ship Stability Research Centre, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Universities of Glasgow and Strathclyde, 2005. 56