Ebu Cehil (Calligonum Polygonoides L. Ssp. Comosum (L’Hér.) Çalısının Yıllık Yem Değerinin Belirlenmesi

Year 2015, Volume: 32 Issue: 1, 30 - 36, 20.03.2015

Gülter Oktay Süleyman Temel

https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag770

Cited By: 11

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’nin doğusunda (Iğdır ilinde) doğal florada kendiliğinden yetişen Ebu Cehil çalısının yıl içerisindeki (Nisan–Ekim 2013) yem değerinin değişimini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Kimyasal analizler sonucunda Ebu Cehil çalısının aylara göre besin içeriği önemli farklılık göstermiştir. Mevcut çalışmada Ebu Cehil çalısının yıllık ortalama ham protein (HP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acide detergent fiber (ADF), acide detergent lignin (ADL), kuru madde sindirilebilirliği (KMS), sindirilebilir enerji (SE) ve metabolik enerji (ME) değerleri, sırasıyla 141.8 g/kg, 496.0 g/kg, 319.8 g/kg, 106.8 g/kg, % 63.18, 2.97 Mcal/kg, 2.44 Mcal/kg olarak tespit edilmiştir. Ebu Cehil çalısının olgunlaşmayla birlikte HP, KMS, SE ve ME miktarlarının azaldığı, NDF, ADF ve ADL oranlarının ise artığı belirlenmiştir. Buna göre sürgünlerin HP, KMS, SE ve ME oranları en yüksek Nisan ayında (sırasıyla 252.9 g/kg, % 76.98, 3.56 Mcal/kg ve 2.92 Mcal/kg), en düşük ise Ekim ayında (sırasıyla 75.4 g/kg, % 54.35, 2.59 Mcal/kg ve 2.13 Mcal/kg) çıkmıştır. Oysa NDF, ADF ve ADL oranları en yüksek Ekim ayında (sırasıyla 599.7 g/kg, 393.2 g/kg ve 127.8 g/kg), en düşük değerler ise Nisan ayında (sırasıyla 384.8 g/kg, 209.0 (Çizelgede 209.0) g/kg ve 83.1 g/kg) belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlara göre Ebu Cehil çalısının ilave bir yemlemeye gereksinim duyulmadan özellikle küçükbaş hayvan beslenmesinde kullanılabileceği ortaya konulmuştur.

Keywords

Alternatif yem kaynağı, Besin değeri, Ebu Cehil çalısı, Keçi

References

• Abusuwar AO ve Ahmed EO (2010). Seasonal variability in nutritive value of ruminant diets under open grazing system in the semi-arid rangeland of Sudan (South Darfur State). Agricultural and Biology Journal of North America, 1: 243- 249.
• Akyıldız AR (1984). Yemler Bilgisi ve Laboratuar Kılavuzu. Ankara Üniv. Zir. Fak. Yay. No. 895, Uygulama Kitabı No. 213, 236 s., Ankara.
• AOAC (1990). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA, 125 p.
• Anonymous (1981). Nutrient requirements of domestic animals, Number 15. Nutrient requirements of goats. Nat Acad Sci, Nat Res. Council, Washington, DC.
• Ataşoğlu C, Şahin S, Canbolat Ö ve Baytekin H (2010). The effect of harvest stage on the potential nutritive value of kermes oak (Quercus coccifera) leaves. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22 (2), Article 36.
• Fonnesbeck PV, Clark DH, Garret WN and Speth CF (1984). Predicting energy utilization from alfalfa hay from the Western Region. Proceedings, Western Section, American Society of Animal Science, 35: 305-308.
• Gaur DD, Purohit GR and Mathur CS (1980). Nutritive value of phog (Calligonum polygonoides) for camels in Rajasthan desert. Journal Transactions of Indian Society of Desert Technology and University Centre of Desert Studies, 5: 29-31.
• Ghazanfar S, Latif A, Mirza IH and Nadeem MA (2011). Macro-Minerals Concentrations of Major Fodder Tree Leaves and Shrubs of District Chakwal, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10: 480-484.
• González-Andrés F and Ceresuela JL (1998). Chemical composition of some Iberian Mediterranean leguminous shrubs potentially useful for forage in seasonally dry areas. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 41:139-147.
• Goyal M and Sharma SK (2009). Additional wisdom and value addition prospects of arid foods of desert region of North West India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 8: 581-585.
• Haddi ML, Filacorda S, Meniai K, Rollin F and Susmel P (2003). In vitro fermentation kinetics of some halophyte shrubs sampled at three stages of maturity. Animal Feed Science Technology, 104: 205-225.
• Hussain F and Durrani MJ (2009). Nutrıtıonal Evaluatıon of Some Forage Plants From Harboı Rangeland, Kalat, Pakıstan, Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41: 1137-1154.
• Kacar B, Katkat AV ve Öztürk Ş (2006). Bitki Fizyolojisi (2. Baskı). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 563 s., Ankara.
• Kamalak A (2006). Determination of nutritive value of a native grown shrub, Glycyrrhiza glabra L. using in vitro and in situ measurements. Small Ruminant Research, 64: 268-278.
• Kerven C, Alimaev II, Behnke R, Davidson G, Franchois L, Malmakov N, Mathijs E, Smailov A, Temirbekov S and Wright I (2004). Retraction and expansion of flock mobility in Central Asia: Costs and Consequences. African Journal of Range and Forage Science, 20: 159-169.
• Khalil JK, Sawaya WN and Hyder SZ (1986). Nutrient composition of Atriplex leaves grown in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Range Management, 39: 104-107.
• Kökten K, Kaplan M, Hatipoğlu R, Saruhan V and Çınar S (2012). Nutritive values of the leaves of Mediterranean shrubs. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 22: 188-194 . Lyons RK, Machen RV and Forbes TDA (1999). Why Range Forage Quality Changes. Texas Agricultural Extension Service, B-6036, 7 p.
• Mathur CS (1966). "Phog" as a common camel feed in the desert areas. The Rajasthan Veterinarian, 1: 5-7.
• Mountousis J, Papanikolaou K, Stanogias G, Chatzitheodoridis F and Roukos C (2008). Seasonal variation of chemical composition and dry matter digestibility of rangelands in NW Greece. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 9: 547-556.
• Munton P (1998). Vegetation and forage availability in the sands. Journal of Oman Studies, 3: 241-250.
• NRC (2007). Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington DC, 362 p.
• Oddy VH, Robards GE and Low SG (1983). Prediction of In Vivo Dry Matter Digestibility from the Fiber Nitrogen Content of a Feed. In, Robards GE, Packham RG (Eds.): Feed Information and Animal Production. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK, p. 395-398.
• Papachristou TG and Papanastasis VP (1994). Forage value of Mediterranean deciduous woody fodder species and its implication to management of silvo-pastoral systems for goats. Agroforestry Systems, 27: 269-282.
• Papachristou TG, Platis PD and Nastis AS (2005). Foraging behaviour of cattle and goats in oak forest stands of varying coppicing age in Northern Greece. Small Ruminant Research, 59: 181-189.
• Parissi ZM, Papachristou TG and Nastis AS (2005). Effect of drying method on estimated nutritive value of browse species using an in vitro gas production technique. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 123-124: 119-128.
• Parlak AÖ, Gökkuş A, Hakyemez BH and Baytekin H (2011a). Shrub yield and forage quality in Mediterranean shrublands of West Turkey for a period of one year. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 1726-1734.
• Parlak AÖ, Gökkuş A, Hakyemez BH and Baytekin H (2011b). Forage yield and quality of Kermes oak and herbaceous species throughout a year in Mediterranean zone of western Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 9:510-515.
• Sultani JI, Rahimi IU, Javaidi A, Bilal MG, Akhtar P and Ali S (2010). Chemical Composition, Mineral Profile, Palatability and In Vitro Digestibility of Shrubs. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42: 2453-245.
• Tan M ve Temel S (2012). Alternatif Yem Bitkileri. Atatürk Üniv. Zir. Fak. Ders Yayınları, No. 246, s. 195-207, Erzurum.
• Temel S ve Şahin K (2011). Iğdır ilinde yem bitkilerinin mevcut durumu, sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Yüzüncüyıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 21: 64-72.
• Temel S ve Şimşek U (2011). Iğdır Ovası Toprakların Çoraklaşma Süreci ve Çözüm Önerileri. Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi (Alınteri Journal of Agriculture Science), 20(B): 53-59.
• Temel S and Tan M (2011). Fodder values of shrub species in maquis in different altitudes and slope aspects. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences (The JAPS), 20: 508-512.
• Tolunay A, Adiyaman E, Akyol A and Ince D (2009). Herbage growth and fodder yield characteristics of kermes oak (Quecus coccifera L.) in a vegetation period. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8: 290-294.
• Tsiouvaras CN and Nastis A (1990). Browse production and nutritive value of some fodder shrubs and trees in a semi-arid environment in Greece. In, Proc. FAO (Ed): Subnetwork on Mediterranean Pastures. 6th Meeting, Bari, Italy, p. 169-172.
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JD and Lewis BA (1991). Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animals nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583-3597.
• Wahid A (1990). Dietary Composition and Nutritional Status of Sheep and Goats Grazing Two Rangeland Types in Balochistan, Pakistan. Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University.