Hektolitre Ağırlığının Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.)’ da Kimyasal Bileşime Etkisi

Year 2023, Volume: 40 Issue: 3, 130 - 134, 03.01.2024

Mesut Uyanık

https://doi.org/10.55507/gopzfd.1251826

Abstract

Bu araştırma farklı hektolitre ağırlıklarının arpada bazı kimyasal özelliklere etkisini belirlemek amacıyla laboratuvar koşullarında 4 tekerrürlü olarak yürütülmüştür. 4 farklı hektolitre ağırlığına (55, 60, 65 ve 70 kg/hl) sahip arpanın kullanıldığı bu araştırmada ham protein, ham selüloz, ham yağ, ham kül ve nişasta oranları incelenmiş olup, sonuçlar tesadüf parselleri deneme desenine göre varyans analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Yapılan varyans analizine göre, hektolitre ağırlığı incelenen tüm karakterler üzerine istatistiki olarak %1 düzeyinde önemli etki yapmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, ham protein oranı %9.83-12.18, ham selüloz oranı%4.14-6.26, ham yağ oranı %1.43-1.51, ham kül oranı %2.40-2.98 ve nişasta oranı %47.63-53.17 arasında değişmiş olup, hektolitre ağırlığı arttıkça ham protein, ham selüloz ve ham kül oranı azalırken, ham yağ ve nişasta oranı artmıştır.

Keywords

Arpa, Ham protein, Kimyasal özellik, Nişasta

Chemical Composition in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as Affected by Hectoliter Weight

Abstract

This research was carried out to determine the effect of different hectoliter weights on some chemical properties of barley under laboratory conditions in 4 replications. In this study, barley having 4 different hectoliters weight (55, 60, 65 and 70 kg hl-1) was used and crude protein, crude fiber, crude oil, crude ash and starch content were examined. The datas obtained were subjected to variance analysis according to the randomized plot design. According to the analysis of variance, the hectoliter weight had a statistically significant effect on all characters at the level of 1%. According to the results, crude protein ranged 9.83-12.18%, crude fiber 4.14-6.26%, crude oil 1.43-1.51%, crude ash 2.40-2.98% and starch 47.63-53.17% and as the hectoliter weight increased, the crude protein and crude fiber and crude ash content decreased, while the crude oil and starch content increased.

Keywords

Barley, Chemical property, Crude protein, Starch

References

• Andersson, A. A. M., Elfverson, C., Andersson, R., Regne, S., & Aman, P. (1999). Chemical and physical characteristics of different barley samples, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 79: 979-986. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)10970010(19990515)79:7<979::AID-JSFA313>3.0.CO;2-L
• Akgün., İ., Karakoca, T.A., & Karaman, R. (2019). Effect of different gamma ray doses on some agricultural characteristics of two row barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), Food Science and Technology, 7 (sp2): 86-92. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7isp2.86-92.3152.
• Alijošius, S., Juozas Švirmickas, G., Kliševičiūtė, V., Gružauskas, R., Šašytė, V., Racevičiūtė-Stupelienė, A., Daukšienė, A., & Dailidavičienė, J. (2016). The chemical composition of different barley varieties grown in Lithuania, Veterinarija Ir Zootechnika, 73(95): 9-13. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311434685_The_chemical_composition_of_different_barley_varieties_grown_in_Lithuania
• Atlı A., Koçak N., Köksel H. ve Tuncer T., 1989.Yemlik ve maltlık arpada kalite kriterleri ve arpa ıslah progamlarında kalite değerlendirmesi. Arpa Malt Semineri, Konya, s. 23-37
• Aydoğan, S., Şahin, M., Göçmen Akçacık, A. & Ayrancı, R. (2011). Determination of high yielding and quality of barley genotypes in Konya conditions, Selçuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 25 (1): 10-16. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3112021
• Aydoğan, S., Şahin, M., Göçmen, Akçacık, A., Demir, B., Hamzaoğlu, S. & Kara, İ. (2017). Evaluation of quality properties of barley genotypes in different locations, Selçuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 31 (2): 8-13. https://doi:10.15316/SJAFS.2017.13
• Baik, B.K. & Ullrich, S.E. (2008). Barley for food: Characteristics, improvement and renewed interest, Journal of Cereal Science, 48: 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2008.02.002
• Bell, J.M., Shires, A. & Keith, M.O. (1983). Effects of hull and protein contents of barley on protein and energy digestibility and feeding values for pigs, Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 63: 201-211. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas83-023
• Budaklı, E., Bayram, G., Türk, M. & Çelik, N. (2005). The effects of different levels of nitrogen on yield, yield components and quality in some two-rowed barley (Hordeum vulgare conv. distichon) varieties, Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 19 (2): 1-11.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/154036
• Dyulgerova, B., Dyulgerov, N. & Dimova, D. (2017). Variation in the chemical composition and physical characteristics of grain from winter barley varieties, Agricultural Science and Technology, 9 (3): 198 202. doi:10.15547/ast.2017.03.036
• Evers, T. & Millar, S. (2002). Cereal grain structure and development: Some implications for quality, Journal of Cereal Science, 36: 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.2002.0435
• Farcaş, A., Tofana, M., Socaci, S., Salanta, L. & Doinita, B. (2013). Polarimetric determination of starch in raw materials and discharged waste from beer production, Food Science and Technology, 70 (1): 70-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-fst:9484
• Fedak, G. & De La Roche, I. (1977). Lipid and fatty acid composition of barley kernels, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 57: 257-260.https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps77-035
• Griffey, C., Kurantz, M., Thomason, W., Taylor, F., Obert, D., Moreau, R, Flores, R., Sohn, M. & Hicks, K. (2010). Grain composition of Virginia winter barley and implications for use in feed, food, and biofuels production, Journal of Cereal Science, 51: 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2009.09.004
• Holopainen-Mantila, U. (2015). Composition and structure of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grain in relation to end uses. Phd Thesis, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki.
• Imamoğlu A. & Yılmaz N. (2012). Determination of yield and some quality properties of some barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in Bursa ecological conditions, Anadolu Journal of the Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, 22 (2): 13–36.
• Karaduman, Y. (2006). Kavuzsuz arpa potansiyeli. Unlu mamuller Teknolojisi, 74: 21-26.
• Kendal, E. & Doğan, H. (2014). Impact of row number in barley head on yield, some quality and morphological parameters in barley, Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 1 (2): 132–142. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317279529
• Kaur, S., Kaur, H., Singh, P., Cheema, B.S. & Kumar, V. (2016). Genetic variation and evaluation of exotic barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes for grain protein content, starch content and agronomic traits, Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 7: 1114-1121..DOI: 10.5958/0975-928X.2016.00154.X
• Kutlu, H.R. (2008). Yem değerlendirme ve analiz yöntemleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Zootekni Bölümü, Ders Notu, Adana. (unpublished)
• Madazimov, S.H.T., Tukhtamuradov, Z.T. & Ibragimova, K.I. (1976). Fatty acid composition of uzker barley and changes during malting, Pirkladnaya Biokhimiyai Microbiologiya, 12 (5): 734.
• Kızılgeçti, F. Yıldırım, M., Akıncı, C., Albayrak, Ö. (2019). Genotype and environment effects on the grain yield and quality traits of some in barley genotypes, Journal of Agricultural and Nature Sciences, 22 (3): 346-353. doi : 10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.499013
• Moreu, R.A., (2009). Barley Oil. Gourmet and Health-Promoting Specialty Oils, p: 455-478.
• Oral, E., Kendal, E. & Doğan, Y. (2017). Bazı yazlık Arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotiplerinin verim ve kalite yönünden değerlendirilmesi, Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1): 31-38. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/417435
• Osman, R.O., Abd El Gelil, F.M., El-Noamany, H.M. & Dawood, M.G. (2000). Oil content and fatty acid composition of some varities of bayley and sorghum grains, Grasasy Aceites, 51 (3): 157-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.2000.v51.i3.472
• Öztürk, A., Çağlar, Ö. & Tufan, A. (2001). Adaptation of some barley cultivars in Erzurum conditions, Atatürk University Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 32 (2): 109-115. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1194185
• Öztürk, İ., Kahraman, T., Avcı, R., Girgin, V.Ç., Çiftçigil, T.H., Tülek, A., Akın, K. & Tuna, B. (2017). Effect of various environmental conditions on agronomic characters and leaf diseases on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes, Journal of Bahri Dagdas Crop Research, 6 (1): 48-56. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/476585
• Sirat, A. & Sezer, İ. (2005). Samsun ekolojik koşullarına uygun arpa (Hordeum vulgare L.) çeşitlerinin belirlenmesi, OMU Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (3):72-81. https://www.acarindex.com/pdfs/337957
• Sirat, A. & Bahar, B. (2020). Gümüşhane ekolojik koşullarında bazı altı sıralı arpa çeşitlerinin tane kalite özellikleri ve besin değerlerinin belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2): 325-335. doi: 10.24180/ijaws.683462
• Şehitoğlu, M. (2007). Arpa çeşitlerinde farklı tohumluk miktarlarının verim, verim öğeleri ve kalite özelliklerine etkileri (Tez No: 178872). [Yüksek Lisans tezi, Seçuk Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı, Ulusal Tez Merkezi