Learning and Evaluation in the Design Studio

Year 2022, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 43 - 53, 31.03.2022

Özden Sevgül , H. Güçlü Yavuzcan

Abstract

Kolb [34], argues that learning in the studio begins with experience, continues with reflection, and then becomes action in reflection, becoming a concrete experience. In the studios, where the project-based learning model is adopted, students learn by sharing information with each other and with the instructors during the processes of working on their projects, presenting and receiving feedback, and from the criticisms they receive throughout the process. In design studios, the critique process serves both as a structured mechanism to provide regular feedback and as an effective evaluation tool [29]. Many traditional forms of assessment, including design project criteria, often test a limited range of skills, abilities, and knowledge and products rather than processes [8]. While a process-oriented learning is represented in the design studio, where learning by doing through projects and criticism and learning by reflection in action methods are applied, traditional studio assessments can be more result-oriented. It is the learning objectives that need to be evaluated, and therefore evaluation methods should be compatible with these objectives [8]. According to Graham [28], assessment includes summarizing the whole process and giving a grade to the student. In this context, the scope of this study is to discuss the qualities of a process-oriented assessment that contributes to learning in the design studio, where an increasing number of students participate day by day.

Keywords

design studio, learning in studio, evaluation in studio, process evaluation

References

• [1] Anthony, K. H. (1991). Design juries on trial: The renaissance of the design studio. Van Nostrand Reinhold
• [2] Anthony, K. H. (1991). Design juries on trial: The renaissance of the design studio. Van Nostrand Reinhold
• [3] Ashton, P. (1998). Learning theory through practice: Encouraging appropriate learning. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 9(2), 64-68.
• [4] Bashier, F. (2014). Reflections on architectural design education: The return of rationalism in the studio. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(4), 424-430.
• [5] Bennett, G. (1989). Words in my Eyes—the assessment of art and design in GCSE. Educational Studies, 15(3), 241-249.
• [6] Biggs, J. (1996). Assessing learning quality: Reconciling institutional, staff and educational demands. Assessment and evaluation in Higher Education, 21(1), 5-16.
• [7] Broadfoot, O., & Bennett, R. (2003). Design studios: online. In Apple University consortium academic and developers conference proceedings 2003 (pp. 9-21).
• [8] Brown, S. (1999). Institutional strategies for assessment. Assessment matters in higher education: Choosing and using diverse approaches, 3-13.
• [9] Ceylan, S., Şahin, P., Seçmen, S., Somer, M. E., & Süher, K. H. (2020). An evaluation of online architectural design studios during COVID-19 outbreak. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research.
• [10] Chandrasekera, T. (2015). The effect of augmented reality and virtual reality interfaces on epistemic actions and the creative process. University of Missouri-Columbia.
• [11] Ciravoğlu, A. (2014). Notes on architectural education: An experimental approach to design studio. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 7-12.
• [12] Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Board of international research in design. Basel: Birkhiuser, 41.
• [13] Crowther, P. (2010). Assessing architectural design processes of diverse learners. In Proceedings of Assessment: Sustainability, Diversity and Innovation. ATN Assessment Conference (pp. 24-33). The Institute for Interactive Media and Learning, University of Technology Sydney.
• [14] Crowther, P. (2013). Understanding the signature pedagogy of the design studio and the opportunities for its technological enhancement. Journal of Learning Design, 6(3), 18-28.
• [15] Çıkış, Ş., & Çil, E. (2009). Problematization of assessment in the architectural design education: First year as a case study. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 1(1), 2103-2110.
• [16] De La Harpe, B., Peterson, J. F., Frankham, N., Zehner, R., Neale, D., Musgrave, E., & McDermott, R. (2009). Assessment focus in studio: What is most prominent in architecture, art and design?. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28(1), 37-51.
• [17] Delahaye, B. (2004). Human resource development: Adult learning and knowledge management. John Wiley & Sons Australia.
• [18] Demirbaş, D., & Öğüt, Ş. T. (2018). Design Briefs for Industrial Design Studio Courses: Determination of Expectations and Requirements. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(2), 42-58.
• [19] Demirbaş, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2003). Focus on architectural design process through learning styles. Design studies, 24(5), 437-456.
• [20] Demirbaş, O. O., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and instruction, 17(3), 345-359.
• [21] Demirhan, C., & Demirel, Ö. (2003). Program geliştirmede proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımı. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(5), 48-61.
• [22] Demirkan, H., & Demirbaş, Ö. O. (2008). Focus on the learning styles of freshman design students. Design studies, 29(3), 254-266.
• [23] Demirkan, H., & Goktepe, M. (2001). A framework for the design studio in web‐based education. Journal of Art & Design Education, 20(3), 332-342.
• [24] Dutton, T. A. (1987). Design and studio pedagogy. Journal of architectural education, 41(1), 16-25.
• [25] Earl, L. M. (2012). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.
• [26] Ehmann, D. (2005, November). Using assessment to engage graphic design students in their learning experience. In Making a Difference: 2005 Evaluations and Assessment Conference Refereed Papers.
• [27] Erdem, M. (2002). Project-based learning. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Education, 22, 173.
• [28] Graham, E. M. (2003). Studio design critique: student and faculty expectations and reality.
• [29] Gray, C. M. (2013). Informal peer critique and the negotiation of habitus in a design studio. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 12(2), 195-209.
• [30] Gray, C. M. (2019). Democratizing assessment practices through multimodal critique in the design classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), 929-946.
• [31] Gray, C. M., & Smith, K. M. (2016). Critical views of studio. In Studio Teaching in Higher Education (pp. 272-282). Routledge.
• [32] Green, L. N., & Bonollo, E. (2003). Studio-based teaching: history and advantages in the teaching of design. World Transactions on Eng. and Tech. Edu, 2(2), 269-272.
• [33] Ilgaz, A. (2009). Design juries as a means of assessment and criticism in industrial design education: A Study on Metu Department of Industrial Design (Master's thesis).
• [34] Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Sadle River: Prentice Hall.
• [35] Kulkarni, C., & Klemmer, S. R. (2012). Learning design wisdom by augmenting physical studio critique with online self-assessment. Technical report, Stanford University.
• [36] Lindström, L. (2006). Creativity: What is it? Can you assess it? Can it be taught?. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 25(1), 53-66.
• [37] Lueth, P. (2003). The culture of architectural design studio: a qualitative pilot study on the interaction of the instructor and the student in their culture and the identification of the instructor's teaching styles (Doctoral dissertation).
• [38] Lueth, P. L. O. (2008). The architectural design studio as a learning environment: a qualitative exploration of architecture design student learning experiences in design studios from first-through fourth-year. Iowa State University.
• [39] Maitland, B. (1991). Problem-based learning for an architecture degree. The challenge of problem-based learning.
• [40] Megahed, N. (2018). Reflections on studio-based learning: assessment and critique. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology.
• [41] Nicholls, G. (2002). Developing teaching and learning in higher education. Routledge.
• [42] Oh, Y., Ishizaki, S., Gross, M. D., & Do, E. Y. L. (2013). A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios. Design Studies, 34(3), 302-325.
• [43] Orbey, B., & Sarıoğlu Erdoğdu, G. P. (2021). Design process re-visited in the first year design studio: Between intuition and reasoning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(4), 771-795.
• [44] Öztoprak, A. (2004). An evoluation of virtual design studio: a course between Middle East Technical University and Delft University of Technology (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University).
• [45] Ragheb, G. A. (2016). Assessment in Architectural Design Education Case Study: First-Year Students at Pharos University. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(9), 1015-1026.
• [46] Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge.
• [47] Sagun, A., Demirkan, H., & Goktepe, M. (2001). A framework for the design studio in web‐based education. Journal of Art & Design Education, 20(3), 332-342
• [48] Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
• [49] Straková, Z. (2016). A critical look at the portfolio as a tool for teacher cognition at pre-gradual level: perceptions of students. Journal of language and cultural education, 4(3), 71-85.
• [50] Utaberta, N., & Hassanpour, B. (2012). Aligning assessment with learning outcomes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 228-235.
• [51] Utaberta, N., Hassanpour, B., Handryant, A. N., & Ani, A. I. C. (2013). Upgrading education architecture by redefining critique session in design studio. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 42-47.
• [52] Van Dooren, E., Boshuizen, E., Van Merriënboer, J., Asselbergs, T., & Van Dorst, M. (2014). Making explicit in design education: Generic elements in the design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 53-71.
• [53] Webster, H. (2008). Architectural education after Schön: Cracks, blurs, boundaries and beyond. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 3(2), 63-74.
• [54] Whitcomb, R. M. (1999). The relationship between student cognitive development and learning style preference. The University of Maine.
• [55] Zehner, R., Forsyth, G., De La Harpe, B., Peterson, F., Musgrave, E., Neale, D., ... & Watson, K. (2010, June). Optimising studio outcomes: Guidelines for curriculum development from the Australian studio teaching project. In ConnectED2010–2nd International Conference on Design Education, University of New South Wales, Sydney, June 28th-July 1st.
• [56] Zhao, X. (2019). Online industrial design studio experience design for graduate students (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology).