Examination of Births Before COVID-19 Pandemic Normalization Process and Comparison with Previous Years; A Retrospective Cohort Study

Year 2021, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 81 - 90, 10.09.2021

Bükre Çıkman , Ayşegül Açıkgöz , Sakine Yılmaz

Abstract

In this study, we wanted to show the occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic by cesarean section. The weekly average number of live births, in March-April and May of 2017-2020, three doctor working in the public sector, and the other three doctor working in the public sector, a total of six gynecological births are retrospectfol players. Cesarean section between 2017-2020 are more than normal spontaneous vaginal delivery. Cesarean delivery in a non-public hospital rate is higher than public hospital. Dramatic variation in cesarean rates even among at non-public physicians available. Caesarean section during the first trimester of the COVID-19 pandemic prevalence has increased. Changes in birth patterns in extraordinary situations should be examined in detail.

Keywords

Cesarean section, birth, pandemic

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

References

• Althabe, F., Sosa, C.G. & Gibbons, L. (2006). Cesarean Section Rates and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Low- , Medium- , and High-Income Countries: An Ecological Study. Birth, 33 (4).
• Belizán, J. M., Althabe, F., Barros, F. C. & Alexander S. (1999). Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America : ecological study. British Medical Journal, 319: 1397–1402.
• Bhatia, K. et al. (2021). The effect of COVID-19 on general anaesthesia rates for caesarean section. A cross-sectional analysis of six hospitals in the north-west of England. Anaesthesia, 76 (3): 312–319.
• Bhatiaa, M., Dwivedib, L.K., Banerjeeb, K. & Dixit, P. (2020). An epidemic of avoidable caesarean deliveries in the private sector in India: Is physician-induced demand at play. Social Science & Medicine, 265 (2).
• Cagan M. (2017). The change in the method of delivery over years and the Robson Ten Group Classification System. Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.
• Declercq, E., Young, R., Cabral, H. & Ecker J. (2011). Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in ındustrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth İssues Perinatal Care, 38 (2): 99–104.
• Demir, B. C., Ocakoglu, G., Ozerkan, K., Orhan, A. & Cengiz, C. (2012). Cesarean delivery rates and changing indications in our clinic between 2000 – 2010. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, 38 (2): 123–127.
• Filiz M. (2020). Investigation of Study on The Cesarean Operation Carried out in Turkey. ACU International Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (1): 74–83.
• Government of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2015). India National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4). Retrieved from http://rchiips.org/nfhs/NFHS-4Reports/India.pdf
• Gozukara, F. & Eroglu, K. (2008). Factors that effect the choices of primipars on the mode of delivery. Hacettepe University Nursing Faculty Journal, 15 (1): 32–46.
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2008). Turkey Population and Health Survey 1998. Retrieved from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa1998/rapor/TNSA_1998_ana_rapor.pdf
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2004). Turkey Population and Health Survey 2003. Retrieved from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/pdf/TNSA2003-AnaRapor.pdf
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2008). Turkey Population and Health Survey 2008. Retrieved from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2008/data/TNSA-2008_ana_Rapor-tr.pdf
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2014). Turkey Population and Health Survey 2013. Retrieved from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2013/rapor/TNSA_2013_ana_rapor.pdf
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2018). Turkey Population and Health Survey 2018. Retrieved from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2018/rapor/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf
• Hannah M. E. et al. (2000). Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet, 356 (9239): 1375–1383.
• Isguder, C. K. et al. (2017). Cesarean section rates and ındications in our clinic between 2014-2016. The Journal of Gynecology - Obstetrics and Neonatology, 14 (4): 168–171.
• Karabel, M. P., Demirbas M. & Inci M. B. (2017). Changing rates of cesarean section in Turkey and in the World and probable causes. Sakarya Medical Journal, 7 (4): 158-163.
• Khazaei, L., Khodakarim, S., Mohammadbeigi, A. & Alipour, A. (2019). Epidemiological trends in cesarean section rate in qom province, Iran during 2005-2017: A joinpoint regression analysis. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology, 15 (2): 143–152.
• Konakci S. K. & Kilic B. (2002). Births are Increasing by Cesarean Section. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, 11 (8): 286–288.
• Li, M. et al. (2020), Impact of Wuhan lockdown on the indications of cesarean delivery and newborn weights during the epidemic period of COVID-19. Plos One, 15 (8): 1–9.
• Malhotra Y, Miller R, Bajaj K et al. (2020) No change in cesarean section rate during COVID-19 pandemic in New York City. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 253: 328–329
• South Africa National Department of Health. (2019). South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/sadhs-complete0.pdf
• T.C. Ministry of Health. (2008). Delivery and caesarean section management guide. Retrieved from https://kalite.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/6407/0/dogum-ve-sezaryen-eylemi-yonetim-rehberipdf.pdf
• Todman, D. (2007). A history of caesarean section: From ancient world to the modern era. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 47 (5): 357–361.
• Turamanlar, O. & Songur A. (2014). An anatomical look at the historical development of cesarean operation. Lokman Hekim Journal, 4 (2): 8–12.
• Uckan,K. & Uckan T. (2020). Evaluation of four years birth data and cesarean indications in our clinic. The Journal of Gynecology - Obstetrics and Neonatology, 17 (3): 285–290.
• Uzun, B. & Dag E. (2019). Women’s preferences relating mode of delivery the role of midwife. Health Care Academy Journal, 6 (2): 87–90.
• WHO (2015). WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf;jsessionid=E620D166228690857DE300ED1A300037?sequence=1
• World Bank Group. (2014). Turkey's transıtıon experıence: ıntegratıon, ınclusıon, ınstıtutıons. Retrieved from http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/507871468306558336/pdf/90509-v2-REVISED-P133570-PUBLIC-Box393190B.pdf
• Yilmaz, M., Isaoglu, U. & Kadanali S. (2009). Investigation of the cesarean section cases in our clinic between 2002 and 2007. Marmara Medical Journal, 22 (2): 104-110.
• Zhang, J. et al. (2020). The associated factors of cesarean section during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in nine cities of China. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 25(1): 1–7.