A Comparative Study of Different Grasshopper Plugins for Topology Optimization in Architectural Design

Year 2022, Volume: 10 Issue: 3, 323 - 334, 30.09.2022

Mariam Selmı , Zeynep Yeşim İlerisoy

Abstract

Topology optimization (TO) is one of the structural optimization methods used to find the best suitable material distribution, resulting in the most efficient structure. Although it is widely used in other engineering fields, its application in the architectural field is still relatively limited. In recent years, however, various computational design methodologies have acquired prominence in the architectural community. The predominant use of digital design tools during the architectural design process necessitates conducting more research on these tools. Furthermore, as new tools for applying each algorithm and method emerge, the efficiency of these tools must be evaluated. This study aims to explore and compare three available tools for implementing TO. A box is used as a case study to conduct a comparative study between the three grasshopper plugins for topology optimization: Millipede, tOpos, and Ameba. From an architectural standpoint, the potential and efficiency of the three plugins are discussed.

Keywords

Topology Optimization, Grasshopper plugins, Architectural design

References

• Bendsøe, M. P., & Sigmund, O. (2003). Topology optimization : theory, methods and applications (2nd ed.). Springer.
• Sigmund, O., & Maute, K. (2013). Topology optimization approaches. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(6), 1031-1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6
• Naboni, R., & Paoletti, I. (2018). Architectural Morphogenesis Through Topology Optimization. In D. D'Uva (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Form and Morphogenesis in Modern Architectural Contexts (pp. 69-92). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3993-3.ch004
• Eren, O., & Sezer, H. K. (2019). Üretken Tasarim Ve Topoloji Optimizasyonu Yaklaşimlariyla Ürün Tasarimi Uluslararasi Bilim, Teknoloji Ve Sosyal Bilimlerde Güncel Gelişmeler Sempozyumu, Ankara.
• Vlah, D., Žavbi, R., & Vukašinović, N. (2020). EVALUATION OF TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION AND GENERATIVE DESIGN TOOLS AS SUPPORT FOR CONCEPTUAL DESIGN. Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 1, 451-460. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.165
• Zhu, J., Zhou, H., Wang, C., Zhou, L., Yuan, S., & Zhang, W. (2021). A review of topology optimization for additive manufacturing: Status and challenges. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 34(1), 91-110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.020
• Hassani, B., Tavakkoli, S. M., & Ghasemnejad, H. (2013). Simultaneous shape and topology optimization of shell structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(1), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0894-9
• Yoely, Y. M., Amir, O., & Hanniel, I. (2018). Topology and shape optimization with explicit geometric constraints using a spline-based representation and a fixed grid. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 189-196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.110
• Feringa, J., & Søndergaard, A. (2012, 18-21 October, 2012). An Integral Approach to Structural Optimization and Fabrication. ACADIA 12: Synthetic Digital Ecologies [Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA)], San Francisco.
• Deaton, J. D., & Grandhi, R. V. (2014). A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 49(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0956-z
• Gebisa, A., & Lemu, H. (2017). A case study on topology optimized design for additive manufacturing. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 276, 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/276/1/012026
• Hemmerling, M., & Nether, U. (2014). Generico: A case study on performance-based design XVIII Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics - SIGraDi: Design in Freedom,
• Sutradhar, A., Paulino, G. H., Miller, M. J., & Nguyen, T. H. (2010). Topological optimization for designing patient-specific large craniofacial segmental bone replacements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(30), 13222-13227. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001208107
• Zegard, T., Hartz, C., Mazurek, A., & Baker, W. F. (2020). Advancing building engineering through structural and topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 62(2), 915-935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02506-6
• Beghini, L. L., Beghini, A., Katz, N., Baker, W. F., & Paulino, G. H. (2014). Connecting architecture and engineering through structural topology optimization. Engineering Structures, 59, 716-726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.032
• Januszkiewicz, K., & Banachowicz, M. (2017). Nonlinear Shaping Architecture Designed with Using Evolutionary Structural Optimization Tools. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245, 082042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/8/082042
• DETAIL. (2015). DETAIL engineering 4: SOM Structural Engineering (C. Schittich, Ed. 1 ed.). Institut für internationale Architektur-Dok.
• Motro, R. (2012). Fifty Years of Progress for Shell and Spatial Structures. IASS Jubilee Book, MultiSciences.
• URL-1. SOM: 100 Mount Street. https://www.som.com/projects/100-mount-street/ Last Accessed: 29/08/2022
• Søndergaard, A., & Dombernowsky, P. (2017). UNIKABETON PROTOTYPE: Making Digital Architecture. In R. GLYNN & B. SHEIL (Eds.), Fabricate 2011: Making Digital Architecture. (DGO - Digital original ed., pp. 56-61). UCL Press.
• Jipa, A., Bernhard, M., Meibodi, M., & Dillenburger, B. (2016). 3D‐Printed Stay‐in‐Place Formwork for Topologically Optimized Concrete Slabs TxA Emerging Design + Technology, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
• Gaudillière, N., Duballet, R., Bouyssou, C., Mallet, A., Roux, P., Zakeri, M., & Dirrenberger, J. (2019). Chapter 3 - Building Applications Using Lost Formworks Obtained Through Large-Scale Additive Manufacturing of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete. In J. G. Sanjayan, A. Nazari, & B. Nematollahi (Eds.), 3D Concrete Printing Technology (pp. 37-58). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815481-6.00003-8
• Vantyghem, G., De Corte, W., Shakour, E., & Amir, O. (2020). 3D printing of a post-tensioned concrete girder designed by topology optimization. Automation in Construction, 112, 103084. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103084
• URL-2. Topology Optimisation For A Concrete Slab - dbt. https://dbt.arch.ethz.ch/project/topology-optimisation-concrete-slab/ Last Accessed: 29/08/2022
• AVDIĆ, I. (2019). Bio-Inspired Approach To Early-Stage Structural Form Finding [Master's thesis, Delft University of Technology].
• Bialkowski, S. (2018). Topology Optimisation Influence on Architectural Design Process - Enhancing Form Finding Routine by tOpos Toolset utilisation. 36th eCAADe Conference, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Poland.
• Shao, G. (2020). Comparison of BESO and SIMP to Do Structural Topology Optimization in Discrete Digital Design, and then Combine Them into a Hybrid Method. In P. F. Yuan, M. Xie, N. Leach, J. Yao, & X. Wang (Eds.), Architectural Intelligence: Selected Papers from the 1st International Conference on Computational Design and Robotic Fabrication (CDRF 2019) (pp. 219-232). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6568-7_14
• Tyflopoulos, E., & Steinert, M. (2022). A Comparative Study of the Application of Different Commercial Software for Topology Optimization. Applied Sciences, 12(2), 611. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/2/611
• ATEŞ, F. S. (2020). Farkli Topoloji Optimizasyon Algoritmalarinin Performans Değerlendirmesi Üzerine Bir Çalişma [Master's thesis, Gazi Üniversitesi].
• Zhou, Q., Shen, W., Wang, J., Zhou, Y. Y., & Xie, Y. M. (2018). Ameba: A new topology optimization tool for architectural design. Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia,
• Bialkowski, S. (2016). Structural Optimisation Methods as a New Toolset for Architects. 34th eCAADe Conference - Complexity & Simplicity, University of Oulu, Finland.
• Bialkowski, S. (2017). tOpos GPGPUAccelerated Structural Optimisation Utility for Architects. 35th eCAADe Conference, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
• URL-3. Millipede. https://www.creativemutation.com/millipede Last Accessed: 29/08/2022