Abstract
Bu çalışma Richard Posner’ın sorduğu bir sorudan kaynaklanmıştır: Pragmatizm hukuka ne önerebilir? Bu çerçevede çeşitli düşünürlerin görüşlerinin incelenmesi neticesinde, pragmatizm ve hukuk ilişkisinde Rosenfeld’ın orta pragmatizm olarak isimlendirdiği bir olanağın araştırılmasına girişilmiştir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, pragmatist felsefede hukukun kendisine temel alabileceği pragmatist öze ulaşmaktır. Böylece hukuk, yalnızca pragmatist felsefenin sınırlamalarına tabi olacak, bunun dışında tüm diğer felsefelerden bağımsız olacaktır. Ancak, pragmatizm çatısı altında toplanan görüşler çok çeşitli ve pragmatist olarak addedilebilecek düşünür çok fazladır. Bu sebeple araştırmayı sınırlayabilmek için hem felsefi hem hukuki yöne sahip olması sebebiyle Posner’ın pragmatizmi tercih edilmiştir. Posner’ın pragmatizmi bağlamında yapılan pragmatist öz ya da temel arayışında, Posner’ın pragmatizminin orta pragmatizm imkanı için elverişli olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Ancak bu sonuç yalnızca Posner’ın pragmatizmi için geçerli olmasının yanı sıra, pragmatizm ile hukuk arasında hiçbir ilişki/bağlantı kurulamayacağı anlamına da gelmemektedir.
References
- BURTON, Steven J., “Jurisprudence of Skeptism”, Michigan Law Rev., 1988-1989, (s.710-723)
- GREY, Thomas C., “Freestanding Legal Pragmatism”, “The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law and Culture”, Edited by: Morris Dickstein, Duke University Press, 1999,
- LAKE, Peter F., “Posner’s Pragmatic Jurisprudence”, Nebraska. Law. Rev., 1999, (s.545-645)
- LUBAN, David, “What’s Pragmatic About Legal Pragmatism”, The Revial of Pragmatism-New Essays on Social Tought, Law and Culture, Editid by Moris Dickstein, Duke University Press, 1999, (s. s: 275-304)
- MACHON, Tibor R., “Posner’s Rortyite (Pragmatic) Jurisprudence”, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 1995, (361-375)
- MACHON, Tibor R., Objectivity: Recovering Determinate Reality in Philosophy, Science and Everyday Life, Ashgate Publishing Company, 2004,
- POSNER, Richard, The Problems of Jurisprudence, Harvard University, USA, 1990
- POSNER, Richard, “Pragmatism Versus the Rule of Law”, An American Enterprise Institute Presentation of July, 1, 1991
- POSNER Richard, Overcoming Law, Harvard College, London, 1995
- POSNER, Richard, “Pragmatic Adjudication”, The Revial of Pragmatism - New Essays on Social Tought, Law and Culture, Editid by Moris Dickstein, Duke University Press, 1999, (s. 235-254)
- POSNER, Richard, Law, Pragmatism and Democracy, Harvard College, USA, 2003a
- Posner’ın önerisi pragmatizmin bir sistem olarak uygulanmasıdır. Posner’ın bir sistem olarak hukuki pragmatizmi konu edindiği kitabı “Law, Pragmatism and Democracy”dir. Bkz.R.Posner, 2003a, s:59, 63.
- POSNER, Richard “What Has Pragmatism Offer to Law”, Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Edited by Dennis Michael Patterson, Blackwell Publishing, USA, 2003b, (s.180-191)
- POSNER, Richard, How Judges Think, Harvard College, London, 2008
- RORTY, Richard, “Pragmatism and Law: A Response to David Luban”, Philosophy and Social Hope, Penguin Books, 1994,(104-113)
- RORTY, Richard, “The Banality of Pragmatism and the Poety of Justice”, Philosophy and Social Hope, Penguin Books, 1999, (93-104)
- ROSENFELD, Michel, “Pragmatism, Pluralism and Legal Interpretation: Posner’s and Rorty’s Justive without Metaphysıcs Meets Hate Speech”, Cardoza Law Rev. vol.18, 1996-1997, (s.97-151)
- TEPE, Harun, Değer ve Anlam: Değerler Anlamlı mıdır?, s:6 www.flsfdergisi.com/sayi7/1-10., 28.04.2013
- http://www.answers.com/topic/richard -posner 31.01.2011
Abstract
This study originates from a question posed by Richard Posner: What can pragmatism offer to law? In this regard, in consequence of analyzing various philosophers’ remarks, research of the possibility in pragmatismlaw relation, so called ‘intermediate pragmatism’ by Rosenfeld, has been embarked. The purpose of this research is to achieve the pragmatist substance that can law use as basis in pragmatist philosophy. Thereby law would only be subject to the pragmatist philosophy’s boundaries, and would be independent from all other philosophies. That being said, the views that fall under pragmatism and the philosophers which are assumed pragmatist are numerous. That’s why, in order to limit the research, Posner’ pragmatism has been preferred as it has both the philosophical and legal aspects. In course of the quest of the pragmatist substance or basis in the context of Posner’s pragmatism, it has been concluded that Posner’s pragmatism is not suitable for the intermediate pragmatism possibility. However, this conclusion is only valid for Posner’s pragmatism and it does not lead to the meaning that no relation/connection between law and pragmatism can be construed
References
- BURTON, Steven J., “Jurisprudence of Skeptism”, Michigan Law Rev., 1988-1989, (s.710-723)
- GREY, Thomas C., “Freestanding Legal Pragmatism”, “The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law and Culture”, Edited by: Morris Dickstein, Duke University Press, 1999,
- LAKE, Peter F., “Posner’s Pragmatic Jurisprudence”, Nebraska. Law. Rev., 1999, (s.545-645)
- LUBAN, David, “What’s Pragmatic About Legal Pragmatism”, The Revial of Pragmatism-New Essays on Social Tought, Law and Culture, Editid by Moris Dickstein, Duke University Press, 1999, (s. s: 275-304)
- MACHON, Tibor R., “Posner’s Rortyite (Pragmatic) Jurisprudence”, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 1995, (361-375)
- MACHON, Tibor R., Objectivity: Recovering Determinate Reality in Philosophy, Science and Everyday Life, Ashgate Publishing Company, 2004,
- POSNER, Richard, The Problems of Jurisprudence, Harvard University, USA, 1990
- POSNER, Richard, “Pragmatism Versus the Rule of Law”, An American Enterprise Institute Presentation of July, 1, 1991
- POSNER Richard, Overcoming Law, Harvard College, London, 1995
- POSNER, Richard, “Pragmatic Adjudication”, The Revial of Pragmatism - New Essays on Social Tought, Law and Culture, Editid by Moris Dickstein, Duke University Press, 1999, (s. 235-254)
- POSNER, Richard, Law, Pragmatism and Democracy, Harvard College, USA, 2003a
- Posner’ın önerisi pragmatizmin bir sistem olarak uygulanmasıdır. Posner’ın bir sistem olarak hukuki pragmatizmi konu edindiği kitabı “Law, Pragmatism and Democracy”dir. Bkz.R.Posner, 2003a, s:59, 63.
- POSNER, Richard “What Has Pragmatism Offer to Law”, Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Edited by Dennis Michael Patterson, Blackwell Publishing, USA, 2003b, (s.180-191)
- POSNER, Richard, How Judges Think, Harvard College, London, 2008
- RORTY, Richard, “Pragmatism and Law: A Response to David Luban”, Philosophy and Social Hope, Penguin Books, 1994,(104-113)
- RORTY, Richard, “The Banality of Pragmatism and the Poety of Justice”, Philosophy and Social Hope, Penguin Books, 1999, (93-104)
- ROSENFELD, Michel, “Pragmatism, Pluralism and Legal Interpretation: Posner’s and Rorty’s Justive without Metaphysıcs Meets Hate Speech”, Cardoza Law Rev. vol.18, 1996-1997, (s.97-151)
- TEPE, Harun, Değer ve Anlam: Değerler Anlamlı mıdır?, s:6 www.flsfdergisi.com/sayi7/1-10., 28.04.2013
- http://www.answers.com/topic/richard -posner 31.01.2011
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 1, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 7 Issue: 1 |