Research Article

Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution?

Volume: 1 Number: 2 December 30, 2020
EN

Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution?

Abstract

This article analyses the academics’ role in the (shared) governance of the Malaysian higher education system over a period of five years (2007 – 2013). The aim is to provide a perspective of how Malaysian academics perceive the governance and management practices based on data from two similar studies of the Changing Academic Profession (CAP) in 2007 and 2013. Findings reveal that the academics clearly consolidated their hold over personnel decisions. However, the mid-level management maintained the control of decisions in areas related to the regulation of academic work. Furthermore, the respondents in the 2007 and 2013 studies acknowledged having little influence in determining institutional policies at the school/faculty and institutional levels. In the areas of selection of administrators and approval of new programmes, top management and boards retained their primary influence. While the quality of communication seemed to have improved since 2007, the academics’ perceptions of a stronger performance orientation, top-down management style and bureaucracy over the five years reflected the continued strength of the market coordinated system in the Malaysian higher education system. Middle management appeared to have made inroads in the management and governance of HEIs. The paper concludes by proposing a number of initiatives for ensuring that shared governance is effectively implemented in higher education institutions.

Keywords

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (2010). The Realities of Mass Higher Education in a Globalized World. In B. Johnstone, M. Ambrosio, and P. Yakoboski (Eds). Higher Education in a Global Society (pp.25–41). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
  2. Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2016). Governance of higher education: Global perspectives, theories, and practices. New York, US: Routledge.
  3. Author (2019). Teaching and learning: The Malaysian academic profession in transition. In C. D. Wan, M. Sirat & D. Abdul Razak (Eds.), Higher education in Malaysia: A critical review of the past and present for the future (pp. 75-94). Penang, Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
  4. Author and Colleague. (2016). Imposing global university rankings on local academic culture: Insights from the National University of Malaysia. In M. Yudkevich, P. G. Altbach & L. E. Rumbley (Eds.), The global academic rankings game: Changing institutional policy, practice, and academic life (pp. 97-123). London, UK: Routledge.
  5. Author et al. (2016). Academic promotion in Malaysian public universities: A critical look at issues and challenges. Oxford Review of Education, 42(1), 71-88.
  6. Author et al. . (2011). Malaysia: Perspectives of university governance and management within the academic profession. In W. Locke, K. Cummings & D. Fisher (Eds.), Changing governance and management in higher education: The perspectives of the academy (pp. 83-106). Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
  7. Birnbaum, R. (2004). The end of shared governance: Looking ahead or looking back. New Directions for Higher Education, 127, 5-22.
  8. Bok, D. (2013). The trouble with the shared governance. Trusteeship, 2/(5). Retrieved from: http://agb.org/trusteeship/2013/9/trouble-shared-govemance

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 30, 2020

Submission Date

October 14, 2020

Acceptance Date

November 24, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 1 Number: 2

APA
Azman, N. (2020). Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution? Higher Education Governance and Policy, 1(2), 109-125. https://izlik.org/JA42TH84XN
AMA
1.Azman N. Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution? HEGP. 2020;1(2):109-125. https://izlik.org/JA42TH84XN
Chicago
Azman, Norzaini. 2020. “Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution?”. Higher Education Governance and Policy 1 (2): 109-25. https://izlik.org/JA42TH84XN.
EndNote
Azman N (December 1, 2020) Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution? Higher Education Governance and Policy 1 2 109–125.
IEEE
[1]N. Azman, “Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution?”, HEGP, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 109–125, Dec. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA42TH84XN
ISNAD
Azman, Norzaini. “Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution?”. Higher Education Governance and Policy 1/2 (December 1, 2020): 109-125. https://izlik.org/JA42TH84XN.
JAMA
1.Azman N. Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution? HEGP. 2020;1:109–125.
MLA
Azman, Norzaini. “Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution?”. Higher Education Governance and Policy, vol. 1, no. 2, Dec. 2020, pp. 109-25, https://izlik.org/JA42TH84XN.
Vancouver
1.Norzaini Azman. Trends in Governance and Management of the Malaysian Academic Profession (2007-2013): Evolution or Devolution? HEGP [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 1;1(2):109-25. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA42TH84XN