The Impact of the Erasmus Program and the Institutional Administration of Internationalization in Türkiye

Abstract

International student and staff mobility, which is widely experienced worldwide, constitutes one of the most critical dimensions of the internationalization of higher education. The Erasmus program, initiated by the European Union, plays a significant role in increasing mobility, especially between European countries. Turkey is one of these countries that benefit significantly from the Erasmus program, and the Program became a driving force for Turkish universities to accelerate internationalization. In this study, quantitative research was conducted to evaluate the perceptions of international office professionals (IPs) on the impact of the Erasmus Program and institutional structures in the universities to administer internationalizaiton. 126 IPs working in international offices of Turkish universities representing public and foundation universities participated in the study. The survey results revealed that IPs believe in the positive impacts of the Erasmus student and staff mobility on the institutionalization of internationalization in their universities, and most universities in Turkey include internationalization in their strategic plan as one of the priorities. On the other hand, IPs stated that institutional support given to their offices by top management and other stakeholders is not sufficient to administer internationalization. Moreover, the T-test results between public and foundation universities revealed that developing internationalization is a more important priority for foundation universities than the public ones.

Keywords

• Erasmus Program
• Internationalization
• International Office Professionals
• Higher Education
• Turkey

References

1. Bulut-Sahin, B. (2022). Vakıf üniversiteleri ve uluslararasılaşma [Foundation universities and internationalization]. In H. Simsek (Ed.), Türkiye’de vakıf üniversiteleri: Genç bir sektörün anatomisi [Foundation universities in Türkiye: Anatomy of a young sector] (pp. 227-250). Seçkin.
2. Bulut-Sahin, B., & Kondakci, Y. (2022). Conflicting perspectives on the internationalization of higher education: Evidence from the Turkish case. Journal of Studies in International Education [Online First]. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153221126245
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Council of Higher Education (CoHE). (2017). Strategic Plan for Internationalization for 2018-2022. Accessed: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/AnaSayfa/Yuksekogretimde_Uluslararasilasma_Strateji_Belgesi_2018_2022.pdf
5. Council of Higher Education (CoHE). (2021). Yükseköğretimde hedef odaklı Uluslararasılaşma [Goal-oriented internationalization in higher education]. Accessed: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/2021/yuksekogretimde-hedef-odakli-uluslararasilasma.pdf
6. Council of Higher Education (CoHE). (n.d.). Statistics for higher education. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
7. De Wit, H. (2013). Internationalization of higher education, an introduction on the why, how and what. In H. de Wit (Ed.), An introduction to higher education internationalization. Vita E Pensiero.
8. De Wit, H. (2020). The future of internationalization of higher education in challenging global contexts. Educação Temática Digital, 22(3), 538. https://doi.org/10.20396/etd.v22i3.8659471

9. De Wit, H., & Altbach P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898
10. De Wit, H., & Hunter, F. (2014). Europe’s 25 years of internationalization: The EAIE in a changing world. International Higher Education, 74, 14. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2014.74.5467
11. De Wit, H., Hunter, F., Howard, I., & Egron-Polak, E. (2015). Internationalization of higher education. European Parliament Policy Department, Brussels, Belgium.
12. De Wit, H., & Jones, E. (2018). Inclusive internationalization: Improving access and equity. International Higher Education, 94, 16. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2018.0.10561
13. Edelstein, R. J., & Douglass, J. A. (2012). Comprehending the international initiatives of universities: A taxonomy of modes of engagement and institutional logics. Research & Occasional Paper Series: Center for Studies in Higher Education (19.12).
14. Erdogan, A. (2014). Türkiye’de yükseköğretimin gündemi için politika önerisi [Policy proposal for higher education agenda in Turkey]. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 4(1), 1.
15. Erdogan, A., & Bulut-Sahin, B. (2022). Bologna Süreci ve Türk yükseköğretiminin uluslararasılaşması [Bologna Process and internationalization of Turkish higher education]. In M. Kurtoglu, A. Erdogan, & M. Durman (Eds.), 20. Yılında Bologna Süreci, Avrupa Yükseköğretim Alanı ve Türkiye [Bologna Process in its 20th Year, European Higher Education Area and Türkiye] (pp. 117-141). Beykoz Üniversitesi.
16. European Commission. (2021). Erasmus+ Country Factsheets. Accessed: https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/resources-and-tools/statistics-and-factsheets/factsheets/country-2020
17. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. (2021). Erasmus+ Annual Report 2020. Accessed: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/36418
18. Foskett, N. (2012). Global markets, national challenges, local strategies: The strategic challenge of internationalization. In F. Maringe & N. Foskett (Eds.), Globalization and internationalization in higher education (pp. 35-51). Bloomsbury.
19. Gornitzka, A. (2010). Bologna in context: A horizontal perspective on the dynamics of governance sites for a Europe of Knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(4), 535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01452.x
20. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2016). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
21. IBM Corp. (2021). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. IBM Corp.
22. Janebová, E., & Johnstone, C. J. (2020). Mapping the dimensions of inclusive internationalization. In S. Kommers & K. Bista (Eds.), Inequalities in study abroad and student mobility: Navigating challenges and future directions (pp. 115-128). Routledge.
23. Kelo, M., Teichler, U., & Wachter, B. (2006). Toward improved data on student mobility in Europe: Findings and concepts of the Eurodata study. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 194.
24. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of Structural Equation Modeling. (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
25. Knight, J. (2015). International universities: Misunderstandings and emerging models? Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(2), 107.
26. Kondakci, Y. (2011). Student mobility reviewed: Attraction and satisfaction of international students in Turkey. Higher Education, 62(5), 573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9406-2
27. Kondakci, Y., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Social network analysis of international student mobility: Uncovering the rise of regional hubs. Higher Education, 75, 517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0154-9
28. Luijten-Lub, A. (2007). Choices in internationalisation: How higher education institutions respond to internationalisation, Europeanisation, and globalisation (Unpublish doctoral dissertation). University of Twente, Netherlands.
29. Marginson, S., & van der Wende, M. (2007). Globalisation and higher education: OECD Education Working Papers (No. 8). OECD Publishing.
30. McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2009). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.
31. OECD/UIS/Eurostat. (2021). See source section for more information and Annex 3 for notes. Accessed: https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/EAG2021_Annex3_ChapterB.pdf.
32. Stromquist, N. P. (2007). Internationalization as a response to globalization: Radical shifts in university environments. Higher Education, 53, 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-1975-5
33. Sursock, A., & Smidt, H. (2010). Trends 2010: A decade of change in European higher education. The European University Association.
34. Taylor, J. (2010). The management of internationalization in higher education. In F. Maringe & N. Foskett, (Eds.), Globalization and internationalization in higher education (pp. 97-107). Bloomsbury.
35. Teichler, U. (2002). The Socrates Support Program: Framework and management. In U. Teichler (Ed.), Erasmus in the Socrates Program (pp. 201-216). ACA Papers on International Cooperation in Education, Lemmens Verlags & Mediengesellschaft, Bonn.
36. Van Damme, D. (2001). Quality issues in the internationalization of higher education. Higher Education, 41(4), 415. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017598422297
37. Van Mol, C., & Perez-Encinas, A. (2022). Inclusive internationalisation: Do different (social) groups of students need different internationalisation activities? Studies in Higher Education, 47(12), 2523. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2083102
38. Yılmaz, D. V. (2013). Yükseköğretimin değişen bağlamı: 21. yüzyılda dönüşümler ve eğilimler [Changing context of higher education: Transformations and trends in the 21st Century]. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 3(3), 169.