Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe ve İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Edimsel Yeti Gelişimi Açısından Karşılaştırılması / A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks as a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development

Feryal Çubukçu; Sercan Atay

EN TR

A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks as a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development

Abstract

Studies on foreign language teaching aiming at communication development accelarated in the 20th century when transmission became easier due to globalisation. By the time it was 1970s, the communicative approach was already at the center of foreign language teaching methods. Studies on pragmatic competence, which is one of the fundamental components of the communicative approach, got the momentum parallel to those exercises. Pragmatic competence, which is one of the important aspects of the communicative approach, was examined through textbooks that are the most widespread teaching materials around the world. Being subject to the highest number of studies in the field, EFL books were chosen for comparison with Turkish as a Foreign Language books. This research was conducted so as to determine the differences and similarities by comparing Turkish and English textbooks in terms of pragmatic competence development.

Keywords

Pragmatic competence,communicative approach,textbooks,foreign language teaching,speech acts

References

Akyol, B. & Yavuzkurt, T. (2016) Türkiye’de lisansüstü tezlerde eğitim denetimi. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), 908-926
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bach, K. & Harnish R.M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Boran, G. (2003). Pragmatics in EFL teaching. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 139-154.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. California: SAGE Publications.
Crystal, D. (1992). Introducing linguistics, Penguin, 18(1), 77.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995) Choosing your textbook. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.
Demirezen, M. (1991). Pragmatics and language teaching. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6, 281-287.
Fraser, B. (1975). Hedged performatives, (P. Cole ve J. L. Morgan ed.), Syntax and semantics, 3, New York: Academic Press.

Günay, V.D. (2015). İzmir. Papatya Yayıncılılık: İstanbul.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Longman ELT.
Hutchinson, T. & Torres, E. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal 48(4), 315-328.
Kansu-Yetkiner, N. (2009). Çeviribilim edimbilim ilişkisi üzerine, İzmir:İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, 6, 1-10.
Latham-Koenig, C.,Oxenden, C. (2013). English File. Oxford Press : Oxford.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S.C. (2000). Pragmatik. Konzepte der Sprach Literaturwissenschaft. Neu Übersetzt von M. Wiese. Herg: P.Eisenberg/H.Kiesel. Niemeyer: Tübingen
Lin, M.X. (2008). Pragmatic failure in intercultural communication and English teaching in China. China Media Research, 4(3), 43-52.
McKinlay, S. & Hastings, B. (2012). New Success. Pearson Press: Harlow
Neuner, G, & Hunfeld, H.(1993). Methoden des fremdsprachlichen Deutschunterrichts. Fernstudieneinheit 4. Berlin: Langenscheidt.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Printice Hall.
Richards, J., Rodgers, S.T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching. CUP. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (1992). Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Longman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An Essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Uzun, N.E. (2008). Yeni hitit 2. Ankara : TÖMER Yayıncılık.
Vasquez, C. & Sharpless, D. (2009). The role of pragmatics in the master’s TESOL curriculum: Findings from a nationwide survey. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 5-28.
Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? TESL-EJ, 8(2), 1-18

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Studies on Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Feryal Çubukçu
DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Sercan Atay
BALIKESİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Türkiye

Publication Date

October 25, 2017

Submission Date

October 6, 2017

Acceptance Date

October 24, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 1 Number: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA58JZ38EW

APA

Çubukçu, F., & Atay, S. (2017). Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe ve İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Edimsel Yeti Gelişimi Açısından Karşılaştırılması / A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks as a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 8-20. https://izlik.org/JA58JZ38EW

AMA

1.Çubukçu F, Atay S. Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe ve İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Edimsel Yeti Gelişimi Açısından Karşılaştırılması / A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks as a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development. GAUN-JES. 2017;1(1):8-20. https://izlik.org/JA58JZ38EW

Chicago

Çubukçu, Feryal, and Sercan Atay. 2017. “Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Ve İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Edimsel Yeti Gelişimi Açısından Karşılaştırılması A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks As a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development”. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 1 (1): 8-20. https://izlik.org/JA58JZ38EW.

EndNote

Çubukçu F, Atay S (October 1, 2017) Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe ve İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Edimsel Yeti Gelişimi Açısından Karşılaştırılması / A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks as a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 1 1 8–20.

IEEE

[1]F. Çubukçu and S. Atay, “Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe ve İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Edimsel Yeti Gelişimi Açısından Karşılaştırılması / A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks as a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development”, GAUN-JES, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–20, Oct. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA58JZ38EW

ISNAD

Çubukçu, Feryal - Atay, Sercan. “Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Ve İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Edimsel Yeti Gelişimi Açısından Karşılaştırılması A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks As a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development”. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 1/1 (October 1, 2017): 8-20. https://izlik.org/JA58JZ38EW.

JAMA

1.Çubukçu F, Atay S. Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe ve İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Edimsel Yeti Gelişimi Açısından Karşılaştırılması / A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks as a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development. GAUN-JES. 2017;1:8–20.

MLA

Çubukçu, Feryal, and Sercan Atay. “Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Ve İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Edimsel Yeti Gelişimi Açısından Karşılaştırılması A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks As a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development”. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 1, Oct. 2017, pp. 8-20, https://izlik.org/JA58JZ38EW.

Vancouver

1.Feryal Çubukçu, Sercan Atay. Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe ve İngilizce Ders Kitaplarının Edimsel Yeti Gelişimi Açısından Karşılaştırılması / A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks as a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development. GAUN-JES [Internet]. 2017 Oct. 1;1(1):8-20. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA58JZ38EW

A Comparison of Turkish and English Textbooks as a Foreign Language in Terms of Pragmatic Competence Development

Abstract

Keywords