BibTex RIS Cite

Production of Landslide Susceptibility Map of Samsun Province Center

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 3, 13 - 27, 01.09.2010

Abstract

Due to the increased need for housing, Samsun province center were quickly opened construction in the last 25 years. Because of the population growth, construction progressed towards to the southern hillside of the city. Large amount of landslides observed and classified in this region by the relevant institutions. To prevent the life and property losses, it is required to evaluate pre-determined landslides and to determine probable landslide areas in the construction regions. Therefore, this study aims to create a landslide susceptibility map of Samsun province center. Frequency Ratio Method which is widely used in the literature has been used in the creation of landslide susceptibility map. The geological formation of the region, altitude, slope, aspect, curvature, plan and profile curvature, road and stream distance parameters have been considered in the landslide susceptibility evaluation.

References

  • Vos, F., Rodriguez, J., Below, R., Guha-Sapir, D., 2010. Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2009: The Numbers and Trends, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • CRED, 2010. Disaster Data: A Balanced Perspective, CRED Crunch, Issue No. 21.
  • Assilzadeh, H., Levy, J. K., Wang, X., 2010. Landslide Catastrophes and Disaster Risk Reduction: A GIS Framework for Landslide Prevention and Management, Remote Sensing, 2, 2259-2273.
  • Gökçe, O., Özden, Ş., Demir, A., 2008. Türkiye’de Afetlerin Mekansal ve İstatistiksel Dağılımı Afet Bilgileri Envanteri, Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Afet Etüt ve Hasar Tespit Daire Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  • Doyuran V., Lünel, T., Altıner, D., Koçyiğit, A., 1985. Samsun Yerleşim Sahası Mikrobölgelendirme Çalışmaları, Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni, Cilt 28, Sayfa 93-103.
  • Varnes, D.J., 1984. Landslide Hazard Zonation: A Review of Principles and Practices, Commision on Landslides of the IAEG, UNESCO, Natural Hazards No. 3, 61 p, Paris.
  • Yalçın, A., 2007. Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Analitik Hiyerarşi Yönteminin ve CBS’nin Kullanımı, Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 22, Sayı 3, Sayfa 1-14.
  • Reis, S., Yalçın, A., Atasoy, M., Nişancı, R., Bayrak, T., Sancar, C., Ekercin, S., 2009. CBS ve Uzaktan Algılama Teknikleri İle Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretimi: Rize İli Örneği, Türkiye Ulusal Fotogrametri ve Uzaktan Algılama Birliği V. Teknik Sempozyumu, 4-6 Şubat, Ankara.
  • Lee, S., Evangelista, D.G., 2005. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping using Probability and Statistics Models in Baguio City, Philippines, ISPRS 31st International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, 20-24 May, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
  • Lee, S., Tu Dan, N., 2005. Probabilistic landslide susceptibility mapping in the Lai Chau province of Vietnam: Focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides, Environmental Geology, Volume 48, Number 6, 778-787.
  • Lee, S., Pradhan, B., 2006. Probabilistic landslide hazards and risk mapping on Penang Island, Malaysia, Journal of Earth System Science, Volume 115, Number 6, 661–672.
  • Lee, S., Sambath, T., 2006. Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models, Environmental Geology, Vol.50, No.6, 847-855.
  • Lee, S., Pradhan, B., 2007. Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models, Landslides , Volume 4, Number 1, 33–41.
  • Yılmaz, I., 2007. GIS based susceptibility mapping of karst depression in gypsum: A case study from Sivas basin (Turkey), Engineering Geology, Volume 90, Issues 1-2, 89-103.
  • Akgün, A., Dağ, S., Bulut, F., 2008. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models, Environmental Geology, Volume 54, Number 6, 1127-1143.
  • Yılmaz, I., 2009. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey) Computers & Geosciences, Volume 35, Issue 6, 1125-1138.
  • Jadda, M., Shafri, H.Z.M., Mansor, S.B., Sharifikia, M., Pirasteh, S., 2009. Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation and Factor Effect Analysis Using Probabilistic-Frequency Ratio Model, European Journal of Scientific Research, Volume 33, Number 4, 654-668.
  • Erener, A., Düzgün, H.S.B., 2010. Improvement of statistical landslide susceptibility mapping by using spatial and global regression methods in the case of More and Romsdal (Norway), Landslides, Volume 7, Number 1, 55-68.
  • Öztekeşin, K., 2008. Samsun Kenti (Büyükşehir Belediyesi) İçmesuyu Potansiyeli, TMMOB Samsun Kent Sempozyumu, 27-29 Kasım, Samsun.
  • Carrara A., Cardinali M., Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P., 1995. GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard. In: Carrara, A., Guzzetti, F. (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 135-175.
  • Lee, S., Choi, J., Min, K., 2004. Probabilistic landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing data at Boun, Korea. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Volume 25, Issue 11, 2037-2052.
  • Erener, A., Düzgün, H.S.B., 2007. Heyelan Analizlerinde Coğrafi Ağırlıklandırılmış Regresyon (CAR) Metodu, 11. Türkiye Bilimsel Harita ve Teknik Kurultayı, 02-06 Nisan, Ankara.
  • Kumtepe P., Nurlu, Y., Cengiz, T., Sütçü, E., 2009. Bolu Çevresinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Analizi, TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi, 02-06 Kasım, İzmir.
  • Hansen, A., 1984. Landslide hazard analysis. In: Brunsden, D., Prior, D.B. (Eds) Slope instability. Wiley, New York, pp 523–602.
  • Wieczorek, G.F., 1984. Preparing a detailed landslide-inventory map for hazard evaluation and reduction. Bulletin Association of Engineering Geologists, 21(3), 337–342.
  • Einstein, H.H., 1988. Special lecture: landslide risk assessment procedure. In Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Landslides, Lausanne, Switzerland, Volume 2, pp 1075–1090.
  • Van Westen, C.J., 1994. GIS in landslide hazard zonation: a review, with examples from the Andes of Colombia. In: Price, M.F., Heywood, D.I. (Eds) Geographical information systems in landslide hazard zonation GIS applications for mountain areas. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 135–165.
  • Parise, M., 2001. Landslide mapping techniques and their use in the assessment of the landslide hazard. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Volume 26, Issue 9, 697–703.
  • Griffiths, J.S., Mather, A.E., Hart, A.B., 2002. Landslide susceptibility in the Rio Aguas catchment, SE Spain. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, Volume 35, Issue 1, 9–17.
  • Çevik, E., Topal, T., 2003. GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for a Problematic Segment of the Natural Gas Pipeline, Hendek (Turkey), Environmental Geology, Vol. 44, No. 8, 949-962.
  • Pachauri, A.K., Gupta, P.V., Chander, R., 1998. Landslide zoning in a part of the Garhwal Himalayas, Environmental Geology, Volume 36, Numbers 3-4, 325–334.
  • Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F., Li, J., Xu, Z.W., 2001. Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong, Environmental Geology, Volume 40, Number 3, 381-391.
  • Lee, S., Min, K., 2001. Statistical analyses of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environmental Geology, Volume 40, Number 9, 1095–1113.
  • Saha, A.K., Gupta, R.P., Arora, M.K., 2002. GIS-based Landslide Hazard Zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Volume 23, Issue 2, 357-369.
  • Ercanoğlu, M., Gökçeoğlu, C., Van Asch, Th.W. J., 2004. Landslide Susceptibility Zoning North of Yenice (NW Turkey) by Multivariate Statistical Techniques, Natural Hazards, 32: 1–23.
  • Yalçın, A., 2008. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of results and confirmations, Catena, Volume 72, Issue 1, 1–12.
  • Carrara, A., Cardinalli, M., Detti, R., Guzzetti, F., Pasqui, V., Reichenbach, P., 1991. GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazards. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Volume 16, Issue 5, 427–445.
  • Gökçeoğlu, C., Aksoy, H., 1996. Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and image processing techniques, Engineering Geology, Volume 44, Issues 1-4, 147–161.
  • Gökçeoğlu, C., Ercanoğlu, M., 2001. Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Hazırlanmasında Kullanılan Parametrelere İlişkin Belirsizlikler, Yerbilimleri, 23, 189-206.
  • Juang, C.H., Lee, D.H., Sheu, C., 1992. Mapping slope failure potential using fuzzy sets, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 3, 475–494.
  • Pachauri, A.K., Pant, M., 1992. Landslide hazard mapping based on geological attributes, Engineering Geology, Volume 32, Issues 1-2, 81–100.
  • Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda–Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology, Volume 65, Issues 1-2, 15–31.
  • Chung, C. F., Fabbri, A. G., 1999. Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 65, No. 12, 1389–1399.
  • Bonham-Carter, G.F., 1994. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists, Modeling with GIS. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p. 398.
  • Erener, A., Lacasse, S., 2007. Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalamasında CBS Kullanımı, TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi, 30 Ekim–02 Kasım, KTÜ, Trabzon.

Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 3, 13 - 27, 01.09.2010

Abstract

Samsun il merkezi, son 25 yılda konut ihtiyacının artması nedeniyle hızla yapılasmaya açılmıstır. Nüfus artısının etkisiyle yapılasma, kentin güney sırtlarına dogru ilerlemistir. Bu bölgede, ilgili kamu kurumlarının gözlemledigi ve sınıflandırdıgı çok sayıda heyelan mevcuttur. Can ve mal kayıplarının önüne geçmek için yapılasmaya açılan bölgelerde önceden saptanmıs heyelanların yeniden degerlendirilmesi ve olası heyelan alanlarının tespit edilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu nedenle çalısmada, Samsun il merkezinin heyelan duyarlılık haritasının üretilmesi amaçlanmıstır. Duyarlılık haritasının üretilmesinde, literatürde yaygın olarak kullanıldıgı tespit edilen Frekans Oranı metodu kullanılmıstır. Degerlendirmelerde bölgeye ait jeolojik formasyon, yükseklik, egim, bakı, egrilik, plan ve profil egriligi, yola ve akarsuya yakınlık parametreleri dikkate alınmıstır.

References

  • Vos, F., Rodriguez, J., Below, R., Guha-Sapir, D., 2010. Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2009: The Numbers and Trends, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
  • CRED, 2010. Disaster Data: A Balanced Perspective, CRED Crunch, Issue No. 21.
  • Assilzadeh, H., Levy, J. K., Wang, X., 2010. Landslide Catastrophes and Disaster Risk Reduction: A GIS Framework for Landslide Prevention and Management, Remote Sensing, 2, 2259-2273.
  • Gökçe, O., Özden, Ş., Demir, A., 2008. Türkiye’de Afetlerin Mekansal ve İstatistiksel Dağılımı Afet Bilgileri Envanteri, Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Afet Etüt ve Hasar Tespit Daire Başkanlığı, Ankara.
  • Doyuran V., Lünel, T., Altıner, D., Koçyiğit, A., 1985. Samsun Yerleşim Sahası Mikrobölgelendirme Çalışmaları, Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni, Cilt 28, Sayfa 93-103.
  • Varnes, D.J., 1984. Landslide Hazard Zonation: A Review of Principles and Practices, Commision on Landslides of the IAEG, UNESCO, Natural Hazards No. 3, 61 p, Paris.
  • Yalçın, A., 2007. Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretilmesinde Analitik Hiyerarşi Yönteminin ve CBS’nin Kullanımı, Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 22, Sayı 3, Sayfa 1-14.
  • Reis, S., Yalçın, A., Atasoy, M., Nişancı, R., Bayrak, T., Sancar, C., Ekercin, S., 2009. CBS ve Uzaktan Algılama Teknikleri İle Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Üretimi: Rize İli Örneği, Türkiye Ulusal Fotogrametri ve Uzaktan Algılama Birliği V. Teknik Sempozyumu, 4-6 Şubat, Ankara.
  • Lee, S., Evangelista, D.G., 2005. Landslide Susceptibility Mapping using Probability and Statistics Models in Baguio City, Philippines, ISPRS 31st International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, 20-24 May, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
  • Lee, S., Tu Dan, N., 2005. Probabilistic landslide susceptibility mapping in the Lai Chau province of Vietnam: Focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides, Environmental Geology, Volume 48, Number 6, 778-787.
  • Lee, S., Pradhan, B., 2006. Probabilistic landslide hazards and risk mapping on Penang Island, Malaysia, Journal of Earth System Science, Volume 115, Number 6, 661–672.
  • Lee, S., Sambath, T., 2006. Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models, Environmental Geology, Vol.50, No.6, 847-855.
  • Lee, S., Pradhan, B., 2007. Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models, Landslides , Volume 4, Number 1, 33–41.
  • Yılmaz, I., 2007. GIS based susceptibility mapping of karst depression in gypsum: A case study from Sivas basin (Turkey), Engineering Geology, Volume 90, Issues 1-2, 89-103.
  • Akgün, A., Dağ, S., Bulut, F., 2008. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models, Environmental Geology, Volume 54, Number 6, 1127-1143.
  • Yılmaz, I., 2009. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey) Computers & Geosciences, Volume 35, Issue 6, 1125-1138.
  • Jadda, M., Shafri, H.Z.M., Mansor, S.B., Sharifikia, M., Pirasteh, S., 2009. Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation and Factor Effect Analysis Using Probabilistic-Frequency Ratio Model, European Journal of Scientific Research, Volume 33, Number 4, 654-668.
  • Erener, A., Düzgün, H.S.B., 2010. Improvement of statistical landslide susceptibility mapping by using spatial and global regression methods in the case of More and Romsdal (Norway), Landslides, Volume 7, Number 1, 55-68.
  • Öztekeşin, K., 2008. Samsun Kenti (Büyükşehir Belediyesi) İçmesuyu Potansiyeli, TMMOB Samsun Kent Sempozyumu, 27-29 Kasım, Samsun.
  • Carrara A., Cardinali M., Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P., 1995. GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard. In: Carrara, A., Guzzetti, F. (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems in Assessing Natural Hazards. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 135-175.
  • Lee, S., Choi, J., Min, K., 2004. Probabilistic landslide hazard mapping using GIS and remote sensing data at Boun, Korea. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Volume 25, Issue 11, 2037-2052.
  • Erener, A., Düzgün, H.S.B., 2007. Heyelan Analizlerinde Coğrafi Ağırlıklandırılmış Regresyon (CAR) Metodu, 11. Türkiye Bilimsel Harita ve Teknik Kurultayı, 02-06 Nisan, Ankara.
  • Kumtepe P., Nurlu, Y., Cengiz, T., Sütçü, E., 2009. Bolu Çevresinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Analizi, TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi, 02-06 Kasım, İzmir.
  • Hansen, A., 1984. Landslide hazard analysis. In: Brunsden, D., Prior, D.B. (Eds) Slope instability. Wiley, New York, pp 523–602.
  • Wieczorek, G.F., 1984. Preparing a detailed landslide-inventory map for hazard evaluation and reduction. Bulletin Association of Engineering Geologists, 21(3), 337–342.
  • Einstein, H.H., 1988. Special lecture: landslide risk assessment procedure. In Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Landslides, Lausanne, Switzerland, Volume 2, pp 1075–1090.
  • Van Westen, C.J., 1994. GIS in landslide hazard zonation: a review, with examples from the Andes of Colombia. In: Price, M.F., Heywood, D.I. (Eds) Geographical information systems in landslide hazard zonation GIS applications for mountain areas. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 135–165.
  • Parise, M., 2001. Landslide mapping techniques and their use in the assessment of the landslide hazard. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Volume 26, Issue 9, 697–703.
  • Griffiths, J.S., Mather, A.E., Hart, A.B., 2002. Landslide susceptibility in the Rio Aguas catchment, SE Spain. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, Volume 35, Issue 1, 9–17.
  • Çevik, E., Topal, T., 2003. GIS-Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping for a Problematic Segment of the Natural Gas Pipeline, Hendek (Turkey), Environmental Geology, Vol. 44, No. 8, 949-962.
  • Pachauri, A.K., Gupta, P.V., Chander, R., 1998. Landslide zoning in a part of the Garhwal Himalayas, Environmental Geology, Volume 36, Numbers 3-4, 325–334.
  • Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F., Li, J., Xu, Z.W., 2001. Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong, Environmental Geology, Volume 40, Number 3, 381-391.
  • Lee, S., Min, K., 2001. Statistical analyses of landslide susceptibility at Yongin, Korea. Environmental Geology, Volume 40, Number 9, 1095–1113.
  • Saha, A.K., Gupta, R.P., Arora, M.K., 2002. GIS-based Landslide Hazard Zonation in the Bhagirathi (Ganga) Valley, Himalayas, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Volume 23, Issue 2, 357-369.
  • Ercanoğlu, M., Gökçeoğlu, C., Van Asch, Th.W. J., 2004. Landslide Susceptibility Zoning North of Yenice (NW Turkey) by Multivariate Statistical Techniques, Natural Hazards, 32: 1–23.
  • Yalçın, A., 2008. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): Comparisons of results and confirmations, Catena, Volume 72, Issue 1, 1–12.
  • Carrara, A., Cardinalli, M., Detti, R., Guzzetti, F., Pasqui, V., Reichenbach, P., 1991. GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazards. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Volume 16, Issue 5, 427–445.
  • Gökçeoğlu, C., Aksoy, H., 1996. Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and image processing techniques, Engineering Geology, Volume 44, Issues 1-4, 147–161.
  • Gökçeoğlu, C., Ercanoğlu, M., 2001. Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Hazırlanmasında Kullanılan Parametrelere İlişkin Belirsizlikler, Yerbilimleri, 23, 189-206.
  • Juang, C.H., Lee, D.H., Sheu, C., 1992. Mapping slope failure potential using fuzzy sets, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 3, 475–494.
  • Pachauri, A.K., Pant, M., 1992. Landslide hazard mapping based on geological attributes, Engineering Geology, Volume 32, Issues 1-2, 81–100.
  • Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda–Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology, Volume 65, Issues 1-2, 15–31.
  • Chung, C. F., Fabbri, A. G., 1999. Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 65, No. 12, 1389–1399.
  • Bonham-Carter, G.F., 1994. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists, Modeling with GIS. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p. 398.
  • Erener, A., Lacasse, S., 2007. Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalamasında CBS Kullanımı, TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi, 30 Ekim–02 Kasım, KTÜ, Trabzon.
There are 45 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Halil Akıncı This is me

Sedat Dogan This is me

Cem Kılıçoglu This is me

Sevim Bilge Keçeci This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 2 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Akıncı, H., Dogan, S., Kılıçoglu, C., Keçeci, S. B. (2010). Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 2(3), 13-27.
AMA Akıncı H, Dogan S, Kılıçoglu C, Keçeci SB. Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi. September 2010;2(3):13-27.
Chicago Akıncı, Halil, Sedat Dogan, Cem Kılıçoglu, and Sevim Bilge Keçeci. “Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi”. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi 2, no. 3 (September 2010): 13-27.
EndNote Akıncı H, Dogan S, Kılıçoglu C, Keçeci SB (September 1, 2010) Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi 2 3 13–27.
IEEE H. Akıncı, S. Dogan, C. Kılıçoglu, and S. B. Keçeci, “Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi”, Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 13–27, 2010.
ISNAD Akıncı, Halil et al. “Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi”. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi 2/3 (September 2010), 13-27.
JAMA Akıncı H, Dogan S, Kılıçoglu C, Keçeci SB. Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi. 2010;2:13–27.
MLA Akıncı, Halil et al. “Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi”. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 3, 2010, pp. 13-27.
Vancouver Akıncı H, Dogan S, Kılıçoglu C, Keçeci SB. Samsun İl Merkezinin Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritasının Üretilmesi. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi. 2010;2(3):13-27.