Ethical Protection Of Human Subjects: Turkiye Regulations İnsan Deneklere Etik Koruması: Türkiye Mevzuatı

Murat Türk; Halise Eroğlu; İlhan Eroğlu

doi:10.62001/gsijses.1711026

Derleme

Ethical Protection Of Human Subjects: Turkiye Regulations İnsan Deneklere Etik Koruma: Türkiye Mevzuatı

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 409 - 423, 30.06.2025

Murat Türk , Halise Eroğlu , İlhan Eroğlu

https://doi.org/10.62001/gsijses.1711026

Öz

During the trials held in Nuremberg, It was understood that there were no ethical, and legal regulations regarding the mass-scale atrocities committed by Nazi scientists against Jews and other prisoners under the guise of medical research during World War II and the Holocaust. This deficiency led to the preparation of the Nuremberg Code in 1947, which consists of 10 principles focusing on patient consent and autonomy, regulating research human subjects. Subsequently, in 1964, the Helsinki Declaration was accepted, stating that "the interests of science and society should never take precedence over the well-being of the subject." In 1978, the Belmont Report established a broader of ethical principles framework focused on respect for persons, beneficence, and justice, to create a foundation where "specific rules can be developed, critiqued, and interpreted." These regulations have continuously evolved to influence ethical and legal regulations at both international and local levels, aiming to prevent the repetition of the horrors experienced in Nazi Germany and to promote the development of medical ethics. This systematic review study aims to increase the awareness of health professionals and provide a general evaluation of the protection of human subject research participants by ethical laws related to human subject research and the legal norms and secondary regulations at national and international levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Human experimentation , Nuremberg Code , Declaration of Helsinki , Law of experimental research , Patient rights

Kaynakça

Açıkgöz, P. Ö. (2023). Klinik Araştırmalar Hukuku. İstanbul: Yetkin Yayınları
Bayındır, S. (2018). İnsan Üzerinde Deney ve Deneme Suçları (TCK.M.90). Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi. 24(1): 77-121.
Constantin, A. (2018). Human Subject Research International and Regional Human Rights Standards. Health Hum Rights, 20(2):137-148.
Çaparlar, C. Ö., & Dönmez, A.(2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Nedir, Nasıl Yapılır? Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim, (44): 2012-2017.
Dumancı, G. (2020). İnsan Konulu Klinik Araştırmalar ve Hukuki Boyutu. İstanbul: Legal yayınevi.
Ekiz, D. (2009). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri: Yaklaşım, yöntem ve teknikler. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Ertin, H., & Temel, M. K. (2016). İnsan Üzerindeki Deneyler ve İlgili Etik– Yasal Metinler. Anadolu Kliniği, 21(3): 223-234.
Fraenkel, R. J., Wallen, E. N., & Hyun, H. (2018). How to design and evaluate research in education. 10th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Gostin , L. (1991). Ethical Principles for the Conduct of Human Subject Research: Population Based Research and Ethics. Law, Medicine and Healthcare. 1991, Fall-Winter; 19(3-4):191-201.
İHD. (1976). Siyasi ve Medeni Haklar Uluslararası Sözleşmesi. https://www.ihd.org.tr/sasve-medenhaklar-uluslararasi-slees/
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2013). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th Ed.). England: Pearson Education
Murray, P. (2021). Moral Responsibility for the Thalidomide Birth Defects Disaster: An Actor Network. STS Research Paper Presented to the Faculty of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. Virginia, USA: University of Virginia; 2021, April 23.
Steinbock, B. (1999). Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies, Workshop and Commissioned Papers. Within: A.
Mastroianni, A.C. Faden, R. Federman, D. Editors; Ethical Issues Related to the Inclusion of Pregnant Women in Clinical Trials (II).Volume 2. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US);1999. 23-28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK236574/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK236574.pdf
The World Medical Association.(2015). Tıp Etiği El Kitabı. 3. Basım. Çev: M. Murat Civaner. Ankara: Türk Tabipler Birliği Yayını. Wrigley, A.(2015). Human experiments: the good, the bad, and the ugly [Internet]. 2015, June 8 [Update: 2010-2024; Accepted date: November 2024]. Accepted addresses: https://theconversation.com/human-experiments-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-39876
Yıldırım, M. Y. (2020). Tıp-Felsefe ilişkisinin tarihi. https://www.aybutft.com/post/tip-felsefesi
Yüksel, H. (2017) Kişilik Hakkı İhlali Kapsamında İnsan Üzerinde Yapılan Deneyler ve Hukuki Sonuçları. İstanbul: Onikilevha Yayıncılık.
TDK (Turkish Language Association). (2024). www.sozluk.gov.tr
www.britannica.com (a). Tuskegee syphilis study [Internet]. 2024, September 10. [Update: 2024; Accepted date: November 2024]. Accepted addresses: https://www.britannica.com/event/Tuskegee-syphilis-study
www.usshm.org. Nazi medical experiments[Internet]. 2024. [Update: 2024; Accepted date: November 2024]. Accepted addresses: https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/tr/article/nazi-medical-experiments
www.britannica.com (b). Nuremberg Code [Internet]. 2024. [Update: 2024; Accepted date: November 2024]. Accepted addresses: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Nuremberg-Code
www.habertürk.com. İngiltere Hint Askerini Kobay Yaptı [Internet]. 2007, 09 02. [Update: 2024; Accepted date: November 2024]. Accepted addresses: https://www.haberturk.com/dunya/haber/34554-ingiltere-hint-askerini-kobay-yapti
TBMM (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi) . Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasası [İnternet]. 1982: [Update: 2024; Accepted date: November 2024]. Accepted addresses: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=2709&MevzuatTur=1&MevzuatTertip=5.
TBMM (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi). Türk Ceza Kanunu [İnternet]. 2004: [Update: 2024; Accepted date: November 2024]. Accepted addresses: https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.5.5237.pdf