Research Article

Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House

Volume: 12 Number: 3 September 30, 2024
EN

Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House

Abstract

The Republic, declared on October 29, 1923, brought many innovations in the fields of architecture and urbanization. Atatürk's vision played a crucial role in the development and implementation of these innovations. In the Early Republic Period, buildings in the style known in many sources as Late Ottoman Early Republic Architecture or First National Architecture, along with buildings in the international style that Atatürk especially wanted to be implemented with the arrival of foreign architects and artists to our country, were constructed together. Especially in the capital Ankara, buildings constructed in both the First National and international styles were located side by side or very close to each other. The modernization movements in cities that started with Ankara in the early Republic also manifested themselves in other Anatolian provinces. With the establishment of the Republic, the idea of establishing People's Houses as an educational institution emerged to disseminate the ideology of Turkish revolutions to the public. The establishment of People's Houses in 1932 and the gradual opening of People's Houses in every province are evidence of the role of People's Houses in the modernization of cities and the education of the people. The Elâzığ People's House, which is discussed in the article, was opened on February 19, 1934, for these purposes. The building, which served as a People's House from 1934 to 1952, was used as a Girls' Primary School from 1952 to 1972, and as a High School and Education Institute from 1972 to 1982. Since 1983, it has continued to be used as a teachers' house. The Elâzığ People's House Building, built in the international style in the Early Republic Period, will be examined in terms of its plan, construction technique, and facade features, and will be compared with People's House buildings in other cities in terms of these features.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Durukan, A., “Cumhuriyet’ in Çağdaşlaşma Düşüncesinin Yaşama ve Mekana Yansımaları: Halkevi Binaları Örneği”, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, (2006).
  2. [2] Tekeli, İ., “Bir Moderrnite Projesi Olarak Türkiye’ de Kent Planlaması”, Ege Mimarlık Dergisi, 5(16), 51-55, (1995).
  3. [3] Tekeli, İ., “Kent Tarih Yazımı Konusunda Yeni Bir Paradigma Önerisi”, ODTÜ Yayıncılık, 152-171, (2006).
  4. [4] Çeçen, A., “Atatürk’ ün Kültür Kurumu Halkevleri”, Ankara, (1990).
  5. [5] Yeşilkaya, N.G. “Halkevleri: İdeoloji ve Mimarlık”, İletişim Yayınları, (2003).
  6. [6] Özdemir, Y., Aktaş, E., “Halkevleri (1932’ den 1951’e)”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, 45, 235-262, (2011).
  7. [7] Ergen, S., “Türkiye’ de Halkevleri ve Elazığ Örneği”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, (2007).
  8. [8] Arkitekt Dergisi. http://dergi.mo.org.tr/detail.php?id=2. Last Accessed: 06.03.2024.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Architectural Heritage and Conservation, Architectural History, Theory and Criticism

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2024

Submission Date

March 31, 2024

Acceptance Date

September 9, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 12 Number: 3

APA
Köksal, A. B., & Urfalıoğlu, N. (2024). Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, 12(3), 415-430. https://izlik.org/JA45JJ69UE
AMA
1.Köksal AB, Urfalıoğlu N. Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House. GUJSPB. 2024;12(3):415-430. https://izlik.org/JA45JJ69UE
Chicago
Köksal, Ayşe Betül, and Nur Urfalıoğlu. 2024. “Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 12 (3): 415-30. https://izlik.org/JA45JJ69UE.
EndNote
Köksal AB, Urfalıoğlu N (September 1, 2024) Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 12 3 415–430.
IEEE
[1]A. B. Köksal and N. Urfalıoğlu, “Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House”, GUJSPB, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 415–430, Sept. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA45JJ69UE
ISNAD
Köksal, Ayşe Betül - Urfalıoğlu, Nur. “Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 12/3 (September 1, 2024): 415-430. https://izlik.org/JA45JJ69UE.
JAMA
1.Köksal AB, Urfalıoğlu N. Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House. GUJSPB. 2024;12:415–430.
MLA
Köksal, Ayşe Betül, and Nur Urfalıoğlu. “Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, vol. 12, no. 3, Sept. 2024, pp. 415-30, https://izlik.org/JA45JJ69UE.
Vancouver
1.Ayşe Betül Köksal, Nur Urfalıoğlu. Architectural Evaluation Of People’s House Building As A Modernization Project In The Early Republic Period And The Example Of Elazığ People’s House. GUJSPB [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 1;12(3):415-30. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA45JJ69UE