Effects of Rootstocks On Growth, Fruit And Yielding Characters Sweet Cherry Cultivar 0900

Year 2011, Volume: 2011 Issue: 1, 37 - 43, 01.06.2011

Ahu Bolsu Yaşar Akça

Abstract

In this study, the effect of Gisel A®5 (Prunus cerasus x P. canescens), GiselA®6 (P. cerasus x P. canescens), and P. mahaleb L.seedling (control) rootstocks on vegetative growth, yield, phenological, pomological and morphological characteristics of Sweet Cherry 0900 cultivar was investigated. Compared to GiselA®5 with GiselA®6, and P. mahaleb, reduced significantly tree growth. Average of total tree volume of GiselA®5 was small smaller than GiselA®6 and Prunus mahaleb L., respectively 57,70% and 26,03 %. Trunk cross-sectional area of sweet cherry 0900 cv at the end of the 4 rd year was 29,31 cm2/tree, 48,99 cm2/tree and 30,47 cm2/tree on grafted GiselA®5, GiselA® 6 and P. mahaleb L seedling rootstock respectively. The soluble solid were not affected by rootstocks. The highest fruit diameter (24,64 mm) and fruit weight (7,95 gr) was determined in 0900 Ziraat/GiselA® 5 combinations. The trees that are grafted on Gisel A® 5 collapsed down.

Keywords

GiselA®5, GiselA®6, P. mahaleb L.seedling rootstock, 0900 Ziraat Sweet Cherry Cultivar

Farklı Anaçların 0900 Ziraat Kiraz Çeşidinde Vejetatif Gelişim, Meyve ve Verim Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, GiselA®5 (Prunus cerasus x P. canescens), GiselA®6 (P. cerasus x P. canescens) ve mahlep çöğür (kontrol) (P. mahaleb L) anaçları üzerine aşılanmış 0900 Ziraat kiraz çeşidinin vejetatif gelişme, verim, fenolojik, morfolojik ve pomolojik özellikleri incelenmiştir. GiselA®5 anacı üzerine aşılı ağaçların ortalama taç hacim değerleri GiselA®6 anacına göre % 57,77; mahlep anacına göre ise %26,03 oranında daha düşük değerde tespit edilmiştir. GiselA®5, Gisel A®6 ve mahlep üzerine aşılı ağaçlarda ortalama birim gövde kesit alanı değerleri, dördüncü vejetasyon yılı sonunda sırasıyla 29,31 cm2/ağaç, 48,99 cm2/ağaç ve 30,47 cm2/ağaç olarak bulunmuştur. Anaçların meyvelerin SÇKM içeriği üzerine etkisi olmamıştır. Anaçlar arasında en yüksek meyve çapı (24,64 mm) ve en yüksek meyve ağırlığı (7,95 g) GiselA®5 anacı üzerindeki ağaçlarda tespit edilmiştir. GiselA®5 anacı üzerindeki ağaçlarda yüksek oranda devrilmeler saptanmıştır.

Keywords

GiselA® 5, GiselA® 6, Prunus mahaleb L., 0900 Ziraat Kirazı Çeşidi

References

• Anonim 2005. www.arastirma- yalova.gov.tr
• Anonymous, 2007. www.puphort.org.actabook
• Anonim, 2008. www.tuik.org.tr.
• Bujdoso, G., Hrotko, K. and Stehr, R., 2004. Evaluation of sweet and sour cherry cultivars on German dwarfing rootstocks in hungary. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 12: 233-244
• Burak M.,Akçay M., Yalçınkaya E.,Türkeli Y., 2008.Effect of Some Clonal Rootstocks on Growth and Earliness of ‘0900 Ziraat’ Sweet Cherry, Proc.5th IS on Cherry, Acta hort. 795, ISHS: 199- 202
• Erdoğan, B., 1998. Tokat’ta yetiştirilen bazı kiraz çeşitlerinin fenolojik, özelliklerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma, Gaziosmapaşa Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe Bitkileri, Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Tokat.
• Facteau, T.J., Rove, K. E. and Chestnut N.E., 1986. Firmness of sweet cherry fruit following grow in New York . Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 57:169- 178
• Fischer, R.R., von Elbe, J.H., Schuler R.T., Bruhn H.D., and Moore J.D., 1996. Some physical properties of sour cherries, Trans. ASAE, p:175-179.
• Gyeviki, M., Bujdoso, G. and Hrotko K., 2008. Results of cherry International Journal of Horticultural Science 2008, 14 (4): 11-14 Agro inform Publishing House, Budapest, Printed in Hungary ISSN 1585-0404.
• Kader, A.A., 1983. Post-harvest quality maintenance of fruits and vegetables in developing countries. Post- harvest Physiology and Crop Production, Plenum, New York, p:455-470.
• Kappel, F. and Lichou J., 1994. Flowering and fruiting of ‘Burlat’ sweet cherry on size-controlling rootstock. Hortscıence 29(6):611–612.
• Lauri, P.E. and Claverie, J., 2005. Extinction training of sweet cherries in France Appraisal after six years. Acta. Hort. 667:367–371.
• Lenahan, O. and Whiting, M.D., 2006. Fish oil plus lime sulphur shows potential as a sweet cherry postbloom thinning agent. Hort Science 41:860–861.
• Long, L.E., Nunez-Elisea R. and Cahn H., 2009.Cherry rootstock http://viverosur.com/g12/infoosu.pdf and management.
• Reına, A., Gıorgıa, V., 1987. Biometrical and chemical measurement on fruits of six cultivaris of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) during growth. Horth. Abs., 57(1), 18.
• Riesen, W. and Ladner, J., 1998. Hohe ertrage mit den neuen Kirschenunterlagen. Schweiz. Z. Obst- Und Weınbau 24: 609- 611Studman C.J.,1994. Quality in fresh fruit-meaning, measurement and maintenance. Ag. Eng Mileno, Report N 94-G-080, 1-9.
• Santos, A., Santos, R.R., Cavalheiro, J., Cordeiro, V. and Lousada, J.L., 2006. Initial growth and fruiting of ‘Summit’ Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium) on five rootstocks. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 34 (3): 269- 277.
• Schaumberg, G. and Gruppe, W.,., 1985. Growth and fruiting habit of Prunus avium cv. ‘Hedelfingen’ on clonal cherry hybrid rootstock. Acts Hort. 169:227- 233.
• Sıve, A. and Resnızky, D., 1986. Experiments on the Storage of Rainier and Bing cherries. Hort. Abs., 56(2):88.
• Szot, B. and Stepniewski, A., 1999. Significance of the investigation of physical properties of plant raw metarial for food industry. Int. Agrophysics, 13:411- 415.
• Szot, I.and Meland, M., 2001. Influence of rootstocks on size distribution and fruit quality of sweet cherry cultivars Int. Agrophysics, 2001, 15, 207-204.
• Ugolik M. and Kantorowicz-Bak M., 1996. The influence of dwarfing rootstocks of series GM on growth and yield of sweet cherry (in Polish). Proc. XXXIV Conf. on Pomology, p:172-173.
• Younce, F.l. and Davis, D.C., 1985. A dynamic sensor for cherry firmness. ASAE, 38 (5):1467-1476.
• Webster, A.D. and Schmidt, H., 1995. Rootstocks for sweet and sour cherries, p. 127–163. In: A.D. Webster and N.E. Looney (eds.). Cherries, crop physiology, production and uses. CAB Intl., Oxford, U.K.
• Whiting, M.D.,.Lang, G. and Opharth, D., 2005. Rootstocks and training system affect sweet cherry growth yield and 40(3):582:586.