Discussion

The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy

Volume: 1 Number: 2 December 30, 2020
EN

The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy

Abstract

Immersed in a local and global contextualized higher education expansion process, the Mexican academic profession has undergone a profound reconfiguration during the last decades. Its socio-demographic, training, work, attitudes and career have all change in a significant way, particularly amongst full-time academics. During this period, policies directed at public higher education have centered on a performance-based funding scheme that has generated a strong stratification amongst institutions, students and faculty. Created in 1984, the National Researchers System (SNI), the first such policy, was directed at full-time faculty involved in research and served as a seed for future policies. This paper discusses the role of SNI as a key element not only in the reconfiguration of the academic profession, but also in the emergence of an academic meritocracy that sits on top of a pyramid in terms of resources and prestige within the academic profession, many of whose members are excluded from adequate working conditions and recognition. Considering this situation as unsustainable, the proposal is made to move the SNI merit-based logic that now applies to all faculty working at a public higher education institution, into each institution individually, where its mission would play a central rol in determining faculty work, career and rewards. By making academic work and careers root in each of the institutions in which faculty work, the proposal aims at building an inclusive meritocracy much in need at this stage of Mexican higher education.

Keywords

References

  1. Acosta Silva, A. (2015). ANUIES: La política y las políticas [ANUIES: Politics and policies]. En G. Alvarez Mendiola (Ed.), La ANUIES y la construcción de políticas de educación superior 1950-2015 [ANUIES and the building of higher education policies, 1950-2015] (pp. 47-71). México: Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior.
  2. Alvarez Mendiola, G. et al. (2010, mayo 5-8). Los efectos indeseados del SNI y la necesidad de su transformación [The unwanted effects of SNI and the need of its transformation]. Ponencia presentada en el I Congreso de los Miembros del Sistema Nacional de Investigadores. Querétaro, Querétaro.
  3. Arocena, R., & Sutz, J. (2001). Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities. Research Policy, 30, 1221-1234.
  4. Balbachevsky, E. (2016, January 29). Academically excellent, but deaf to society’s needs. University World News Global Edition, Issue 398. Available at https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20160126134110710.
  5. Bensusán, G., & Valenti, G. (Eds.) (2018). La evaluación de los académicos: Instituciones y Sistema Nacional de Investigadores, aciertos y controversias [Faculty evaluation: Institutions and National Researchers System, successes and controversies]. México: FLACSO México y UAM.
  6. Bowen, H.R. & Schuster, J.H. (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  8. Buendía Espinosa, A., García Salord, S., Grediaga, R., Landesman, M., Rodríguez Gómez, R., Rondero, N., Rueda, M., & Vera, H. (2017). Queríamos evaluar y terminamos contando: Alternativas para la valoración del trabajo académico [We wanted to evaluate and ended-up counting: Alternatives for evaluatin academic work]. Perfiles Educativos, Vol. 39, No. 157, 200-219.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education

Journal Section

Discussion

Publication Date

December 30, 2020

Submission Date

November 17, 2020

Acceptance Date

December 22, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 1 Number: 2

APA
Galaz Fontes, J. F., Martınez Stack, J., & Gıl Antón, M. (2020). The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy. Higher Education Governance and Policy, 1(2), 138-151. https://izlik.org/JA54PA24FX
AMA
1.Galaz Fontes JF, Martınez Stack J, Gıl Antón M. The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy. HEGP. 2020;1(2):138-151. https://izlik.org/JA54PA24FX
Chicago
Galaz Fontes, Jesús Francisco, Jorge Martınez Stack, and Manuel Gıl Antón. 2020. “The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy”. Higher Education Governance and Policy 1 (2): 138-51. https://izlik.org/JA54PA24FX.
EndNote
Galaz Fontes JF, Martınez Stack J, Gıl Antón M (December 1, 2020) The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy. Higher Education Governance and Policy 1 2 138–151.
IEEE
[1]J. F. Galaz Fontes, J. Martınez Stack, and M. Gıl Antón, “The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy”, HEGP, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 138–151, Dec. 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA54PA24FX
ISNAD
Galaz Fontes, Jesús Francisco - Martınez Stack, Jorge - Gıl Antón, Manuel. “The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy”. Higher Education Governance and Policy 1/2 (December 1, 2020): 138-151. https://izlik.org/JA54PA24FX.
JAMA
1.Galaz Fontes JF, Martınez Stack J, Gıl Antón M. The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy. HEGP. 2020;1:138–151.
MLA
Galaz Fontes, Jesús Francisco, et al. “The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy”. Higher Education Governance and Policy, vol. 1, no. 2, Dec. 2020, pp. 138-51, https://izlik.org/JA54PA24FX.
Vancouver
1.Jesús Francisco Galaz Fontes, Jorge Martınez Stack, Manuel Gıl Antón. The Emergence of the New Mexican Academic Meritocracy. HEGP [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 1;1(2):138-51. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA54PA24FX