Düşük Karbon Ekonomisine Geçiş ve Bu Geçişte Karbon Yakalama ve Depolamanın Rolü

Abstract

Düşük karbonlu enerji teknolojileri arasında karbon yakalama ve depolama (KYD) farklılık arz eden bir teknolojidir. Tek varoluş sebebi iklim değişikliğinin yavaşlatılması ya da önüne geçilmesi olup sürdürülebilir bir dönüşüm için en uygun maliyeti olan teknolojik çözümlerden biri olarak görülmektedir. Ancak, uluslararası düzeyde KYD çalışmalarının yavaşladığı bir döneme şahitlik etmekteyiz. Bu makalenin amacı enerji, ağır sanayi ve yakıt imalat sektörlerinde karbon dioksit (CO2) salınımlarını azaltmak için kilit bir teknoloji olmasına rağmen KYD’nin neden istenilen düzeyde kullanılmadığını irdelemektir. KYD’den büyük ölçekte faydalanabilmek ve KYD’nin iklim değişikliğiyle olan mücadelede etkili olabilmesi için güçlü ekonomik saiklere ihtiyaç vardır. Bu politikalar genellikle iki şekildedir. Bunlardan birincisi talebin getirdiği (market-pull) diğeri de teknolojinin sürüklediği (technology-push) politikadır. Talebin getirdiği politikaya örnek olarak karbon emisyonlarının fiyatlandırılması (vergilendirilmesi) verilebilir. Gelecekte KYD’nin rolü (i) belirlenecek karbon fiyatı seviyesine (ii) ülkelerin hali hazırdaki enerji portföylerine ve (iii) diğer düşük karbonlu enerji üretim teknolojilerinin, teknolojik gelişme ve öğrenmeye bağlı olarak, zamanla değişecek olan (birim) üretim maliyetlerine göre şekillenecektir.

Keywords

• düşük karbon ekonomisi,karbon fiyatlandırması,yenilenebilir enerji,İklim değişikliği,karbon yakalama ve depolama

Transition to A Low-Carbon Economy and The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage

Abstract

Among low-carbon energy technologies, carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a distinct type of technology. The main reason for its existence is to slow down climate change, and it is considered as one of the most cost-effective solutions for a sustainable energy transformation. Even though CCS is a crucial technology to capture emissions from emissions-intense industrial processes, such as energy, cement, steel, and petrochemicals, we are witnessing a period of slow growth in its activity. This article discusses the reasons for this slow progress and, by using a simple economic model, presents factors, such as a sufficiently high carbon price or a pure CCS subsidy, that can promote CCS. The study highlights that political support is a critical factor for the development of CCS technologies and that CCS and renewable energy are complementary in combating climate change

Keywords

• Climate change,carbon capture and storage

References

1. Arnette, A. N. (2017). Renewable energy and carbon capture and sequestration for a reduced carbon energy plan: An optimization model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 254-265.
2. Budinis, S., Krevor, S., Mac Dowell, N., Brandon, N., & Hawkes, A. (2018). An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential. Energy Strategy Reviews, 22, 61-81.
3. Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., ... & Hallett, J. P. (2018). Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy & Environmental Science, 11(5), 1062-1176.
4. Durmaz, T. (2018). The economics of CCS: Why have CCS technologies not had an international breakthrough?. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 95, 328-340.
5. Durmaz, T., & Schroyen, F. (2020). Evaluating Carbon Capture and Storage in a Climate Model with Directed Technical Change. Climate Change Economics, 11(01).
6. Clarke, L., K. Jiang, K. Akimoto, M. Babiker, G. Blanford, K. Fisher-Vanden, J. C. Hourcade, V. Krey, E. Kriegler, A. Löschel, D. McCollum, S. Paltsev, S. Rose, P. R. Shukla, M. Tavoni, B. C. C. van der Zwaan, and D. van Vuuren (2014). Assessing Transformation Pathways. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
7. Finkenrath, M. (2011). Cost and performance of carbon dioxide capture from power generation. International Energy Agency.
8. Gardarsdottir, S. O., De Lena, E., Romano, M., Roussanaly, S., Voldsund, M., Pérez-Calvo, J. F., ... & Gazzani, M. (2019). Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis. Energies, 12(3), 542.

9. Global CCS Institute, The Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Facilities Database: https://co2re.co/FacilityData (Erişim Tarihi: 23.09.2019)
10. Global CCS Institute (2018). The global status of CCS: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/global-status-report/ (Erişim Tarihi: 03.05.2019)
11. Gollakota & McDonald (2018). Successful Demonstration of Illinois Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage in a Saline Reservoir. 18AIChE Annual Meeting, Pitsburgh, PA, ABD. (Conference Proceedings: https://www.aiche.org/conferences/aiche-annual-meeting/2018/proceeding/paper/329c-successful-demonstration-illinois-industrial-carbon-capture-and-storage-saline-reservoir) (Erişim Tarihi: 10.10.2019)
12. Grimaud, A., Lafforgue, G., & Magné, B. (2011). Climate change mitigation options and directed technical change: A decentralized equilibrium analysis. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(4), 938-962.
13. Hensley, R., Newman, J., Rogers, M., & Shahinian, M. (2012). Battery technology charges ahead. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 5-50.
14. IEA & UN (2011). Technology roadmap: carbon capture and storage in industrial applications. International Energy Agency, United Nations Industrial Development Organizations.
15. IEA (2019). Carbon capture, utilisation and storage: a critical tool in the climate energy toolbox. International Energy Agency https://www.iea.org/topics/carbon-capture-and-storage/power/
16. IEEFA (2018). Holy Grail of Carbon Capture Continues to Elude Coal Industry. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. Cleveland, OH. http://ieefa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Holy-Grail-of-Carbon-Capture-Continues-to-Elude-Coal-Industry_November-2018.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 03.04.2019)
17. IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)].
18. Jacobson, M. Z., Delucchi, M. A., Bazouin, G., Dvorak, M. J., Arghandeh, R., Bauer, Z. A., ... & Holmes, R. T. (2016). A 100% wind, water, sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy plan for Washington State. Renewable Energy, 86, 75-88.
19. Kalkuhl, M., Edenhofer, O., & Lessmann, K. (2015). The role of carbon capture and sequestration policies for climate change mitigation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 60(1), 55-80.
20. Leung, D. Y., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014). An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 426-443.
21. Lehne, J., & Preston, F. (2018). Making Concrete Change. Innovation in Low-carbon Cement and Concrete. Cambridge: Chatham House, The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
22. Licht, S., Wang, B., Ghosh, S., Ayub, H., Jiang, D., & Ganley, J. (2010). A new solar carbon capture process: solar thermal electrochemical photo (STEP) carbon capture. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 1(15), 2363-2368.
23. Lipponen, J., McCulloch, S., Keeling, S., Stanley, T., Berghout, N., & Berly, T. (2017). The politics of large-scale CCS deployment. Energy Procedia, 114, 7581-7595.
24. Lohwasser, R., & Madlener, R. (2012). Economics of CCS for coal plants: Impact of investment costs and efficiency on market diffusion in Europe. Energy Economics, 34(3), 850-863.
25. Ma, J., Kang, R., Dong, M., & Conroyl, P. (2018, May). The Impact of the Carbon Market on the Economics of CCUS. In 2018 7th International Conference on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (ICEESD 2018). Atlantis Press.
26. McDonald, A., & Schrattenholzer, L. (2001). Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy policy, 29(4), 255-261.
27. POWER (2019). Inside NET Power: Gas Power Goes Supercritical: www.powermag.com/inside-net-power-gas-power-goes-supercritical (Erişim Tarihi: 08.08.2019)
28. Reuters (2019a), Carbon capture struggles to accelerate in race to avert climate crash by Laurie Goering https://www.reuters.com/article/us-climate-change-emissions-storage/carbon-capture-struggles-to-accelerate-in-race-to-avert-climate-crash-idUSKCN1VY21A (Erişim Tarihi: 14.09.2019s)
29. Reuters (2019b). Chevron starts burying CO2 off Australia at huge Gorgon storage Project. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-chevron-australia-lng-carbon/chevron-starts-burying-CO2-off-australia-at-huge-gorgon-storage-project-idUSKCN1UY0A7 (Erişim Tarihi: 09.08.2019)
30. Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E., & Herzog, H. J. (2015). The cost of CO2 capture and storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, 378-400.
31. Sinn, H. W. (2017). Buffering volatility: A study on the limits of Germany's energy revolution. European Economic Review, 99, 130-150.
32. Walsh, D. M., O'Sullivan, K., Lee, W. T., & Devine, M. T. (2014). When to invest in carbon capture and storage technology: a mathematical model. Energy Economics, 42, 219-225.
33. Wang, M., Lawal, A., Stephenson, P., Sidders, J., & Ramshaw, C. (2011). Post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: a state-of-the-art review. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89(9), 1609-1624.
34. Ward, John; Sammon, Paul; Dundas, Guy; Peszko, Grzegorz; Kennedy, Pauline Maree; Wienges, Sebastian; Prytz, Nicolai. 2015. Carbon leakage : theory, evidence, and policy design (English). Partnership for Market Readiness technical note; no. 11. Washington, D.C. : World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/138781468001151104/Carbon-leakage-theory-evidence-and-policy-design (Erişim Tarihi: 12.05.2019)
35. Whiriskey, Keith. (2017). CCS and Europe's Contribution to the Paris Agreement - Modelling least-cost CO2 reduction pathways. European Zero Emission Technology and Innovation Platform. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22268.18566.
36. Yenilenebilir Enerji Genel Müdürlüğü(YEGM), Karbon Yakalama Ve Depolama Nedir? www.yegm.gov.tr/teknoloji/ccs_nedir.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 02.06.2019)