Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method

Sadık Aytek Kalyon; Hüseyin Rıza Börklü

Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method

Abstract

The study introduces a new evaluation method developed within the scope of Industry 5.0. The new method, called Sustainability in Maintenance and Repair (SMR), aims to measure the sustainability value of a repair task in terms of environmental, economic, time management, and social aspects. Within the research, an example of a fault was considered and examined. The different values arising from repairing the fault using two different repair methods were compared. The first scenario involves repair by the technical service, while the other scenario involves the end-user repairing the fault by receiving support from technicians using Augmented Reality (AR). During the evaluation process, first, the weight values of the main sustainability criteria (emission, energy consumption, social/occupational safety, and cost/time) were determined. Data related to the example was collected using a question-and-answer method. Evaluations were conducted according to the criteria in light of this data. Subsequently, an SMR score ranging between 0–100 was calculated for each maintenance and repair scenario. As a result, the maintenance method performed by the end-user achieved an "Excellent Sustainability" level with a numerical value of 90.9, whereas the traditional technical service maintenance method remained at the "Low Sustainability" level with a score of 37.55. Thus, it was found that AR-supported maintenance significantly contributes to sustainability.

Keywords

References

[1] R. Kılıç, "Sanayi Devrimlerinin Serüveni: Endüstri 1.0’dan Endüstri 5.0’a," Takvim-I Vekayi, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 276–291, December 2023.
[2] M. Farsi, R. K. Mishra, and J. A. Erkoyuncu, “Industry 5.0 for Sustainable Reliability Centered Maintenance,” in Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Through-life Engineering Services 2021, TES Conf 2021, 16–17 November 2021, University of Twente, The Netherlands. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com. [Accessed: 23 Dec. 2024].
[3] B. Yücebalkan, “Endüstri 4.0’dan Endüstri 5.0’a Geçiş Sürecine Genel Bakış,” Pearson Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 241–250, October 2020. doi: 10.46872/pj.181
[4] A. Kaya, “Endüstri 5.0: Türkiye ve Çin Karşılaştırması,” Journal of International Economics, Finance and Trade, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–16, June 2023.
[5] H. Özyürek and Z. Baysal, Sanayi Yönetiminde Gelecek Yaklaşımları Dijitalleşme ve Yetenekler: Endüstri 5.0'da Dijital İkiz ve Denetim. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2023, pp. 223–244.
[6] J. K. Manda, “Augmented Reality (AR) Applications in Telecom Maintenance: Utilizing AR Technologies for Remote Maintenance and Troubleshooting in Telecom Infrastructure,” ssrn.com, August 2023. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5136767
[7] S. Henderson and S. Feiner, “Exploring the Benefits of Augmented Reality Documentation for Maintenance and Repair,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1355–1368, October 2011. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.245
[8] D. Mourtzis, V. Siatras, and J. Angelopoulos, “Real-Time Remote Maintenance Support Based on Augmented Reality (AR),” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 5, Art. no. 1855, March 2020. doi: 10.3390/app10051855

[9] D. Weng, Y. Wang, and Y. Liu, “Applications of Augmented Reality for Maintenance Training,” in Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments, EGVE 2005, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, 2005, E. Kjems, R. Blach Eds. The Eurographics Association, 2005. pp. 219–220.
[10] H. Alatawi, N. Albalawi, G. Shahata, K. Aljohani, A. Alhakamy, and M. Tuceryan, “Augmented Reality-Assisted Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Model Towards Industrial Training and Maintenance for NanoDrop Spectrophotometer,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 13, Art. no. 6024, July 2023. doi: 10.3390/s23136024
[11] Ş. Sadıç, Endüstri 5.0 Dijital Toplum: Endüstri 5.0 ve Sürdürülebilirlik. Antalya: Ekin Yayınevi, 2022.
[12] A. Rahman, E. Pasaribu, Y. Nugraha, F. Khair, K. E. N. Soebandrija, and D. I. Wijaya, “Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 Through Lens of Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) and Machine Learning of Artificial Intelligence (MLAI),” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 852, July 2020. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/852/1/012022
[13] M. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, S. Legutko, and P. Kluk, “Maintenance 4.0 Technologies – New Opportunities for Sustainability Driven Maintenance,” Management and Production Engineering Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 74–87, June 2020. doi: 10.24425/mper.2020.133730
[14] K. M. Ngu, N. Philip, and S. Sahlan, “Proactive and Predictive Maintenance Strategies and Application for Instrumentation & Control in Oil & Gas Industry,” International Journal of Integrated Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 119–130, September 2019. doi: 10.30880/ijie.2019.11.04.013
[15] M. H. Maturi et al., “Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis Using IoT in Industry 5.0,” International Numeric Journal of Machine Learning and Robots, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 1–21, January 2023. Online. Available: https://injmr.com/index.php/fewfewf/article/view/80.
[16] “Remote AR Assistance," teamviewer.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.teamviewer.com/en-us/products/remote/solutions/remote-ar-assistance/. [Accessed: 16 Mar. 2025].
[17] Porsche AG, “Unlocking the Future of Vehicle Maintenance with AR,” medium.com. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/next-level-german-engineering/unlocking-the-future-of-vehicle-maintenance-with-augmented-reality-026c27ec12b4. [Accessed: 28 Mar. 2025].
[18] M. Boland, “Case Study: Boeing Cuts Production Time with AR,” arinsider.co. [Online]. Available: https://arinsider.co/2021/08/24/case-study-boeing-cuts-production-time-with-ar/. [Accessed: 08 Dec. 2024].
[19] V. Radisek, “3 Examples of Augmented Reality in Industrial Maintenance,” roundtablelearning.com. [Online]. Available: https://roundtablelearning.com/3-examples-augmented-reality-industrial-maintenance/. [Accessed: 30 Mar. 2025}.
[20] “Unity 6 User Manual,” unity3d.com. [Online]. Available: https://docs.unity3d.com/6000.0/Documentation/Manual/UnityManual.html. [Accessed: 19 Dec. 2024].
[21] J. B. Guinée et al., “Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Past, Present, and Future,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 90–96, August 2011.
[22] “BS EN ISO 14040:2006: Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework,” iso.org. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html. [Accessed: 19 Jan. 2025].
[23] “Environmental Profit and Loss Report,” kering.com. [Online]. Available: https://www.kering.com. [Accessed: 19 Jan. 2025].
[24] D. Hunkeler, K. Lichtenvort, and G. Rebitzer, Environmental Life Cycle Costing. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL: 2008.
[25] “Eco-efficiency: Creating More Value with Less Impact,” wbcsd.org. [Online]. Available: https://docs.wbcsd.org/2006/08/EfficiencyLearningModule.pdf. [Accessed: 01 Apr. 2025].
[26] P. H. Brunner and H. Rechberger, “Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 9, pp. 337–338, September 2004. doi: 10.1007/BF02979426
[27] M. Geissdoerfer, P. Savaget, N. Bocken, and E. J. Hultink, “The Circular Economy – A New Sustainability Paradigm?” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 143, pp. 757–768, February 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
[28] “McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry,” mbdc.com. [Online]. Available: https://mbdc.com/. [Accessed: 04 Apr. 2025}.
[29] A. Tukker et al., “Fostering Change to Sustainable Consumption and Production: An Evidence-Based View,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1218–1225, July 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.015
[30] T. L. Saaty and L. G. Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 2nd ed., vol. 175, New York: Springer, 2012.
[31] C. L. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications A State-of-the-Art Survey, vol. 186, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 1981.
[32] “Türkiye Otomotiv Ana Sanayii Yaşam Döngüsü Değerlendirmesi Raporu,” osd.org.tr. [Online]. Available: https://www.osd.org.tr/pdf/Osd_Urun_Yasam_Dongusu.pdf. [Accessed: 04 Jun. 2025].
[33] “Environmental Impact of Disc Brakes Life Cycle,” ogab.co.uk. [Online]. Available: https://www.ogab.co.uk/facts-on-disc-brake-life-cycle-report/. [Accessed: 19 Feb. 2025].
[34] “Greenhouse Gas Reporting: Conversion Factors 2024,” gov.uk. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2024. [Accessed: 19 Feb. 2025].
[35] “Karbon Ayak İzi Nedir? Hesaplama Formülü,” metsims.com.tr. [Online]. Available: https://metsims.com/tr/karbon-ayak-izi/. [Accessed: 21 Feb. 2025].
[36] “Climate Transparency Report: Comparing G20 Climate Action 2022,” climate-transparency.org. [Online]. Available: https://www.climate-transparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CT2022-Turkey-Web.pdf. [Accessed: 24 Feb. 2025].

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Industrial Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Sadık Aytek Kalyon ^*
0000-0001-6752-5176
Türkiye

Hüseyin Rıza Börklü
0000-0001-5104-9195
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 31, 2025

Submission Date

May 7, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 27, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 11 Number: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA66GY39TW

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kalyon, S. A., & Börklü, H. R. (2025). Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences, 11(2), 214-232. https://izlik.org/JA66GY39TW

AMA

1.Kalyon SA, Börklü HR. Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method. GJES. 2025;11(2):214-232. https://izlik.org/JA66GY39TW

Chicago

Kalyon, Sadık Aytek, and Hüseyin Rıza Börklü. 2025. “Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method”. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences 11 (2): 214-32. https://izlik.org/JA66GY39TW.

EndNote

Kalyon SA, Börklü HR (August 1, 2025) Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences 11 2 214–232.

IEEE

[1]S. A. Kalyon and H. R. Börklü, “Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method”, GJES, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 214–232, Aug. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA66GY39TW

ISNAD

Kalyon, Sadık Aytek - Börklü, Hüseyin Rıza. “Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method”. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences 11/2 (August 1, 2025): 214-232. https://izlik.org/JA66GY39TW.

JAMA

1.Kalyon SA, Börklü HR. Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method. GJES. 2025;11:214–232.

MLA

Kalyon, Sadık Aytek, and Hüseyin Rıza Börklü. “Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method”. Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 11, no. 2, Aug. 2025, pp. 214-32, https://izlik.org/JA66GY39TW.

Vancouver

1.Sadık Aytek Kalyon, Hüseyin Rıza Börklü. Comparison of Alternative Maintenance and Repair Methods Within the Scope of Industry 5.0 Using SMR Sustainability Assessment Method. GJES [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 1;11(2):214-32. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA66GY39TW