Research Article

Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods

Volume: 9 Number: 3 September 30, 2022
EN

Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods

Abstract

Abrasive waterjet machining (AWJM), a known metal cutting process in manufacturing, is likely to be improved with the selection and use of the most influential parameters in machining decision-making. This work illustrates the development of two multicriteria indicators to optimize parameters for the abrasive waterjet machining process, providing optimization information for the surface morphology problem. The evaluation based on the distance from average solution (EDAS) method was used as the first indicator while the desirability function analysis (DFA) method reflects the second indicator. The results demonstrate a huge promise of both indicators, EDAS and DFA, to develop procedures for optimizing the parameters of Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo alpha-beta alloy through the abrasive waterjet machining process. For the EDAS method, experimental trial 7 provided the best results with the water jet pressure of 220 bar, traverse speed of 40mm/min, and standoff distance of 1mm. The corresponding material removal rate is 151.667mm3/min while the roughness average is 2.76mm. The DFA method also provided the same results as those of the EDAS method. The present study is evidence of optimization of the parameters of Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo alpha-beta alloy using the AWJM process. This warrants an intervention to enhance productivity and the economic gains of the company.

Keywords

References

  1. Akkurt, A. (2004). Waterjet cutting systems and assesment of their industrial applications. Journal of Polytechnic, 7(2), 129-139
  2. Bhamare, S., Ramakrishnan, G., Mannava, S. R., Langer, K., Vasudevan, V. K., & Qian, D. (2013). Simulation-based optimization of laser shock peening process for improved bending fatigue life of Ti–6Al–2Sn–4Zr–2Mo alloy. Surface and Coatings Technology, 232, 464-474. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.003
  3. Chen, M., Zhang, S., Zeng, J., Chen, B., Xue, J., & Ji, L. (2019). Correcting shape error on external corners caused by the cut-in/cut-out process in abrasive water jet cutting. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 103, 849-859. doi:10.1007/s00170-019-03564-x
  4. Ergür, H. S. (2009). Theoretical analysis of abrasive waterjet and modelling with artificial neural network. Journal of Engineering and Architecture Faculty of Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 22(2), 179-197
  5. Fleißner-Rieger, C., Pfeifer, T., Turk, C., & Clemens, H. (2022) Optimization of the post-process heat treatment strategy for a near-α titanium base alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion. Materials, 15(3), 1032. doi:10.3390/ma15031032
  6. Hashish, M. (2014). Waterjet Machining Process. In: A. Nee (Eds.), Handbook of Manufacturing Engineering and Technology (pp. 1-30). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4976-7_75-1
  7. Iqbal, A., Dar, N. U., & Hussain, G. O. (2011). Optimization of abrasive water jet cutting of ductile materials. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology - Materals Science Edition, 26, 88-92. doi:10.1007/s11595-011-0174-8
  8. Johnston, C. E. (1989). Waterjet/Abrasive Waterjet Machining. In: ASM Handbook, 16, Machining (pp. 520-527). ASM International. doi:10.31399/asm.hb.v16.a0002158

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2022

Submission Date

June 27, 2022

Acceptance Date

August 11, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 9 Number: 3

APA
Nwankiti, U. S., & Oke, S. (2022). Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation, 9(3), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.54287/gujsa.1135609
AMA
1.Nwankiti US, Oke S. Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods. GU J Sci, Part A. 2022;9(3):233-250. doi:10.54287/gujsa.1135609
Chicago
Nwankiti, Ugochukwu Sixtus, and Sunday Oke. 2022. “Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation 9 (3): 233-50. https://doi.org/10.54287/gujsa.1135609.
EndNote
Nwankiti US, Oke S (September 1, 2022) Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation 9 3 233–250.
IEEE
[1]U. S. Nwankiti and S. Oke, “Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods”, GU J Sci, Part A, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 233–250, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.54287/gujsa.1135609.
ISNAD
Nwankiti, Ugochukwu Sixtus - Oke, Sunday. “Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation 9/3 (September 1, 2022): 233-250. https://doi.org/10.54287/gujsa.1135609.
JAMA
1.Nwankiti US, Oke S. Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods. GU J Sci, Part A. 2022;9:233–250.
MLA
Nwankiti, Ugochukwu Sixtus, and Sunday Oke. “Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation, vol. 9, no. 3, Sept. 2022, pp. 233-50, doi:10.54287/gujsa.1135609.
Vancouver
1.Ugochukwu Sixtus Nwankiti, Sunday Oke. Optimal Cutting Conditions of Abrasive Waterjet Cutting for Ti-6Al-2Sn-2Mo Alpha-Beta Alloy Using EDAS and DFA Methods. GU J Sci, Part A. 2022 Sep. 1;9(3):233-50. doi:10.54287/gujsa.1135609

Cited By