Seismic Rehabilitation of a Reinforced Concrete School in Northern Cyprus Following the 2023 Turkey Earthquake Sequences

Abstract

In 2023, a 7.8-magnitude earthquake struck Turkey, causing severe damage to residential and critical infrastructure. In response, the government of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus launched a program to rehabilitate educational facilities. This study examines the rehabilitation efforts at Atatürk Technical High School in Nicosia. A nonlinear time-history analysis was conducted to assess the building's seismic behavior, lateral load resistance, and plastic deformation during main shock and aftershock sequences. Shear walls and steel X-braced frames were subsequently integrated into the building's lateral load-resisting system, and their effectiveness was evaluated. The analysis indicated that the original structure would likely experience life safety risks and structural damage in vertical elements, with some parts at risk of collapse after the second loading sequence. In contrast, the rehabilitated structure demonstrated immediate occupancy performance, with no plastic hinge formation in either direction. The maximum roof displacement was also reduced to as little as one-third of that in the original structure.

Keywords

• Case Study
• Seismic Rehabilitation
• School Building
• Performance-Based Design
• Time History Analysis

References

1. AFAD (2024). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Interior, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD) "Training and Awareness Department". Accessed: 24.02.2024, https://www.afad.gov.tr)
2. Akar, F., Işık, E., Avcil, F., Büyüksaraç, A., Arkan, E., & İzol, R. (2024). Geotechnical and Structural Damages Caused by the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes in Gölbaşı (Adıyaman). Applied Sciences, 14(5).
3. Altunsu, E., Güneş, O., Öztürk, S., Sorosh, S., Sarı, A., & Beeson, S. T. (2024). Investigating the structural damage in Hatay province after Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye earthquake sequences. Engineering Failure Analysis, 157, 107857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107857
4. ASCE/SEI 41/17. (2017). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. American Society Of Civil Engineers.
5. Babaei, S., Habib, A., Hosseini, M., & Yildirim, U. (2024). Investigating the Inelastic Performance of a Seismic Code-Compliant Reinforced Concrete Hospital Under Long Sequence of Ground Motions Records. In: Proceedings of 15th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering (ACE2023) (pp. 364-373). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1781-1_34
6. Babaei, S., & Hosseini, M. (2023). Semi-active Control of 3D-Vertically Isolated Buildings with Divided Skeleton into Inner and Outer Interactive Subsystems Equipped with MR Dampers Canadian Conference - Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2023.
7. Babaei, S., & Karimi Ghaleh Jough, F. (2024). A Comprehensive Evaluation of Tuned Vertical Isolation System for Seismic Risk Mitigation. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences, 14(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2024-0004
8. Babaei, S., & Zarfam, P. (2019). Optimization of shape memory alloy braces for concentrically braced steel braced frames. Open Engineering, 9(1), 697-708. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2019-0084

9. Babaei, S., Zarfam, P., & Sarvghad Moghadam, A. (2020). Probabilistic and Deterministic Semi-Active Control Strategies for Adjacent Buildings Connected by MR Dampers 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
10. Babaei, S., Zarfam, P., Sarvghad Moghadam, A., & Zahrai, S. M. (2023). Assessment of a dual isolation system with base and vertical isolation of the upper portion. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 88(3), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2023.88.3.263
11. Computers and Structures, Inc. (2023). SAP2000 Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design (Version 24). Berkeley, CA: Computers and Structures, Inc. Available at: https://www.csiamerica.com
12. Doğan, T. P., Kalkan, H., Aldemir, Ö., Ayhan, M., Böcek, M., & Anıl, Ö. (2024). Investigation of RC structure damages after February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake in the Hatay region. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 22(10), 5201-5229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01965-2
13. Jough, F. K. G. (2024). Fuzzy Logic-Based Fragility Curve Development for Steel Moment-Resisting Frames Considering Uncertainties in Seismic Response. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 18(05), 2450014. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431124500143
14. Jough, F. K. G., & Şensoy, S. (2016). Prediction of seismic collapse risk of steel moment frame mid-rise structures by meta-heuristic algorithms. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 15(4), 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0362-9
15. Jough, F. K. G., Veghar, M., & Beheshti-Aval, S. B. (2021). Epistemic Uncertainty Treatment Using Group Method of Data Handling Algorithm in Seismic Collapse Fragility. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 18.
16. Dowell, K. (2023). Reconnaissance Report of Observed Structural Bridge Damage (SDSU STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH PROJECT, Issue.)
17. Karimi Ghaleh Jough, F. (2023). The contribution of steel wallposts to out-of-plane behavior of non-structural masonry walls. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 22(1), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-023-2161-4
18. Karimi Ghaleh Jough, F., & Beheshti Aval, S. B. (2018). Uncertainty analysis through development of seismic fragility curve for an SMRF structure using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based on fuzzy C-means algorithm. Scientia Iranica, 25(6), 2938-2953. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4232
19. Karimi Ghaleh Jough, F., & Ghasemzadeh, B. (2024). Uncertainty Interval Analysis of Steel Moment Frame by Development of 3D-Fragility Curves Towards Optimized Fuzzy Method. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 49(4), 4813-4830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08223-8
20. Karimi Ghaleh Jough, F., & Ghasemzadeh, B. (2023). Reliability Prediction of SMRF Based on the Combination of Neural Network And Incremental Dynamic Analysis [SMRF’nin Sinir Ağı ve Artımlı Dinamik Analizin Birleşimine Dayanan Güvenilirlik Tahmini]. Journal of Innovations in Civil Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.60093/jiciviltech.1317804
21. Karimi Ghaleh Jough, F., & Golhashem, M. (2020). Assessment of out-of-plane behavior of non-structural masonry walls using FE simulations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(14), 6405-6427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00932-x
22. Mohammadi, N. K., Yasuko; Akyol, E. (2024). Observed structural bridge damage report for the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquake. Kobe University Research Center for Urban Safety.
23. Onat, O., Özmen, A., Özdemir, E., & Sayın, E. (2024). Damage propagation and failure mechanism of single dome historical Masonry Mosque after February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake doublets (Mw = 7.7 and Mw = 7.6). Structures, 69, 107288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107288
24. Prota Software. (2018). ProtaStructure: Structural Design and Analysis Software. Available at: https://www.protasoftware.com
25. Qu, Z., Wang, F., Chen, X., Wang, X., & Zhou, Z. (2023). Rapid report of seismic damage to hospitals in the 2023 Turkey earthquake sequences. Earthquake Research Advances, 3(4), 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqrea.2023.100234
26. SeismoSoft. (2022). SeismoStruct: A Finite Element Analysis Program for Static and Dynamic Nonlinear Analysis of Framed Structures. Available at: https://www.seismosoft.com
27. Turan, A. I., Celik, A., Kumbasaroglu, A., & Yalciner, H. (2024). Assessment of reinforced concrete building damages following the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in Malatya, Turkey (February 6, 2023). Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 54, 101718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101718
28. TS 708, Turkish Standards Institute. (1973). TS 708-Steel for the reinforcement of concrete – reinforcing steel, Ankara.
29. Vuran, E., Serhatoğlu, C., Timurağaoğlu, M. Ö., Smyrou, E., Bal, İ. E., & Livaoğlu, R. (2024). Damage observations of RC buildings from 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence and discussion on the seismic code regulations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 23, 1153-1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-023-01843-3
30. Wang, X., Feng, G., He, L., An, Q., Xiong, Z., Lu, H., Wang, W., Li, N., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Evaluating Urban Building Damage of 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey Earthquake Sequence Using SAR Change Detection. Sensors, 23(14), 6342. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23146342
31. Zengin, B., & Aydin, F. (2023). The Effect of Material Quality on Buildings Moderately and Heavily Damaged by the Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes. Applied Sciences, 13(19) 10668. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910668