Research Article

Exploring young-level academic leadership: A thematic analysis of a MOOC discussion forum

Volume: 2 Number: 1 June 30, 2021
EN

Exploring young-level academic leadership: A thematic analysis of a MOOC discussion forum

Abstract

Higher education institutions around the world have been experiencing pressures resulting in substantial changes. In this transformative era, the successful functioning of the universities and maintaining their competitive advantage highly relies on the institutional level governance and the capacities of academic leaders at all levels. Despite some studies in senior and middle-level academic leadership, there is still a scarcity of research on the young-level academic leaders. Young-level academic leaders are those who play a decisive role in both practices of department and research group running and teaching and research to promote the development of a new turn of higher education. They also constitute an important part of academic leaders as they have excelled competencies in welcoming change, inspiring, being receptive to feedback, and setting stretch goals. However, they struggle to lead teaching programs, course coordination, and research projects in an era of the ever-increasing impact of neo-liberalism in a more competitive environment. Therefore, this paper is intended to fill the gap to study the concepts, competencies, and challenges of young academic leadership. Conducting qualitative content analysis to explore the perceptions about young academic leadership in a MOOC course discussion forum, this study explores young-level academic leadership through online discussion forums to uncover additional materials in comparison to traditional qualitative methodologies. This study also documents the perspectives of MOOC discussion users on three main issues: the concept of young-level academic leadership, competencies to be an effective leader, and the current challenges they encounter. Moreover, it can serve as a stepping-stone for designing the leadership framework used in academic leadership development programs.

Keywords

References

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139-158.
  2. Armstrong, P. & Gough, A. (2019). Developing and Motivating Young Leaders for Sustainability: A Developmental Framework. In D. Zandvliet (ed) Culture and Environment Weaving New Connections (163-191). Leiden: Brill Sense.
  3. Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F. & May, D. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6): 801–823.
  4. Aziz, D. (2018). Competencies and Strategies Utilized by Higher Education Leaders During Planned Change. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Wayne State University Dissertations, USA: Michigan.
  5. Bass, B.M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 3, 19–31.
  6. Blackburn, I. M., Eunson, K. M., & Bishop, S. (1986). A two-year naturalistic follow-up of depressed patients treated with cognitive therapy, pharmacotherapy and a combination of both. Journal of Affective disorders, 10(1), 67-75.
  7. Bolden, R., Petrov, G. and Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37: 257–277.
  8. Boroujeni, M. S., Shirvani, M., Hecking, T., Hoppe, U., Dillenbourg, P. (2017). Dynamics of MOOC Discussion Forums, LAK’17, March 13-17, 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2021

Submission Date

November 24, 2020

Acceptance Date

June 11, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 2 Number: 1

APA
Calıskan, A., Zhu, C., & Dınh, N. B. K. (2021). Exploring young-level academic leadership: A thematic analysis of a MOOC discussion forum. Higher Education Governance and Policy, 2(1), 1-18. https://izlik.org/JA46RT66TZ
AMA
1.Calıskan A, Zhu C, Dınh NBK. Exploring young-level academic leadership: A thematic analysis of a MOOC discussion forum. HEGP. 2021;2(1):1-18. https://izlik.org/JA46RT66TZ
Chicago
Calıskan, Aysun, Chang Zhu, and Ngoc Bich Khuyen Dınh. 2021. “Exploring Young-Level Academic Leadership: A Thematic Analysis of a MOOC Discussion Forum”. Higher Education Governance and Policy 2 (1): 1-18. https://izlik.org/JA46RT66TZ.
EndNote
Calıskan A, Zhu C, Dınh NBK (June 1, 2021) Exploring young-level academic leadership: A thematic analysis of a MOOC discussion forum. Higher Education Governance and Policy 2 1 1–18.
IEEE
[1]A. Calıskan, C. Zhu, and N. B. K. Dınh, “Exploring young-level academic leadership: A thematic analysis of a MOOC discussion forum”, HEGP, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–18, June 2021, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA46RT66TZ
ISNAD
Calıskan, Aysun - Zhu, Chang - Dınh, Ngoc Bich Khuyen. “Exploring Young-Level Academic Leadership: A Thematic Analysis of a MOOC Discussion Forum”. Higher Education Governance and Policy 2/1 (June 1, 2021): 1-18. https://izlik.org/JA46RT66TZ.
JAMA
1.Calıskan A, Zhu C, Dınh NBK. Exploring young-level academic leadership: A thematic analysis of a MOOC discussion forum. HEGP. 2021;2:1–18.
MLA
Calıskan, Aysun, et al. “Exploring Young-Level Academic Leadership: A Thematic Analysis of a MOOC Discussion Forum”. Higher Education Governance and Policy, vol. 2, no. 1, June 2021, pp. 1-18, https://izlik.org/JA46RT66TZ.
Vancouver
1.Aysun Calıskan, Chang Zhu, Ngoc Bich Khuyen Dınh. Exploring young-level academic leadership: A thematic analysis of a MOOC discussion forum. HEGP [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 1;2(1):1-18. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA46RT66TZ