Considering Industrial Design In The Context Of Communication: The Concept of Design Communication

Abstract

The design process, essentially a problem-solving activity, is deeply intertwined with communication. In this process, designers share ideas and information not only with themselves but also with external parties through various media. Communication is defined as "the process of sending information using a medium," and it serves as a pivotal intersection between the fields of design and communication. One crucial element in this design communication process is the environment. The environment acts as a physical mediator, facilitating the loading and transmission of messages that can stimulate the senses. Different environmental factors, such as the method, process, and perception, influence the formation of the designer's original idea and the overall functioning of the design process. While the literature frequently addresses the concept of "Communication Design," the specific concept of "Design Communication" itself has not received adequate examination. Furthermore, its framework within the context of industrial design discipline remains incompletely defined. As part of this study's scope, an analysis of various definitions of design communication in the literature has been conducted, leading to the identification of five distinct contexts through which the concept is approached and its framework established within the realm of industrial design discipline.

Keywords

• industrial design
• design communication
• context of design communication

References

1. [1] Stacey, M., Lauche, K. (2005). Thinking and representing in design. In Design process improvement. London: Springer.
2. [2] Norman, D. (2005). The Design of Everyday Things. Newyork: Basic Books.
3. [3] Asanowicz, A., (2002). Evolution of media for early design stages. Sixth Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning-Part one: Architecture Proceedings.
4. [4] Fiske, J. (2003). İletişim Çalışmalarına Giriş. Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
5. [5] Miller, K. (2005). Communication Theories: Perspectives, Processes, and Contexts. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. [6] Wood, J. T. (2000). Communication theories in action: An introduction. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
7. [7] Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. The communication of ideas, 37(1), 136-139.
8. [8] Taura, T., Nagai, Y., (2012). Concept generation for design creativity: A systematized theory and methodology. London: Springer. [9] Piaget, J. (1972). The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities, 127-139.

9. [10] Eco, U. (1968) La struttura assente: introduzione alla ricerca semiologica Bompiani. Milano: Bompiani.
10. [11] Nelson, G. (1979). Problems of design. Newyork: Whitney Library of Design.
11. [12] Koenig, G., K. (1970) Architettura e comunicazione Seconda edizione accresciutia da un saggio su Schindler e Neutra, Florence: Liberia Editrice Fiorentina.
12. [13] Krippendorff, K. and Butter, R. (1984) Product semantics: exploring the symbolic qualities of form Innovation: The Journal of the Industrial Designers Society of America, 3(2).
13. [14] Buchanan, R. (1985) A Response to Klaus Krippendorff. Design Issues, 2(2), 72-74.
14. [15] Monö, R. (1997) Design for product understanding: The aesthetics of design from a semiotic approach. Stockholm: Liber. [16] Muller, W. (2001). Order and meaning in design. Utrecht: LEMMA Publishers.
15. [17] Krippendorff, K. (2006) The semantic turn. CRC Press.
16. [18] Crilly, N., Good, D., Matravers, D., Clarkson, P. J. (2008). Design as communication: exploring the validity and utility of relating intention to interpretation. Design Studies, 29(5), 425-457.
17. [19] Maser, S. (1976). Theorie ohne Praxis ist leer. Praxis ohn, 49. [20] Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell system technical journal, 27(3), 379-423.
18. [21] Simon, H.A.(1969). The Science of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. [22] Chan, C.S., Hill, L., Cruz-Neira, C. (1999). Can design be done in full-scale representation? In: Proceedings of the 4th Design Thinking Research Symposium – Design Representation, 139–148.
20. [23] Eastman, C. (2001). New directions in design cognition: studies of representation and recall. In: Eastman, C., McCracken, M., Newstetter, W. (eds.) Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
21. [24] Goldschmidt, G. (1997). Capturing indeterminism: Representation in the design problem space. Design Studies, 18(4), 441-455.
22. [25] Goldschmidt, G. (2004). Design representation: Private process, public image. In: Goldschmidt, G., Porter, W.L. (eds.) Design Representation. London: Springer.
23. [26] Chan, C. S. (2011). Design representation and perception in virtual environments. In Collaborative Design in Virtual Environments. Dordrecht: Springer.
24. [27] Turan, B. O. (2011). 21. Yüzyıl Tasarım Ortamında Süreç, Biçim ve Temsil İlişkisi. Megaron, 6(3).
25. [28] Hepburn, M. (2012). Investigating the potential for new media and new technologies in design and technology undergraduate education, Doctoral dissertation, Loughborough University.
26. [29] Kvan, T., West, R., Vera, A. H. (1998). Tools and channels of communication: Dealing with the effects of computer mediation on design communication. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 3(3), 21-33.
27. [30] Dave, B. (1995). Towards distributed computer-aided design environments. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on CAAD Futures'95.
28. [31] Riva, G., Galimberti, C. (1998a). Computer-mediated communication: identity and social interaction in an electronic environment. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs, 124(4), 434-464.
29. [32] Riva, G., Galimberti, C. (1998b). Interbrain frame: interaction and cognition in computer- mediated communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 295-309.
30. [33] Gabriel, G. C., Maher, M. L. (1999). Does computer mediation affect design representation. Design Thinking’99.
31. [34] Maher, M. L., Simoff, S. J., Cicognani, A. (1997). Observations from an experimental study of computer-mediated collaborative design. Preprints Formal Aspects of Collaborative CAD, 165-185.
32. [35] Chiu, M. L. (1998). The design guidance of CSCW. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia.
33. [36] Oxman, R. (2006). Special Issue of Design Studies on Digital Design. Design Studies, 27(3), 225-227.
34. [37] Chiu, M. L. (2002). An organizational view of design communication in design collaboration. Design studies, 23(2), 187-210.
35. [38] Eckert, C. M., Stacey, M. (2001). Dimensions of communication in design. In 13th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 01).
36. [39] Williams, A., Cowdroy, R. (2002). How designers communicate ideas to each other in design meetings. In Proceedings of DESIGN 2002, the 7th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik.
37. [40] Minneman, S., L. (1991). The social construction of a technical reality: empirical studies of group engineering design practice. PhD thesis, Stanford University, CA, USA.
38. [41] Bucciarelli, L., L. (1994). Designing engineers. MIT Press.
39. [42] Henderson, K. (1999) On line and on paper. MIT Press.
40. [43] Persson, S., Warell, A. (2003). Relational modes between industrial design and engineering design a conceptual model for interdisciplinary design work. In Proceedings of the 6th Asian Design International Conference.
41. [44] Industrial Design Institute (IDI) (2014). A Guide to the Industrial Design Body of Knowledge. Philadelphia: Industrial Design Institute.
42. [45] Maier, A. M., Dönmez, D., Hepperle, C., Kreimeyer, M., Lindemann, U., Clarkson, P. J. (2011). Improving communication in design: recommendations from the literature. In DS 68-7: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11).
43. [46] Clarkson, J.,Eckert, C. (Eds.). (2010). Design process improvement: a review of current practice. London: Springer.