EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF TURKISH LIRA REAL EFFECTIVE EXCHANGE RATES IN NONLINEAR NATURE
Abstract
In this paper, the tendency properties of Turkish real effective exchange rate with an inaction band are examined in nonlinear nature. The general SETAR (3) model is used. This is a convenient way of presenting the inactivity band caused by the transfer costs and other factors. In this modelling, the stationarity is defined globally which is allow to unit root in the corridor regime but the outers regimes must be a mean reverting process. The data are used de-meaned and de-trended form. For de-meaned data, we execute both the linearity and the stationarity tests. For de-trended data, only the linearity test is executed. According to our empirical results, the statistical evidence is poor for the validity of PPP in even nonlinear nature. The null of unit root is not rejected for the CPI based reel effective exchange rate and it is rejected only 5% significance level for PPI based one. However, take into account possibility of the existence of trend component, Turkish real effective exchange rates are well characterized by nonlinear process with inactivity band and a tendency property. While these findings support the transaction costs hypothesis, they do not strongly support the validity of the PPP hypothesis.
Keywords
Nonlinear adjustment, Purchasing power parity, Transaction cost, SETAR
References
- Alba, J. D.; Park, D. (2005), "An empirical investigation of purchasing power parity (PPP) for Turkey", Journal of Policy Modeling, 27:8, 989-1000.
- Arghyrou, M. G., Boinet, V. and Martin, C. (2006), "Non-linear and non-symmetric exchange-rate adjustment: Evidence from medium- and high-inflation countries", Journal of Economics and Finance, 30:1, 38-56.
- Bai, J. (1997), "Estimating Multiple Breaks One at a Time. Econometric Theory", 13:3, 315-352.
- Bai, J.; Perron, P. (1998), "Estimating and Testing Linear Models with Multiple Structural Changes", Econometrica, 66:1, 47-78.
- Balke, N. S.; Fomby, T. B. (1997), "Threshold Cointegration. International Economic Review", 38:3, 627-645.
- Bec, F.; Ben Salem, M. and Carrasco, M. (2004), "Tests for Unit-Root versus Threshold Specification with an Application to the Purchasing Power Parity Relationship" Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 22:4, 382-395.
- Beninga, S.; Protopapadakis, A. A. (1988), "The equilibrium pricing of exchange rates and assets when trade takes time", Journal of International Economics, 7, 129-149.
- Blassa, B. (1964), "The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: A Reapraisal", Journal of Political Economy, 72, 584-596.
- Caner, M.; Hansen, B. E. (2001), "Threshold Autoregression with a Unit Root", Econometrica, 69:6, 1555-1596.
- Canzoneri, M. B.; Cumby, R. E. and Diba, B. (1996), "Relative Labor Productivity and the Real Exchange Rate in the Long Run: Evidence for a Panel of OECD Countries", NBER, Working Paper no: 5676.